nach oben

Management Review Quarterly

Erschienen in:

03.01.2022

Improving continuity by simplifying the structure of family firms: a replication study

verfasst von: Angela Dettori, Michela Floris

Erschienen in: Management Review Quarterly | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study replicates a research undertaken in 2008 by Lambrecht and Lievens, Pruning the Family Tree: An Unexplored Path to Family Business Continuity and Family Harmony. Adopting an extended replication approach, this work analyzes a sample of family firms in Sardinia to investigate how and why family businesses prune the family tree to safeguard family harmony and business continuity. Our findings confirm that pruning is an effective strategy for managing complexity, increasing firm performance, and supporting succession plans. We extend the original study by stressing the relevance of pruning during succession.

Vorheriger Artikel The cauldron has cooled down: a systematic literature review on home advantage in football during the COVID-19 pandemic from a socio-economic and psychological perspective

Nächster Artikel Start-up accelerator value chain: a systematic literature review

The Sardinian saying “centu concas, centu berrittas,” translates to “one hundred heads, one hundred hairs.” It is one of the most common proverbs in Sardinia and can be interpreted as being either negative or positive. It can mean that Sardinians are not united, or it can mean that every Sardinian has the ability to think independently, without restrictions.

Anderson RC, Duru A, Reeb DM (2009) Founders, heirs, and corporate opacity in the United States. J Financ Econ 92:205–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.04.006CrossRef

Astrachan JH, Shanker MC (2003) Family businesses’ contribution to the U.S. economy: a closer look. Fam Bus Rev 16:211–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865030160030601CrossRef

Avloniti A, Iatridou A, Kaloupsis I, Vozikis GS (2014) Sibling rivalry: implications for the family business succession process. Int Entr Man J 10:661–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0271-6CrossRef

Barontini R, Bozzi S (2018) Family firm heterogeneity and CEO compensation in Continental Europe. J Econ Bus 97:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.02.001CrossRef

Basco R (2013) The family’s effect on family firm performance: a model testing the demographic and essence approaches. J Fam Bus Strategy 4:42–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.12.003CrossRef

Baù M, Chirico F, Pittino D, Backman M, Klaesson J (2019) Roots to grow: family firms and local embeddedness in rural and urban contexts. Entrep Theor Pract 43:360–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718796089CrossRef

Bergh DD, Sharp BM, Aguinis H, Li M (2017) Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings. Strateg Organ 15:423–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017701076CrossRef

Bertrand C, Bourdeau L (2010) Research interviews by Skype: a new data collection method. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, Madrid, Spain

Bertrand M, Johnson S, Samphantharak K, Schoar A (2008) Mixing family with business: a study of Thai business groups and the families behind them. J Financ Econ 88:466–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.04.002CrossRef

Bettis RA, Helfat CE, Shaver JM (2016) The necessity, logic, and forms of replication. Strateg Manag J 37:2193–2203. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2580CrossRef

Blanco-Mazagatos V, de Quevedo-Puente E, Delgado-García JB (2016) How agency conflict between family managers and family owners affects performance in wholly family-owned firms: a generational perspective. J Fam Bus Strategy 7:167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.07.003CrossRef

Block JH, Kuckertz A (2018) Seven principles of effective replication studies: strengthening the evidence base of management research. Manag Rev Q 68:355–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-018-0149-3CrossRef

Brumana M, Minola T, Garrett RP, Digan SP (2017) How do family firms launch new businesses? A developmental perspective on internal corporate venturing in family business. J Small Bus Manag 55:594–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12344CrossRef

Calabrò A, Campopiano G, Basco R (2017) Principal-principal conflicts and family firm growth: the moderating role of business family identity. J Fam Bus Manag 7:291–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-02-2017-0005CrossRef

Campopiano G, Brumana M, Minola T, Cassia L (2020a) Does growth represent chimera or Bellerophon for a family business? The role of Entrepreneurial orientation and family influence nuances. Eur Manag Rev 17:765–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12351CrossRef

Campopiano G, Calabrò A, Basco R (2020b) The “most wanted”: the role of family strategic resources and family involvement in CEO succession intention. Fam Bus Rev 33:284–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486520927289CrossRef

Caputo A, Marzi G, Pellegrini MM, Rialti R (2018) Conflict management in family businesses: a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. IJCMA 29:519–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-02-2018-0027CrossRef

Carney M (2005) Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrep Theor Pract 29:249–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00081.xCrossRef

Carney M, Gedajlovic E (2002) The coupling of ownership and control and the allocation of financial resources: evidence from Hong Kong. J Manag Stud 39:123–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00285CrossRef

Cassidy A, McGrath B (2014) The relationship between “Non-successor” farm offspring and the continuity of the irish family farm. Soc Ruralis 54:399–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12054CrossRef

Chen L, Zhu JA, Fang H (2021) The rise of family business in China before 1949. In: Family business in China, 1. Springer, pp 99–131

Colli A (2012) Contextualizing performances of family firms: the perspective of business history. Fam Bus Rev 25:243–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511426872CrossRef

Crenos (2020) Economia della sardegna. 27° rapporto. Arcadia

Daspit JJ, Chrisman JJ, Ashton T, Evangelopoulos N (2021) Family Firm Heterogeneity: a definition, common themes, scholarly progress, and directions forward. Fam Bus Rev 34:296–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211008350CrossRef

Davis JA (2008) Toward a typology of family business systems. In: Family values and value creation. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 127–154

De Massis A, Chua JH, Chrisman JJ (2008) Factors preventing intra-family succession. Fam Bus Rev 21(2):183–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.xCrossRef

De Massis A, Kotlar J, Campopiano G, Cassia L (2013) Dispersion of family ownership and the performance of small-to-medium size private family firms. J Fam Bus Strategy 4:166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.05.001CrossRef

Deakin H, Wakefield K (2014) Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers. Qual Res 14:603–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113488126CrossRef

Dettori A, Floris M, Dessì C (2020) Customer-perceived quality, innovation and tradition: some empirical evidence. TQM J32:1467–1486. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2019-0273CrossRef

Eddleston KA, Otondo RF, Kellermanns FW (2008) Conflict, participative decision-making, and generational ownership dispersion: a multilevel analysis. J Small Bus Manag 46:456–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008.00252.xCrossRef

Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14:532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385CrossRef

Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J 50:25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888CrossRef

Ensley MD, Pearson AW, Sardeshmukh SR (2007) The negative consequences of pay dispersion in family and non-family top management teams: an exploratory analysis of new venture, high-growth firms. J Bus Res 60:1039–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.012CrossRef

EU (2020) Unleashing the full potential of European SMEs. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/fs_20_426

EY (2017) Family business yearbook. https://familybusiness.ey-vx.com/fb-yearbook-flipbook-2017/mobile/index.html#p=1

Fitz-Koch S, Nordqvist M (2017) The reciprocal relationship of innovation capabilities and socioemotional wealth in a family firm. J Small Bus Manag 55:547–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12343CrossRef

Floris M, Dettori A, Dessì C (2020) Innovation within tradition: interesting insights from two small family bakeries. Piccola Impresa/Small Bus 1

Gagné M, Marwick C, Brun de Pontet S, Wrosch C (2021) Family business succession: What’s motivation got to do with it? Fam Bus Rev 34:154–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519894759CrossRef

Gersick KE, Davis JA, McCollom Hampton M, Lansberg IS (1997) Generation to generation: life cycles of the family business. Harvard Business School Press

Gibb Dyer WG (2006) Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Fam Bus Rev 19:253–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00074.xCrossRef

Gimeno A, Baulenas G, Coma-Cros J (2010) Family business models. In: Family business models. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 57–77

Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ Res Methods 16:15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151CrossRef

González-Cruz TF, Cruz-Ros S (2016) When does family involvement produce superior performance in SME family business? J Bus Res 69:1452–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.124CrossRef

Großmann S, Von Schlippe AV (2015) Family businesses: fertile environments for conflict. J Fam Bus Manag 5:294–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-11-2014-0038CrossRef

Gubitta P, Gianecchini M (2002) Governance and flexibility in family-owned SMEs. Fam Bus Rev 15:277–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00277.xCrossRef

Habbershon TG, Williams ML, MacMillan IC (2003) A unified systems theory of family firm performance. J Bus Res 18:451–465

Hoskisson RE, Chirico F, Gambeta ZJ, E, (2017) Managerial risk taking: a multitheoretical review and future research agenda. J Manag 43:137–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316671583CrossRef

Humphrey RH, Massis AD, Picone PM, Tang Y, Piccolo RF (2021) The psychological foundations of management in family firms: emotions, memories, and experiences. Fam Bus Rev 34:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211012139CrossRef

Iacono VL, Symonds P, Brown DH (2016) Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Soc Res Online 21:1–9

Kammerlander N, Dessì C, Bird M, Floris M, Murru A (2015) The impact of shared stories on family firm innovation a multicase study. Fam Bus Rev 28:332–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486515607777CrossRef

Kellermanns FW, Eddleston KA (2004) Feuding families: when conflict does a family firm good. Entrep Theor Pract 28:209–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00040.xCrossRef

Klein PG, Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2010) Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. Eur Manag Rev 7:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2010.1CrossRef

Kotlar J, De Massis A (2013) Goal setting in family firms: goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family–centered goals. Entrep Theor Pract 37:1263–1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12065CrossRef

Labaki R (2007) Contribution à la connaissance des liens familiaux dans les entreprises familiales françaises cotées: renforcement versus atténuation. Bordeaux

Lambrecht J, Lievens J (2008) Pruning the family tree: an unexplored path to family business continuity and family harmony. Fam Bus Rev 21:295–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865080210040103CrossRef

Lansberg IS (1999) Succeeding generations. Harvard Business School Press. http://www.netlibrary.com/urlapi.asp?action=summary&v=1&bookid=35047

Martin-Cruz N, Barros Contreras I, Hernangómez Barahona J, Pérez Fernández H (2020) Parents’ learning mechanisms for family firm succession: an empirical analysis in Spain through the lens of the dynamic capabilities approach. Sustainability 12:8220. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198220CrossRef

Matser I, Bouma J, Veldhuizen E (2020) No hard feelings? Non-succeeding siblings and their perceptions of justice in family firms. J Fam Bus Manag 6:66. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2018-0048CrossRef

Memili E, Chang EPC, Kellermanns FW, Welsh DHB (2015) Role conflicts of family members in family firms. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 24:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.839549CrossRef

Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I (2006) Family governance and firm performance: agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Fam Bus Rev 19:73–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00063.xCrossRef

Montemerlo D (2005) Family ownership: boost or obstacle to growth. FBN-IFERA World Academic Research Forum, EHSAL Brussels

Mukherjee K, Rautiainen M, Pihkala T, Rosa P (2019) The dynamics and complexity of family business groups. In: The family Business Group Phenomenon. Springer, pp 177–200

Nordqvist M, Sharma P, Chirico F (2014) Family firm heterogeneity and governance: a configuration approach. J Small Bus Man 52:192–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12096CrossRef

OECD P (2017) Enhancing the contributions of SMEs in a global and digitalised economy. Paris. Accessed 25 Feb2019

Oudah M, Jabeen F, Dixon C (2018) Determinants linked to family business sustainability in the UAE: an AHP approach. Sustainability 10:246. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010246CrossRef

Picone PM, De Massis A, Tang Y, Piccolo RF (2021) The psychological foundations of management in family firms: Values, biases, and heuristics. Fam Bus Rev 34:12–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486520985630CrossRef

Qiu H, Freel M (2020) Managing family-related conflicts in family businesses: a review and research agenda. Fam Bus Rev 33:90–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519893223CrossRef

Sandig AG, Labadie GJ, Saris W, Mayordomo XM (2006) Internal factors of family business performance: an integrated theoretical model. In: Handbook of research in family business, pp 145–164

Santulli R, Torchia M, Calabrò A, Gallucci C (2019) Family ownership concentration and firm internationalization: integrating principal–principal and socioemotional wealth perspectives. J Int Entrep 17:220–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-019-00245-4CrossRef

Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN (2003) Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Acad Manag J 46:179–194CrossRef

Schwass J (2005) Wise growth strategies in leading family businesses. SpringerCrossRef

Sharma P, Manikutty S (2003) Shedding of unproductive resources in family firms: role of family structure and community culture. The School of Business and Economics publishes working papers

Sharma P, Nordqvist M (2013) Using the configuration approach to understand the reasons for and consequences of varied family involvement in business. In: Handbook of research on family business, 2nd edn. Edward Elgar

Shepherd DA, Zacharakis A (2000) Structuring family business succession: an analysis of the future leader’s decision making. Entrep Theor Pract 24:25–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870002400402CrossRef

Siebels JF, zu Knyphausen‐Aufseß D (2012) A review of theory in family business research: the implications for corporate governance. Int J Manag Rev 14:280–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00317.x

Simon A, Marquès P, Bikfalvi A, Dolors Muñoz MD (2012) Exploring value differences across family firms: the influence of choosing and managing complexity. J Fam Bus Strategy 3:132–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.05.003CrossRef

Singh K, Ang SH, Leong SM (2003) Increasing replication for knowledge accumulation in strategy research. J Manag 29:533–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00024-2CrossRef

Suáre KC, Santana-Martín DJ (2004) Governance in Spanish family business. Int J Entrep Behav Res 10:141–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550410521425CrossRef

Toncar MF, Munch JM (2010) Meaningful replication: when is a replication no longer a replication? A rejoinder to Stella and Adam (2008). J Mark Theor Pract 18:71–80. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679180105CrossRef

Van der Meulen H, Terluin I, Matser I (2015) The role of women on Dutch farms. In: 20th International farm manage congress. Laval University, Québec City, QC, Canada

Weismeier-Sammer D (2011) Entrepreneurial behavior in family firms: a replication study. J Fam Bus Strategy 2:128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.07.003CrossRef

Westhead P, Howorth C, Cowling M (2002) Ownership and management issues in first generation and multi-generation family firms. Entrep Reg Dev 14:247–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620110112088CrossRef

Witt P (2008) Corporate Governance in Familienunternehmen. Z Betriebswirtschaft 78:1–19

Yin RK (2008) Case study research, 4th ed. Sage

Zahra SA, Wright M, Abdelgawad SG (2014) Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. Int Small Bus J 32:479–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613519807CrossRef

Titel: Improving continuity by simplifying the structure of family firms: a replication study
verfasst von: Angela Dettori
Michela Floris
Publikationsdatum: 03.01.2022
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Management Review Quarterly / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 2198-1620
Elektronische ISSN: 2198-1639
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00255-4

Springer Professional

Improving continuity by simplifying the structure of family firms: a replication study

Abstract

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Corporate tax risk: a literature review and future research directions

Beyond conventional corporate responses to climate change towards deep decarbonization: a systematic literature

Correction to: Beyond conventional corporate responses to climate change towards deep decarbonization: a systematic literature review

Sustainable business models for social enterprises in developing countries: a conceptual framework

Correction: Conceptualization of research themes and directions in business ecosystem strategies: a systematic literature review

Ambiguity aversion: bibliometric analysis and literature review of the last 60 years

Premium Partner