Skip to main content
Erschienen in: TechTrends 5/2019

09.02.2019 | Original Paper

Is the Maker Movement Inclusive of ANYONE?: Three Accessibility Considerations to Invite Blind Makers to the Making World

verfasst von: JooYoung Seo

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The issue this paper addresses is the lack of attention to inclusivity of people with visual impairments in the maker movement. To capture major challenges which blind makers are faced with in makerspaces and to learn how to pursue a more accessible making ecology, three online communities for blind makers (The Blind Arduino Blog; Raspberry VI; and Blind Electronics) have been qualitatively explored based on the autoethnographic approach. As a result, three imperative challenges that need attention in designing inclusive maker tools have been highlighted: (1) inaccessible/undocumented instructions for maker toolkits; (2) a less tangible design of making board; and (3) a lack of multi-sensory modules. Three corresponding practical recommendations drawing from the blind makers’ know-hows along with author’s personal experience as a blind maker, are suggested. This paper contributes to improving the current awareness of accessibility aspects of the maker movement to invite another marginalized group into its discourse.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Buechley, L., & Hill, B. M. (2010). LilyPad in the wild: How hardware’s long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. Buechley, L., & Hill, B. M. (2010). LilyPad in the wild: How hardware’s long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.
Zurück zum Zitat Buechley, L., Eisenberg, M., Catchen, J., & Crockett, A. (2008). The lilypad arduino: Using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 423–432). ACM. Buechley, L., Eisenberg, M., Catchen, J., & Crockett, A. (2008). The lilypad arduino: Using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 423–432). ACM.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504.CrossRef Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hatch, M. (2014). The maker movement manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. Hatch, M. (2014). The maker movement manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Zurück zum Zitat Kafai, Y. B., Lee, E., Searle, K., Fields, D., Kaplan, E., & Lui, D. (2014). A crafts-oriented approach to computing in high school: Introducing computational concepts, practices, and perspectives with electronic textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), 1.CrossRef Kafai, Y. B., Lee, E., Searle, K., Fields, D., Kaplan, E., & Lui, D. (2014). A crafts-oriented approach to computing in high school: Introducing computational concepts, practices, and perspectives with electronic textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), 1.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. Constructionism, 36(2), 1–11. Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. Constructionism, 36(2), 1–11.
Zurück zum Zitat Persson, H., Åhman, H., Yngling, A. A., & Gulliksen, J. (2014). Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14, 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z.CrossRef Persson, H., Åhman, H., Yngling, A. A., & Gulliksen, J. (2014). Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14, 505–526. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10209-014-0358-z.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seo, J., & Richard, G. T. (2018). Accessibility, making and tactile robotics: Facilitating collaborative learning and computational thinking for learners with visual impairments. In J. Kay & R. Luckin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference of the Learning Sciences (vol. 3, pp. 1755–1757). London: International Society of the Learning Sciences. Seo, J., & Richard, G. T. (2018). Accessibility, making and tactile robotics: Facilitating collaborative learning and computational thinking for learners with visual impairments. In J. Kay & R. Luckin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference of the Learning Sciences (vol. 3, pp. 1755–1757). London: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Zurück zum Zitat Seo, J. Y., AlQahtani, M., Ouyang, X., & Borge, M. (2017). Embracing students with visual impairments in CSCL. In B. K. Smith, M. Borge, E. Mercier, K. Y. Lim (Eds.), Making a Difference: Prioritizing Equity and Access in CSCL, 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2017, Volume 2. Philadelphia: International Society of the Learning Sciences. Seo, J. Y., AlQahtani, M., Ouyang, X., & Borge, M. (2017). Embracing students with visual impairments in CSCL. In B. K. Smith, M. Borge, E. Mercier, K. Y. Lim (Eds.), Making a Difference: Prioritizing Equity and Access in CSCL, 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2017, Volume 2. Philadelphia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Metadaten
Titel
Is the Maker Movement Inclusive of ANYONE?: Three Accessibility Considerations to Invite Blind Makers to the Making World
verfasst von
JooYoung Seo
Publikationsdatum
09.02.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
TechTrends / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00377-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

TechTrends 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe