Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Argumentation 2/2017

25.02.2016

Leonard Nelson: A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies

Translated by Fernando Leal and David Carus (Argumentation Library, Vol. 26) Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2016, vi + 211 pp

verfasst von: Andrew Aberdein

Erschienen in: Argumentation | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

Leonard Nelson (1882–1927) is a fascinating but neglected figure. He represents a minority tradition within post-Kantian German philosophy that anticipates much later developments in Anglophone analytic philosophy. Specifically, Nelson saw himself as a posthumous disciple of Jakob Friedrich Fries (1773–1843). Almost alone amongst Kant’s nineteenth-century interpreters, Fries stressed the methodological aspects of Kant’s work over its metaphysical implications. Fries’s influence faded fast after his death, and his work was little known when Nelson encountered it as a student. Nelson made it his life’s work to remedy this oversight. Initially, this focus may have imperilled Nelson’s own career: he secured a position at Göttingen only with the intervention of the mathematician David Hilbert, and over the objections of Edmund Husserl and other members of the philosophy faculty (Reid 1970, p. 122). Nelson’s early death limited his direct influence—and frustratingly prevented what might have been a fruitful interaction with the pioneers of analytic philosophy. However, Nelson had a profound effect on his immediate circle amongst whom his posthumous influence was enduring. …

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
For the history of this term, Leal cites the monograph (Birken-Bertsch 2006), which is unavailable in English, but see (Pozzo 2008).
 
2
‘Although I had to resist the temptation to change Nelson’s diagrams to make them even more similar to modern usages, arrows were added to indicate the direction of the reasoning involved’ (p. 14, emphasis in original).
 
3
For the French logician Robert Blanché whose version of the hexagon is best known. However, Blanché was anticipated by his fellow countryman Augustin Sesmat and by the American Paul Jacoby (Jacoby 1950). Earlier versions of the hexagon may yet be uncovered. As one commentator has observed, ‘Blanché’s hexagon was up to very recently part of an esoteric folklore’ (Béziau 2012, p. 2).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aberdein, A. 2006. Raising the tone: Definition, bullshit, and the definition of bullshit. In Bullshit and philosophy, ed. G. Reisch, and G. Hardcastle, 151–169. Chicago, IL: Open Court. Aberdein, A. 2006. Raising the tone: Definition, bullshit, and the definition of bullshit. In Bullshit and philosophy, ed. G. Reisch, and G. Hardcastle, 151–169. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
Zurück zum Zitat Beardsley, M. 1950. Practical logic. New York, NY: Prentice Hall. Beardsley, M. 1950. Practical logic. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Béziau, J.-Y. 2012. The power of the hexagon. Logica Universalis 6(1): 1–43.CrossRef Béziau, J.-Y. 2012. The power of the hexagon. Logica Universalis 6(1): 1–43.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Birken-Bertsch, H. 2006. Subreption und Dialektik bei Kant: Der Begriff des Fehlers der Erschleichung in der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog. Birken-Bertsch, H. 2006. Subreption und Dialektik bei Kant: Der Begriff des Fehlers der Erschleichung in der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosanquet, B. 1888. Logic, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon. Bosanquet, B. 1888. Logic, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon.
Zurück zum Zitat Flew, A. 1975. Thinking about thinking. London: Fontana. Flew, A. 1975. Thinking about thinking. London: Fontana.
Zurück zum Zitat Horn, L.R. 2015. On the contrary: Disjunctive syllogism and pragmatic strengthening. In The road to universal logic: Festschrift for 50th birthday of Jean-Yves Béziau, vol. 1, ed. A. Koslow, and A. Buchsbaum, 241–265. Berlin: Springer. Horn, L.R. 2015. On the contrary: Disjunctive syllogism and pragmatic strengthening. In The road to universal logic: Festschrift for 50th birthday of Jean-Yves Béziau, vol. 1, ed. A. Koslow, and A. Buchsbaum, 241–265. Berlin: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacoby, P. 1950. A triangle of opposites for types of propositions in Aristotelian logic. New Scholasticism 24(1): 32–56.CrossRef Jacoby, P. 1950. A triangle of opposites for types of propositions in Aristotelian logic. New Scholasticism 24(1): 32–56.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lakatos, I. 1976. Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery, ed. J. Worrall, and E. Zahar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Lakatos, I. 1976. Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery, ed. J. Worrall, and E. Zahar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson, L. 2011. Typische Denkfehler in der Philosophie, ed. A. Brandt, and J. Schroth. Hamburg: Felix Meiner. Nelson, L. 2011. Typische Denkfehler in der Philosophie, ed. A. Brandt, and J. Schroth. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Zurück zum Zitat Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Powers, L.H. 1986. On philosophy and its history. Philosophical Studies 50(1): 1–38.CrossRef Powers, L.H. 1986. On philosophy and its history. Philosophical Studies 50(1): 1–38.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Powers, L.H. 1995a. Equivocation. In Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, ed. H.V. Hansen, and R.C. Pinto, 287–301. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. Powers, L.H. 1995a. Equivocation. In Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, ed. H.V. Hansen, and R.C. Pinto, 287–301. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Powers, L.H. 1995b. The one fallacy theory. Informal Logic 17(2): 303–314.CrossRef Powers, L.H. 1995b. The one fallacy theory. Informal Logic 17(2): 303–314.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reed, C., D.N. Walton, and F. Macagno. 2007. Argument diagramming in logic, law and artifical intelligence. Knowledge Engineering Review 22(1): 87–109.CrossRef Reed, C., D.N. Walton, and F. Macagno. 2007. Argument diagramming in logic, law and artifical intelligence. Knowledge Engineering Review 22(1): 87–109.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shackel, N. 2005. The vacuity of postmodernist methodology. Metaphilosophy 36: 295–320.CrossRef Shackel, N. 2005. The vacuity of postmodernist methodology. Metaphilosophy 36: 295–320.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Rees, M.A. 2008. Dissociation in argumentative discussions: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. van Rees, M.A. 2008. Dissociation in argumentative discussions: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Metadaten
Titel
Leonard Nelson: A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies
Translated by Fernando Leal and David Carus (Argumentation Library, Vol. 26) Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2016, vi + 211 pp
verfasst von
Andrew Aberdein
Publikationsdatum
25.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Argumentation / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0920-427X
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8374
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9398-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Argumentation 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner