Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 8/2019

20.11.2017

Inclusive risk modeling for manufacturing firms: a Bayesian network approach

verfasst von: Yash Daultani, Mohit Goswami, Omkarprasad S. Vaidya, Sushil Kumar

Erschienen in: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing | Ausgabe 8/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper focuses on modelling the enterprise level risks from the perspective of an original equipment manufacturer. We intend to converge on an overall risk measure that is representative of the cumulative effect of risks emanating from considerations pertaining to respective functional divisions within the enterprise. Further, due to multitude of interplays between the core objectives of various functional divisions, modeling the cumulative risk pertaining to any project within a firm presents significant challenges. This paper proposes a systematic risk assessment methodology considering various enterprise specific risk characteristics (primarily technical, commercial, and operational in nature) related to multiple functional divisions of an enterprise. Specifically, we consider six different functional divisions i.e. planning, sourcing, operations, marketing, logistics and service. A Bayesian network model is then evolved by mapping the risk parameters related to various functional divisions and their interdependencies. Further, each of these risk parameters are represented in terms of parent and root nodes. In order to determine the probabilities of existing nodes in a Bayesian network, a methodical approach is developed that focuses on obtaining the conditional probabilities of the nodes with multiple parents. Thereafter, an enterprise level value chain risk measure is proposed that evaluates the feasible risk states in terms of an aggregate risk number. Employing an example of a typical automotive company, the methodology is illustrated.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Cao, M., Vonderembrse, M. A., Zhang, Q., & Ragunathan, T. S. (2010). Supply chain collaboration: Conceptualization and instrument development. International Journal of Production Research, 48(22), 6613–6635.CrossRef Cao, M., Vonderembrse, M. A., Zhang, Q., & Ragunathan, T. S. (2010). Supply chain collaboration: Conceptualization and instrument development. International Journal of Production Research, 48(22), 6613–6635.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chaudhuri, A., Mohanty, B. K., & Singh, K. N. (2013). Supply chain risk assessment during new product development: a group decision making approach using numeric and linguistic data. International Journal of Production Research, 51(10), 2790–2804.CrossRef Chaudhuri, A., Mohanty, B. K., & Singh, K. N. (2013). Supply chain risk assessment during new product development: a group decision making approach using numeric and linguistic data. International Journal of Production Research, 51(10), 2790–2804.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chin, K., Tang, D., Yang, J., Wong, S., & Wang, H. (2009). Assessing new product development project risk by Bayesian network with a systematic probability generation methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), 9879–9890. Chin, K., Tang, D., Yang, J., Wong, S., & Wang, H. (2009). Assessing new product development project risk by Bayesian network with a systematic probability generation methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), 9879–9890.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiu, C. H., & Choi, T. M. (2016). Supply chain risk analysis with mean-variance models: A technical review. Annals of Operations Research, 240(2), 489–507.CrossRef Chiu, C. H., & Choi, T. M. (2016). Supply chain risk analysis with mean-variance models: A technical review. Annals of Operations Research, 240(2), 489–507.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cowell, R. G., Verrall, R. J., & Yoon, Y. K. (2007). Modeling operational risk with Bayesian networks. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 74(4), 795–827.CrossRef Cowell, R. G., Verrall, R. J., & Yoon, Y. K. (2007). Modeling operational risk with Bayesian networks. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 74(4), 795–827.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2007). The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sciences, 38(1), 131–156.CrossRef Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2007). The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sciences, 38(1), 131–156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Daultani, Y., Kumar, S., Vaidya, O. S., & Tiwari, M. K. (2015). A supply chain network equilibrium model for operational and opportunism risk mitigation. International Journal of Production Research, 53(18), 5685–5715.CrossRef Daultani, Y., Kumar, S., Vaidya, O. S., & Tiwari, M. K. (2015). A supply chain network equilibrium model for operational and opportunism risk mitigation. International Journal of Production Research, 53(18), 5685–5715.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fazlollahtabar, H., & Aliahmadi, A. (2014). Bayesian dynamic program for a new product development. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 4(4), 329–344.CrossRef Fazlollahtabar, H., & Aliahmadi, A. (2014). Bayesian dynamic program for a new product development. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 4(4), 329–344.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garvey, M. D., Carnovale, S., & Yeniyurt, S. (2015). An analytical framework for supply network risk propagation: A Bayesian network approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(2), 618–627.CrossRef Garvey, M. D., Carnovale, S., & Yeniyurt, S. (2015). An analytical framework for supply network risk propagation: A Bayesian network approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(2), 618–627.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goswami, M., & Tiwari, M. K. (2014). A predictive risk evaluation framework for modular product concept selection in new product design environment. Journal of Engineering Design, 25(1–3), 150–171.CrossRef Goswami, M., & Tiwari, M. K. (2014). A predictive risk evaluation framework for modular product concept selection in new product design environment. Journal of Engineering Design, 25(1–3), 150–171.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goswami, M., Singh, J., & Kumar, V. (2016). An enterprise based decision support system for engineering aggregate selection: A case study. Journal of Engineering Design and Technology, 14(4), 851–873.CrossRef Goswami, M., Singh, J., & Kumar, V. (2016). An enterprise based decision support system for engineering aggregate selection: A case study. Journal of Engineering Design and Technology, 14(4), 851–873.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grubisic, V. V. F., & Ogliari, A. (2009). Methodology for the integrated management of technical and managerial risks related to the product design process. Product: Management & Development, 7(2), 149–160. Grubisic, V. V. F., & Ogliari, A. (2009). Methodology for the integrated management of technical and managerial risks related to the product design process. Product: Management & Development, 7(2), 149–160.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim, J. H., & Pearl, J. (1983, August). A computational model for causal and diagnostic reasoning in inference systems. In IJCAI (Vol. 83, pp. 190–193). Kim, J. H., & Pearl, J. (1983, August). A computational model for causal and diagnostic reasoning in inference systems. In IJCAI (Vol. 83, pp. 190–193).
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar, R. S., Choudhary, A., Babu, S. A. I., Kumar, S. K., Goswami, A., & Tiwari, M. K. (2017). Designing multi-period supply chain network considering risk and emission: A multi-objective approach. Annals of Operations Research, 250(2), 427–461.CrossRef Kumar, R. S., Choudhary, A., Babu, S. A. I., Kumar, S. K., Goswami, A., & Tiwari, M. K. (2017). Designing multi-period supply chain network considering risk and emission: A multi-objective approach. Annals of Operations Research, 250(2), 427–461.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lavastre, O., Gunasekaran, A., & Spalanzani, A., (2014). “Effect of firm characteristics, supplier relationships and techniques used on Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM): an empirical investigation on French industrial firms”, International Journal of Production Research, 51(21), 6484–9498, 52(11), 3381–3403. Lavastre, O., Gunasekaran, A., & Spalanzani, A., (2014). “Effect of firm characteristics, supplier relationships and techniques used on Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM): an empirical investigation on French industrial firms”, International Journal of Production Research, 51(21), 6484–9498, 52(11), 3381–3403.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, Z., & Nagurney, A. (2011). Supply chain outsourcing under exchange rate risk and competition. Omega, 39(5), 539–549.CrossRef Liu, Z., & Nagurney, A. (2011). Supply chain outsourcing under exchange rate risk and competition. Omega, 39(5), 539–549.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lockamy, A, I. I. I., & McCormack, K. (2012). Modeling supplier risks using Bayesian networks. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(2), 313–333.CrossRef Lockamy, A, I. I. I., & McCormack, K. (2012). Modeling supplier risks using Bayesian networks. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(2), 313–333.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lockamy, A, I. I. I. (2011). Benchmarking supplier risks using Bayesian networks. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(3), 409–427.CrossRef Lockamy, A, I. I. I. (2011). Benchmarking supplier risks using Bayesian networks. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(3), 409–427.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mittnik, S., & Starobinskaya, I. (2010). Modeling dependencies in operational risk with hybrid Bayesian networks. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 12(3), 379–390.CrossRef Mittnik, S., & Starobinskaya, I. (2010). Modeling dependencies in operational risk with hybrid Bayesian networks. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 12(3), 379–390.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mogale, D. G., Dolgui, A., Kandhway, R., Kumar, S. K., & Tiwari, M. K. (2017). A multi-period inventory transportation model for tactical planning of food grain supply chain. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 110(2017), 379–394.CrossRef Mogale, D. G., Dolgui, A., Kandhway, R., Kumar, S. K., & Tiwari, M. K. (2017). A multi-period inventory transportation model for tactical planning of food grain supply chain. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 110(2017), 379–394.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Monti, S., & Carenini, G. (2000). Dealing with the expert inconsistency in probability elicitation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 12(4), 499–508.CrossRef Monti, S., & Carenini, G. (2000). Dealing with the expert inconsistency in probability elicitation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 12(4), 499–508.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nepal, B., & Yadav, O. P. (2015). Bayesian belief network-based framework for sourcing risk analysis during supplier selection. International Journal of Production Research, 53(20), 6114–6135.CrossRef Nepal, B., & Yadav, O. P. (2015). Bayesian belief network-based framework for sourcing risk analysis during supplier selection. International Journal of Production Research, 53(20), 6114–6135.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pai, R. R., Kallepall, V. R., Caudill, R. J., & Zhou, M. (2003). Methods toward supply chain risk analysis. IEEE International Conference In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2003, 5, 4560–4565. Pai, R. R., Kallepall, V. R., Caudill, R. J., & Zhou, M. (2003). Methods toward supply chain risk analysis. IEEE International Conference In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2003, 5, 4560–4565.
Zurück zum Zitat Spring, M., Hughes, A., Mason, K., & McCaffrey, P. (2017). Creating the competitive edge: A new relationship between operations management and industrial policy. Journal of Operations Management, 49–51(2017), 6–19.CrossRef Spring, M., Hughes, A., Mason, K., & McCaffrey, P. (2017). Creating the competitive edge: A new relationship between operations management and industrial policy. Journal of Operations Management, 49–51(2017), 6–19.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451–488.CrossRef Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451–488.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tang, C., & Tomlin, B. (2008). The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(1), 12–27.CrossRef Tang, C., & Tomlin, B. (2008). The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(1), 12–27.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tang, O., & Musa, S. N. (2011). Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), 25–34.CrossRef Tang, O., & Musa, S. N. (2011). Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), 25–34.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vishwanadham, N., & Samvedi, A. (2013). Supplier selection based on supply chain ecosystem, performance and risk criteria. International Journal of Production Research, 51(21), 6484–9498.CrossRef Vishwanadham, N., & Samvedi, A. (2013). Supplier selection based on supply chain ecosystem, performance and risk criteria. International Journal of Production Research, 51(21), 6484–9498.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wieland, A., & Wallenburg, C. M. (2012). Dealing with supply chain risks: Linking risk management practices and strategies to performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42(10), 887–905.CrossRef Wieland, A., & Wallenburg, C. M. (2012). Dealing with supply chain risks: Linking risk management practices and strategies to performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42(10), 887–905.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, D. Y., Cao, X., Wang, L., & Zeng, Y. (2012). Mitigating the risk of information leakage in a two-level supply chain through optimal supplier selection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(4), 1351–1364.CrossRef Zhang, D. Y., Cao, X., Wang, L., & Zeng, Y. (2012). Mitigating the risk of information leakage in a two-level supply chain through optimal supplier selection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(4), 1351–1364.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Inclusive risk modeling for manufacturing firms: a Bayesian network approach
verfasst von
Yash Daultani
Mohit Goswami
Omkarprasad S. Vaidya
Sushil Kumar
Publikationsdatum
20.11.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing / Ausgabe 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0956-5515
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8145
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-017-1374-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2019

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 8/2019 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.