nach oben

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Erschienen in:

06.07.2019

Investigating the Relations Among Pre-Service Teachers’ Teaching/Learning Beliefs and Educational Technology Integration Competencies: a Structural Equation Modeling Study

verfasst von: Eralp Bahcivan, M. D. Gurer, N. Yavuzalp, S. Akayoglu

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

With the rapid developments in technology, training of pre-service teachers in terms of technology integration has become a crucial issue for all stakeholders of education. However, it is important to investigate the relationships among pre-service teachers’ teaching beliefs, skills, and educational technology integration competencies before training pre-service teachers of all fields. Within the scope of this objective, a model was proposed to investigate the relations among pre-service teachers’ epistemological beliefs, conceptions of teaching and learning (COTL), and educational technology integration competencies. As for the participants, 1499 pre-service teachers enrolled at the School of Education at Northwestern region of Turkey participated in the study. An Educational Technology Integration Competencies Scale, Epistemological Beliefs Scale, and COTL Scale, which were developed by the researchers, were utilized to collect the data. At the end of the study, it was found that there were significant relations between pre-service teachers’ beliefs (epistemological beliefs and COTL) and their educational technology integration competencies, which is parallel with the findings of the studies in the literature.

Vorheriger Artikel Measuring Quality Technology Integration in Science Classrooms

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. EDU Working paper no. 41. Retrieved June 8, 2018, from http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/WKP(2009)20&docLanguage=En.

Ayad, F. I., & Ajrami, S. J. (2017). The degree of implementing ISTE standards in technical education colleges of Palestine. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 107–118.

Aydin, M. K., Gürol, M., & Vanderlinde, R. (2016). Evaluating ICT integration in Turkish K-12 schools through teachers’ views. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(4), 747–766. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1227a.CrossRef

Bahcivan, E. (2014). Examining relationships among Turkish preservice science teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning, scientific epistemological beliefs and science teaching efficacy beliefs. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(6), 870–882.

Bahcivan, E., & Cobern, W. W. (2016). Investigating coherence among Turkish elementary science teachers’ teaching belief systems, pedagogical content knowledge and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(10), 62–86.

Banister, S., & Reinhart, R. V. (2012). Assessing NETS•T performance in teacher candidates: exploring the wayfind teacher assessment. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(2), 59–65.CrossRef

Barron, A. E., Kemker, K., Harmes, C., & Kalaydjian, K. (2003). Large-scale research study on technology in K–12 schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782398.CrossRef

Bowes, K., D'Onofrio, A., & Marker, E. (2006). Assessing technology integration: Its validity and value for classroom practice and teacher accountability. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1279.

Brownlee, J., Boulton-Lewis, G., & Purdie, N. (2002). Core beliefs about knowing and peripheral beliefs about learning: developing an holistic conceptualisation of epistemological beliefs. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 2, 1–16.

Buehl, M. M., Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Beliefs about schooled knowledge: domain specific or domain general? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(3), 415–449.CrossRef

Chan, K. W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(8), 817–831.CrossRef

Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, L., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 186–204.CrossRef

Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Issues and Trends, 85, 554–567.

Eren, A. (2009). Examining the teacher efficacy and achievement goals as predictors of Turkish student teachers’ conceptions about teaching and learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2009v34n1.6.CrossRef

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.CrossRef

Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.CrossRef

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & York, C. (2007). Exemplary technology using teachers: perceptions of factors influencing success. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(2), 55–61.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 471–499). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill, Inc..

Güneş, E., & Bahçivan, E. (2018). A mixed research-based model for pre-service science teachers’ digital literacy: Responses to “which beliefs” and “how and why they interact” questions. Computers & Education, 118, 96–106.

Han, I., Shin, W. S., & Ko, Y. (2017). The effect of student teaching experience and teacher beliefs on pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy and intention to use technology in teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 23(7), 829–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1322057.CrossRef

Hernandez-Ramos, P. (2005). If not here, where? Understanding teachers’ use of technology in Silicon Valley schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(1), 39–64.CrossRef

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.CrossRef

Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.CrossRef

Hsu, P. S. (2013). Examining changes of pre-service teachers’ beliefs about technology integration during student teaching. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 21, 27–48.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2014). ISTE Standards Teachers. Retrieved June 5, 2018, from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-T_PDF.pdf.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2017). ISTE Standards. Retrieved May 5, 2018, from https://www.iste.org/standards

Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story: a critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 177–228.CrossRef

Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76–85.CrossRef

King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (2004). Reflective judgment: theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 5–18.CrossRef

Koballa, T. R., Graber, W., Coleman, D. C., & Kemp, A. C. (2000). Prospective gymnasium teachers’ conceptions of chemistry learning and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 209–224.CrossRef

Koballa, T. R., Glynn, S. M., Upson, L., & Coleman, D. C. (2005). Conceptions of teaching science held by novice teachers in an alternative certification program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(4), 287–308.CrossRef

Liu, S. H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1012–1022.CrossRef

Liu, S.-H. (2012). A multivariate model of factors influencing technology use by pre-service teachers during practice teaching. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 137–149.

Martin, W., & Shulman, S. (2006). Intel teach essentials instructional practices and classroom use of technology survey report. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED494013.pdf.

Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(3), 277–299.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRef

Morphew, V. N. (2012). A constructivist approach to the national educational technology standards for teachers. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.CrossRef

Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.

Saljö, R. (1979). Learning in the learner’s perspective: Some commonsense conceptions. Gothenburg: Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg.

Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103–112.CrossRef

Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504.CrossRef

Schommer, M. (1994). An emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and their role in learning. In R. Garner & P. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and about text instruction (pp. 25–39). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19–29.CrossRef

Shevlin, M., & Miles, J. N. (1998). Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(1), 85–90.CrossRef

Şimşek, Ö., & Yazar, T. (2016). Education technology standards self-efficacy (ETSSE) scale: a validity and reliability study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(63), 311–334 http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1112452.pdf.CrossRef

Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 123–138.CrossRef

So, H. J., Choi, H., Lim, W. Y., & Xiong, Y. (2012). Little experience with ICT: are they really the Net Generation student-teachers? Computers & Education, 59(4), 1234–1245.CrossRef

Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social science (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

Thieman, G. Y. (2008). Using technology as a tool for learning and developing 21st-century citizenship skills: an examination of the NETS and technology use by pre-service teachers with their K-12 students. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 8(4).

Tsai, C. C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning, and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 771–783.CrossRef

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st-century competencies: implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.CrossRef

Titel: Investigating the Relations Among Pre-Service Teachers’ Teaching/Learning Beliefs and Educational Technology Integration Competencies: a Structural Equation Modeling Study
verfasst von: Eralp Bahcivan
M. D. Gurer
N. Yavuzalp
S. Akayoglu
Publikationsdatum: 06.07.2019
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09788-6

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Measuring Quality Technology Integration in Science Classrooms

“I’m a Computer Scientist!”: Virtual Reality Experience Influences Stereotype Threat and STEM Motivation Among Undergraduate Women

The Science Teacher Identity and the Use of Technology in the Classroom

Timing of Homework Completion vs. Performance in General Chemistry

Wearable Textiles to Support Student STEM Learning and Attitudes

Using Epistemic Network Analysis to Examine Discourse and Scientific Practice During a Collaborative Game

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten