nach oben

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

Erschienen in:

17.04.2021 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Influence of hydrological runoff and catchment characteristics on accumulation floatable litter load in gross pollutant trap (GPT)

verfasst von: Nur Khaliesah Abdul Malik, Latifah Abd Manaf, Nor Rohaizah Jamil, Mohd Hafiz Rosli, Zulfa Hanan Ash’aari, Mohamad Al-Ekhwan Othman

Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The accumulation of floatable litter load captured in gross pollutant trap (GPT) due to the hydrological runoff has become challenging due to rapid development and alteration of land use changes. The application of soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) method has been widely used to estimate the direct runoff from the given rainfall especially when there is no runoff measured within the catchment. The results found that there was enormous variation on floatable litter load between different months and individual GPT. There was a high accumulation of floatable litter load on August 2015 with 495 kg/month and at K17 with 510 kg. Both of these conditions was significantly influenced by rainfall depth, hydrological parameters such as initial abstraction, potential maximum retention, and average weighted curve number (CN_aw) values from different types of land use within their respective catchment area for individual GPT. Thus, the outcomes from this study can be very useful and beneficial for related government agencies and various stakeholders in ameliorating this critical and challenging environmental issue in terms of operation and management; technical operation; the selection of GPT prior to installation in other areas including the design, costs and maintenance.

Vorheriger Artikel Effect of banana, pineapple and coir fly ash filled with hybrid fiber epoxy based composites for mechanical and morphological study

Nächster Artikel Life cycle assessment and energy intensity of CFRP recycling using supercritical N-butanol

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Armitage N, Rooseboom A, Nel C, Townshend P (1998) The Removal of Urban Litter from Stormwater Conduits and Streams. WRC Report No. TT 95/98, Pretoria, South Africa.

Armitage N (2003) The removal of urban solid waste from stormwater drains. International Workshop on Global Developments in Urban Drainage Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, Mumbai India., 28. http://unix.eng.ua.edu/~rpitt/Class/Internationalurbanwatersystems/module3/MicrosoftWord-M3. The removal of urban solid waste from stormwater drains.pdf

Armitage N (2007) The reduction of urban litter in the stormwater drains of South Africa. Urban Water J 4(3):151–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620701464117CrossRef

González-Fernández D, Hanke G (2018) Floating Macro Litter in European Rivers—Top Items. Publications Office of the European Union, EUR 29383(December). https://doi.org/10.2760/316058

Marais M, Armitage N (2004) The measurement and reduction of urban litter entering stormwater drainage systems: paper 2—strategies for reducing the litter in the stormwater drainage systems. Water SA 30(4):483–492. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v30i4.5100CrossRef

CSIRO (2006) Urban stormwater: best practice environmental management guidelines. CSIRO, Canberra

Allison RA, Chiew FHS, McMahon TA (1997) Stormwater gross pollutants: industry report, Australia, December, pp. 1–26

Alam MZ, Anwar AHMF, Sarker DC, Heitz A, Rothleitner C (2017) Characterising stormwater gross pollutants captured in catch basin inserts. Sci Total Environ 586(May):76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.210CrossRef

Ab Ghani A, Azamathulla HM, Lau TL, Ravikanth CH, Zakaria NA, Leow CS, Yusof MAM (2011) Flow pattern and hydraulic performance of the REDAC gross pollutant trap. Flow Meas Instrum 22(3):215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2011.02.004CrossRef

10.

Madhani JT, Brown RJ (2015) The capture and retention evaluation of a stormwater gross pollutant trap design. Ecol Eng 74(January):56–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.074CrossRef

11.

Ngien S, Tan J, Akbari A, Ahmad S (2015) Physical modelling of floating debris boom. In: The 3rd international conference on water resources (ICWR-2015), vol 24. Langkawi, Malaysia, p 25

12.

Madhani JT (2010) The hydrodynamic and capture/retention performance of a gross pollutant trap. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane

13.

Madhani JT, Brown RJ (2011) A literature review on research methodologies of gross pollutant traps. In: First international postgraduate conference on engineering, designing and developing the built environment for sustainable Wellbeing

14.

Fitzgerald B, Bird WS (2011) Gross pollutant traps as a stormwater management practice, (vol 2011/006)

15.

McCormick AR, Hoellein TJ (2016) Anthropogenic litter is abundant, diverse, and mobile in urban rivers: insights from cross-ecosystem analyses using ecosystem and community ecology tools. Limnol Oceanogr 61(5):1718–1734. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10328CrossRef

16.

Franz B (2011) Freitas MAV (2012) Generation and impacts of floating litter on urban canals and rivers: Rio de Janeiro megacity case study. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 167:321–332. https://doi.org/10.2495/ST110291CrossRef

17.

Williams AT, Simmons SL (1997) Movement patterns of riverine litter. Water Air Soil Pollut 98(1–2):119–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02128653CrossRef

18.

Sidek L, Basri H, Lee LK, Foo KY (2016) The performance of gross pollutant trap for water quality preservation: a real practical application at the Klang Valley, Malaysia. Desalin Water Treat 57(52):24733–24741. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.1145599CrossRef

19.

Williams AT, Simmons SL (1996) The degradation of plastic litter in rivers: implications for beaches. J Coast Conserv 2(1):63–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02743038CrossRef

20.

Rech S, Macaya-Caquilpán V, Pantoja JF, Rivadeneira MM, Jofre Madariaga D, Thiel M (2014) Rivers as a source of marine litter—a study from the SE Pacific. Mar Pollut Bull 82(1–2):66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.03.019CrossRef

21.

Armitage N, Rooseboom A (2000) The removal of urban litter from stormwater conduits and streams: paper 2—model studies of potential trapping structures. Water SA 26(2):189–194

22.

Salles A, Wolff DB, Silveira GL (2012) Solid wastes drained in an urban river sub-basin. Urban Water J 9(1):21–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2011.633612CrossRef

23.

Noor MSFM, Sidek LM, Basri H, Zahari NM, Said NFM, Roseli ZA, Dom NM (2016) Evaluation of gross pollutant wet load in Sungai Sering, Malaysia. IOP conference series: earth and environmental science 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/32/1/012066

24.

Munir SNU, Sidek LM, Haron SH, Said NFM, Basri H, Ahmad R, Dom NM, Ismail MA (2018) Optimizing of gross pollutant trap to improve the maintenance at Sungai Bunus Malaysia. In: AIP conference proceedings, 2030. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5066845

25.

Ball J, Babister M, Nathan R, Weeks W, Weinmann E, Retallick MTI (2019) A guide to Australian rainfall and runoff. Engineers Australia (EA).

26.

Masoud M (2015) Rainfall-runoff modeling of ungauged Wadis in arid environments (case study Wadi Rabigh—Saudi Arabia). Arab J Geosci 8(5):2587–2606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1404-0CrossRef

27.

Ahn J, Cho W, Kim T, Shin H, Heo JH (2014) Flood frequency analysis for the annual peak flows simulated by an event-based rainfall-runoff model in an urban drainage basin. Water (Switzerland) 6(12):3841–3863. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6123841CrossRef

28.

Jarihani B, Sidle RC, Bartley R, Roth CH, Wilkinson SN (2017) Characterisation of hydrological response to rainfall at multi spatio-temporal scales in savannas of semi-arid Australia. Water (Switzerland) 9(7):7–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9070540CrossRef

29.

Jallé CL, Désille D, Burkhardt G (2013) Urban stormwater management in developing countries. Novatech 2013:1–10

30.

Essery CI (1994) Gross pollutant water quality-Its measurement and the performance of remediation technologies/management practices‖. Stormwater Industry Association, Best Stormwater Management Practise, New South Wales

31.

Rosli MH (2018) Development of an integrated spatial distributed travel time method using GIS to model rainfall runoff in Bentong catchment in Peninsular Malaysia. (Doctoral Dissertation). Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia

32.

Roy S, Mistri B (2013) Estimation of peak flood discharge for an ungauged river: a case study of the Kunur River, West Bengal. Geogr J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/214140CrossRef

33.

Nayak TR, Jaiswal RK (2003) Rainfall-runoff modeling using satellite data and GIS for Bebas river in Madhya Pradesh. 1E(I) J 84:47–50

34.

United States Department of Agriculture (1986) Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Technical Release 55 (TR-55). Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1044171.pdf

35.

Ibrahim-Bathis K, Ahmed SA (2016) Rainfall-runoff modelling of Doddahalla watershed—an application of HEC-HMS and SCN-CN in ungauged agricultural watershed. Arab J Geosci 9(3):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2228-2CrossRef

36.

Blöschl G (2005) Rainfall-runoff modeling of ungauged catchments. Encycl Hydrol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470848944.hsa140CrossRef

37.

Satheeshkumar S, Venkateswaran S, Kannan R (2017) Rainfall–runoff estimation using SCS–CN and GIS approach in the Pappiredipatti watershed of the Vaniyar sub basin, South India. Model Earth Syst Environ 3(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0301-4CrossRef

38.

Zahari NM, Sidek LM, Basri H, Md Said NF, Md Noor MSF, Jajarmizadeh M, Zainal Abidin MR, Mohd Dom N (2016) Wet load study of gross Pollutant Traps; Kemensah River, Malaysia. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science vol 32, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/32/1/012015

39.

Allison RA, Walker TA, Chiew FHS, Neill ICO, Mcmahon TA, Angus R (1998) From roads to rivers gross pollutant removal from urban waterways. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Report 98/6, May

40.

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2007) Guideline for monitoring stormwater gross pollutants. ASCE, Reston

41.

Faram MG, Lecornu P, Andoh RYG (2000) The “Mk2” downstream defender TM for the removal of sediments and oils from urban runoff. In WaterTECH, April 9–13, 2000, Sydney, Australia

42.

Fletcher T, Duncan H, Poelsma P, Lloyd S (2004) Stormwater flow and quality, and the effectiveness of non-proprietary stormwater treatment measures: a review and gap analysis. Technical report, December, pp 1–171

43.

Department of Planning L (2010) Chapter 9 gross pollutant traps. Water Sensitive Urban Design Technical Manual for Greater Adelaide Region, (December), pp 1–63

44.

Osei K, Faram MG, Iwugo KO (2007) Physical and chemical characterization of sediments captured by flow-through stormwater interceptors. In: 6th North American Surface Water Quality Conference and Exposition. August 20–23, 2007, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

45.

Soulis KX, Valiantzas JD (2012) SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds-the two-CN system approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(3):1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1001-2012CrossRef

46.

Fábrega DJR, Pinzón R, Vallester E, Vega D (2012) Rainfall—CN (Curve Number) relationships in a tropical rainforest microbasin within the Panamá Canal watershed. Rev Fac Ing Univ Antioquia 62:170–176

47.

Li D, Wan J, Ma Y, Wang Y, Huang M, Chen Y (2015) Stormwater runoff pollutant loading distributions and their correlation with rainfall and catchment characteristics in a rapidly industrialized city. PLoS ONE 10(3):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118776CrossRef

48.

Goonetilleke A, Thomas E, Ginn S, Gilbert D (2005) Understanding the role of land use in urban stormwater quality management. J Environ Manage 74(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.08.006CrossRef

49.

Halwatura D, Najim MMM (2013) Application of the HEC-HMS model for runoff simulation in a tropical catchment. Environ Model Softw 46:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.006CrossRef

50.

He Y, Lin K, Chen X (2013) Effect of land use and climate change on runoff in the Dongjiang basin of south China. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/471429CrossRef

51.

Baltas EA, Dervos NA, Mimikou MA (2007) Technical note: determination of the SCS initial abstraction ratio in an experimental watershed in Greece. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11(6):1825–1829. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1825-2007CrossRef

Titel: Influence of hydrological runoff and catchment characteristics on accumulation floatable litter load in gross pollutant trap (GPT)
verfasst von: Nur Khaliesah Abdul Malik
Latifah Abd Manaf
Nor Rohaizah Jamil
Mohd Hafiz Rosli
Zulfa Hanan Ash’aari
Mohamad Al-Ekhwan Othman
Publikationsdatum: 17.04.2021
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1438-4957
Elektronische ISSN: 1611-8227
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01205-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Development and performance verification of quality improvement equipment for recycled fine aggregate and soil

A lab fermenter level study on anaerobic hydrogen fermentation using potato peel waste: effect of pH, temperature, and substrate pre-treatment

Ammonium removal from landfill fresh leachate using zeolite as adsorbent

Dry scrubbing of municipal solid waste incineration flue gas using porous sodium carbonate produced via vacuum thermal treatment of sodium bicarbonate

Copper, zinc, and nickel recovery from printed circuit boards using an ammonia–ammonium sulphate system

Life cycle assessment and energy intensity of CFRP recycling using supercritical N-butanol