Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Revising Possibilistic Knowledge Bases via Compatibility Degrees

verfasst von : Yifan Jin, Kewen Wang, Zhe Wang, Zhiqiang Zhuang

Erschienen in: Logics in Artificial Intelligence

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Possibilistic logic is a weighted logic for dealing with incomplete and uncertain information by assigning weights to propositional formulas. A possibilistic knowledge base (KB) is a finite set of such formulas. The problem of revising a possibilistic KB by possibilistic formula is not new. However, existing approaches are limited in two ways. Firstly, they suffer from the so-called drowning effect. Secondly, they handle certain and uncertain formulas separately and most only handle certain inputs. In this paper, we propose a unified approach that caters for revision by both certain and uncertain inputs and relieves the drowning effect. The approach is based on a refined inconsistency degree function called compatibility degree which provides a unifying framework (called cd-revision) for defining specific revision operators for possibilistic KBs. Our definition leads to an algorithm for computing the result of the proposed revision. The revision operators defined in cd-revision possess some desirable properties including those from classic belief revision and some others that are specific to possibilistic revision. We also show that several major revision operators for possibilistic, stratified and prioritised KBs can be embedded in cd-revision.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Alchourrón, C., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. J. Symb. Log. 50(2), 510–530 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Alchourrón, C., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. J. Symb. Log. 50(2), 510–530 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bauters, K., Schockaert, S., Cock, M., Vermeir, D.: Possible and necessary answer sets of possibilistic answer set programs. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI, pp. 836–843 (2012) Bauters, K., Schockaert, S., Cock, M., Vermeir, D.: Possible and necessary answer sets of possibilistic answer set programs. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI, pp. 836–843 (2012)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bauters, K., Schockaert, S., Cock, M., Vermeir, D.: Semantics for possibilistic answer set programs: uncertain rules versus rules with uncertain conclusions. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 55(2), 739–761 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Bauters, K., Schockaert, S., Cock, M., Vermeir, D.: Semantics for possibilistic answer set programs: uncertain rules versus rules with uncertain conclusions. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 55(2), 739–761 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Benferhat, S., Cayrol, C., Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Inconsistency management and prioritized syntax-based entailment. IJCAI 93, 640–645 (1993) Benferhat, S., Cayrol, C., Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Inconsistency management and prioritized syntax-based entailment. IJCAI 93, 640–645 (1993)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Benferhat, S., da Costa Pereira, C., Tettamanzi, A.: Hybrid possibilistic conditioning for revision under weighted inputs. In: 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 151–156 (2012) Benferhat, S., da Costa Pereira, C., Tettamanzi, A.: Hybrid possibilistic conditioning for revision under weighted inputs. In: 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 151–156 (2012)
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Benferhat, S., da Costa Pereira, C., Tettamanzi, A.: Syntactic computation of hybrid possibilistic conditioning under uncertain inputs. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 739–745 (2013) Benferhat, S., da Costa Pereira, C., Tettamanzi, A.: Syntactic computation of hybrid possibilistic conditioning under uncertain inputs. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 739–745 (2013)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H., Williams, M.: A practical approach to revising prioritized knowledge bases. Stud. Logica 70(1), 105–130 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H., Williams, M.: A practical approach to revising prioritized knowledge bases. Stud. Logica 70(1), 105–130 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H., Williams, M.: A framework for iterated belief revision using possibilistic counterparts to jeffrey’s rule. Fundamenta Informaticae 99(2), 147 (2010)MathSciNetMATH Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H., Williams, M.: A framework for iterated belief revision using possibilistic counterparts to jeffrey’s rule. Fundamenta Informaticae 99(2), 147 (2010)MathSciNetMATH
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Brewka, G.: Preferred subtheories: an extended logical framework for default reasoning. IJCAI 89, 1043–1048 (1989)MATH Brewka, G.: Preferred subtheories: an extended logical framework for default reasoning. IJCAI 89, 1043–1048 (1989)MATH
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Possibilistic logic (1994) Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Possibilistic logic (1994)
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Possibilistic logic. In: Gabbay, D.M., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, vol. 3, pp. 439–513. Oxford University Press, New York (1997) Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Possibilistic logic. In: Gabbay, D.M., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, vol. 3, pp. 439–513. Oxford University Press, New York (1997)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubois, D., Prade, H.: A synthetic view of belief revision with uncertain inputs in the framework of possibility theory. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 17, 295–324 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Dubois, D., Prade, H.: A synthetic view of belief revision with uncertain inputs in the framework of possibility theory. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 17, 295–324 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Generalized Possibilistic Logic, pp. 428–432. Springer, Berlin (2011) Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Generalized Possibilistic Logic, pp. 428–432. Springer, Berlin (2011)
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma, J., Liu, W.: A framework for managing uncertain inputs: an axiomization of rewarding. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 52(7), 917–934 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Ma, J., Liu, W.: A framework for managing uncertain inputs: an axiomization of rewarding. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 52(7), 917–934 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nebel, B.: Belief revision and default reasoning: syntax-based approaches. In: KR, pp. 417–428 (1991) Nebel, B.: Belief revision and default reasoning: syntax-based approaches. In: KR, pp. 417–428 (1991)
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nebel, B.: How hard is it to revise a belief base? In: Dubois, D., Prade, H. (eds.) Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems. Springer, Netherlands (1998) Nebel, B.: How hard is it to revise a belief base? In: Dubois, D., Prade, H. (eds.) Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems. Springer, Netherlands (1998)
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Qi, G.: A semantic approach for iterated revision in possibilistic logic. In: Proceedings of the 23rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 523–528 (2008) Qi, G.: A semantic approach for iterated revision in possibilistic logic. In: Proceedings of the 23rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 523–528 (2008)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Qi, G., Wang, K.: Conflict-based belief revision operators in possibilistic logic. In: AAAI (2012) Qi, G., Wang, K.: Conflict-based belief revision operators in possibilistic logic. In: AAAI (2012)
Metadaten
Titel
Revising Possibilistic Knowledge Bases via Compatibility Degrees
verfasst von
Yifan Jin
Kewen Wang
Zhe Wang
Zhiqiang Zhuang
Copyright-Jahr
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48758-8_20

Premium Partner