Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics 7/2021

25.01.2021

Likert or Not? How Using Likert Rather Than Biposlar Ratings Reveal Individual Difference Scores Using the Godspeed Scales

verfasst von: A. D. Kaplan, T. L. Sanders, P. A. Hancock

Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Ausgabe 7/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We examined how a revised presentation method of The Godspeed Scales affected results accruing from such tests which concern user judgments of anthropomorphism, animacy, likability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Through the use of Likert-type scales, rather than the original semantic- or bipolar-scale structure, we correlated results in order to determine which word pairs in the original scales were truly opposite in their meanings, where true opposites were anticipated to possess a strongly negative correlation. Results showed that individual differences in each participant’s baseline tendency to choose a rating exerted the strongest relationship with their overall scores. When those differences were accounted for the majority of the word-pairs used in the Godspeed Scale had negative correlations. These findings indicate that individual differences, rather than features of the robot per se, played the largest part in predicting how people will perceive any particular robot.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartneck C, Kulić D, Croft E, Zoghbi S (2009) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot 1(1):71–81CrossRef Bartneck C, Kulić D, Croft E, Zoghbi S (2009) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot 1(1):71–81CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowling A, Windsor J (2008) The effects of question order and response-choice on self-rated health status in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). J Epidemiol Community Health 62(1):81–85CrossRef Bowling A, Windsor J (2008) The effects of question order and response-choice on self-rated health status in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). J Epidemiol Community Health 62(1):81–85CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: The 12th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003. IEEE, pp 55–60 Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: The 12th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003. IEEE, pp 55–60
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho CC, MacDorman KF (2010) Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices. Comput Hum Behav 26(6):1508–1518CrossRef Ho CC, MacDorman KF (2010) Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices. Comput Hum Behav 26(6):1508–1518CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hancock PA, Billings DR, Schaefer KE, Chen JY, De Visser EJ, Parasuraman R (2011) A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Hum Factors 53(5):517–527CrossRef Hancock PA, Billings DR, Schaefer KE, Chen JY, De Visser EJ, Parasuraman R (2011) A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Hum Factors 53(5):517–527CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hancock PA, Billings DR, Schaefer KE (2011) Can you trust your robot? Ergon Des 19(3):24–29 Hancock PA, Billings DR, Schaefer KE (2011) Can you trust your robot? Ergon Des 19(3):24–29
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hancock PA, Hancock GM, Warm JS (2009) Individuation: the N = 1 revolution. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 10(5):481–488CrossRef Hancock PA, Hancock GM, Warm JS (2009) Individuation: the N = 1 revolution. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 10(5):481–488CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hancock PA, Kessler TT, Kaplan AD, Brill JC, Szalma JL (2020) Evolving trust in robots: specification through sequential and comparative meta-analyses. Hum Factors Hancock PA, Kessler TT, Kaplan AD, Brill JC, Szalma JL (2020) Evolving trust in robots: specification through sequential and comparative meta-analyses. Hum Factors
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hancock PA, Weaver JL, Parasuraman R (2002) Sans subjectivity, ergonomics is engineering. Ergonomics 45(14):991–994CrossRef Hancock PA, Weaver JL, Parasuraman R (2002) Sans subjectivity, ergonomics is engineering. Ergonomics 45(14):991–994CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamide H, Mae Y, Kawabe K, Shigemi S, Hirose M, Arai T (2012) New measurement of psychological safety for humanoid. In: 2012 7th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI). IEEE, pp 49–56 Kamide H, Mae Y, Kawabe K, Shigemi S, Hirose M, Arai T (2012) New measurement of psychological safety for humanoid. In: 2012 7th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI). IEEE, pp 49–56
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan AD, Sanders T, Hancock PA (2019) The relationship between extroversion and the tendency to anthropomorphize robots: a bayesian analysis. Front Robot AI 5:135–140CrossRef Kaplan AD, Sanders T, Hancock PA (2019) The relationship between extroversion and the tendency to anthropomorphize robots: a bayesian analysis. Front Robot AI 5:135–140CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mori M (1970) Bukimi no tani [the uncanny valley]. Energy 7:33–35 Mori M (1970) Bukimi no tani [the uncanny valley]. Energy 7:33–35
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Moshkina L (2012) Reusable semantic differential scales for measuring social response to robots. In: Proceedings of the workshop on performance metrics for intelligent systems, pp 89–94 Moshkina L (2012) Reusable semantic differential scales for measuring social response to robots. In: Proceedings of the workshop on performance metrics for intelligent systems, pp 89–94
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Powers A, Kiesler S (2006) The advisor robot: tracing people’s mental model from a robot’s physical attributes. In: 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human–robot interaction, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA Powers A, Kiesler S (2006) The advisor robot: tracing people’s mental model from a robot’s physical attributes. In: 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human–robot interaction, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Proctor RW, Cho YS (2006) Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychol Bull 132(3):416–442CrossRef Proctor RW, Cho YS (2006) Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychol Bull 132(3):416–442CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothermund K, Wentura D (2004) Underlying processes in the implicit association test: dissociating salience from associations. J Exp Psychol Gen 133(2):139–165CrossRef Rothermund K, Wentura D (2004) Underlying processes in the implicit association test: dissociating salience from associations. J Exp Psychol Gen 133(2):139–165CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruijten PA, Bouten DH, Rouschop DC, Ham J, Midden CJ (2014) Introducing a Rasch-type anthropomorphism scale. In: 2014 9th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI). IEEE, pp 280–281 Ruijten PA, Bouten DH, Rouschop DC, Ham J, Midden CJ (2014) Introducing a Rasch-type anthropomorphism scale. In: 2014 9th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI). IEEE, pp 280–281
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Schaefer KE, Chen JY, Szalma JL, Hancock PA (2016) A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation: Implications for understanding autonomy in future systems. Hum Factors 58(3):377–400CrossRef Schaefer KE, Chen JY, Szalma JL, Hancock PA (2016) A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation: Implications for understanding autonomy in future systems. Hum Factors 58(3):377–400CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Weijters B, Geuens M, Schillewaert N (2010) The stability of individual response styles. Psychol Methods 15(1):96–110CrossRef Weijters B, Geuens M, Schillewaert N (2010) The stability of individual response styles. Psychol Methods 15(1):96–110CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss A, Bartneck C (2015) Meta-analysis of the usage of the Godspeed questionnaire series. In: 2015 24th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, pp 381–388 Weiss A, Bartneck C (2015) Meta-analysis of the usage of the Godspeed questionnaire series. In: 2015 24th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, pp 381–388
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang T, Kaber DB, Zhu B, Swangnetr M, Mosaly P, Hodge L (2010) Service robot feature design effects on user perceptions and emotional responses. Intel Serv Robot 3(2):73–88CrossRef Zhang T, Kaber DB, Zhu B, Swangnetr M, Mosaly P, Hodge L (2010) Service robot feature design effects on user perceptions and emotional responses. Intel Serv Robot 3(2):73–88CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Likert or Not? How Using Likert Rather Than Biposlar Ratings Reveal Individual Difference Scores Using the Godspeed Scales
verfasst von
A. D. Kaplan
T. L. Sanders
P. A. Hancock
Publikationsdatum
25.01.2021
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Social Robotics / Ausgabe 7/2021
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00740-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2021

International Journal of Social Robotics 7/2021 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.