nach oben

Neural Computing and Applications

Erschienen in:

26.10.2017 | Original Article

Improving multi-criterion optimization with chaos: a novel Multi-Objective Chaotic Crow Search Algorithm

verfasst von: Salvador Hinojosa, Diego Oliva, Erik Cuevas, Gonzalo Pajares, Omar Avalos, Jorge Gálvez

Erschienen in: Neural Computing and Applications | Ausgabe 8/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper presents two multi-criteria optimization techniques: the Multi-Objective Crow Search Algorithm (MOCSA) and an improved chaotic version called Multi-Objective Chaotic Crow Search Algorithm (MOCCSA). Both methods MOCSA and MOCCSA are based on an enhanced version of the recently published Crow Search Algorithm. Crows are intelligent animals with interesting strategies for protecting their food hatches. This compelling behavior is extended into a Multi-Objective approach. MOCCSA uses chaotic-based criteria on the optimization process to improve the diversity of solutions. To determinate if the performance of the algorithm is significantly enhanced, the incorporation of a chaotic operator is further validated by a statistical comparison between the proposed MOCCSA and its chaotic-free counterpart (MOCSA) indicating that the results of the two algorithms are significantly different from each other. The performance of MOCCSA is evaluated by a set of standard benchmark functions, and the results are contrasted with two well-known algorithms: Multi-Objective Dragonfly Algorithm and Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization. Both quantitative and qualitative results show competitive results for the proposed approach.

Vorheriger Artikel Further improvements on extreme learning machine for interval neural network

Nächster Artikel Correction to: Improving multi-criterion optimization with chaos: a novel Multi-Objective Chaotic Crow Search Algorithm

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Yang X (2010) Engineering optimization. Eng Optim. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 15–28CrossRef

Araghi S, Khosravi A, Creighton D (2015) Intelligent cuckoo search optimized traffic signal controllers for multi-intersection network. Expert Syst Appl 42:4422–4431. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.063 CrossRef

Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM, Yang X-S (2015) Sizing optimization of truss structures using flower pollination algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 37:322–331. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.08.037 CrossRef

Hong W-C (2009) Chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithm in a support vector regression electric load forecasting model. Energy Convers Manag 50:105–117. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2008.08.031 CrossRef

Walia GS, Kapoor R (2014) Intelligent video target tracking using an evolutionary particle filter based upon improved cuckoo search. Expert Syst Appl 41:6315–6326. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.012 CrossRef

Coello CAC, Lamont GB, Van Veldhuizen DA (2007) Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems, 2nd edn. doi:10.1007/s11276-014-0817-8

Deb K (1999) Multi-objective genetic algorithms: problem difficulties and construction of test problems. Evol Comput 7:205–230. doi:10.1162/evco.1999.7.3.205 CrossRef

Deb K, Pratab S, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NGSA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:182–197. doi:10.1109/4235.996017 CrossRef

Zitzler E, Thiele L (1999) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 3:257–271. doi:10.1109/4235.797969 CrossRef

10.

Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L (2002) SPEA2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In: Giannakoglou KC et al (eds) Proceedings of evolutionary methods for design, optimization and control with application to industrial problems (EUROGEN 2001). International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), Barcelona, Spain, pp 95–100

11.

Coello CAC, Pulido GT, Lechuga MS (2004) Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8:256–279. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067 CrossRef

12.

Knowles JD, Corne DW (2000) Approximating the nondominated front using the Pareto archived evolution strategy. Evol Comput 8:149–172. doi:10.1162/106365600568167 CrossRef

13.

Zhang Q, Li H (2007) MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 11:712–731. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2007.892759 CrossRef

14.

Mirjalili S (2016) Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Comput Appl 27:1053–1073. doi:10.1007/s00521-015-1920-1 CrossRef

15.

Suman B (2005) Study of self-stopping PDMOSA and performance measure in multiobjective optimization. Comput Chem Eng 29:1131–1147. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2004.12.002 CrossRef

16.

von Lücken C, Barán B, Brizuela C (2014) A survey on multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for many-objective problems. Comput Optim Appl 58:707–756. doi:10.1007/s10589-014-9644-1 MathSciNetMATH

17.

Deb K, Deb K (2014) Multi-objective optimization. Search methodol. Springer, Boston, pp 403–449CrossRef

18.

Zavala GR, Nebro AJ, Luna F, Coello Coello CA (2014) A survey of multi-objective metaheuristics applied to structural optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49:537–558. doi:10.1007/s00158-013-0996-4 MathSciNetCrossRef

19.

Sağ T, Çunkaş M (2015) Color image segmentation based on multiobjective artificial bee colony optimization. Appl Soft Comput 34:389–401. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.05.016 CrossRef

20.

Costa CBB, Potrich E, Cruz AJG (2016) Multiobjective optimization of a sugarcane biorefinery involving process and environmental aspects. Renew Energy 96:1142–1152. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.10.043 CrossRef

21.

Ahmadi A, Tiruta-Barna L (2015) A Process Modelling-Life Cycle Assessment-Multiobjective Optimization tool for the eco-design of conventional treatment processes of potable water. J Clean Prod 100:116–125. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.045 CrossRef

22.

Ruiz AB, Sindhya K, Miettinen K et al (2015) E-NAUTILUS: a decision support system for complex multiobjective optimization problems based on the NAUTILUS method. Eur J Oper Res 246:218–231. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.027 MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

23.

Garcia DJ, You F (2015) Multiobjective optimization of product and process networks: general modeling framework, efficient global optimization algorithm, and case studies on bioconversion. AIChE J 61:530–554. doi:10.1002/aic.14666 CrossRef

24.

Fang J, Gao Y, Sun G et al (2015) Multiobjective robust design optimization of fatigue life for a truck cab. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 135:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2014.10.007 CrossRef

25.

Wolpert DH, Macready WG (1997) No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1:67–82. doi:10.1109/4235.585893 CrossRef

26.

Tavazoei MS, Haeri M (2007) Comparison of different one-dimensional maps as chaotic search pattern in chaos optimization algorithms. Appl Math Comput 187:1076–1085. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2006.09.087 MathSciNetMATH

27.

Bucolo M, Caponetto R, Fortuna L et al (2002) Does chaos work better than noise? IEEE Circuits Syst Mag 2:4–19. doi:10.1109/MCAS.2002.1167624 CrossRef

28.

Yang D, Liu Z, Zhou J (2014) Chaos optimization algorithms based on chaotic maps with different probability distribution and search speed for global optimization. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 19:1229–1246. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.08.017 MathSciNetCrossRef

29.

Ott E (2002) Chaos in dynamical systems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefMATH

30.

Yang D, Yang P, Zhang C (2012) Chaotic characteristic analysis of strong earthquake ground motions. Int J Bifurc Chaos. doi:10.1142/S0218127412500459 MATH

31.

Caponetto R, Fortuna L, Fazzino S, Xibilia MG (2003) Chaotic sequences to improve the performance of evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 7:289–304. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2003.810069 CrossRef

32.

Willi-Hans S (2014) The nonlinear workbook: chaos, fractals, cellular automata, neural networks, genetic algorithms, fuzzy logic, 6th edn. World Scientific Publishing Co Inc, Hackensack

33.

Chuang L-Y, Yang C-H, Li J-C (2011) Chaotic maps based on binary particle swarm optimization for feature selection. Appl Soft Comput 11:239–248. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.11.014 CrossRef

34.

Yuan X, Zhao J, Yang Y, Wang Y (2014) Hybrid parallel chaos optimization algorithm with harmony search algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 17:12–22. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2013.12.016 CrossRef

35.

Gokhale SS, Kale VS (2016) An application of a tent map initiated Chaotic Firefly algorithm for optimal overcurrent relay coordination. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 78:336–342. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.11.087 CrossRef

36.

Afrabandpey H, Ghaffari M, Mirzaei A, Safayani M (2014) A novel Bat Algorithm based on chaos for optimization tasks. In: 2014 Iranian conference intelligent systems. IEEE, pp 1–6

37.

Song Y, Chen Z, Yuan Z (2007) Neural network nonlinear predictive control based on tent-map chaos optimization. Chin J Chem Eng 15:539–544. doi:10.1016/S1004-9541(07)60121-9 CrossRef

38.

Askarzadeh A (2016) A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: crow search algorithm. Comput Struct 169:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.001 CrossRef

39.

Coello Coello CA (2009) Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: some current research trends and topics that remain to be explored. Front Comput Sci China 3:18–30. doi:10.1007/s11704-009-0005-7 CrossRef

40.

Zhou A, Qu B-Y, Li H et al (2011) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art. Swarm Evol Comput 1:32–49. doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2011.03.001 CrossRef

41.

Black H (2013) Social skills to crow about. Sci Am Mind 24:12. doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0913-12 CrossRef

42.

Zhang Q, Zhou A, Zhao S, et al (2009) Multiobjective optimization test instances for the CEC 2009 special session and competition. Tech Rep 1–30

43.

Sierra MR, Coello Coello CA (2005) Improving PSO-based multi-objective optimization using crowding, mutation and ∈-dominance. Springer, Berlin, pp 505–519MATH

44.

Zitzler E (1999) Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: methods and applications. PhD Thesis

45.

Fonseca CM, Fleming PJ (1996) On the performance assessment and comparison of stochastic multiobjective optimizers. In: Lect Notes Comput Sci (including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics). pp 584–593

46.

López-Ibáñez M, Paquete L, Stützle T (2010) Exploratory analysis of stochastic local search algorithms in biobjective optimization. Experimental methods for the analysis of optimization algorithms. Springer, Berlin, pp 209–222CrossRef

47.

García S, Molina D, Lozano M, Herrera F (2008) A study on the use of non-parametric tests for analyzing the evolutionary algorithms’ behaviour: a case study on the CEC’2005 special session on real parameter optimization. J Heuristics 15:617–644. doi:10.1007/s10732-008-9080-4 CrossRefMATH

Titel: Improving multi-criterion optimization with chaos: a novel Multi-Objective Chaotic Crow Search Algorithm
verfasst von: Salvador Hinojosa
Diego Oliva
Erik Cuevas
Gonzalo Pajares
Omar Avalos
Jorge Gálvez
Publikationsdatum: 26.10.2017
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Neural Computing and Applications / Ausgabe 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0941-0643
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3058
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3251-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2018

A new denoising method for fMRI based on weighted three-dimensional wavelet transform

Vision-based hand gesture recognition of alphabets, numbers, arithmetic operators and ASCII characters in order to develop a virtual text-entry interface system

Effect of Legendre–Fenchel denoising and SVD-based dimensionality reduction algorithm on hyperspectral image classification

A novel approach for automated detection of focal EEG signals using empirical wavelet transform

Hybrid classifier based life cycle stages analysis for malaria-infected erythrocyte using thin blood smear images

Classification of nucleotide sequences for quality assessment using logistic regression and decision tree approaches

Premium Partner