Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

13. Innovationsorientierte Personalauswahl

verfasst von : Kristina Potočnik, Neil Anderson

Erschienen in: Personalauswahl

Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

In Zeiten turbulenter, durch die globale Rezession ernsthaft angeschlagener Märkte ist es für Organisationen bedeutsam, zur Erlangung bzw. Aufrechterhaltung ihrer Wettbewerbsfähigkeit kontinuierlich zu innovieren. Ein Weg, organisationale Innovation zu steigern, besteht in der Rekrutierung und Auswahl innovativer Talente. Gemeint sind organisationsexterne Personen, die in ihren neuen Arbeitsrollen und Arbeitskontexten zukünftig kreativ und innovativ sein werden. Dieses Kapitel beschreibt und integriert vorliegende Forschungsergebnisse zu unterschiedlichen Variablen, die individuelle, innovative Leistung am Arbeitsplatz vorherzusagen vermögen. Auf diesen Überblick aufbauend geben wir Handlungsempfehlungen für die zukünftige Forschung und Praxis. Insbesondere werden wir der Frage Beachtung schenken, welche spezifischen Personalauswahlverfahren zur Diagnose des innovativen Potenzials von Personen besonders geeignet sind.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40, 39–58.CrossRef Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40, 39–58.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson, N., & Burch, G. S. J. (2003). The team selection inventory. Windsor: ASE/NFER-Nelson. Anderson, N., & Burch, G. S. J. (2003). The team selection inventory. Windsor: ASE/NFER-Nelson.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson, N., & Gasteiger, R. M. (2008). Innovation and creativity in organisations: Individual and work team research findings and implications for government policy. In B. Nooteboom & E. Stam (Hrsg.), Micro-foundations for innovation policy (S. 249–271). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press/WRR. Anderson, N., & Gasteiger, R. M. (2008). Innovation and creativity in organisations: Individual and work team research findings and implications for government policy. In B. Nooteboom & E. Stam (Hrsg.), Micro-foundations for innovation policy (S. 249–271). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press/WRR.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 147–173. Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 147–173.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson, N., Salgado, J., Schinkel, S., & Cunningham-Snell, N. (2008). Staffing the organization: An introduction to personnel selection and assessment. In N. Chmiel (Hrsg.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective (S. 257–280). Oxford: Blackwell. Anderson, N., Salgado, J., Schinkel, S., & Cunningham-Snell, N. (2008). Staffing the organization: An introduction to personnel selection and assessment. In N. Chmiel (Hrsg.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective (S. 257–280). Oxford: Blackwell.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson, N., Hülsheger, U., & Salgado, J. (2010). Selecting for innovation. Unpublished manuscript. Anderson, N., Hülsheger, U., & Salgado, J. (2010). Selecting for innovation. Unpublished manuscript.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 2014, 1–37. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 2014, 1–37.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265–285.CrossRef Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265–285.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 963–970.CrossRef Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 963–970.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Baer, M., Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (2003). Rewarding creativity: When does it really matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 569–586.CrossRef Baer, M., Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (2003). Rewarding creativity: When does it really matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 569–586.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.CrossRef Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartram, D. (2005). The great eight competencies: A criterion-centric approach to validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 9, 1185–1203.CrossRef Bartram, D. (2005). The great eight competencies: A criterion-centric approach to validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 9, 1185–1203.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Batey, M., Furnham, A., & Safiullina, X. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 532–535.CrossRef Batey, M., Furnham, A., & Safiullina, X. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 532–535.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrick, R. M., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.CrossRef Barrick, R. M., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Burch, G. S. J., Pavelis, C., & Port, R. L. (2008). Selecting for creativity and innovation: The relationship between the innovation potential indicator and the team selection inventory. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 177–181.CrossRef Burch, G. S. J., Pavelis, C., & Port, R. L. (2008). Selecting for creativity and innovation: The relationship between the innovation potential indicator and the team selection inventory. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 177–181.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 35–48.CrossRef Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 35–48.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi, J. N. (2004a). Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: The mediating role of psychological processes. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 187–199.CrossRef Choi, J. N. (2004a). Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: The mediating role of psychological processes. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 187–199.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi, J. N. (2004b). Person-environment fit and creative behavior: Differential impacts of supplies-values and demands-abilities versions of fit. Human Relations, 57, 531–552.CrossRef Choi, J. N. (2004b). Person-environment fit and creative behavior: Differential impacts of supplies-values and demands-abilities versions of fit. Human Relations, 57, 531–552.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi, J. N. (2004c). Individual and contextual dynamics of innovation-use behavior in organizations. Human Performance, 17, 397–414.CrossRef Choi, J. N. (2004c). Individual and contextual dynamics of innovation-use behavior in organizations. Human Performance, 17, 397–414.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi, J. N., Anderson, T. A., & Veillette, A. (2009). Contextual inhibitors of employee creativity in organizations: The insulating role of creative ability. Group und Organization Management, 34, 330–357.CrossRef Choi, J. N., Anderson, T. A., & Veillette, A. (2009). Contextual inhibitors of employee creativity in organizations: The insulating role of creative ability. Group und Organization Management, 34, 330–357.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Clegg, C., Unsworth, K., Epitropaki, O., & Parker, G. (2002). Implicating trust in the innovation process. Journal of Occupational und Organizational Psychology, 75, 409–422.CrossRef Clegg, C., Unsworth, K., Epitropaki, O., & Parker, G. (2002). Implicating trust in the innovation process. Journal of Occupational und Organizational Psychology, 75, 409–422.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 40–57.CrossRef Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 40–57.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 618–630.CrossRef Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 618–630.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.CrossRef Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Frese, M., Teng, E., & Wijnen, C. J. D. (1999). Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1139–1155.CrossRef Frese, M., Teng, E., & Wijnen, C. J. D. (1999). Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1139–1155.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Furnham, A., Batey, M., Anand, D., & Manfield, J. (2008). Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1060–1069.CrossRef Furnham, A., Batey, M., Anand, D., & Manfield, J. (2008). Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1060–1069.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Furnham, A., & Nederstrom, M. (2010). Ability, demographic and personality predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 957–961.CrossRef Furnham, A., & Nederstrom, M. (2010). Ability, demographic and personality predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 957–961.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524.CrossRef George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gong, Y., Cheung, S., Wang, M., & Huang, J. (2012). Unfolding the proactive process for creativity: Integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/0149206310380250 (in press). Gong, Y., Cheung, S., Wang, M., & Huang, J. (2012). Unfolding the proactive process for creativity: Integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management. doi:10.​1177/​0149206310380250​ (in press).
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 90–105.CrossRef Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 90–105.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Howell, J. M., & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 123–143.CrossRef Howell, J. M., & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 123–143.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hülsheger, U. R., Lang, J. W. B., Anderson, N., & Kersting, M. (2011). Beyond the Big Five: The role of need for cognition and core self-evaluations for innovative work performance. Presentation at the 15th European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology (EAWOP), Maastricht. Hülsheger, U. R., Lang, J. W. B., Anderson, N., & Kersting, M. (2011). Beyond the Big Five: The role of need for cognition and core self-evaluations for innovative work performance. Presentation at the 15th European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology (EAWOP), Maastricht.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869–879.CrossRef Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869–879.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Judge, T. A., Locke, A. E., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188. Judge, T. A., Locke, A. E., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629.CrossRef Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Krause, D. E. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An empirical investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 79–102.CrossRef Krause, D. E. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An empirical investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 79–102.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowe, E. A., & Taylor, W. G. K. (1986). Creativity in life sciences research. R und D Management, 16, 45–61.CrossRef Lowe, E. A., & Taylor, W. G. K. (1986). Creativity in life sciences research. R und D Management, 16, 45–61.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Madjar, N. (2008). Emotional and informational support from different sources and employee creativity. Journal of Occupational und Organizational Psychology, 81, 83–100.CrossRef Madjar, N. (2008). Emotional and informational support from different sources and employee creativity. Journal of Occupational und Organizational Psychology, 81, 83–100.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 757–767.CrossRef Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 757–767.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.CrossRef McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat McEntire, L. E., & Greene-Shortridge, T. M. (2011). Recruiting and selecting leaders for innovation: How to find the right leader. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13, 266–278.CrossRef McEntire, L. E., & Greene-Shortridge, T. M. (2011). Recruiting and selecting leaders for innovation: How to find the right leader. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13, 266–278.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 175–199.CrossRef Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 175–199.CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Mount, M. K., & Barrick, R. M. (1995). The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resource management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 153–200. Mount, M. K., & Barrick, R. M. (1995). The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resource management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 153–200.
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertiusiungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 100–130.CrossRef Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertiusiungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 100–130.CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.CrossRef Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636–652.CrossRef Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636–652.CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Patterson, F. (2000). The Innovation Potential Indicator: Test manual and user’s guide. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press. Patterson, F. (2000). The Innovation Potential Indicator: Test manual and user’s guide. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Potočnik, K., & Anderson, N. (2012). Assessing Innovation: A 360-degree appraisal study. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20, 497–509.CrossRef Potočnik, K., & Anderson, N. (2012). Assessing Innovation: A 360-degree appraisal study. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20, 497–509.CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Raja, U., & Johns, G. (2010). The joint effects of personality and job scope on in-role performance, citizenship behaviors and creativity. Human Relations, 63, 981–1005.CrossRef Raja, U., & Johns, G. (2010). The joint effects of personality and job scope on in-role performance, citizenship behaviors and creativity. Human Relations, 63, 981–1005.CrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research finding. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.CrossRef Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research finding. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.CrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–958.CrossRef Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–958.CrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Shipton, H., Fay, D., West, M., Patterson, M., & Birdi, K. (2005). Managing people to promote innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 118–128.CrossRef Shipton, H., Fay, D., West, M., Patterson, M., & Birdi, K. (2005). Managing people to promote innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 118–128.CrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2009). Do Big Five personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 37, 941–956.CrossRef Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2009). Do Big Five personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 37, 941–956.CrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Tett, P. R., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703–742.CrossRef Tett, P. R., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703–742.CrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591–620.CrossRef Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591–620.CrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–1148.CrossRef Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–1148.CrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30, 413–432.CrossRef Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30, 413–432.CrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 277–293.CrossRef Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 277–293.CrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 540–555.CrossRef Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 540–555.CrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, A., & Cheng, B. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 106–121.CrossRef Wang, A., & Cheng, B. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 106–121.CrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, H., Begley, T., Hui, C., & Lee, C. (2012). Are the effects of conscientiousness on contextual and innovative performance context specific? Organizational culture as a moderator. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 174–189.CrossRef Wang, H., Begley, T., Hui, C., & Lee, C. (2012). Are the effects of conscientiousness on contextual and innovative performance context specific? Organizational culture as a moderator. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 174–189.CrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat West, M. A., & Anderson, N. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 680–693.CrossRef West, M. A., & Anderson, N. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 680–693.CrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Hrsg.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (S. 3–13). Chichester: Wiley. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Hrsg.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (S. 3–13). Chichester: Wiley.
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 413–422.CrossRef Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 413–422.CrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2001). Enhancing creative performance: Effects of expected developmental assessment strategies and creative personality. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 151–167.CrossRef Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2001). Enhancing creative performance: Effects of expected developmental assessment strategies and creative personality. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 151–167.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Innovationsorientierte Personalauswahl
verfasst von
Kristina Potočnik
Neil Anderson
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14567-5_13

Premium Partner