nach oben

Erschienen in:

18.01.2022 | Original Paper

Innovative design on the shop floor of the Saint-Nazaire Airbus factory

verfasst von: Honorine Harlé, Sophie Hooge, Pascal Le Masson, Kevin Levillain, Benoit Weil, Guillaume Bulin, Thierry Ménard

Erschienen in: Research in Engineering Design | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this study, we examine innovative design practices on the Saint-Nazaire Airbus factory shop floor. The engineering and manufacturing engineering departments are in charge of the design of products and their industrialization, even though the factory is usually seen as a place for manufacturing, rather than design. However, there is also design activity in a factory that is devoted to the optimization of manufacturing processes. In this study, we highlight an alternative form of design that relies on a collective exploratory approach. A total of 30 projects from the Saint-Nazaire Airbus factory were selected and analyzed. Of these, two were selected as case studies to illustrate the factory’s different design methods. Subsequently, quantitative analysis provided evidence of the existence of two design regimes: closed prescription and expandable prescription. The resulting solutions were examined, and it was found that designs under the expandable prescription regime provided more robust long-term solutions. This study offers new perspectives for reexamining innovation in manufacturing and exploring design activity on factory shop floors.

Vorheriger Artikel Eliciting user preference for quantitative vs. emotional information display in eco-feedback designs

Nächster Artikel Modelling engineering interfaces in big science collaborations at CERN: an interaction-based model

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abdulmalek FA, Rajgopal J (2007) Analyzing the benefits of lean manufacturing and value stream mapping via simulation: a process sector case study. Int J Prod Econ 107(1):223–236CrossRef

Adamczyk S, Bullinger AC, Möslein KM (2012) Innovation contests: a review, classification and outlook. Creat Innov Manag 21(4):335–360CrossRef

Anand G, Ward PT, Tatikonda MV, Schilling DA (2009) Dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement infrastructure. J Oper Manag 27(6):444–461CrossRef

Barker M, Neailey K (1999) From individual learning to project team learning and innovation: a structured approach. J Workplace Learn 11(2):60–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665629910260752CrossRef

Bullinger AC, Neyer A-K, Rass M, Moeslein KM (2010) Community-based innovation contests: where competition meets cooperation. Creat Innov Manag 19(3):290–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00565.xCrossRef

Caloghirou Y, Kastelli I, Tsakanikas A (2004) Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation 24(1):29–39CrossRef

Campanelli AS, Parreiras FS (2015) Agile methods tailoring–a systematic literature review. J Syst Softw 110:85–100CrossRef

Carvajal Pérez D, Le Masson P, Weil B, Araud A, Chaperon V (2020) Creative heritage: overcoming tensions between innovation and tradition in the luxury industry. Creat Innov Manag 29:140–151CrossRef

Charue-Duboc F, Aggeri F, Chanal V, Garel G (2010) Managing Exploratory Innovation, 2010 European Academy of Management Conference, 1-33

Chen LH, Chen YH (1996) A design procedure for a robust job shop manufacturing system under a constraint using computer simulation experiments. Comput ind eng 30(1):1-12.CrossRef

Christensen CM, McDonald R, Altman EJ, Palmer JE (2018) Disruptive innovation: an intellectual history and directions for future research. J Manag Stud 55(7):1043–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12349CrossRef

Cross N (2011) Design thinking: understanding how designers think and work. Berg Publishers, OxfordCrossRef

Cunha MPE (2005) Bricolage in organizations. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.882784CrossRef

Dorst K (2006) Design problems and design paradoxes. Des Issues 22(3):14CrossRef

Duymedjian R, Rüling C-C (2010) Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory. Organ Stud 31(2):133–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609347051CrossRef

Engwall M, Svensson C (2004) Cheetah teams in product development: the most extreme form of temporary organization? Scand J Manag 20(3):297–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2003.05.001CrossRef

Fantini P, Pinzone M, Taisch M (2018) Placing the operator at the centre of Industry 4.0 design: modelling and assessing human activities within cyber-physical systems. Comput Ind Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.025CrossRef

Fargnoli M, Lombardi M, Haber N, Guadagno F (2020) Hazard function deployment: a QFD-based tool for the assessment of working tasks–a practical study in the construction industry. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 26(2):348-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1483100CrossRef

Fujimoto T (2012) The evolution of production systems exploring the sources of Toyota’s competitiveness. Ann Bus Adm Sci 11:25–44

Gilbert P, Teglborg A-C, Raulet-Croset N (2018) The liberated firm, a radical innovation or a mere avatar of participatory management? Gérer Et Compr 3:1–10

Grewal C (2008) An initiative to implement lean manufacturing using value stream mapping in a small company. Int J Manuf Technol Manag 15(3–4):404–417CrossRef

Hatchuel A (2001) Towards Design Theory and Expandable Rationality: The Unfinished Program of Herbert Simon. J Manag Gov 5(3/4):260–273CrossRef

Hatchuel A, Chen MK (2017) Creativity under strong constraints: the hidden influence of Design Models. Eur Rev 25(2):194–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798716000557CrossRef

Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, Weil B (2001) From R&D to RID: design strategies and the management of innovation fields. In: 8th International product development management conference, pp 415–430

Hatchuel A, Reich Y, Le Masson P, Weil B, Kazakçi A (2013) Beyond models and decisions: situating design through generative functions. In: DS 75-2: proceedings of the 19th international conference on engineering design (ICED13), design for harmonies, Design theory and research methodology, Seoul, Korea, 19-22.08, vol 2, pp 233–242

Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, Reich Y, Subrahmanian E (2018) Design theory: a foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering. Res Eng Des 29(1):5–21CrossRef

Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, Weil B, Carvajal-Perez D (2019) Innovative design within tradition - injecting topos structures in c-k theory to model culinary creation heritage. Proc Des Soc Int Conf Eng Des 1(1):1543–1552. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.160CrossRef

Hooge S, Chen M, Laousse D (2018) Dynamics of innovative concepts in exploratory projects: managing consistency between originality, collaboration and strategy. In R&D Management Conference 2018," R&Designing Innovation: Transformational Challenges for Organizations and Society".

Ikävalko H, Lempiälä T (2019) Innovation contests, routine dynamics and innovation management. Creat Innov Manag 28(2):191–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12299CrossRef

Iwao S (2017) Revisiting the existing notion of continuous improvement (Kaizen): literature review and field research of Toyota from a perspective of innovation. Evol Inst Econ Rev. 14(1):29-59CrossRef

Iwao S, Marinov M (2018) Linking continuous improvement to manufacturing performance. Benchmarking Int J. 25(5):1319-1332. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2015-0061CrossRef

Johansson-Sköldberg U, Woodilla J, Çetinkaya M (2013) Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creat Innov Manag 22(2):121–146CrossRef

Kadir BA, Broberg O, da Conceicao CS. (2019) Current research and future perspectives on human factors and ergonomics in Industry 4.0. Comput Ind Eng 137:106004CrossRef

Kagermann H, Wahlster W, Helbig J (2013) Securing the future of german manufacturing industry: recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final Report of the Industrie, vol 4

Kaplan S (1996) An Introduction to TRIZ, Ideation International Inc., USA

Kidder T (2011) The soul of a new machine. Hachette, London

Knol WH, Slomp J, Schouteten RLJ, Lauche K (2019) The relative importance of improvement routines for implementing lean practices. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 39(2):214-237. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2018-0010CrossRef

Koch J, Gritsch A, Reinhart G (2016) Process design for the management of changes in manufacturing: toward a manufacturing change management process. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 14:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.04.010CrossRef

Krishnan V, Ulrich KT (2001) Product development decisions: a review of the literature. Manag Sci 47(1):1–21CrossRef

Kuipers BS, De Witte MC, van der Zwaan AH (2004) Design or development? Beyond the LP‐STS debate; inputs from a Volvo Truck case. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 24(8):840-854. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410548257CrossRef

Lenfle S, Midler C (2003) Innovation in automotive telematics services: characteristics of the field and management principles. Int J Automot Technol Manag 3(1–2):144–159CrossRef

Lenfle S, Midler C (2009) The launch of innovative product-related services: lessons from automotive telematics. Res Policy 38(1):156–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.020CrossRef

Lévi-Strauss C (1962) Savage mind. University of Chicago, Chicago

Li Y, Vanhaverbeke W, Schoenmakers W (2008) Exploration and exploitation in innovation: reframing the interpretation. Creat Innov Manag 17(2):107–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00477.xCrossRef

Lu SC-Y, Conger A (2007) Supporting participative joint decisions in integrated design and manufacturing teams. In: Tichkiewitch S, Tollenaere M, Ray P (eds) Advances in integrated design and manufacturing in mechanical engineering II. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6761-7_1CrossRef

Lund HB, Steen M (2020) Make at home or abroad? Manufacturing reshoring through a GPN lens: a Norwegian case study. Geoforum 113:154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.04.015CrossRef

Maher ML, Poon J (1996) Modeling design exploration as co‐evolution. Computer‐Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 11(3):195-209CrossRef

Micheli P, Wilner SJS, Bhatti SH, Mura M, Beverland MB (2019) Doing design thinking: conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda. J Prod Innov Manag 36(2):124–148CrossRef

Paton B, Dorst K (2011) Briefing and reframing: a situated practice. Des Stud 32(6):573–587CrossRef

Pfeiffer S, Lee H, Held M (2019) Doing Industry 4.0 – participatory design on the shop floor in the view of engineering employees. Cuad Relac Laborales 37(2):293–311. https://doi.org/10.5209/crla.66039CrossRef

Polacsek T, Roussel S, Bouissiere F, Cuiller C, Dereux P-E, Kersuzan S (2017) Towards thinking manufacturing and design together: an aeronautical case study. In: International conference on conceptual modeling, Springer, pp 340–53

Rafaeli A (1985) Quality circles and employee attitudes. Pers Psychol 38(3):603–615CrossRef

Rantanen K, Domb E, Simplified TRIZ (2002) New problem solving applications for engineers and manufacturing professionals. St Lucie Press, Boca Raton

Realff, Matthew J, Jane CA, David JN (2004) Robust Reverse Production System Design for Carpet Recycling. Iie Transactions 36(8):767–76.CrossRef

Reich Y, Subrahmanian E (2020) The PSI framework and theory of design. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2973238CrossRef

Reiman A, Kaivo-oja J, Parviainen E, Takala EP, Lauraeus T (2021). Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing in the industry 4.0 context–A scoping review. Technol Soc 65:101572CrossRef

Rhodes L, Dawson R (2013) Lessons learned from lessons learned. Knowl Process Manag 20(3):154–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1415CrossRef

Roucoules L, Yahia E, Soufi WE, Tichkiewitch S (2016) Engineering design memory for design rationale and change management toward innovation. CIRP Ann 65(1):193–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.046CrossRef

Scafà M, Marconi M, Germani M (2020) A critical review of symbiosis approaches in the context of Industry 4.0. J Comput Des Eng 7(3):269–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwaa022CrossRef

Schmidt JB, Sarangee KR, Montoya MM (2009) Exploring new product development project review practices. J Prod Innov Manag 26(5):520–535CrossRef

Schön DA (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass Higher Education Series

Schön DA (1990) The design process. In: Varieties of Thinking: Essays from Harvard’s Philosophy of Education Research Center, pp 110–141

Scott-Young C, Samson D (2008) Project success and project team management: evidence from capital projects in the process industries. J Oper Manag 26(6):749–766CrossRef

Shah MK, Deshpande VA, Patil RM (2015) A review on lean tools & techniques: continuous improvement in industry. Int J Adv Ind Eng 3(4):200–207

Sharda B, Banerjee A (2013) Robust manufacturing system design using multi objective genetic algorithms, Petri nets and Bayesian uncertainty representation. J Manuf Syst 32(2):315-324CrossRef

Si S, Chen H (2020) A literature review of disruptive innovation: what it is, how it works and where it goes. J Eng Technol Manag 56:101568CrossRef

Simonsen J, Hertzum M (2012) Sustained participatory design: extending the iterative approach. Des Issues 28(3):10–21CrossRef

Stratton R, Mann D (2003) Systematic innovation and the underlying principles behind TRIZ and TOC. J Mater Process Technol 139(1-3):120-126.CrossRef

Taylor MP, Boxall P, Chen JJJ, Xun Xu, Liew A, Adeniji A (2020) Operator 4.0 or Maker 1.0? Exploring the implications of Industrie 4.0 for innovation, safety and quality of work in small economies and enterprises. Comput Ind Eng 139:105486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.047CrossRef

Thompson P, Wallace T (1996) Redesigning production through teamworking: case studies from the Volvo Truck Corporation. Int J Oper Prod Manag 16(2):103–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579610109875CrossRef

Trentesaux D, Millot P (2016) A human-centred design to break the myth of the ‘magic human’ in intelligent manufacturing systems. In: Service orientation in holonic and multi-agent manufacturing, Springer, pp 103–113

Vanharanta O (2018) Whose responsibility is it anyway? Competing narratives of suggestion system change. Creat Innov Manag 27(3):244–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12286CrossRef

Vijayakumar G, Robinson Y (2016) Impacts of lean tools and techniques for improving manufacturing performance in garment manufacturing scenario: a case study. Int J Adv Eng Technol 7(2):251–260

West MA, Farr JL (1989) Innovation at work: psychological perspectives. Soc Behav 4(1):15–30

Wheelwright SC, Clark KB (1992) Revolutionizing product development: quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. Simon and Schuster, New York

Titel: Innovative design on the shop floor of the Saint-Nazaire Airbus factory
verfasst von: Honorine Harlé
Sophie Hooge
Pascal Le Masson
Kevin Levillain
Benoit Weil
Guillaume Bulin
Thierry Ménard
Publikationsdatum: 18.01.2022
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Research in Engineering Design / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0934-9839
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-6066
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-021-00380-x

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Changeability and agility enablers in one-of-a-kind product development and design processes

The research environmental impact disclosure

Journal innovations, 2021 closure, and reviewers’ gratitude

The relationship between personal intrinsic factors towards a design problem and the degree of novelty and circularity

Modelling engineering interfaces in big science collaborations at CERN: an interaction-based model

CDFA method: a way to assess assembly and installation performance of aircraft system architectures at the conceptual design

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten