Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Incremental Computation of Deterministic Extensions for Dynamic Argumentation Frameworks

verfasst von : Sergio Greco, Francesco Parisi

Erschienen in: Logics in Artificial Intelligence

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We address the problem of efficiently recomputing the extensions of abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs) which are updated by adding/deleting arguments or attacks. In particular, after identifying some properties that hold for updates of AFs under several well-known semantics, we focus on the two most popular ‘deterministic’ semantics (namely, grounded and ideal) and present two algorithms for their incremental computation, well-suited to dynamic applications where updates to an initial AF are frequently performed to take into account new available knowledge. We experimentally validated the proposed approach.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Baroni, P., Boella, G., Cerutti, F., Giacomin, M., van der Torre, L.W.N., Villata, S.: On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell. 217, 144–197 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Baroni, P., Boella, G., Cerutti, F., Giacomin, M., van der Torre, L.W.N., Villata, S.: On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell. 217, 144–197 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Baroni, P., Caminada, M., Giacomin, M.: An introduction to argumentation semantics. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 26(4), 365–410 (2011)CrossRef Baroni, P., Caminada, M., Giacomin, M.: An introduction to argumentation semantics. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 26(4), 365–410 (2011)CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Liao, B.: On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. a correction and extension to dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method. Artif. Intell. 212, 104–115 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Liao, B.: On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation semantics. a correction and extension to dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method. Artif. Intell. 212, 104–115 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann, R.: Splitting an argumentation framework. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR), pp. 40–53 (2011) Baumann, R.: Splitting an argumentation framework. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR), pp. 40–53 (2011)
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann, R.: Context-free and context-sensitive kernels: update and deletion equivalence in abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of ECAI, pp. 63–68 (2014) Baumann, R.: Context-free and context-sensitive kernels: update and deletion equivalence in abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of ECAI, pp. 63–68 (2014)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann, R., Brewka, G.: Expanding argumentation frameworks: enforcing and monotonicity results. In: Proceedings of COMMA, pp. 75–86 (2010) Baumann, R., Brewka, G.: Expanding argumentation frameworks: enforcing and monotonicity results. In: Proceedings of COMMA, pp. 75–86 (2010)
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann, R., Brewka, G., Dvorák, W., Woltran, S.: Parameterized splitting: a simple modification-based approach. In: Correct Reasoning - Essays on Logic-Based AI in Honour of Vladimir Lifschitz, pp. 57–71 (2012) Baumann, R., Brewka, G., Dvorák, W., Woltran, S.: Parameterized splitting: a simple modification-based approach. In: Correct Reasoning - Essays on Logic-Based AI in Honour of Vladimir Lifschitz, pp. 57–71 (2012)
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bisquert, P., Cayrol, C., de Saint-Cyr, F.D., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: Characterizing change in abstract argumentation systems. Trends Belief Revision Argum. Dyn. 48, 75–102 (2013)MathSciNetMATH Bisquert, P., Cayrol, C., de Saint-Cyr, F.D., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: Characterizing change in abstract argumentation systems. Trends Belief Revision Argum. Dyn. 48, 75–102 (2013)MathSciNetMATH
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Boella, G., Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: abstraction principles and the grounded extension. In: Proceedings of ECSQARU, pp. 107–118 (2009) Boella, G., Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: abstraction principles and the grounded extension. In: Proceedings of ECSQARU, pp. 107–118 (2009)
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Boella, G., Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: attack refinement and the grounded extension. In: Proceedings of ArgMAS, pp. 150–159 (2009) Boella, G., Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: attack refinement and the grounded extension. In: Proceedings of ArgMAS, pp. 150–159 (2009)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Calautti, M., Greco, S., Trubitsyna, I.: Detecting decidable classes of finitely ground logic programs with function symbols. In: 15th International Symposium on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming, PPDP 2013, Madrid, Spain, 16–18 September 2013, pp. 239–250 (2013) Calautti, M., Greco, S., Trubitsyna, I.: Detecting decidable classes of finitely ground logic programs with function symbols. In: 15th International Symposium on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming, PPDP 2013, Madrid, Spain, 16–18 September 2013, pp. 239–250 (2013)
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Caminada, M.: Semi-stable semantics. In: Proceedings of COMMA, pp. 121–130 (2006) Caminada, M.: Semi-stable semantics. In: Proceedings of COMMA, pp. 121–130 (2006)
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Caminada, M., Sá, S., Alcântara, J., Dvorák, W.: On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 58, 87–111 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Caminada, M., Sá, S., Alcântara, J., Dvorák, W.: On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 58, 87–111 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cayrol, C., de Saint-Cyr, F.D., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: Revision of an argumentation system. In: Proceedings of KR, pp. 124–134 (2008) Cayrol, C., de Saint-Cyr, F.D., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: Revision of an argumentation system. In: Proceedings of KR, pp. 124–134 (2008)
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cayrol, C., de Saint-Cyr, F.D., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 38, 49–84 (2010)MathSciNetMATH Cayrol, C., de Saint-Cyr, F.D., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 38, 49–84 (2010)MathSciNetMATH
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Charwat, G., Dvorák, W., Gaggl, S.A., Wallner, J.P., Woltran, S.: Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation - a survey. Artif. Intell. 220, 28–63 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Charwat, G., Dvorák, W., Gaggl, S.A., Wallner, J.P., Woltran, S.: Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation - a survey. Artif. Intell. 220, 28–63 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321–358 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321–358 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
21.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Two party immediate response disputes: properties and efficiency. Artif. Intell. 149(2), 221–250 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Two party immediate response disputes: properties and efficiency. Artif. Intell. 149(2), 221–250 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunne, P.E., Wooldridge, M.: Complexity of abstract argumentation. In: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 85–104 (2009) Dunne, P.E., Wooldridge, M.: Complexity of abstract argumentation. In: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 85–104 (2009)
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Dvorák, W., Pichler, R., Woltran, S.: Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for argumentation. In: Proceedings of KR (2010) Dvorák, W., Pichler, R., Woltran, S.: Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for argumentation. In: Proceedings of KR (2010)
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dvorák, W., Woltran, S.: Complexity of semi-stable and stage semantics in argumentation frameworks. Inf. Process. Lett. 110(11), 425–430 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Dvorák, W., Woltran, S.: Complexity of semi-stable and stage semantics in argumentation frameworks. Inf. Process. Lett. 110(11), 425–430 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Eiter, T., Strass, H., Truszczyński, M., Woltran, S. (eds.): Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9060. Springer, Heidelberg (2015) Eiter, T., Strass, H., Truszczyński, M., Woltran, S. (eds.): Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9060. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Falappa, M.A., Garcia, A.J., Kern-Isberner, G., Simari, G.R.: On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 26(1), 35–43 (2011)CrossRef Falappa, M.A., Garcia, A.J., Kern-Isberner, G., Simari, G.R.: On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 26(1), 35–43 (2011)CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S., Parisi, F.: Efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of SUM, pp. 106–119 (2013) Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S., Parisi, F.: Efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of SUM, pp. 106–119 (2013)
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S., Parisi, F.: On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of IJCAI, pp. 898–904 (2013) Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S., Parisi, F.: On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of IJCAI, pp. 898–904 (2013)
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S., Parisi, F.: On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 16(3), 22 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S., Parisi, F.: On the complexity of probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 16(3), 22 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S., Parisi, F.: On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 69, 106–132 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S., Parisi, F.: On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 69, 106–132 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S., Parisi, F., Pietramala, A.: PARTY: a mobile system for efficiently assessing the probability of extensions in a debate. In: Proceedings of DEXA, pp. 220–235 (2015) Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S., Parisi, F., Pietramala, A.: PARTY: a mobile system for efficiently assessing the probability of extensions in a debate. In: Proceedings of DEXA, pp. 220–235 (2015)
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S., Molinaro, C., Trubitsyna, I.: Logic programming with function symbols: checking termination of bottom-up evaluation through program adornments. TPLP 13(4–5), 737–752 (2013)MathSciNetMATH Greco, S., Molinaro, C., Trubitsyna, I.: Logic programming with function symbols: checking termination of bottom-up evaluation through program adornments. TPLP 13(4–5), 737–752 (2013)MathSciNetMATH
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S., Molinaro, C., Trubitsyna, I., Zumpano, E.: NP datalog: a logic language for expressing search and optimization problems. TPLP 10(2), 125–166 (2010)MathSciNetMATH Greco, S., Molinaro, C., Trubitsyna, I., Zumpano, E.: NP datalog: a logic language for expressing search and optimization problems. TPLP 10(2), 125–166 (2010)MathSciNetMATH
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Greco, S., Parisi, F.: Efficient computation of deterministic extensions for dynamic abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of ECAI, pp. 1668–1669 (2016) Greco, S., Parisi, F.: Efficient computation of deterministic extensions for dynamic abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of ECAI, pp. 1668–1669 (2016)
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Liao, B.S., Jin, L., Koons, R.C.: Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method. Artif. Intell. 175(11), 1790–1814 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Liao, B.S., Jin, L., Koons, R.C.: Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method. Artif. Intell. 175(11), 1790–1814 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Lifschitz, V., Turner, H.: Splitting a logic program. In: Proceedings of ICLP, pp. 23–37 (1994) Lifschitz, V., Turner, H.: Splitting a logic program. In: Proceedings of ICLP, pp. 23–37 (1994)
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Modgil, S., Prakken, H.: Revisiting preferences and argumentation. In: Proceedings of IJCAI, pp. 1021–1026 (2011) Modgil, S., Prakken, H.: Revisiting preferences and argumentation. In: Proceedings of IJCAI, pp. 1021–1026 (2011)
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Oikarinen, E., Woltran, S.: Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell. 175(14–15), 1985–2009 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Oikarinen, E., Woltran, S.: Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell. 175(14–15), 1985–2009 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
41.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahwan, I., Simari, G.R.: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, New York (2009) Rahwan, I., Simari, G.R.: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, New York (2009)
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Thimm, M.: Tweety: a comprehensive collection of java libraries for logical aspects of artificial intelligence and knowledge representation. In: Proceedings of KR (2014) Thimm, M.: Tweety: a comprehensive collection of java libraries for logical aspects of artificial intelligence and knowledge representation. In: Proceedings of KR (2014)
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Vreeswijk, G., Prakken, H.: Credulous and sceptical argument games for preferred semantics. In: Proceedings of JELIA, pp. 239–253 (2000) Vreeswijk, G., Prakken, H.: Credulous and sceptical argument games for preferred semantics. In: Proceedings of JELIA, pp. 239–253 (2000)
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, Y., Cayrol, C.: The matrix approach for abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of International TAFA Workshop, pp. 243–259 (2015) Xu, Y., Cayrol, C.: The matrix approach for abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of International TAFA Workshop, pp. 243–259 (2015)
Metadaten
Titel
Incremental Computation of Deterministic Extensions for Dynamic Argumentation Frameworks
verfasst von
Sergio Greco
Francesco Parisi
Copyright-Jahr
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48758-8_19

Premium Partner