Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Materials Science
Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Science 3/2017

23.09.2016 | Review

Influence of surface texturing on scratch/mar visibility for polymeric materials: a review

verfasst von: C. J. Barr, L. Wang, J. K. Coffey, F. Daver

Erschienen in: Journal of Materials Science | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Surface texturing has long played a vital role in determining both the look and feel of modern consumer goods. Recently, texture patterns have also shown to be an effective method for enhancing the scratch resistance of polymeric surfaces, which are more sensitive to scratch damage due to their relatively low strengths and stiffness. This paper examines the emerging studies of scratch-resistant surface textures and analyses the key principles and challenges faced by texture design and the assessment of scratch resistance. The analysis of scratch resistance is broken into three key sections: (1) the influence of the base material on deformation characteristics, (2) the influence of surface texturing on scratch damage and visibility, and (3) the influence of human vision and the capacity of textures to obscure scratch damage. The complex interactions between these three facets highlight the wealth of opportunities for further study in this area, and the need for improved methods for quantifying scratch resistance for these materials. This paper also presents experimental results to demonstrate the variation in scratch damage and texture effects.
Nächster Artikel Theoretical study of YD2-o-C8-based derivatives as promising sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Barnes C, Childs T, Henson B, Southee C (2004) Surface finish and touch—a case study in a new human factors tribology. Wear 257(7):740–750CrossRef
2.
Baar T, Samadzadegan S, Urban P, Ortiz Segovia MV (2016) Interrelation between gloss and texture perception of 2.5 D-printed surfaces. Electron Imaging 9:1–6
3.
Ho Y-X, Landy MS, Maloney LT (2008) Conjoint measurement of gloss and surface texture. Psychol Sci 19(2):196–204CrossRef
4.
He XD, Torrance KE, Sillion FX, Greenberg DP (1991) A comprehensive physical model for light reflection. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput Graph 25(4):175–186CrossRef
5.
Briscoe BJ, Sinha SK (2003) Scratch resistance and localised damage characteristics of polymer surfaces—a review. Materialwiss Werkstofftech 34(10–11):989–1002CrossRef
6.
Xiang C, Sue HJ, Chu J, Coleman B (2001) Scratch behavior and material property relationship in polymers. J Polym Sci Part B 39(1):47–59CrossRef
7.
Jiang H, Browning R, Sue H-J (2009) Understanding of scratch-induced damage mechanisms in polymers. Polymer 50(16):4056–4065CrossRef
8.
Briscoe BJ, Pelillo E, Sinha SK (1996) Scratch hardness and deformation maps for polycarbonate and polyethylene. Polym Eng Sci 36(24):2996–3005CrossRef
9.
Misra R, Hadal R, Duncan S (2004) Surface damage behavior during scratch deformation of mineral reinforced polymer composites. Acta Mater 52(14):4363–4376CrossRef
10.
11.
Myshkin N, Petrokovets M, Kovalev A (2006) Tribology of polymers: adhesion, friction, wear, and mass-transfer. Tribol Int 38(11):910–921
12.
Dasari A, Yu Z-Z, Mai Y-W (2009) Fundamental aspects and recent progress on wear/scratch damage in polymer nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng Rep 63(2):31–80CrossRef
13.
Felder E, Bucaille J-L (2006) Mechanical analysis of the scratching of metals and polymers with conical indenters at moderate and large strains. Tribol Int 39(2):70–87CrossRef
14.
Browning R, Hossain MM, Li J, Jones S, Sue H-J (2011) Contrast-based evaluation of mar resistance of thermoplastic olefins. Tribol Int 44(9):1024–1031CrossRef
15.
Hamdi M, Sue H-J (2015) Effect of color, gloss, and surface texture perception on scratch and mar visibility in polymers. Mater Des 83:528–535
16.
Jiang H, Browning R, Fincher J, Gasbarro A, Jones S, Sue H-J (2008) Influence of surface roughness and contact load on friction coefficient and scratch behavior of thermoplastic olefins. Appl Surf Sci 254(15):4494–4499CrossRef
17.
Chivatanasoontorn V, Tsukise S, Kotaki M (2012) Surface texture effect on scratch behavior of injection molded plastics. Polym Eng Sci 52(9):1862–1867CrossRef
18.
Myint SM, Minn M, Yaping R, Satyanarayana N, Sinha SK, Bhatia CS (2013) Friction and wear durability studies on the 3D negative fingerprint and honeycomb textured SU-8 surfaces. Tribol Int 60:187–197CrossRef
19.
He B, Chen W, Wang QJ (2008) Surface texture effect on friction of a microtextured poly (dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS). Tribol Lett 31(3):187–197CrossRef
20.
Brörmann K, Barel I, Urbakh M, Bennewitz R (2013) Friction on a microstructured elastomer surface. Tribol Lett 50(1):3–15CrossRef
21.
22.
Jiang H, Browning RL, Hossain MM, Sue H-J, Fujiwara M (2010) Quantitative evaluation of scratch visibility resistance of polymers. Appl Surf Sci 256(21):6324–6329CrossRef
23.
Liu P, Browning RL, Sue H-J, Li J, Jones S (2011) Quantitative scratch visibility assessment of polymers based on Erichsen and ASTM/ISO scratch testing methodologies. Polym Test 30(6):633–640CrossRef
24.
Browning RL, Jiang H, Moyse A, Sue H-J, Iseki Y, Ohtani K, Ijichi Y (2008) Scratch behavior of soft thermoplastic olefins: effects of ethylene content and testing rate. J Mater Sci 43(4):1357–1365. doi:10.​1007/​s10853-007-2283-5 CrossRef
25.
Yu C, Yu H, Liu G, Chen W, He B, Wang QJ (2014) Understanding topographic dependence of friction with micro-and nano-grooved surfaces. Tribol Lett 53(1):145–156CrossRef
26.
Lin L, Blackman G, Matheson R (2000) A new approach to characterize scratch and mar resistance of automotive coatings. Prog Org Coat 40(1):85–91CrossRef
27.
Zhang S, Li J (2003) Slip process of stick–slip motion in the scratching of a polymer. Mater Sci Eng A 344(1):182–189CrossRef
28.
29.
Gauthier C, Schirrer R (2000) Time and temperature dependence of the scratch properties of poly (methylmethacrylate) surfaces. J Mater Sci 35(9):2121–2130. doi:10.​1039/​C6TA06746H CrossRef
30.
Sangermano M, Messori M (2010) Scratch resistance enhancement of polymer coatings. Macromol Mater Eng 295(7):603–612CrossRef
31.
Misra R, Nathani H, Dasari A, Wanjale S, Jog J (2004) The determining role of clay particles on mechanically induced surface damage and associated stress whitening in polybutene–clay nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng A 386(1):175–185CrossRef
32.
Thridandapani R, Mudaliar A, Yuan Q, Misra R (2006) Near surface deformation associated with the scratch in polypropylene–clay nanocomposite: a microscopic study. Mater Sci Eng A 418(1):292–302CrossRef
33.
34.
Bertrand-Lambotte P, Loubet J, Verpy C, Pavan S (2001) Nano-indentation, scratching and atomic force microscopy for evaluating the mar resistance of automotive clearcoats: study of the ductile scratches. Thin Solid Films 398:306–312CrossRef
35.
36.
Hamilton GM (1983) Explicit equations for the stresses beneath a sliding spherical contact. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C 197(1):53–59CrossRef
37.
Browning R, Lim GT, Moyse A, Sun L, Hung-Jue S (2006) Effects of slip agent and talc surface-treatment on the scratch behavior of thermoplastic olefins. Polym Eng Sci 46(5):601CrossRef
38.
Gauthier C, Durier A-L, Fond C, Schirrer R (2006) Scratching of a coated polymer and mechanical analysis of a scratch resistance solution. Tribol Int 39(2):88–98CrossRef
39.
Ozaki S, Inanobe C, Nakano K (2014) Finite element analysis of precursors to macroscopic stick–slip motion in elastic materials: analysis of friction test as a boundary value problem. Tribol Lett 55(1):151–163CrossRef
40.
Briscoe B (1981) Wear of polymers: an essay on fundamental aspects. Tribol Int 14(4):231–243CrossRef
41.
42.
43.
Jardret V, Morel P (2003) Viscoelastic effects on the scratch resistance of polymers: relationship between mechanical properties and scratch properties at various temperatures. Prog Org Coat 48(2–4):322–331CrossRef
44.
Zhang J, Jiang H, Jiang C, Cheng Q, Kang G (2016) In-situ observation of temperature rise during scratch testing of poly (methylmethacrylate) and polycarbonate. Tribol Int 95:1–4CrossRef
45.
Sung L-P, Drzal PL, VanLandingham MR, Wu TY, Chang S-H (2005) Metrology for characterizing scratch resistance of polymer coatings. J Coat Technol Res 2(8):583–589CrossRef
46.
Kambour R (1964) Structure and properties of crazes in polycarbonate and other glassy polymers. Polymer 5:143–155CrossRef
47.
Dasari A, Rohrmann J, Misra RDK (2003) Surface microstructural modification and fracture behavior of tensile deformed polypropylene with different percentage crystallinity. Mater Sci Eng A 360(1–2):237–248CrossRef
48.
49.
Nathani H, Dasari A, Misra R (2004) On the reduced susceptibility to stress whitening behavior of melt intercalated polybutene–clay nanocomposites during tensile straining. Acta Mater 52(11):3217–3227CrossRef
50.
Hadal R, Yuan Q, Jog J, Misra R (2006) On stress whitening during surface deformation in clay-containing polymer nanocomposites: a microstructural approach. Mater Sci Eng A 418(1):268–281CrossRef
51.
52.
Rozanski A, Galeski A (2011) Controlling cavitation of semicrystalline polymers during tensile drawing. Macromolecules 44(18):7273–7287CrossRef
53.
Chu J, Rumao L, Coleman B (1998) Scratch and mar resistance of filled polypropylene materials. Polym Eng Sci 38(11):1906–1914CrossRef
54.
Fu S-Y, Feng X-Q, Lauke B, Mai Y-W (2008) Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. Compos B Eng 39(6):933–961CrossRef
55.
56.
Jiang L, Zhang J, Wolcott MP (2007) Comparison of polylactide/nano-sized calcium carbonate and polylactide/montmorillonite composites: reinforcing effects and toughening mechanisms. Polymer 48(26):7632–7644CrossRef
57.
Liu H-Y, Wang G-T, Mai Y-W, Zeng Y (2011) On fracture toughness of nano-particle modified epoxy. Composites B 42(8):2170–2175CrossRef
58.
59.
Karpenko YA, Akay A (2001) A numerical model of friction between rough surfaces. Tribol Int 34(8):531–545CrossRef
60.
Ford I (1993) Roughness effect on friction for multi-asperity contact between surfaces. J Phys D Appl Phys 26(12):2219CrossRef
61.
Varenberg M, Gorb SN (2009) Hexagonal surface micropattern for dry and wet friction. Adv Mater 21(4):483–486CrossRef
62.
Kligerman Y, Varenberg M (2014) Elimination of stick-slip motion in sliding of split or rough surface. Tribol Lett 53(2):395–399CrossRef
63.
Matsuda K, Hashimoto D, Nakamura K (2016) Real contact area and friction property of rubber with two-dimensional regular wavy surface. Tribol Int 93:523–529CrossRef
64.
Xue L, Iturri J, Kappl M, Butt H-J, del Campo A (2014) Bioinspired orientation-dependent friction. Langmuir 30(37):11175–11182CrossRef
65.
Landy MS, Graham N (2004) Visual perception of texture. In: Chalupa LM, Werner JS (eds) The visual neurosciences. MIT, Cambridge, pp 1106–1118
66.
Bhushan N, Rao AR, Lohse GL (1997) The texture lexicon: understanding the categorization of visual texture terms and their relationship to texture images. Cogn Sci 21(2):219–246CrossRef
67.
Bergen JR, Landy MS (1991) Computational modeling of visual texture segregation. Comput Models Visual Process 1:253–271
68.
Cremers D, Rousson M, Deriche R (2007) A review of statistical approaches to level set segmentation: integrating color, texture, motion and shape. Int J Comput Vision 72(2):195–215CrossRef
69.
Arino I, Kleist U, Rigdahl M (2005) Effect of gloss and texture on the color of injection-molded pigmented plastics. Polym Eng Sci 45(5):733–744CrossRef
70.
Arino I, Kleist U, Mattsson L, Rigdahl M (2005) On the relation between surface texture and gloss of injection-molded pigmented plastics. Polym Eng Sci 45(10):1343–1356CrossRef
71.
Alexander-Katz R, Barrera R (1998) Surface correlation effects on gloss. J Polym Sci Part B 36(8):1321–1334CrossRef
72.
Wirgin A (1983) Scattering from sinusoidal gratings: an evaluation of the Kirchhoff approximation. JOSA 73(8):1028–1041CrossRef
73.
Julesz B (1981) Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature 290(5802):91–97CrossRef
74.
Beck J (1983) Textural segmentation, second-order statistics, and textural elements. Biol Cybern 48(2):125–130CrossRef
75.
Treisman AM, Gelade G (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol 12(1):97–136CrossRef
76.
Field DJ, Hayes A, Hess RF (1993) Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local “association field”. Vision Res 33(2):173–193CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Influence of surface texturing on scratch/mar visibility for polymeric materials: a review
verfasst von
C. J. Barr
L. Wang
J. K. Coffey
F. Daver
Publikationsdatum
23.09.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Materials Science / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0022-2461
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-4803
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0423-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Journal of Materials Science 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

CSLM study on the interaction of Nd2O3 with CaCl2 and CaF2–LiF molten melts

Original Paper

Design of Cu–Ce co-doped TiO2 for improved photocatalysis

Original Paper

Employing Al buffer layer with Al droplets-distributed surface to obtain high-quality and stress-free GaN epitaxial films on Si substrates

Original Paper

Preparation of Au nanoparticle-decorated ZnO/NiO heterostructure via nonsolvent method for high-performance photocatalysis

Original Paper

Hydrothermal carbonization of forestry residues: influence of reaction temperature on holocellulose-derived hydrochar properties

Original Paper

Analysis of phase diagram and diffusion coefficient for modeling of microsegregation

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise