Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 1/2015

01.03.2015 | Original Article

Light olefins and transport fuels from biomass residues via synthetic methanol: performance and cost analysis

verfasst von: Ilkka Hannula, Vesa Arpiainen

Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A thermochemical processing route from biomass residues to light olefins (ethylene and propylene) is assessed by means of process simulation and cost analysis. A two-step process chain is proposed where (1) biomass residues are first converted to synthetic methanol in a gasification plant situated close to feedstock resources and (2) the produced methanol is transported to a steam cracking site where it is further converted in a methanol to olefins (MTO) plant. Possibilities for heat and product integration as well as equipment sharing with a steam cracking plant are discussed. Overall mass yields from dry biomass to light olefins range from 169 to 203 kg/t. Based on cursory capital cost estimates, the maximum methanol purchase price for such integrated MTO plants is estimated to be in the range of 420–450 €/t.
Vorheriger Artikel Biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass - a multi-criteria approach for comparing overall concepts
Nächster Artikel Using a manganese ore as catalyst for upgrading biomass derived gas

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
1 These include Shenhua Baotou’s methanol to olefins (300 kt/a ethylene and 300 kt/a propylene) and Shenhua Ningmei’s methanol to propylene (500 kt/a propylene) [4].
 
2
2 The PDU was run circa 4,000 h in pressurised oxygen-blown mode using various wood residues as feedstock.
 
3
3 The heat of combustion is defined on lower heating value basis and calculated for the wet biomass prior drying.
 
4
4 Higher costs are due to more expensive double fluidised-bed reactor/regenerator system, reactor internals, catalyst and combustion air blower.
 
5
5 Following breakdown is assumed for the O&M: personnel costs 0.5 %, maintenance & insurances 2.5 %, catalysts & chemicals 1 %.
Table 10
Financial parameters assumed for the purpose of cost analysis
Investment factors
 
Annuity factor (10 %, 20 a)
0.12
Annual O&M cost factor 0.04 a
 
Annual operating hours
7890
Investment support, M€
0
Product values, €/tonne
 
Ethylene
1,100
Propylene
1,200
H 2
1,500
C 4+
600/1,015 b
Fuelgas
500
Ethane
500
Propane
500
Utilities
 
Electricity, €/MWh
50
High pressure steam, €/t
35
Low pressure steam, €/t
30
a Fraction of Total Capital Investment
b When end-product conv. motor fuel / biofuel
 
6
6 The C 4+ is valued at 80 % of the end-product value, which we assume to be 750 €/t for conventional motor fuel and 1,269 €/t for biofuel
 
7
7 Both plants having 10 % internal rate on return and paying 12 €/MWh for the feedstock
 
Literatur
1.
Funk G, Myers D, Vora B (2013) A different game plan. Brochure, Hydrocarbon Engineering
2.
Ren T, Patel M, Blok K (2006) Olefins from conventional and heavy feedstocks: energy use in steam cracking and alternative processes. Energy 31(4): 425–451CrossRef
3.
Hyde B (2012) Light olefins market review
4.
Hyde BICIS. China develops coal-to-olefins projects, which could lead to ethylene self-sufficiency, 2012. bit.ly/MgIGE6
5.
Kreutz TG, Larson ED, Williams RH, Liu G Fischer-tropsch fuels from coal and biomass. PA, Pittsburgh, p 2008
6.
Liu G, Larson E D, Williams R H, Kreutz T G, Guo X (2011) Making Fischer-Tropsch fuels and electricity from coal and biomass: performance and cost analysis. Energy & Fuels 25(1)
7.
Landälv I (2013) Demonstration plants for advanced biofuels production based on thermochemical pathways—status and reflections Proceedings of the 21st European Biomass Conference and Exhibition
8.
Hannula I, Kurkelaz E (2013) Liquid transportation fuels via large-scale fluidised-bed gasification of lignocellulosic biomass, VTT Technology 91. Technical Research Centre of Finland
9.
Hannula I, Kurkela E (2012) A parametric modelling study for pressurised steam/ O2-blown fluidised-bed gasification of wood with catalytic reforming. Biomass Bioenergy 38(0): 58–67. Overcoming Barriers to Bioenergy: Outcomes of the Bioenergy Network of Excellence 2003-2009CrossRef
10.
Katofsky R (1993) The production of fluid fuels from biomass Center for energy and environmental studies, vol 279. CEES Rpt, Princeton University
11.
Wilen C, Moilanen A, Kurkela E (1996) Biomass feedstock analyses, vol 282. VTT Publications, VTT
12.
(1994) Converter options for methanol synthesis. Nitrogen 210: 36–44
13.
Glover BLight olefin technologies, 2007. Journées Annuelles du Pétrole
14.
(2007) Wiley Critical Content—Petroleum Technology, vol.1–2, John Wiley & Sons
15.
ChemSystems, 2009. Ethylene PERP 08/09-5, Report Abstract.
16.
Wan V (2007) Methanol to olefins. Report no. 261. SRI Consulting
17.
(2003). In: Meyers R (ed) Handbook of Petroleum Refining Processes, 3rd edn. The McGraw-Hill, New York
18.
Kuechler K., Lattner J. (2000) Process for converting oxygenates to olefins with direct product quenching for heat recovery, US patent 6121504. Exxon Chemical Patents Inc
19.
Barger PUOP Advanced MTO Technology—integration of methanol-to-Olefins and olefin cracking processes, 2012. SynFuel2012 Symposium
20.
Kempf RAdvances in commercialization of the UOP advanced MTO technology, 2011. 2011 Middle East Chemical Week Conference
21.
Chen J Q, Bozzano A, Glover B, Fuglerud T, Kvisle S (2005) Recent advancements in ethylene and propylene production using the UOP/Hydro MTO process Catalysis Today, vol 106. Intenational Conference on Gas-Fuel 05, pp 103–107
22.
Stewart D G, Zimmermann J E, Furfaro A P, Vora B V (2007) Apparatus and process for light olefin recovery. U.S patent 7268265 B1, UOP LLC
23.
Larson E D, Williams R H, Kreutz T G, Hannula I, Lanzini A, Liu G (2012) Energy, environmental, and economic analyses of design concepts for the co-production of fuels and chemicals with electricity via co-gasification of coal and biomass. Final report under contract DEFE0005373 to the National Energy Technology Laboratory, US Department of Energy. Princeton University
24.
Hannula I., Sorsamki L., Arpiainen V., Harlin A.Renewable packaging materials and chemicals from biomass—Techno-economics of methanol-to-olefins route Proceedings of the 21st European Biomass Conference and Exhibition. Denmark, Copenhagen, p 2013
25.
Smith RChemical Process Design and Integration. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England, 2005
26.
Liu G, Larson E D, Williams R H, Kreutz T G, Guo X (2011) Supporting information for making Fischer-Tropsch fuels and electricity from coal and biomass: performance and cost analysis. Energy Fuels 25(1)
27.
Williams R, Larson E, Katofsky R, Chen J (1995) Methanol and hydrogen from biomass for transportation, with comparisons to methanol and hydrogen from natural gas and coal. PU/CEES report, vol 292. Princeton University
28.
Hamelinck C, Faaij A (2002) Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass. J Power Sources 111(1): 1–22CrossRef
29.
McKeough P, E. Kurkela. (2008) VTT Research Notes: 2434
30.
IHS/SRI, 2009. Process Economics Program (PEP) Yearbook
31.
Phillips S, Tarud J, Biddy M, Dutta A (2011) Gasoline from wood via integrated gasification, synthesis, and methanol-to-gasoline technologies. NREL/TP-5100-47594. National Renewable Energy Laboratory
32.
Talmadge M. (2013) Workshop on System and Integration Aspects of Biomass-based Gasification. IEA Bioenergy Task 33
33.
Metadaten
Titel
Light olefins and transport fuels from biomass residues via synthetic methanol: performance and cost analysis
verfasst von
Ilkka Hannula
Vesa Arpiainen
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 2190-6815
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-6823
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-014-0123-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Review Article

Polygeneration of SNG, heat and power based on biomass gasification and water electrolysis—concepts and their assessment

Original Article

Ash reduction of corn stover by mild hydrothermal preprocessing

Review Article

Microwave-assisted thermochemical and primary hydrolytic conversions of lignocellulosic resources: a review

Original Article

Sorption-enhanced reforming with limestone from iron production

Original Article

Using a manganese ore as catalyst for upgrading biomass derived gas

Original Article

Life cycle assessment of pyrolysis oil applications