Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Mechanics of Composite Materials
Erschienen in: Mechanics of Composite Materials 3/2018

09.07.2018

Investigation of Two- and Three-Body Wear Resistance on Flowable Bulk-Fill and Resin-Based Composites

verfasst von: E. Ç. Yilmaz, R. Sadeler

Erschienen in: Mechanics of Composite Materials | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate two and three-body wear resistance and hardness of eighth kinds of modern bulk-fill and resin-based composite materials — Grandio, Estelite Flow, Filtek bulk-fill, Charisma, Clearfil, Ultimate, Quadrant, and G-aenial. All samples were kept in distilled water for one week, and their Vickers hardness was determined before two- and three-body wear tests. The mean volume loss of all specimens after the wear tests was determined by the 3D profilometry. In addition, a random specimen was selected from each test group and scanning electron microscope images were taken for an analysis of wear tracks. The surface morphology of the Clearfil and Ultimate composite materials was damaged severely, whereas Grandio and Charisma had a very smooth surface after two-body wear tests. The lowest mean volume loss was measured in micro-fill Grandio two-body and three-body wear tests. The Filtek bulk-fill and resinbased composites showed similar two- and three-body wear behavior. For the composite materials considered, correlations between the filler volume loss, Vickers hardness, and two- and three-body wear resistances were found to be insignificant.
Vorheriger Artikel Calculation of Bending of Steel-Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Members by a Nonlinear Deformation Model with the Use of Iteration Procedures
Nächster Artikel Dry Wear and Metallographic Study of PTFE Polymer Composites

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
F. Engelhardt et al., “Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis,” Clin. Oral Investig., 20, No. 8, 2123-2130 (2016).CrossRef
2.
N. Ilie and K. Stark, “Curing behaviour of high-viscosity bulk-fill composites,” J. of Dentistry, 42, No. 8, 977-985 (2014).CrossRef
3.
S. Bucuta and N. Ilie, “Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites,” Clin. Oral Investig., 18, N. 8, 1991-2000 (2014).CrossRef
4.
U. Lohbauer et al., “The effect of different light-curing units on fatigue behavior and degree of conversion of a resin composite,” Dental Mater., 21, No. 7, 608-615 (2005).CrossRef
5.
N. Koottathape et al., Quantitative wear and wear damage analysis of composite resins in vitro,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 29, 508-516 (2014).CrossRef
6.
G. J. Christensen, “Remaining challenges with Class II resin-based composite restorations,” J. Am. Dental Assoc., 138, No. 11, 1487-1489 (2007).CrossRef
7.
D. Lazaridou et al., “Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear,” Clin. Oral Investig., 19, No. 6, 1485-1492 (2015).CrossRef
8.
L. H. Mair et al., “Wear: Mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop,” J. Dentistry, 24, Nos. 1-2, 141-148 (1996).CrossRef
9.
S. K. Kim et al., “A study of the effects of chewing patterns on occlusal wear,” J. Oral Rehabilit., 28. No. 11, 1048-1055 (2001).CrossRef
10.
S. Hahnel et al., “Two-body wear of dental restorative materials,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 4, No. 3, 237-244 (2011).CrossRef
11.
J. L. Ferracane, “Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks,” Dental Mater., 22, No. 3, 211-222 (2006).CrossRef
12.
C. Mehl et al., “Wear of composite resin veneering materials and enamel in a chewing simulator,” Dental Mater, 23, No. 11, 1382-1389 (2007).CrossRef
13.
M. Rosentritt et al., “Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of all-ceramic fixed-partial dentures,” Dental Mater., 22, No. 2, 176-182 (2006).CrossRef
14.
J. C. M. Souza et al., “Abrasive and sliding wear of resin composites for dental restorations,” Tribology Int., 102, 154-160 (2016).CrossRef
15.
X. Hu, P.M. Marquis, and A.C. Shortall, “Influence of filler loading on the two-body wear of a dental composite,” J. Oral Rehabilit., 30, No. 7, 729-737 (2003).CrossRef
16.
L. A. Knobloch et al., “Two-body wear resistance and degree of conversion of laboratory-processed composite materials,” Int. J. Prosthodontics, 12. No. 5, 432-438 (1999).
17.
N. Koottathape et al., “Two- and three-body wear of composite resins,” Dental Mater., 28, No. 12, 1261-1270 (2012).CrossRef
18.
N. Finlay et al., “The in vitro wear behavior of experimental resin-based composites derived from a commercial formulation,” Dental Mater., 29, No. 4, 365-374 (2013).CrossRef
19.
S. Lauvahutanon et al., “In vitro evaluation of the wear resistance of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM,” Dental Mater. J., 34, No. 4, 495-502 (2015).CrossRef
20.
S. D. Heintze, “How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods,” Dental Mater., 22, No. 8, 712-734 (2006).CrossRef
21.
X. Hu, A. C. Shortall, and P. M. Marquis, “Wear of three dental composites under different testing conditions,” J. Oral Rehabilit., 29, No. 8, 756-764 (2002).CrossRef
22.
A. U. J. Yap, S. H. Teoh, and K. B. Tan, “Influence of water exposure on three-body wear of composite restoratives,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 53, No. 5, 547-553 (2000).CrossRef
23.
E. Yilmaz and R. Sadeler, “Effect of thermal cycling and microhardness on roughness of composite restorative materials,” J. of Restorative Dentistry, 4, No. 3, 93-96 (2016).CrossRef
24.
R. G. Chadwick et al., The effect of storage media upon the surface microhardness and abrasion resistance of 3 composites,” Dental Mater., 6, No. 2, 123-128 (1990).CrossRef
25.
P. Pieters et al., “Water uptake of a silorane-based composite used in restorative dentistry,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 50, No. 3, 395-402 (2014).CrossRef
26.
W. J. Obrien and J. Yee, “Microstructure of posterior restorations of composite resin after clinical wear,” Operative Dentistry, 5, No. 3, 90-94 (1980).
27.
K. D. Jorgensen, “Restorative resins – abrasion vs. mechanical-properties,” Scandinav. J. Dental Res., 88, No. 6, 557-568 (1980).
28.
J. R. Condon and J. L. Ferracane, “In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment,” J. Dental Res., 76, No. 7, 1405-1411 (1997).CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Investigation of Two- and Three-Body Wear Resistance on Flowable Bulk-Fill and Resin-Based Composites
verfasst von
E. Ç. Yilmaz
R. Sadeler
Publikationsdatum
09.07.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Mechanics of Composite Materials / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0191-5665
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-8922
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-018-9750-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Mechanics of Composite Materials 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Dry Wear and Metallographic Study of PTFE Polymer Composites

OriginalPaper

Tensile, Impact, and Thermal Properties of an Epoxynovolac Matrix Composites with Cuban Henequen Fibers

OriginalPaper

Calculation of Bending of Steel-Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Members by a Nonlinear Deformation Model with the Use of Iteration Procedures

OriginalPaper

Interfacial Strain Energy Continuity Assumption-Based Analysis of an Orthotropic-Skin Sandwich Plate Using a Refined Layer-by-Layer Theory

OriginalPaper

Diagram and Parameters of Fatigue Sensitivity for Evaluating the Residual Strength of Layered GFRP Composites After Preliminary Cyclic Loadings

OriginalPaper

Rational Choice of Angle-Ply Composites for Identification of the Elastic Characteristics of Unidirectional Composites

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise