nach oben

Operations Management Research

Erschienen in:

27.04.2022

Investigating the interaction of factors for implementing additive manufacturing to build an antifragile supply chain: TISM-MICMAC approach

verfasst von: Jaya Priyadarshini, Rajesh Kr Singh, Ruchi Mishra, Surajit Bag

Erschienen in: Operations Management Research | Ausgabe 1-2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic has come across as an exogenous shock to the firms and their supply chains. It has led firms to rethink and rework their existing robust and resilient supply chains. The purpose of this study is to move beyond robustness and resilience and shift to an antifragile supply chain that sees disorder as an opportunity to learn and grow. In this study, various factors to attain an antifragile supply chain have been identified through literature review and experts’ opinions. Using TISM-MICMAC, structural relationships among these factors have been developed, and, then the factors have been classified as drivers or dependents. The study reveals the importance of having proactive top management as a major driving power to build an antifragile supply chain. Development of a strategy for collaboration and innovation, development of a skilled workforce for technology adoption, and resource allocation for digitalization are some other factors with strong driving power. The novelty of the study lies in its effort to drive the attention of researchers and practitioners towards thinking beyond robustness and resilience and shifting towards antifragility. The study will help firms in strategic decision-making for the adoption of additive manufacturing technology to develop antifragility in the supply chain and save itself from negative consequences in the face of disruption.

Vorheriger Artikel Analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic’s impacts on manufacturing: a systematic literature review and future research agenda

Nächster Artikel Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/8

https://www.whitehouse.gov/cea/written-materials/2021/06/17/why-the-pandemic-has-disrupted-supply-chains/

http://www.emro.who.int/pandemic-epidemic-diseases/outbreaks/outbreaks-archive.html

https://www.unido.org/news/covid-19-critical-supplies-manufacturing-repurposing-challenge

https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/risk-resilience-and-rebalancing-in-global-value-chains

Achillas C, Tzetzis D, Raimondo MO (2017) Alternative production strategies based on the comparison of additive and traditional manufacturing technologies. Int J Prod Res 55(12). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1282645

Afshari H, Jaber MY, Searcy C (2019) Investigating the effects of learning and forgetting on the feasibility of adopting additive manufacturing in supply chains. Comput Ind Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.069CrossRef

Ajmera P, Jain V (2019) Modelling the barriers of Health 4.0–the fourth healthcare industrial revolution in India by TISM. Oper Manag Res 12(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-019-00143-x

ASTM F2792–12 (2012) Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies. In ASTM International: Vol. West Consh

Attaran M (2017) The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing. Bus Horiz 60(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011

Baah C, Opoku Agyeman D, Acquah ISK, Agyabeng-Mensah Y, Afum E, Issau K, Ofori D, Faibil D (2021) Effect of information sharing in supply chains: understanding the roles of supply chain visibility, agility, collaboration on supply chain performance. Benchmarking. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2020-0453CrossRef

Baral MM, Singh RK, Kazançoğlu Y (2021) Analysis of factors impacting survivability of sustainable supply chain during COVID-19 pandemic: an empirical study in the context of SMEs. Int J Logist Manag

Bag S (2016) Building Theory of Green Procurement using Fuzzy TISM and Fuzzy DEMATEL Methods. Int J Appl Manag Sci Eng 3(2). https://doi.org/10.4018/ijamse.2016070102

Bag S, Dhamija P, Luthra S, Huisingh D (2021a) How big data analytics can help manufacturing companies strengthen supply chain resilience in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Logist Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2021-0095CrossRef

Bag S, Gupta S, Choi TM, Kumar A (2021b) Roles of Innovation Leadership on Using Big Data Analytics to Establish Resilient Healthcare Supply Chains to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multimethodological Study. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3101590CrossRef

Bag S, Kilbourn P, Pisa N, Giannakis M (2021c) Key Success Factors for Supply Chain Sustainability in COVID-19 Pandemic: An ISM Approach. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 633 IFIP. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85910-7_76

Bag S, Pretorius JHC, Gupta S, Dwivedi YK (2021d) Role of institutional pressures and resources in the adoption of big data analytics powered artificial intelligence, sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy capabilities. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120420CrossRef

Balleer A, Link S, Menkhoff M, Zorn P (2020) Demand or Supply? Price Adjustment during the Covid-19 Pandemic. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3669497

Bamel N, Bamel U (2020) Big data analytics based enablers of supply chain capabilities and firm competitiveness: a fuzzy-TISM approach. J Enterp Inf Manag 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-02-2020-0080

Barney JB (2012) Purchasing, supply chain management and sustained competitive advantage: the relevance of resource-based theory. J Supply Chain Manag 48(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2012.03265.x

Barriball E, George K, Marcos I, Radtke P (2020) Jump-starting resilient and reimagined operations. McKinsey & Company. (Accessed on 6th January 2022)

Behl A, Rathi P, Ajith Kumar VV (2018) Sustainability of the Indian auto rickshaw sector: Identification of enablers and their interrelationship using TISM. Int J Serv Oper Manag 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2018.094750

Berman B (2012) 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution. Bus Horiz 55(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003

den Boer J, Lambrechts W, Krikke H (2020) Additive manufacturing in military and humanitarian missions: Advantages and challenges in the spare parts supply chain. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120301CrossRef

Bogers M, Hadar R, Bilberg A (2016) Additive manufacturing for consumer-centric business models: Implications for supply chains in consumer goods manufacturing. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.024CrossRef

Bogue R (2013) 3D printing: The dawn of a new era in manufacturing? Assem Autom 33(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-06-2013-055

Cestana A, Pastore E, Alfieri A, Matta A (2019) Reducing resupply time with additive manufacturing in spare part supply chain. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52(13). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.220

Chaple AP, Narkhede BE, Akarte MM, Raut R (2021) Modeling the lean barriers for successful lean implementation: TISM approach. Int J Lean Six Sigma 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-10-2016-0063

Chekurov S, Metsä-Kortelainen S, Salmi M, Roda I, Jussila A (2018) The perceived value of additively manufactured digital spare parts in industry: An empirical investigation. Int J Prod Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.008CrossRef

Chopra S, Sodhi MM, Lücker F (2021) Achieving supply chain efficiency and resilience by using multi-level commons. Decis Sci 52(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12526

Choudhary N, Kumar A, Sharma V, Kumar P (2021) Barriers in adoption of additive manufacturing in medical sector supply chain. J Adv Manag Res 18(5):637–660CrossRef

Choudhury, A., Behl, A., Sheorey, P. A., & Pal, A. (2021). Digital supply chain to unlock new agility: a TISM approach. Benchmarking 28(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2020-0461

Chowdhury MMH, Quaddus M (2016) Supply chain readiness, response and recovery for resilience. Supply Chain Manag 21(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2015-0463

Chowdhury P, Paul SK, Kaisar S, Moktadir MA (2021) COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102271CrossRef

Christopher M, Peck H (2004) Building the Resilient Supply Chain. Int J Logist Manag 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275

Comerio N, Strozzi F (2019) Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools. Tour Econ 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618793762

Dalkey N, Helmer O (1963) An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag Sci 9(3)

Deaton BJ, Deaton BJ (2020) Food security and Canada’s agricultural system challenged by COVID-19. Can J Agric Econ 68(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12227

Delic M, Eyers DR (2020) The effect of additive manufacturing adoption on supply chain flexibility and performance: An empirical analysis from the automotive industry. Int J Prod Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107689CrossRef

Delic M, Eyers DR, Mikulic J (2019) Additive manufacturing: empirical evidence for supply chain integration and performance from the automotive industry. Supply Chain Manag 24(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2017-0406

Derbyshire J, Wright G (2014) Preparing for the future: Development of an “antifragile” methodology that complements scenario planning by omitting causation. In Technol Forecast Soc Chang (Vol. 82, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.07.001

Despeisse M, Baumers M, Brown P, Charnley F, Ford SJ, Garmulewicz A, Knowles S, Minshall THW, Mortara L, Reed-Tsochas FP, Rowley J (2017) Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: A research agenda. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.021CrossRef

Despeisse M, Minshall T (2017) Skills and education for additive manufacturing: A review of emerging issues. IFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66923-6_34CrossRef

Devi KS, Paranitharan KP, Agniveesh AI (2020) Interpretive framework by analysing the enablers for implementation of Industry 4.0: an ISM approach. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2020.1735933

Dircksen M, Feldmann C (2020) Holistic evaluation of the impacts of additive manufacturing on sustainability, distribution costs, and time in global supply chains. Transportation Res Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.272CrossRef

Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature. Int J Prod Res 56(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1387680

Dubey R, Bryde DJ, Foropon C, Tiwari M, Gunasekaran A (2021) How frugal innovation shape global sustainable supply chains during the pandemic crisis: lessons from the COVID-19. Supply Chain Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2021-0071CrossRef

Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ, Papadopoulos T, Blome C, Luo Z (2019) Antecedents of Resilient Supply Chains: An Empirical Study. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 66(1). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2017.2723042

Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Sushil, Singh T (2015) Building theory of sustainable manufacturing using total interpretive structural modelling. Int J Syst Sci: Oper Logist 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2015.1025890

Durach CF, Kurpjuweit S, Wagner SM (2017) The impact of additive manufacturing on supply chains. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 47(10). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-11-2016-0332

Dwivedi G, Srivastava SK, Srivastava RK (2017) Analysis of barriers to implement additive manufacturing technology in the Indian automotive sector. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 47(10). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-07-2017-0222

El Baz J, Ruel S (2021) Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era. Int J Prod Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107972CrossRef

Engelseth P, Salman M, Mushtaq W, Awaleh F, Kozlowski R, Glavee-Geo R (2021) Additive manufacturing: Currently a disruptive supply chain innovation? Operations and Supply Chain Manag 14(4), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0470312

Equbal A, Akhter S, Sood AK, Equbal I (2021) The usefulness of additive manufacturing (AM) in COVID-19. Annals of 3D Printed Medicine 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2021.100013

Fan Y, Stevenson M (2018) A review of supply chain risk management: definition, theory, and research agenda. In Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag (Vol. 48, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0043

Fonseca LM, Azevedo AL (2020) COVID-19: Outcomes for Global Supply Chains. Manag Mark 15(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2020-0025

Ford S, Despeisse M (2016) Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150CrossRef

Fortune (2020) 94% of the Fortune 1000 are seeing coronavirus supply chain disruptions: Report. Fortune. (Accessed on 6th January 2022)

Ft.com (2020) Companies should shift from ‘just in time’ to ‘just in case.’ Financial Times. (Accessed on 6th January 2022)

Gardan J (2016) Additive manufacturing technologies: State of the art and trends. Int J Prod Res 54(10). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1115909

Gebler M, Schoot Uiterkamp AJM Visser C (2014) A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies. Energy Policy 74(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.033

Ghaffar SH, Corker J, Fan M (2018) Additive manufacturing technology and its implementation in construction as an eco-innovative solution. In Autom Constr (Vol. 93). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.005

Ghobadian A, Talavera I, Bhattacharya A, Kumar V, Garza-Reyes JA, O’Regan N (2020) Examining legitimatisation of additive manufacturing in the interplay between innovation, lean manufacturing and sustainability. Int J Prod Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.06.001CrossRef

Govindan K, Palaniappan M, Zhu Q, Kannan D (2012) Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using interpretive structural modeling. Int J Prod Econ 140(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.043

Größler A (2020) A managerial operationalization of antifragility and its consequences in supply chains. Syst Res Behav Sci 37(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2759

Guan D, Wang D, Hallegatte S, Davis S J, Huo J, Li S, Bai Y, Lei T, Xue Q, Coffman DM, Cheng D, Chen P, Liang X, Xu B, Lu X, Wang S, Hubacek K, Gong P (2020) Global supply-chain effects of COVID-19 control measures. Nat Hum Behav 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0896-8

Gunessee S, Subramanian N (2020) Ambiguity and its coping mechanisms in supply chains lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic and natural disasters. Int J Oper Prod Manag 40(7–8). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2019-0530

Gupta M, George JF (2016). Toward the development of a big data analytics capability. Inf Manag 53(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.07.004

Gupta S, Altay N, Luo Z (2019) Big data in humanitarian supply chain management: a review and further research directions. In Ann Oper Res (Vol. 283, Issues 1–2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2671-4

Hald KS, Coslugeanu P (2021) The preliminary supply chain lessons of the COVID-19 disruption—What is the role of digital technologies? Oper Manag Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00207-xCrossRef

Haleem A, Sushil Qadri MA, Kumar S (2012) Analysis of critical success factors of world-class manufacturing practices: An application of interpretative structural modelling and interpretative ranking process. Prod Plan Control 23(10–11). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2011.642134

Hasan S, Rennie A, Hoque MR, Ahmed N (2019a) Requirements for large-scale adoption of rapid manufacturing technologies. Cogent Business Manag 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019a.1623151

Hasan Z, Dhir S, Dhir S (2019b) Modified total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) of asymmetric motives and its drivers in Indian bilateral CBJV. Benchmarking 26(2):614–637. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2018-0020CrossRef

Hedenstierna CPT, Disney SM, Eyers DR, Holmström J, Syntetos AA, Wang X (2019) Economies of collaboration in build-to-model operations. J Oper Manag 65(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1014

Ho W, Zheng T, Yildiz H, Talluri S (2015) Supply chain risk management: A literature review. In Int J Prod Res (Vol. 53, Issue 16). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467

Holmström J, Holweg M, Khajavi SH, Partanen J (2016) The direct digital manufacturing (r)evolution: definition of a research agenda. Oper Manag Res 9(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-016-0106-z

Hosseini S, Ivanov D, Dolgui A (2019) Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.001CrossRef

Huang J, Down DG, Lewis ME, Wu CH (2021a) Dynamically scheduling and maintaining a flexible server. Nav Res Logist. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21994CrossRef

Huang Y, Eyers DR, Stevenson M, Thürer M (2021b) Breaking the mould: achieving high-volume production output with additive manufacturing. Int J Oper Prod Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-05-2021-0350CrossRef

Hudecheck M, Sirén C, Grichnik D, Wincent J (2020) How companies can respond to the Coronavirus. MIT Sloan Manag Rev

Ivanov D (2020) Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922CrossRef

Ivanov D, Das A (2020) Coronavirus (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) and supply chain resilience: A research note. Int J Integr Supply Manag 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISM.2020.107780

Ivanov D, Dolgui A (2021) OR-methods for coping with the ripple effect in supply chains during COVID-19 pandemic: Managerial insights and research implications. Int J Prod Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107921CrossRef

Ivanov D, Rozhkov M (2020) Coordination of production and ordering policies under capacity disruption and product write-off risk: an analytical study with real-data based simulations of a fast moving consumer goods company. Ann Oper Res 291(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2643-8

Ivanov D, Sokolov B, Dolgui A (2014) The Ripple effect in supply chains: Trade-off “efficiency-flexibility- resilience” in disruption management. Int J Prod Res 52(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.858836

Iyengar K, Bahl S, Raju V, Vaish A (2020) Challenges and solutions in meeting up the urgent requirement of ventilators for COVID-19 patients. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.048

Jaaron A, Backhouse CJ (2014) Building antifragility in service organisations: Going beyond resilience. Int J Serv Oper Manag 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2014.065671

Jimo A, Braziotis C, Rogers H, Pawar K (2019) Traditional vs additive manufacturing supply chain configurations: A comparative case study. Procedia Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.432CrossRef

Jin GQ, Li WD, Gao L (2013) An adaptive process planning approach of rapid prototyping and manufacturing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2012.07.001

Joseph Jerome JJ, Saxena D, Sonwaney V, Foropon C (2021) Procurement 4.0 to the rescue: catalysing its adoption by modelling the challenges. Benchmarking. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2021-0030

Kemsaram N, Maley KK (2019) An aerospace business case on additive layer manufacturing technologies in aerospace and defense supply chain. Int J Supply Chain Manag 8(2):297–303

Kinra A, Ivanov D, Das A, Dolgui A (2020) Ripple effect quantification by supplier risk exposure assessment. Int J Prod Res 58(18). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1675919

Kumar R, Singh RK, Dwivedi YK (2020) Application of industry 4.0 technologies in SMEs for ethical and sustainable operations: Analysis of challenges. J Clean Prod 275, 124063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124063

Luomaranta T, Martinsuo M (2020) Supply chain innovations for additive manufacturing. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-10-2018-0337

Mishra R, Singh RK, Subramanian N (2021) Impact of disruptions in agri-food supply chain due to COVID-19 pandemic: contextualised resilience framework to achieve operational excellence. Int J Logist Manag

Mahajan R, Agrawal R, Sharma V, Nangia V (2016) Analysis of challenges for management education in India using total interpretive structural modelling. Qual Assur Educ 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-07-2013-0030

Martín-martín A, Orduna-malea E, López-cózar ED, Martín-martín A (2019) Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. (arXiv:1808.05053v1 [cs.DL]). J Informet 12(4), 1160–1177. http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.05053

Meena A, Dhir S, Sushil (2021) An analysis of growth-accelerating factors for the Indian automotive industry using modified TISM. Int J Product Perform Manag 70(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2019-0047

Mir UB, Sharma S, Kar AK, Gupta MP (2020) Critical success factors for integrating artificial intelligence and robotics. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-03-2020-0032

Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A (2016) The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics 106(1):213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5CrossRef

Muhammad MS, Kerbache L, Elomri A (2021) Potential of additive manufacturing for upstream automotive supply chains. Supply Chain Forum 00(00):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2021.1973872CrossRef

Mukherjee AA, Singh RK, Mishra R, Bag S (2021) Application of blockchain technology for sustainability development in agricultural supply chain: justification framework. Oper Manag Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00180-5CrossRef

Murry JW, Hammons JO (1995) Delphi: A Versatile Methodology for Conducting Qualitative Research. Rev High Educ 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1995.0008

Nagarajan HPN, Raman AS, Haapala KR (2018) A Sustainability Assessment Framework for Dynamic Cloud-based Distributed Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.120CrossRef

Nikookar E, Varsei M, Wieland A (2021) Gaining from disorder: Making the case for antifragility in purchasing and supply chain management. J Purch Supply Manag 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2021.100699

Norris M, Oppenheim C (2007). Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature. J Informet 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001

Novak JI, Loy J (2020) A critical review of initial 3D printed products responding to COVID-19 health and supply chain challenges. Emerald Open Res 2. https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13697.1

Novakowski N, Wellar B (2008) Using the Delphi technique in normative planning research: Methodological design considerations. Environment Plan A 40(6). https://doi.org/10.1068/a39267

Oettmeier K, Hofmann E (2016) Impact of additive manufacturing technology adoption on supply chain management processes and components. J Manuf Technol Manag 27(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-12-2015-0113

Ohmori S (2021) The impact of location of 3d printers and robots on the supply chain. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag 9(2):489–500. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2021.1.002CrossRef

Okorie O, Subramoniam R, Charnley F, Patsavellas J, Widdifield D, Salonitis K (2020) Manufacturing in the Time of COVID-19: An Assessment of Barriers and Enablers. IEEE Eng Manag Rev 48(3). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2020.3012112

Oyekan J, Prabhu V, Tiwari A, Baskaran V, Burgess M, Mcnally R (2017) Remote real-time collaboration through synchronous exchange of digitised human–workpiece interactions. Futur Gener Comput Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.08.012CrossRef

Patel Piyush GP (2021) Role of additive manufacturing in medical application COVID-19 scenario: India case study. J Manuf Syst 60(4):811–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.11.006CrossRef

Pereira T, Kennedy JV, Potgieter J (2019) A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job. Procedia Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003CrossRef

Pour MA, Zanardini M, Bacchetti A, Zanoni S (2016) Additive Manufacturing Impacts on Productions and Logistics Systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.822

Queiroz MM, Ivanov D, Dolgui A, Fosso Wamba S (2020) Impacts of epidemic outbreaks on supply chains: mapping a research agenda amid the COVID-19 pandemic through a structured literature review. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03685-7CrossRef

Rajan R, Dhir S, Sushil (2021) Technology management for innovation in organizations: an argumentation-based modified TISM approach. Benchmarking 28(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2020-0019

Raji IO, Shevtshenko E, Rossi T, Strozzi F (2021) Industry 4.0 technologies as enablers of lean and agile supply chain strategies: an exploratory investigation. Int J Logist Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-04-2020-0157

Remko van H (2020) Research opportunities for a more resilient post-COVID-19 supply chain – closing the gap between research findings and industry practice. Int J Oper Prod Manag 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2020-0165

Rinaldi M, Caterino M, Fera M, Manco P, Macchiaroli R (2021a) Technology selection in green supply chains - the effects of additive and traditional manufacturing. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124554CrossRef

Rinaldi M, Caterino M, Manco P, Fera M, Macchiaroli R (2021) The impact of Additive Manufacturing on Supply Chain design: A simulation study. Procedia Comput Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.261CrossRef

Rogers H, Baricz N, Pawar KS (2016) 3D printing services: classification, supply chain implications and research agenda. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 46(10). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-07-2016-0210

Routroy S, Bhardwaj A, Sharma SK, Rout BK (2018) Analysis of manufacturing supply chain agility performance using Taguchi loss functions and design of experiment. Benchmarking 25(8):3296–3319. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2017-0328CrossRef

Rowley J, Slack F (2004) Conducting a literature review. Manag Res News 27(6):31–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185CrossRef

Sanders A, Elangeswaran C, Wulfsberg J (2016) Industry 4.0 implies lean manufacturing: Research activities in industry 4.0 function as enablers for lean manufacturing. J Ind Eng Manag 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1940

Sarkis J (2021) Supply chain sustainability: learning from the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Oper Prod Manag 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2020-0568

Saxena JP, Sushil, & Vrat, P. (1990) Impact of indirect relationships in classification of variables—a micmac analysis for energy conservation. Syst Res 7(4):245–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3850070404CrossRef

Shah S, Mattiuzza S, Naghi Ganji E, Coutroubis A (2017) Contribution of Additive Manufacturing Systems to Supply Chain. 2017 International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Application, ICIMSA 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMSA.2017.7985586

Sharma A, Adhikary A, Borah SB (2020) Covid-19′s impact on supply chain decisions: Strategic insights from NASDAQ 100 firms using Twitter data. J Bus Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.035CrossRef

Sharma M, Joshi S (2021) Barriers to blockchain adoption in health-care industry: an Indian perspective. J Glob Oper Strateg Sourc 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-06-2020-0026

Shokrani A, Loukaides EG, Elias E, Lunt AJG (2020) Exploration of alternative supply chains and distributed manufacturing in response to COVID-19; a case study of medical face shields. Mater Des. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108749CrossRef

Shukla M, Todorov I, Kapletia D (2018) Application of additive manufacturing for mass customisation: understanding the interaction of critical barriers. Prod Plan Control 29(10):814–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1474395CrossRef

Singh AK, Sushil (2013) Modeling enablers of TQM to improve airline performance. In Int J Product Perform Manag (Vol. 62, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401311309177

Singh RK, Garg SK, Deshmukh SG (2007) Interpretive structural modelling of factors for improving competitiveness of SMEs. In Int J Product Qual Manag (Vol. 2, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2007.013336

Singh RK (2015) Modelling of critical factors for responsiveness in supply chain. J Manuf Tech Manag 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2014-0042

Singh RK, Gupta A (2020) Framework for sustainable maintenance system: ISM–fuzzy MICMAC and TOPSIS approach. Ann Oper Res 290(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03162-w

Singh RK, Gupta A, Gunasekaran A (2018) Analysing the interaction of factors for resilient humanitarian supply chain. Int J Prod Res 56(21). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1424373

Sonar H, Khanzode V, Akarte M (2020) Investigating additive manufacturing implementation factors using integrated ISM-MICMAC approach. Rapid Prototyp J 26(10). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-02-2020-0038

Sushil (2012) Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/S40171-012-0008-3

Taleb NN (2012) Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. Allen Lane, London

Tuck C, Hague R, Burns N (2007) Rapid manufacturing: Impact on supply chain methodologies and practice. Int J Serv Oper Manag 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2007.011459

Valilai OF, Houshmand M (2015) Depicting additive manufacturing from a global perspective; Using Cloud manufacturing paradigm for integration and collaboration. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 229(12). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405414546706

Warfield JN (1974) Developing Interconnection Matrices in Structural Modeling. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-4(1). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1974.5408524

Yadav N, Sushil (2014) Total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) of strategic performance management for Indian telecom service providers. Int J Product Perform Manag 63(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2013-0081

Zhao G, Liu S, Lopez C, Chen H, Lu H, Mangla SK, Elgueta S (2020) Risk analysis of the agri-food supply chain: A multi-method approach. Int J Prod Res 58(16). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1725684

Zhong RY, Xu X, Klotz E, Newman ST (2017) Intelligent Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Review. Eng 3(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015

Titel: Investigating the interaction of factors for implementing additive manufacturing to build an antifragile supply chain: TISM-MICMAC approach
verfasst von: Jaya Priyadarshini
Rajesh Kr Singh
Ruchi Mishra
Surajit Bag
Publikationsdatum: 27.04.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Operations Management Research / Ausgabe 1-2/2022
Print ISSN: 1936-9735
Elektronische ISSN: 1936-9743
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00259-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1-2/2022

Capturing attitudinal characteristics of decision-makers in group decision making: application to select policy recommendations to enhance supply chain resilience under COVID-19 outbreak

Challenges to agile project management during COVID-19 pandemic: an emerging economy perspective

Is artificial intelligence an enabler of supply chain resiliency post COVID-19? An exploratory state-of-the-art review for future research

A case study on strategies to deal with the impacts of COVID-19 pandemic in the food and beverage industry

The impact of food supply chain traceability on sustainability performance

A location-allocation model for influenza pandemic outbreaks: A case study in India

Premium Partner