Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Information Retrieval Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2011 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

11. Is a Relevant Piece of Information a Valid One? Teaching Critical Evaluation of Online Information

verfasst von : Josiane Mothe, Gilles Sahut

Erschienen in: Teaching and Learning in Information Retrieval

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this chapter we first point out the importance for any user to keep in mind the level of validity of a piece of information; specifically in the context of the Web in which the information is heterogeneous in terms of the editorial process used. We detail the criteria coming from users’ behavior and those that should be taught in order to provide users with an opportunity to become information literate. We suggest a taxonomy of criteria and concepts that can be taught. We present three different ways for a trainer to make trainees learn about information validity: first making students aware of the validity issue, then using a criteria grid and finally teaching based on practice. We finish the chapter with assessments and feedback on these practices.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Teaching Web Information Retrieval to Computer Science Students: Concrete Approach and Its Analysis
Nächstes Kapitel Training Students to Evaluate Search Engines
Fußnoten
1
Like Macedo-Rouet and Rouet (2008) we consider that credibility is the subjective perception of the information receiver on its reliability.
 
2
We considered that the discourse is a practical application of a language. Any discourse is subject to standards and organizational rules that exist in a given social group. In addition, any discourse testifies a transmitter’s aim; the transmitter aims at producing an effect on the receiver (e.g. to cause a stir, persuade the reader or inform him) Mainguenau (2007).
 
3
Some of these types of discourses can be declined into more specific types. For example, when they talk to general public, journalists use discourses that are codified according to quite particular types (reporting, editorial, news, etc.).
 
4
In English, several projects are listed on Wikipedia:School and university projects http://​en.​wikipedia.​org/​wiki/​Wikipedia:​School_​and_​university_​projects.
In French, a project description can be found on the following web page: Wikipedia:projets pédagogiques http://​fr.​wikipedia.​org/​wiki/​Wikip%C3%A9dia:​Projets_​p%C3%A9dagogiques.
 
Literatur
ACRL (2000) Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Association of College & Research Libraries, Chicago, IL
Babu R (2008) Information literacy – competency standards and performance indicators: an overview. J Libr Inf Technol 28(2):56–65
Barry CL, Schamber L (1998) Users’ criterias for relevance evaluation: a cross study comparison. Inf Process Manag 24(2/3):219–236CrossRef
Boisvert J (2002) Pensée critique et sciences humaines – étude sur l’évolution de la pensée critique des élèves du programme de sciences humaines au collégial. Research report, Cégep
Boubée N (2007) Des pratiques documentaires ordinaires: Analyse de l’activité de recherche d’information des élèves du secondaire. PhD thesis, Université de Toulouse Le Mirail
Brem SR, Russel S, Weems L (2001) Science on the web: student evaluations of scientific arguments. Discourse Process 32:191–213
Bundy A (2004) Australian and New Zealand information literacy framework, principles, standards and practices, 2nd edn. Library Publications, University of South Australia, Mt. Gambier
Callon M, Latour B (1990) La science telle qu’elle se fait, Paris, éditions La Découverte
Candy P, Crebert G, O’Leary J (1994) Developing lifelong learners through undergraduate education. AGPS, Canberra
Carr N (2008) Is Google making us stupid? The Atlantic 302(1):56–58, 60, 62–63
Chartier R (2008) Le livre: Son passé, son avenir. La Vie des idées.fr, 29 Septembre 2008
Claburn T (2008) Is Google making us smarter? Information Week articleID = 211200721
FADBEN (1997) Référentiel: Compétences en information-documentation. Fédération des enseignants documentalistes de l’Education nationale, Médiadoc, 28p
Fink-Shamit N, Bar-Ilan J (2008) Information quality assessment on the Web- an expression of behaviour. Inf Res 13(4):paper 357
Fitzgerald MA (1999) Evaluating information: an information literacy challenge, vol 2. School Library Media Research, Chicago, IL
Flanagin A, Metzger M (2008) In: Flanagin A, Metzger M (eds) Digital media and youth: Unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Flavell JH (1981) Cognitive monitoring. In: Dickson W (ed) Children’s oral communication skills. Academic, New York
Fogg BJ et al (2001) What makes websites credible? A report on a large quantitative study. CHI 3:61–68
Francke H, Sundin O (2009) In search of credibility: Pupils’ information practices in learning environments. Inf Res 14:4
Grimes DJ, Boening CH (2001) Worries with the Web: a look at student use of Web resources. Coll Res Libr 62:11–22
Hirsh SG (1999) Children’s relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources. J Am Soc Inf Sci 50(14):1265–1283CrossRef
Kiili C, Laurinen L, Marttunen M (2008) Students evaluating internet sources: from versatile evaluators to uncritical readers. J Educ Comput Res 39(1):75–95CrossRef
Knight SA, Burn JM (2005) Developing a framework for assessing information quality on the World Wide Web. Inf Sci 8:159–172
Le Bigot L, Rouet JF, Coutieras A, Goumi A (2007) Comment mieux évaluer les informations issues de sources multiples? In: Proceedings EIAH’07, Lausanne
Macedo-Rouet M, Rouet J-F (2008) Qui dit quoi ? L’évaluation des sources, une compétence d’avenir. Usages, usagers et compétences informationnelles au 21e siècle. Hermes
Mainguenau D (2007) Analyser les textes de communication. Armand Colin, Paris
Manuel K (2005) What do first-year students know about information research? And what can we teach them? National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago, IL, pp 401–417
McLuhan M (1964) Understanding media, the extensions of man. McGraw-Hill, New York
Metzger MJ, Flanagin AJ, Zwarun L (2003) College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behaviour. Comput Educ 41:271–290CrossRef
Mizzaro S (1998) How many relevances in information retrieval. Interact Comput 10:303–320CrossRef
Mothe J (2010) Teaching information validity – Case study, Internal report, IRIT/RR-2010-21-FR
Pierrat B (2006) Chasser le dahu au bahut. Médialog 60:4–9
Piette J (1996) Education aux médias et fonction critique. L’Harmattan, Paris
Rieh SY, Hilligoss B (2008) College students’ credibility judgements in the information-seeking process. In: Digital media youth and credibility. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 49–72
Rouet JF (2006) The skills of document use: from text comprehension to Web based learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
Rouet M, Rouet JF, Zampa V, Bouin E (2008) L’information sur Internet: Le jugement de crédibilité des usagers. In: SFSIC, article 132
Sahut G, Tricot A (2010) Dictionnaire des concepts et des notions. In Rivano P et al (eds) Aide à la Validation du Socle commun – Académie de Toulouse
Savolainen R (2007) Media credibility and cognitive authority. The case of seeking orienting information. Inf Res 12(3):319
Serres A (2005) Evaluation de l’information sur Internet: Le défi de la formation [Evaluating information from the Internet]. Bull Bibliothèques de France 6:38–44
Small G, Moody T, Siddarth P, Bookheimer S (2009) Your brain on Google: patterns of cerebral activation during internet searching. Am J Geriatr Psychiatr 17(2):116–126CrossRef
UCL (2008) Information behaviour of the researcher of the future.
Walraven A (2008) Becoming a critical websearcher: effects of instruction to foster transfer. PhD thesis. Arhnem, Openuniversiteit Nederland
Zurkowski PG (1974) The information environment: relationships and priorities. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, Washington DC
Metadaten
Titel
Is a Relevant Piece of Information a Valid One? Teaching Critical Evaluation of Online Information
verfasst von
Josiane Mothe
Gilles Sahut
Copyright-Jahr
2011
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
Teaching and Learning in Information Retrieval

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22510-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-22511-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2011

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22511-6_11

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise