Characteristics and constitution of waste management policies
Table
1 shows the waste management policy frameworks in the EU and the five countries. Driven by global environmental problems and the depletion of natural resources, the major focus of waste management policies changed during the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Formerly, the focus was on promoting environmentally sound waste treatment to avoid local environmental pollution, whereas policies have shifted to pursue the concept of sustainability by introducing and promoting 3R policies.
Table 1
Waste management frameworks
USA Enactment of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA, significantly amended in 1984), Pollution Prevention Act (amended in 2002), and Resource Conservation Challenge (2004) has led to the development of a waste management policy centering on resource conservation and pollution prevention in the USA. The RCRA states the fundamental principles for the treatment of solid waste and for the reduction and management of hazardous wastes, but municipal solid waste (MSW) is managed under the regulations of each state.
Under the Pollution Prevention Act, the 2010–2014 Strategic Plan is currently being drawn up. According to a draft, the purposes of the plan are to (1) reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, (2) reduce the manufacture and use of hazardous substances, (3) decrease the use of water, (4) create effective business activities, and (5) develop institutions and integrate established practices for pollution protection. The draft also states that achievement of the first four goals will result in co-benefits [
1].
The Resource Conservation Challenge is a program complementary to the RCRA and Pollution Prevention Act. It aims to prevent pollution and promote reuse and recycling, reduce the use of hazardous chemicals, and conserve energy and resources. Its action plan sets MSW recycling targets [
2].
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also currently working on amending the EPA Strategic Plan. According to the draft, they will shift the political priority from waste management to resource management as a strategy to reduce GHG emissions [
3].
Waste management policy in the USA is currently integrated and includes measures to reduce GHG emissions, manage hazardous chemicals, and conserve natural resources.
EU In the EU, the Waste Framework Directive (2008) [
4] has been established as the basic waste management legislation, and EU Member States have implemented domestic laws on waste management under this directive. The most notable characteristic of the EU’s waste management system is the promotion of 3R policies in parallel with waste management regulations. The Directive on the Incineration of Waste (2000) and the Directive on the Landfill of Waste (1999) concern waste management. The Directive on the Incineration of Waste primarily sets standards for the application of best available techniques/best environmental practice (BAT/BEP) for environmental conservation, and it has had a notable effect in reducing dioxin emissions. The Directive on the Landfill of Waste sets standards for a tiered reduction of the disposal of wastes containing organic materials at final disposal sites (i.e., landfills). To reduce the amount of wastes for final disposal, the directive has promoted the introduction of 3R policies [
5,
6]. The Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and the Directive on Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) were established in 2002 for the purpose of promoting sound material recycling and preventing pollution from the hazardous chemicals contained in such wastes. WEEE recycling has been promoted through the introduction and use of WEEE collection points. The extended producer responsibility (EPR), which requires that a producer of products manages them through reuse, recycling, and disposal even after their useful life and must develop and produce products that are easy to reuse and recycle, was applied to the basic concepts for the development of 3R policies for WEEE and packaging. Germany was the first country within the EU to apply EPR to packaging waste, in 1992 [
7], and that was followed by legislation on collecting and recycling of end-of-life vehicles (ELV) and waste batteries.
Although EPR is recognized as an important concept in the UK, its waste management policy is based on the principle of shared responsibility which presupposes that the responsibility for production of a product, circulation, consumption, disposal, and recycling is shared by everyone [
8]. The government has signed a voluntary agreement with industry to reduce wastes and promote recycling of packaging materials, food, and paper. The UK introduced a landfill tax, which is currently 40 GBP/t and will increase by 8 GBP annually to 72 GBP/t in 2013. Italy has introduced economic measures through a unit-based fee system whereby a management fee in paid according to the quantity of waste to discharge to encourage better waste management, and about 15% of municipalities, or 29% of Italy’s population, currently are covered by this type of system [
9].
Japan The basic law for establishing a Material Cycles Society (2000) defines recyclable resources and states the principles for their utilization [
10]. The law has the goal of a society wherein the consumption of natural resources is restrained and the environmental load is reduced as far as possible, through promotion of the 3R as well as the environmentally sound waste management. The law set quantitative targets for three indicators: resource productivity, cyclical use rate, and final disposal amount. These goals have also been pursued on a global scale through the Group of Eight (G8) process known as the 3R initiative. The basic legislation concerning waste management in Japan consists of the Waste Disposal and Public Cleansing Law (amended in 2010), which is the basic law of waste management, and the Law for the Promotion of Effective Utilities of Resources (2001), which is the basic law for recycling of used resources. The laws for recycling specific items such as containers and packaging, WEEE, food waste, construction waste, and ELV were established in these laws. In addition, the Law on Promoting Green Purchasing was enacted in 2001, with the purpose of promoting government procurement of recycled products. Japan’s waste management system is characterized by the existence of two independent basic acts on waste management as well as on material recycling, under which the laws concerning recycling of specific items are laid down. The legislative framework is similar to those of the EU and Korea.
Korea The basic legislative framework on waste management in Korea consists of the Waste Management Act (amended in 2007) and the Act on Promotion of Resources Saving and Recycling (amended in 2008) [
11]. The full-text amendment of the Waste Management Act was implemented in 1991 to introduce waste recycling, a deposit system, and standards for incineration and landfill [
12]. The Act on Promotion of Resources Saving and Recycling is a revision of the Act on Promotion of Resource Recycling enacted in 2002, and it lays out the basic plan for material reuse, the fee system for waste treatment, regulations on the use of one-way packaging and goods, and EPR [
13]. EPR was also included in the Act on Resource Recycling of Electrical and Electronic Equipment and Vehicles, which was enacted in 2008 [
14].
The initial driving force for the promotion of 3R policies in Korea was a strong campaign by neighborhoods against the construction of waste treatment facilities [
14]. The Promotion of Installation of Waste Disposal Facilities and Assistance to Adjacent Areas Act [
15] was enacted in 1995 to ensure that facilities were adequately established. At the same time, a fee system for waste generation was introduced as a strict economic measure against increases in the amount of waste, in addition to other measures such as separated collection and regulations on the use of one-way packaging. From 2005, organic wastes were no longer accepted at landfills and had to be recycled [
16].
China The basic environmental legislation in China is the Environmental Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China (1989), under which other laws were established. The Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control Law by Solid Waste was enacted in 1996 and amended in 2005. It introduced the application of 3R policies for solid municipal, industrial, and hazardous wastes and required not only a reduction in the amount of waste but also in its hazardousness [
17]. Treatment consists mainly of detoxification of wastes, but the law does not establish a priority in terms of treatment methods (e.g., incineration or landfill). The inventory on hazardous wastes was also established in this act.
The Circular Economy Promotion Law, enacted in 2008, is the basic law concerning material cycles and waste management in China [
18]. Several factors are said to be behind the enactment of the Circular Economy Promotion Law, including a lack of resources, insufficient use of recycled materials, and a national strategy of tackling the problem of resource depletion, accompanied by the desire for sustainable economic growth. In other words, the substantial lack of resources in the face of a rapidly growing economy caused China to expand its use of recycled materials. At the same time, China’s economic growth was accompanied by a massive increase in the amount of waste generated; this produced serious social and environmental problems and an urgent need to improve China’s waste management systems. Consequently, the integrated use of recycled resources and the promotion of zero emissions at production facilities were considered to be essential, especially in the circular economic zone where many industrial facilities are located. The Circular Economy Promotion Law thus emphasizes the promotion and management of 3R activities in the industrial sector and includes economic incentives, such as a reduction in, or exemption from, the value-added tax, for the integrated and circulative use of resources [
19].
In order for the Circular Economy Promotion Law to have substantive effects, WEEE and MSW management systems needed to be enhanced through improving recycling and waste treatment techniques and strengthening the financial base of companies utilizing recycled resources. Although the focus of waste management policies in China has been on the problem of resource depletion and maintaining rapid economic growth, the environmental protection system with regard to imported recycling materials also needed improvements. Furthermore, measures also had to be taken against increased MSW caused by population expansion and economic development in urban areas. To this end, the ELV Recycling Law (2001) and Management Ordinance on WEEE (2009) were established [
19]. The production of automobiles is increasing dramatically in China and is predicted to result in a massive increase in ELV in the near future. Nevertheless, rather than ensuring sound waste management of ELV, the ELV Recycling Law emphasizes the prevention of illegal remodeling, ensures car safety, and promotes the purchase of new models with environmentally friendly features. Furthermore, existing recycling facilities lack the capacity to meet the predicted demand for ELV recycling [
20,
21].
Vietnam The basic legislation for environmental management in Vietnam is the Environmental Protection Law (amended in 2005), which takes precedence over other laws concerning waste management. The waste management system was established under the Decree on Solid Waste Management (2007), which establishes environmental protection measures for solid waste treatment [
22]. The Decree covers the overall waste management policy and prioritizes recycling, reutilization, and treatment and recovery, to prevent land consumption by landfills [
23]. The collection, transport, and treatment of waste are subject to fees of 40,000 VND/t for MSW and as much as 6,000,000 VND/t for hazardous wastes [
24]. Hazardous and medical waste categories are defined under the decision [
25,
26]. The former regulation on the control of hazardous wastes (decision no. 155/1999/QD) was incorporated in the Decree regulations on solid waste management as articles 70–75 at the time of its amendment.
The targets for waste management in Vietnam are determined under The National Strategy on Integrated SWM for the years of 2025 and 2050 (2009) [
27]. The mid-term strategic targets for 2025 are to have separated MSW. Solid wastes from business activities in urban areas and hazardous and non-hazardous wastes from industrial sectors are to be managed completely (100%) in an environmentally sound manner, and 90% of all construction wastes in urban areas and municipal solid wastes in the suburbs are to be collected. In addition, the strategy calls for minimizing the amount of final disposal by 2050 through the collection of all solid wastes, promotion of 3R policies, and employment of advanced and environmentally sound techniques. In Vietnam’s case, the incentive for the promotion of 3R activities in urban areas seems to arise from a sense of crisis about the upcoming depletion of land available for use as landfills [
28].
Waste management targets
The EU and other countries employ a common hierarchical approach in their 3R and waste management policies. However, there are also unique approaches within the various countries. For example, in China, where the concept of the circular economy is promoted as a policy ideal, Article 3 of the Solid Waste Pollution Prevention and Control Law clearly states that reduction (the first priority in the 3R management hierarchy) should be achieved not only in the amount of wastes but also in the waste’s level of hazardousness [
29]. The EU’s waste management system is characterized by concerns about the practicality and effectiveness of its 3R policies, the development of a realistic legal framework, and the underlying attitude of policymakers toward simplifying the bewildering expansion of waste management systems [
30].
Most of the countries are also setting concrete quantitative targets. The waste management targets are summarized in Table
2 (for the USA), Table
3 (the EU), Tables
4 and
5 (Japan), and Table
6 (Korea). A new waste management strategy is currently being drawn up in the USA, so the targets in Table
2 may soon be subject to revision.
Table 2
Recycling targets in the USA [
2,
32]
Organic waste |
Food, other | 26.2 | 11.4 | 0.7 | 2.8 | 5 | 1.28 | 2.2 | 0.58 |
Yard waste | 28.0 | 12.2 | 15.8 | 56.5 | 60 | 16.8 | 3.5 | 1.0 |
Paper |
Paper and paperboard products | 81.85 | 37.2 | 36.7 | 44.9 | 53.8 | 44.1 | 8.9 | 7.32 |
Packaging and containers |
Wood packaging | 8.17 | 3.6 | 1.25 | 15 | 24 | 2 | 9.2 | 0.75 |
Plastic wrap | 2.58 | 1.1 | 0.17 | 6.6 | 19 | 0.5 | 12.8 | 0.33 |
Beverage containers | 11.3 | 5.0 | 2.93 | 26 | 39 | 4.36 | 12.7 | 1.43 |
Total | 158.1 | 68.9 | 57.55 | 36.4 | 43.7 | 69.04 | 7.3 | 11.5 |
Table 3
Waste management targets in the EU [
30]
Packaging | 2008 | 60% | 55% | |
Cars | 2015 | 95% | 85% | 100% |
Electronics | 2006 | 70% | 50% | Min, 4 kg per inhabitant per year |
Batteries | 2011 | | 50–75% | |
| 2012 | | | 25% |
| 2016 | | | 45% |
Tires | 2006 | Zero landfill of tires |
Biowaste diverted from landfills | 2006 | Reduction to 75% of the 1995 level |
2009 | Reduction to 50% of the 1995 level |
2016 | Reduction to 35% of the 1995 level |
New targets | 2015 | Separate collection of paper, metal, plastic, and glass |
Waste framework directive | 2020 | | 50% of household waste | |
2020 | | 70% of construction and demolition waste | |
Table 4
Waste management targets in Japan [
10,
37]
Resource productivity | 260,000 yen/t | 350,000 yen/t | 420,000 yen/t |
Circulation use ratio | 10% | 12.5% | 14–15% |
MSW, per person per day (decrease) | 1,185 g | 1,116 g (−5.8%) | 1,070 g (−10%) |
Household waste, per person per day (decrease) | 654 g | 601 g (−8.1%) | 520 g (−20%) |
MSW from business sectors | 17.99 Mt | 15.82 Mt (−8.1%) | 14.40 Mt (−20%) |
Recycling amount (increase) | 5.9 Mt (~11%) | 10 Mt (~20%) | 12 Mt (~24%) |
Final disposal | 56 Mt | 29 Mt | 23 Mt |
Table 5
Recycling targets for individual items in Japan [
10]
Containers and packaging | Glass bottles | 91 | Percentage of cullet use relative to the amount of glass bottles manufactured in Japan | 2010 |
PET bottles | – | – | – |
Plastics containers and packaging | – | – | – |
Paper containers and packaging | – | – | – |
Steel cans | – | – | – |
Aluminum cans | – | – | – |
Paper cartons | – | – | – |
Cardboard | – | – | – |
Paper | | 62 | Percentage of recycled paper use relative to the amount of paper manufactured in Japan | 2010 |
Home appliances | Air conditioners | 70 | Recycling/disposal | – |
Cathode-ray tube TVs | 55 | Same as above | – |
Refrigerators and freezers | 60 | Same as above | – |
Washing machines | 65 | Same as above | – |
Liquid-crystal TVs, plasma TVs | 50 | Same as above | |
Construction waste | Asphalt and concrete lumps | 98 | Percentage of recycled material weight relative to the weight of specific construction waste | 2012 |
Concrete lumps | 98 | Same as above | 2012 |
Construction waste timber | 95 | Same as above | 2012 |
Food waste | Food manufacturers | 85 | [(Generating prevention amount) + (recycling amount) + (heat recovery amount) × 0.95 + (treatment amount)]/[(generating prevention amount) + (generating amount)] | – |
Food retailers | 45 | Same as above | – |
Food wholesale business | 70 | Same as above | – |
Food service industry | 40 | Same as above | – |
Personal computers and peripherals devices | Desktop computers | 50 | Resource recycling/recovered | – |
Notebook personal computers | 20 | Same as above | – |
Cathode-ray tube displays | 55 | Same as above | – |
Liquid crystal displays | 55 | Same as above | – |
Small, secondary batteries | Nickel-cadmium batteries | 60 | Recycling/disposal | – |
Nickel-hydride batteries | 55 | Same as above | – |
Lithium batteries | 30 | Same as above | – |
Sealed lead acid batteries | 50 | Same as above | – |
Table 6
3R policy targets in Korea [
16,
31]
Expected generation (t/day) | | 48,003 | 47,989 | 47,975 |
Reduction rate relative to 2005 | | 2.5% | 4.2% | 5.8% |
Waste generation (t/day) | 48,398 | 46,083 | 45,990 | 45,177 |
Recycling amount (t/day) | 27,243 | 26,678 | 27,134 | 27,558 |
Recycling rate (wt%) | 56.3 | 57.0 | 59.0 | 61.0 |
Food stuffs | 10–20 | ≤2 |
Cosmetics | <10 | ≤2 |
Detergents | <10 | ≤2 |
Sundries | 30–35 | ≤2 |
Quasi-drugs | <10 | ≤2 |
Miscellaneous products | <20 | ≤2 |
Egg holders | <40 |
Apple and pear holders | <65 |
Instant noodle containers | <85 |
Agricultural, livestock, and fishery products | <90 |
Electrical appliances | ESP packaging for items under 20,000 cm3 in volume is prohibited |
Used paper | 72 |
Used glass | 71 |
Used glass bottles | 50 |
Used steel cans | 65 |
Waste management targets serve as the progress benchmarks of 3R policies, and the targets are determined at the same time as the waste management hierarchy. The targets for reduction of overall wastes have the highest priority, followed by the targets for specific recycled items and targets for specific waste management measures.
The USA, Japan, and Korea all set targets for waste generation. In the USA, the maximum target for waste generation, which was to be achieved by 2008, is 4.5 lb person
−1 day
−1 or approximately 2 kg person
−1 day
−1 [
2]. The target is under revision and discussion. In Japan, the target for non-industrial waste generation in 2015 is 1,070, or 520 g person
−1 day
−1 for household solid waste [
10]. If achieved, these targets would bring about a 10% (total MSW) and 20% (household waste) reduction relative to the base year of 2000 for the USA and Japan, respectively. In Korea, however, the reduction rate relative to the estimated MSW amount in the target year is applied as a target index. The MSW amount of waste for 2012 is estimated to be 47,975 t/day, and the reduction target is 45,177 t/day or 5.8% [
31].
Targets for waste management measures are also used in the USA, EU, Japan, and Korea. In the USA, the target recycling rate in 2008 was 35 wt%, relative to 31 wt% in 2002 [
2]. In terms of the amount of material recovery, this represents an increase from 57.55 million ton (Mt) in 2001 to 69.04 Mt in 2008. In the 2010–2014 Strategic Plan, which is currently being revised, the target amount of 3R materials increases by approximately 58 Mt by 2014 [
1]. The EU determined that separation and collection should be deployed by 2015 for paper, metals, plastics, and glass, and it set the long-term recycling target at 50 wt% of household waste to be recycled by 2020. The EU also aims to gradually reduce the amount of total household-generated waste containing organic material in landfills (75% in 2006, 50% in 2009, and 35% in 2016) [
30]. In Japan, the recycling target is 12 Mt (24 wt% of waste generation), and the target for final disposal is 23 Mt (41% relative to the base year of 2000) [
10]. In Korea, the recycling target for 2012 is 27,558 t/day (10 Mt/year), or 61.0 wt% of total waste generated [
31].
The USA, EU, and Korea also set recycling targets for packaging materials. In the USA, the target recovery amount for each material is defined, and the rate of recovery is calculated relative to the amount of each material as waste in the base year 2001 [
2]. The target rates of recovery are 24.2% (+9.2%) for wooden packaging, 19.4% (+12.8%) for plastics, and 38.7% (+12.7%) for drinks packaging. It is likely that thermal methods are not regarded during the calculation of recovery rates in the USA. In the EU, the targets for material recycling and the targets for recovery, including heat utilization, are defined relative to the waste amount generated in the base year [
30]. The material recycling target is 55 wt%, whereas the target rate of recovery is 60%. In Korea, the recycling target for each material is set yearly; in 2008 it was 50 wt% for glass and 65 wt% for steel cans [
16]. The Korean performance report shows that the recycling rates for glass bottles, aluminum cans, and steel cans exceed 75 wt% [
31]; thus, the target recycling rates may be subject to amendment. In addition, quantitative targets have also been set for reducing the use of packaging materials, and the selection of materials is also regulated [
16].