nach oben

Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics

Erschienen in:

12.02.2024 | Original Article

Linear stability analysis of surface waves of liquid jet injected in transverse gas flow with different angles

verfasst von: Si. Kasmaiee, M. Tadjfar, Sa. Kasmaiee, G. Ahmadi

Erschienen in: Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

A theoretical and experimental study was conducted to investigate the effect of injection angle on surface waves. Linear stability theory was utilized to obtain the analytical relation. In the experimental study, high-speed photography and shadowgraph techniques were used. Image processing codes were developed to extract information from photos. The results obtained from the theoretical relation were validated with the experimental results at different injection angles. In addition, at the injection angle of 90\({^\circ }\), the theoretical results were evaluated with the experimental results of other researchers. This evaluation showed that the theory results were in good agreement with the experimental data. The proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and the power spectra density (PSD) analysis were also used to investigate the effect of the injection angle on the flow structures. The results obtained from the linear stability were used to determine the maximum waves’ growth rate, and a relation was presented for the breakup length of the liquid jet at different injection angles. The breakup length results were compared with theory and published experimental data. The presented relation is more consistent with experimental data than other theories due to considering the nature of waves. The results showed that the instability of the liquid jet is influenced by three forces: inertial, surface tension, and aerodynamic. Therefore, Rayleigh–Taylor, Kelvin–Helmholtz, Rayleigh–Plateau, and azimuthal instabilities occur in the process. Decreasing the injection angle changes the nature of waves and shifts from Rayleigh–Taylor to Kelvin–Helmholtz. That reduces the wavelength and increases the growth rate of the waves. Axial waves have a significant impact on the physics of the waves and influence parameters. If axial waves are not formed, the growth rate of the waves is independent of the injection angle. An increase in the gas Weber number causes a change in the type of dominant waves and a greater instability of the liquid jet. In contrast, an increase in the liquid Weber number causes an enhancement in the resistance of the liquid jet against the transverse flow without changing the type of the dominant waves. Decreasing the density ratio reduces the effect of Rayleigh–Taylor waves and strengthens the Kelvin–Helmholtz waves. It causes two trends to be observed for the growth rate of waves at low spray angles, while one trend occurs at high spray angles.

Graphical abstract

Vorheriger Artikel Fluid flow past a freely moving body in a straight or distorted channel

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Broumand, M., Birouk, M.: Liquid jet in a subsonic gaseous crossflow: recent progress and remaining challenges. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 57, 1–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054440CrossRef

Kampa, M., Castanas, E.: Human health effects of air pollution. Environ. Pollut. 151, 362–367 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.012CrossRef

Wu, P.-K., Kirkendall, K.A., Fuller, R.P., Nejad, A.S.: Breakup processes of liquid jets in subsonic crossflows. J. Propuls. Power 13, 64–73 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5151CrossRef

Mazallon, J., Dai, Z., Faeth, G.M.: Primary breakup of nonturbulent round liquid jets in gas crossflows. At. Sprays 9, 3 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.v9.i3.40CrossRef

Sallam, K.A., Aalburg, C., Faeth, G.M.: Breakup of round nonturbulent liquid jets in gaseous crossflow. AIAA J. 42, 2529–2540 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.3749CrossRef

Ng, C.-L., Sankarakrishnan, R., Sallam, K.A.: Bag breakup of nonturbulent liquid jets in crossflow. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 34, 241–259 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2007.07.005CrossRef

Behzad, M., Ashgriz, N., Karney, B.W.: Surface breakup of a non-turbulent liquid jet injected into a high pressure gaseous crossflow. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 80, 100–117 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.11.007MathSciNetCrossRef

Li, X., Soteriou, M.C.: High fidelity simulation and analysis of liquid jet atomization in a gaseous crossflow at intermediate Weber numbers. Phys. Fluids 28, 82101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4959290CrossRef

Li, X., Gao, H., Soteriou, M.C.: Investigation of the impact of high liquid viscosity on jet atomization in crossflow via high-fidelity simulations. Phys. Fluids 29, 82103 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4996178CrossRef

10.

Li, X., Soteriou, M.C.: Detailed numerical simulation of liquid jet atomization in crossflow of increasing density. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 104, 214–232 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.02.016MathSciNetCrossRef

11.

Lee, K., Aalburg, C., Diez, F.J., Faeth, G.M., Sallam, K.A.: Primary breakup of turbulent round liquid jets in uniform crossflows. AIAA J. 45, 1907–1916 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19397CrossRef

12.

Ragucci, R., Cavaliere, A., Bellofiore, A.: Trajectory and momentum coherence breakdown of a liquid jet in high-density air cross-flow. At. Sprays 17, 47–70 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.v17.i1.20CrossRef

13.

Eslamian, M., Amighi, A., Ashgriz, N.: Atomization of liquid jet in high-pressure and high-temperature subsonic crossflow. AIAA J. 52, 1374–1385 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052548CrossRef

14.

Song, J., Cary Cain, C., Guen Lee, J.: Liquid jets in subsonic air crossflow at elevated pressure. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 137, 041502 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028565CrossRef

15.

Broumand, M., Birouk, M., et al.: Liquid jet primary breakup in a turbulent cross-airflow at low Weber number. J. Fluid Mech. 879, 775–792 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2016.08.003MathSciNetCrossRef

16.

Wang, F., Fang, T.: Liquid jet breakup for non-circular orifices under low pressures. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 72, 248–262 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.02.015CrossRef

17.

Rajesh, K.R., Sakthikumar, R., Sivakumar, D.: Interfacial oscillation of liquid jets discharging from non-circular orifices. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 87, 1–8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.08.006CrossRef

18.

Prakash, R.S., Sinha, A., Tomar, G., Ravikrishna, R.V.: Liquid jet in crossflow-effect of liquid entry conditions. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 93, 45–56 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.12.012CrossRef

19.

Sinha, A.: Surface waves on liquid jet in crossflow: effect of injector geometry. AIAA J. 57, 4577–4582 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J058383CrossRef

20.

Tadjfar, M., Jaberi, A.: Effects of aspect ratio on the flow development of rectangular liquid jets issued into stagnant air. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 115, 144–157 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.03.011CrossRef

21.

Jaberi, A., Tadjfar, M.: Wavelength and frequency of axis-switching phenomenon formed over rectangular and elliptical liquid jets. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 119, 144–154 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.07.006CrossRef

22.

Jaberi, A., Tadjfar, M.: Visualization of two-dimensional liquid sheets issued into subsonic gaseous crossflow. J. Vis. 23, 605–624 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-020-00655-wCrossRef

23.

Jaberi, A., Tadjfar, M.: Two-dimensional liquid sheet in transverse subsonic airflow. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 123, 110326 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2020.110326CrossRef

24.

Boeck, T., Li, J., López-Pagés, E., Yecko, P., Zaleski, S.: Ligament formation in sheared liquid–gas layers. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 21, 59–76 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-006-0022-1CrossRef

25.

Khosravi, M., Javan, M.: Three-dimensional features of the lateral thermal plume discharge in the deep cross-flow using dynamic adaptive mesh refinement. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 36, 405–422 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-022-00612-3MathSciNetCrossRef

26.

Amini, G.: Linear stability analysis of a liquid jet in a weak crossflow. Phys. Fluids 30, 84105 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5043589CrossRef

27.

Lee, H., Park, D.: Linear stability analysis of compressible vortex flows considering viscous effects. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 36, 799–820 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-022-00610-5MathSciNetCrossRef

28.

Sterling, A.M., Sleicher, C.A.: The instability of capillary jets. J. Fluid Mech. 68, 477–495 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112075001772CrossRef

29.

Lin, S.P., Lian, Z.W.: Mechanisms of the breakup of liquid jets. AIAA J. 28, 120–126 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10361CrossRef

30.

Funada, T., Joseph, D.D.: Viscous potential flow analysis of capillary instability. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 28, 1459–1478 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9322(02)00035-6CrossRef

31.

Liu, Z., Liu, Z.: Linear analysis of three-dimensional instability of non-Newtonian liquid jets. J. Fluid Mech. 559, 451–459 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112006000413MathSciNetCrossRef

32.

Yang, L., Liu, Y., Fu, Q.: Linear stability analysis of an electrified viscoelastic liquid jet. J. Fluids Eng. 134, 071303 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006913CrossRef

33.

Boronin, S.A., Healey, J.J., Sazhin, S.S.: Non-modal stability of round viscous jets. J. Fluid Mech. 716, 96–119 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2012.521MathSciNetCrossRef

34.

Pillai, D.S., Picardo, J.R., Pushpavanam, S.: Shifting and breakup instabilities of squeezed elliptic jets. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 67, 189–199 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.09.004MathSciNetCrossRef

35.

Coelho, S.L.V., Hunt, J.C.R.: The dynamics of the near field of strong jets in crossflows. J. Fluid Mech. 200, 95–120 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112089000583MathSciNetCrossRef

36.

Higuera, F.J., Martinez, M.: An incompressible jet in a weak crossflow. J. Fluid Mech. 249, 73–97 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112093001089CrossRef

37.

Alves, L.S.D.B., Kelly, R.E., Karagozian, A.R.: Local stability analysis of an inviscid transverse jet. J. Fluid Mech. 581, 401–418 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112007005873MathSciNetCrossRef

38.

Bagheri, S., Schlatter, P., Schmid, P.J., Henningson, D.S.: Global stability of a jet in crossflow. J. Fluid Mech. 624, 33–44 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112009006053MathSciNetCrossRef

39.

Regan, M.A., Mahesh, K.: Global linear stability analysis of jets in cross-flow. J. Fluid Mech. 828, 812–836 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.489MathSciNetCrossRef

40.

Yang, H.Q.: Asymmetric instability of a liquid jet. Phys. Fluids A Fluid Dyn. 4, 681–689 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.858287CrossRef

41.

Avital, E.: Asymmetric instability of a viscid capillary jet in an inviscid media. Phys. Fluids 7, 1162–1164 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.868558CrossRef

42.

Brenn, G., Liu, Z., Durst, F.: Three-dimensional temporal instability of non-Newtonian liquid sheets. At. Sprays 11, 1 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.v11.i1.40CrossRef

43.

Wang, S., Huang, Y., Liu, Z.L.: Theoretical analysis of surface waves on a round liquid jet in a gaseous crossflow. At. Sprays 24, 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.2013008203CrossRef

44.

Behzad, M., Ashgriz, N., Mashayek, A.: Azimuthal shear instability of a liquid jet injected into a gaseous cross-flow. J. Fluid Mech. 767, 146–172 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.36MathSciNetCrossRef

45.

Guo, J.-P., Wang, Y.-B., Bai, F.-Q., Du, Q.: Unstable breakup of a power-law liquid fuel jet in the presence of a gas crossflow. Fuel 263, 116606 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116606CrossRef

46.

Liu, L., Fu, Q., Yang, L.: Linear stability analysis of liquid jet exposed to subsonic crossflow with heat and mass transfer. Phys. Fluids 33, 34111 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0040538CrossRef

47.

Liu, L.-H., Fu, Q.-F., Yang, L.-J.: Linear stability analysis of liquid jets exposed to subsonic crossflow with aluminum particles and surfactant. At. Sprays 31, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.2020035501CrossRef

48.

Broumand, M., Birouk, M.: Two-zone model for predicting the trajectory of liquid jet in gaseous crossflow. AIAA J. 54, 1499–1511 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.704CrossRef

49.

Kasmaiee, S., Tadjfar, M.: Influence of injection angle on liquid jet in crossflow. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 153, 104128 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2022.104128CrossRef

50.

Kasmaiee, S., Tadjfar, M.: Experimental study of the injection angle impact on the column waves: wavelength, frequency and drop size. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2023.110989CrossRef

51.

Bradley, D., Roth, G.: Adaptive thresholding using the integral image. J. Graph. Tools 12, 13–21 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/2151237X.2007.10129236CrossRef

52.

Vincent, O.R., Folorunso, O., et al.: A descriptive algorithm for sobel image edge detection. In: Proceedings of Informing Science IT Education Conference (InSITE), pp. 97–107 (2009). https://doi.org/10.28945/3351

53.

Vadivukkarasan, M., Panchagnula, M.V.: Helical modes in combined Rayleigh–Taylor and Kelvin–Helmholtz instability of a cylindrical interface. Int. J. Spray Combust. Dyn. 8, 219–234 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1756827716642159CrossRef

54.

Vadivukkarasan, M., Panchagnula, M.V.: Combined Rayleigh–Taylor and Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities on an annular liquid sheet. J. Fluid Mech. 812, 152–177 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.784MathSciNetCrossRef

55.

Karagozian, A.R.: Transverse jets and their control. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 36, 531–553 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2010.01.001CrossRef

56.

Sedarsky, D., Paciaroni, M., Berrocal, E., Petterson, P., Zelina, J., Gord, J., Linne, M.: Model validation image data for breakup of a liquid jet in crossflow: part I. Exp. Fluids 49, 391–408 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0807-2CrossRef

57.

Rayleigh, R.: Investigation of the character of the equilibrium of an incompressible heavy fluid of variable density. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1, 170–177 (1882). https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s1-14.1.170MathSciNetCrossRef

58.

Clark, C.J., Dombrowski, N.: Aerodynamic instability and disintegration of inviscid liquid sheets. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. Math. Phys. Sci. 329, 467–478 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1972.0124CrossRef

59.

Fu, Q., Yang, L., Qu, Y., Gu, B.: Linear stability analysis of a conical liquid sheet. J. Propuls. Power 26, 955–968 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.48346CrossRef

60.

Brunton, S.L., Noack, B.R., Koumoutsakos, P.: Machine learning for fluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 52, 477–508 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214MathSciNetCrossRef

61.

Nobach, H., Tropea, C., Cordier, L., Bonnet, J.P., Delville, J., Lewalle, J., Farge, M., Schneider, K., Adrian, R.: Review of some fundamentals of data processing. In: Springer Handbooks. pp. 1337–1398. Springer (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30299-5_22

62.

Holmes, P., Lumley, J.L., Berkooz, G., Rowley, C.W.: Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511919701CrossRef

63.

Arienti, M., Soteriou, M.C.: Time-resolved proper orthogonal decomposition of liquid jet dynamics. Phys. Fluids 21, 112104 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3263165CrossRef

64.

Herrmann, M., Arienti, M., Soteriou, M.: The impact of density ratio on the liquid core dynamics of a turbulent liquid jet injected into a crossflow. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (2011). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002273CrossRef

65.

Charalampous, G., Hardalupas, Y.: Application of proper orthogonal decomposition to the morphological analysis of confined co-axial jets of immiscible liquids with comparable densities. Phys. Fluids 26, 113301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4900944CrossRef

66.

Kang, Z., Li, X., Mao, X.: Experimental investigation on the surface wave characteristics of conical liquid film. Acta Astronaut. 149, 15–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.05.030CrossRef

67.

Xu, L., Xia, Z., Zhang, M., Du, Q., Bai, F.: Experimental research on breakup of 2D power law liquid film. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 23, 1429–1439 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2015.03.011CrossRef

Titel: Linear stability analysis of surface waves of liquid jet injected in transverse gas flow with different angles
verfasst von: Si. Kasmaiee
M. Tadjfar
Sa. Kasmaiee
G. Ahmadi
Publikationsdatum: 12.02.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0935-4964
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2250
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-024-00685-2

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphical abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Fluid flow past a freely moving body in a straight or distorted channel

Theory and simulation of shock waves freely propagating through monoatomic non-Boltzmann gas

Free surface wave interaction with a submerged body using a DtN boundary condition

Stability of supersonic boundary layer over an unswept wing with a parabolic airfoil

Investigation of Stokes flow in a grooved channel using the spectral method

An adjoint-based methodology for calculating manufacturing tolerances for natural laminar flow airfoils susceptible to smooth surface waviness

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten