nach oben

Water Resources Management

Erschienen in:

22.08.2019

Hydro Genome Mapping: An Approach for the Diagnosis, Evaluation and Improving Prediction Capability of Hydro-Meteorological Models

verfasst von: Gift Dumedah

Erschienen in: Water Resources Management | Ausgabe 11/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Hydro-meteorological models form a cornerstone for critical societal decisions. The reliability of these models in terms of the trustworthiness of their outputs and the consistency of their performance across diverse hydro-meteorological conditions and time periods, has been widely recognized to be questionable. The major evaluation methods used to derive knowledge about hydro-meteorological models are open loop, calibration and data assimilation (DA). The open loop case tests the model output against observation; the calibration optimizes model output to observations; and the DA approach accounts for errors and corrects model trajectory to find an optimal merger between model and observation. These methods focus on reproducing past observation, which has been widely acknowledged to be insufficient in both model diagnosis and prediction capability for ultimate improvement in forecasts. Consequently, this paper makes the case for a definitive framework for the proposed hydro genome mapping based on the concept of biological genome mapping. The study outlines the procedure for the generation of genome-like data for hydro-meteorological models and subsequent hydro genomic mapping methods to construct a thorough understanding of the model, and its decision variables and outputs. The hydro genomic mapping has the capability to locate specific hydro markers in model decision space that are responsible for certain hydro-meteorological responses, leading to both diagnostic and predictive descriptions of the model. As an integrated framework, the hydro genome mapping approach is not a single specialized method but a combination of innovative methodologies from biological genome mapping, evolutionary computation and DA, designed to find answers to critical hydro-meteorological questions. Accordingly, the proposed hydro genomic mapping approach provides a framework towards a synthesis of both Newtonian and Darwinian approaches with opportunities for a greater insight into hydro-meteorological processes and phenomena.

Vorheriger Artikel Modular Wavelet–Extreme Learning Machine: a New Approach for Forecasting Daily Rainfall

Nächster Artikel Inventory Theory-Based Stochastic Optimization for Reservoir Water Allocation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abbaszadeh P, Moradkhani H, Yan H (2018) Enhancing hydrologic data assimilation by evolutionary Particle Filter and Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Adv Water Resour 111:192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.11.011 CrossRef

Alemohammad SH, McLaughlin DB, Entekhabi D (2015) Quantifying Precipitation Uncertainty for Land Data Assimilation Applications. Mon Weather Rev 143(8):3276–3299. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR--D--14--00337.1 CrossRef

Andreatta ME (2013) Evolutionary Dynamics of Gene and Genome Duplications In Plants. Phd thesis, Purdue University

Beven K, Freer J (2001) Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology. Hydrol Process 249:11–29CrossRef

Beven K (2006) A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. J Hydrol 320(1-2):18–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007 CrossRef

Borah DK, Bera M (2003) Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: Review of mathematical bases. Trans ASAE 46(6):1553–1566CrossRef

Camporese M, Paniconi C, Putti M, Salandin P (2009) Ensemble kalman filter data assimilation for a process-based catchment scale model of surface and subsurface flow. Water Resour Res 45. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007031

Caparrini F, Castelli F, Entekhabi D (2004) Variational estimation of soil and vegetation turbulent transfer and heat flux parameters from sequences of multisensor imagery. Water Resour Res 40(12):W12515CrossRef

Chen Z (2003) Bayesian filtering: from kalman filters to particle filters, and beyond. Technical report, McMaster University, Adaptive Syst Lab Hamilton ON Canada

Clark M, Rupp D, Woods R, Zheng X, Ibbitt R, Slater A, Schmidt J, Uddstrom M (2008) Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble kalman filter: Use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model. Adv Water Resour 31(10):1309–1324CrossRef

Coello Coello CA, Van Veldhuizen DA, Lamont GB (2002) Evolutionary algorithms for solving Multi-Objective problems. Kluwer Academic /Plenum Publishers, New YorkCrossRef

Confesor RB, Whittaker GW (2007) Automatic calibration of hydrologic models with multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and pareto optimization. J Amer Water Resour Assoc 43(4):981–989CrossRef

Crispim JA, de Sousa JP (2009) Partner selection in virtual enterprises: a multi-criteria decision support approach. Int J Prod Res 47(17):4791–4812CrossRef

Crosson WL, Laymon CA, Inguva R, Schamschula MP (2002) Assimilating remote sensing data in a surface flux-soil moisture model. Hydrol Process 16(8):1645–1662CrossRef

Dear PH (1997) Genome mapping: a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford. Pract Approach Ser 184(978-0-19-963630-3):396

Dear P. H. (2001) Genome mapping. In: eLS, https://doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0001467

Deb K, Pratap A, Agrawal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017 CrossRef

Deb K, Gupta H (2005) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion optimization. Vol 3410. Ch. Searching for robust Pareto-optimal solutions in multi-objective optimization, pp 150–164

Dick G (2005) A comparison of localised and global niching methods. 17th Annual Colloquium of the Spatial Information Research Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin

Dumedah G, Berg AA, Wineberg M (2012a) Evaluating auto-selection methods used for choosing solutions from Pareto-optimal set: does non-dominance persist from calibration to validation phase?. J Hydrol Eng 17(1):150–159. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943--5584.0000389

Dumedah G, Berg AA, Wineberg M (2012b) Pareto-optimality and a search for robustness: choosing solutions with desired properties in objective space and parameter space. J Hydroinform 14(2):270–285. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2011.120

Dumedah G (2012c) Formulation of the evolutionary-based data assimilation, and its practical implementation. Water Resour Manag 26(13):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269--012--0107--0

Dumedah G, Coulibaly P (2013) Integration of evolutionary algorithm into Ensemble Kalman Filter, and Particle Filter for hydrologic data assimilation. Journal of Hydroinformatics. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2013.088

Dumedah G, Walker J (2014a) Assessment of land surface model uncertainty: a crucial step towards the identification of model weaknesses. J Hydrol 519:1474–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.015

Dumedah G, Walker J (2014b) Intercomparison of the JULES and CABLE land surface models through assimilation of remotely sensed soil moisture in southeast Australia. Adv Water Resour 74:231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.09.011

Dumedah G (2015) Toward essential union between evolutionary strategy and data assimilation for model diagnostics: an application for reducing the search space of optimization problems using hydrologic genome map. Environ Model Softw 69:342–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.025 CrossRef

Dumedah G, Walker JP (2017) Assessment of model behaviour and acceptable forcing data uncertainty in the context of land surface soil moisture estimation. Adv Water Resour 101:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017,01.001 CrossRef

Efstratiadis A, Koutsoyiannis D (2010) One decade of multi-objective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: a review. Hydrol Sci J 55(1):58–78CrossRef

Ehret U et al (2013) Advancing catchment hydrology to deal with predictions under change. HESSD, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd--10--8581--2013

Eiben AE, Smith JE (2003) Introduction to Evolutionary Computing. Springer, BerlinCrossRef

Evensen G (2003) The ensemble kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dyn 53(4):343–367CrossRef

Fenicia F, Savenije HHG, Matgen P, Pfister L (2008) Understanding catchment behavior through stepwise model concept improvement. Water Resources Research 44(W01402). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005563

Flint J, Valdar W, Shifman S, Mott R (2005) Strategies for mapping and cloning quantitative trait genes in rodents. Nat Rev Genet 6(8):271–286CrossRef

Grierson DE (2008) Pareto multi-criteria decision making. Adv Eng Inform 22 (3):371–384CrossRef

Gupta H, Clark MP, Vrugt JA, Abramowitz G, Ye M (2012) Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy. Water Resour Res 48(W08301):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011044

Gupta H (2003) Handbook of weather, climate, and water: Atmospheric chemistry, hydrology, and societal impacts. John wiley and sons, inc, ch. Hydrological modeling for runoff forecasting, pp 571–690

Gupta H, Wagener T, Liu Y (2008) Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation. Hydrol Process 22(18):3802–3813. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6989 CrossRef

Gutkin M, Shamir R, Dror G (2009) SlimPLS: A Method for Feature Selection in Gene Expression-Based Disease Classification. PLoS ONE 4(7):e6416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006416 CrossRef

Harte J (2002) Towards a synthesis of the Newtonian and Darwinian Worldviews: Physicists seek simplicity in universal laws. Ecologists revel in complex interdependencies. Together, these two approaches may help solve the problem of global warming. American Institute of Physics, Physics Today S-0031-9228-0210-010-X

He M, Hogue TS, Franz KJ, Margulis SA, Vrugt JA (2011) Characterizing parameter sensitivity and uncertainty for a snow model across hydroclimatic regimes. Adv Water Resour 34(1):114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.10.002 CrossRef

He M, Hogue TS, Margulis SA, Franz KJ (2012) An integrated uncertainty and ensemble-based data assimilation approach for improved operational streamflow predictions. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(3):815–831. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess--16--815--2012 CrossRef

Hira ZM, Gillies DF (2015) A review of feature selection and feature extraction methods applied on microarray data. Advances in Bioinformatics 2015(198363). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/198363

Hossain MI (2018) Addressing the Problem of Feature Selection Using Genetic Algorithms. https://www.cytel.com/blog/feature-selection-using-genetic-algorithms, Date accessed: August 2018

Houtekamer PL, Mitchell HL (1998) Data assimilation using an ensemble kalman filter technique. Mon Weather Rev 126(3):796–811CrossRef

Kling H, Gupta H (2009) On the development of regionalization relationships for lumped watershed models: The impact of ignoring sub-basin scale variability. J Hydrol 373(3-4):337–351CrossRef

Leavesley GH (1994) Modeling the effects of climate change on water resources - a review. Clim Chang 28:159–177CrossRef

Liu Y, Gupta H (2007) Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework. Water Resources Research 43. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005756

Liu Y, Sun F (2010) Sensitivity analysis and automatic calibration of a rainfall-runoff model using multi-objectives. Ecol Inf 5(4):304–310CrossRef

Maggioni V, Reichle R, Anagnostou EN (2011) The effect of satellite rainfall error modeling on soil moisture prediction uncertainty. J Hydrometeorol 12(3):413–428. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1355.1 CrossRef

Monical T (2017) Evolutionary Data Assimilation at Long Valley Caldera, CA. Master thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 225 Schmitz Hall, Campus Box 355850, Seattle, WA 98195-5850, USA

Montanari A et al (2013) ’Panta Rhei-Everything Flows’: Change in hydrology and society - The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013-2022. Hydrol Sci J 58(6):1256–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.809088 CrossRef

Moussu F, Oudin L, Plagnes V, Mangin A, Bendjoudi H (2011) A multi-objective calibration framework for rainfall-discharge models applied to karst systems. J Hydrol 400(3-4):364–376CrossRef

Nazemi A, Yao X, Chan A (2006) Extracting A set of robust pareto-optimal parameters for hydrologic models using nsga-ii and scem. 2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp 1901–1908. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2006.1688539

Oudin L, Weisse A, Loumagne C, Le Hegarat Mascle S (2003) Assimilation of soil moisture into hydrological models for flood forecasting: a variational approach. Can J Remote Sens 29(6):679–686CrossRef

Prelic A, Bleuler S, Zimmermann P et al (2006) A systematic comparison and evaluation of biclustering methods for gene expression data. Bioinformatics 22 (9):1122–1129CrossRef

Reichle R, Walker J, Koster R, Houser P (2002) Extended versus ensemble kalman filtering for land data assimilation. J Hydrometeorol 3(6):728–740CrossRef

Singh R, Wagener T, van Werkhoven K, Mann MECR (2011) A trading-space-for-time approach to probabilistic continuous streamflow predictions in a changing climate - accounting for changing watershed behavior. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci (HESS) 15:3591–3603CrossRef

Tabrizi MHN, Said SE, Badr AW, Mashor Y, Billings S.A. (1998) Nonlinear modelling and prediction of a river flow system. J Amer Water Resour Assoc 34:1333–1339CrossRef

Tabus I, Astola J (2005) Gene feature selection. In: Dougherty ER, Shmulevich I, Chen J, Jane Wang Z (eds) Genomic Signal Processing and Statistics. ISBN 977–5945–07–0. Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Thirel G, Martin E, Mahfouf J-F, Massart S, Ricci S, Habets F (2010) A past discharges assimilation system for ensemble streamflow forecasts over France - Part 1: Description and validation of the assimilation system. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14 (8):1623–1637CrossRef

US National Library of Medicine (2018) Genetics home reference. National Institute of Health, US National Library of Medicine

Van Leeuwen PJ (2009) Particle filtering in geophysical systems. Mon Weather Rev 137(12):4089–4114CrossRef

van Werkhoven K, Wagener T, Reed P, Tang Y (2009) Sensitivity-guided reduction of parametric dimensionality for multi-objective calibration of watershed models. Adv Water Resour 32(8):1154–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.03.002 CrossRef

Vossepoel FC, van Leeuwen PJ (2007) Parameter estimation using a particle method: Inferring mixing coefficients from sea level observations. Mon Weather Rev 135 (3):1006–1020. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3328.1 CrossRef

Vrugt JA, Robinson BA (2007) Treatment of uncertainty using ensemble methods: Comparison of sequential data assimilation and bayesian model averaging. Water Re808 sources Research 43 (1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004838

Vrugt JA, Sadegh M (2013) Toward diagnostic model calibration and evaluation: Approximate Bayesian computation. Water Resour Res 49:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20354 CrossRef

Wagener T, McIntyre N, Lees MJ, Wheater HS, Gupta H (2003) Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling: Dynamic identifiability analysis. Hydrol Process 17:455–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1135 CrossRef

Wagener T, Reed P, van Werkhoven K, Tang Y, Zhang Z (2009) Advances in the identification and evaluation of complex environmental systems models. J Hydroinform 11(3-4):266–281. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2009.040 CrossRef

Wang QJ (1991) The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour Res 27(9):2467–2471CrossRef

Weerts AH, El Serafy GY, Hummel S, Dhondia J, Gerritsen H (2010) Application of generic data assimilation tools(datools) for flood forecasting purposes. Comput Geosci 36(4):453–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2009.07.009 CrossRef

Wohling T, Vrugt JA, Barkle GF (2008) Comparison of three multiobjective optimization algorithms for inverse modeling of vadose zone hydraulic properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72(2):305–319CrossRef

Wojcik R, Alemohammad SH, Entekhabi D (2014) Ensemble-based characterization of uncertain environmental features. Adv Water Resour 70:36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.04.005 CrossRef

Xie X, Zhang D (2010) Data assimilation for distributed hydrological catchment modeling via ensemble kalman filter. Adv Water Resour 33(6):678–690CrossRef

Xing EP, Jordan MI, Karp RM (2001) Feature selection for high-dimensional genomic microarray data. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning Morgan Kaufmann, pp 601–608

Yan H, Zarekarizi M, Moradkhani H (2018) Toward improving drought monitoring using the remotely sensed soil moisture assimilation: A parallel particle filtering framework. Remote Sensing of Environment Volume, pp 216, 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.07.017

Zhang Z, Wagener T, Reed P, Bhushan R (2008) Reducing uncertainty in predictions in ungauged basins by combining hydrologic indices regionalization and multiobjective optimization. Water Resources Research 44 (W00B04). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006833

Zitzler E, Thiele L (1999) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 3(4):257–271CrossRef

Titel: Hydro Genome Mapping: An Approach for the Diagnosis, Evaluation and Improving Prediction Capability of Hydro-Meteorological Models
verfasst von: Gift Dumedah
Publikationsdatum: 22.08.2019
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Water Resources Management / Ausgabe 11/2019
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02336-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2019

A Novel Adaptive Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization Based on Decomposition and Dominance for Long-term Generation Scheduling of Cascade Hydropower System

Modular Wavelet–Extreme Learning Machine: a New Approach for Forecasting Daily Rainfall

Inventory Theory-Based Stochastic Optimization for Reservoir Water Allocation

An Event-Based Sediment Yield and Runoff Modeling Using Soil Moisture Balance/Budgeting (SMB) Method

A Hybrid Model for Real-Time Probabilistic Flood Forecasting Using Elman Neural Network with Heterogeneity of Error Distributions

Seasonal Inflow Forecasts Using Gridded Precipitation and Soil Moisture Information: Implications for Reservoir Operation