nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Predictive Process Monitoring Methods: Which One Suits Me Best?

verfasst von : Chiara Di Francescomarino, Chiara Ghidini, Fabrizio Maria Maggi, Fredrik Milani

Erschienen in: Business Process Management

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Predictive process monitoring has recently gained traction in academia and is maturing also in companies. However, with the growing body of research, it might be daunting for data analysts to navigate through this domain in order to find, provided certain data, what can be predicted and what methods to use. The main objective of this paper is developing a value-driven framework for classifying predictive process monitoring methods. This objective is achieved by systematically reviewing existing work in this area. Starting from about 780 papers retrieved through a keyword-based search from electronic libraries and filtering them according to some exclusion criteria, 55 papers have been finally thoroughly analyzed and classified. Then, the review has been used to develop the value-driven framework that can support researchers and practitioners to navigate through the predictive process monitoring field and help them to find value and exploit the opportunities enabled by these analysis techniques.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Assessing the Quality of Search Process Models

Nächstes Kapitel How Context-Aware Are Extant BPM Methods? - Development of an Assessment Scheme

The queries were run on October 20, 2017.

The data extracted was entered into an excel sheet and is available for download at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1l1enKhKWx_3KqtnUgggrPl1aoJMhvmy9TF9jAM3snas/edit#gid=959800788.

For space limitations, in this article, an abridged version of the framework is presented. The complete version of the framework includes additional data and is available for download at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1l1enKhKWx_3KqtnUgggrPl1aoJMhvmy9TF9jAM3snas/edit#gid=959800788.

van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining - Data Science in Action, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4CrossRef

van der Aalst, W.M.P., Schonenberg, M.H., Song, M.: Time prediction based on process mining. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 450–475 (2011)CrossRef

van der Aalst, W.M.P., Pesic, M., Song, M.: Beyond process mining: from the past to present and future. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 38–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13094-6_5CrossRef

Bevacqua, A., Carnuccio, M., Folino, F., Guarascio, M., Pontieri, L.: A data-adaptive trace abstraction approach to the prediction of business process performances. In: ICEIS, vol. 1. SciTePress (2013)

Bevacqua, A., Carnuccio, M., Folino, F., Guarascio, M., Pontieri, L.: A data-driven prediction framework for analyzing and monitoring business process performances. In: Hammoudi, S., Cordeiro, J., Maciaszek, L.A., Filipe, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2013. LNBIP, vol. 190, pp. 100–117. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09492-2_7CrossRef

Bolt, A., Sepúlveda, M.: Process remaining time prediction using query catalogs. In: Lohmann, N., Song, M., Wohed, P. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNBIP, vol. 171, pp. 54–65. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06257-0_5CrossRef

Breuker, D., Matzner, M., Delfmann, P., Becker, J.: Comprehensible predictive models for business processes. MIS Q. 40(4), 1009–1034 (2016)CrossRef

Cabanillas, C., Di Ciccio, C., Mendling, J., Baumgrass, A.: Predictive task monitoring for business processes. In: Sadiq, S., Soffer, P., Völzer, H. (eds.) BPM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8659, pp. 424–432. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10172-9_31CrossRef

Castellanos, M., Salazar, N., Casati, F., Dayal, U., Shan, M.-C.: Predictive business operations management. In: Bhalla, S. (ed.) DNIS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3433, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31970-2_1CrossRef

10.

Ceci, M., Lanotte, P.F., Fumarola, F., Cavallo, D.P., Malerba, D.: Completion time and next activity prediction of processes using sequential pattern mining. In: Džeroski, S., Panov, P., Kocev, D., Todorovski, L. (eds.) DS 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8777, pp. 49–61. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11812-3_5CrossRef

11.

Cesario, E., Folino, F., Guarascio, M., Pontieri, L.: A cloud-based prediction framework for analyzing business process performances. In: Buccafurri, F., Holzinger, A., Kieseberg, P., Tjoa, A.M., Weippl, E. (eds.) CD-ARES 2016. LNCS, vol. 9817, pp. 63–80. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45507-5_5CrossRef

12.

Conforti, R., de Leoni, M., La Rosa, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: A recommendation system for predicting risks across multiple business process instances. Decis. Support Syst. 69, 1–19 (2015)CrossRef

13.

Conforti, R., Fink, S., Manderscheid, J., Röglinger, M.: PRISM – a predictive risk monitoring approach for business processes. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9850, pp. 383–400. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_22CrossRef

14.

Conforti, R., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., La Rosa, M., Adams, M.: Automated risk mitigation in business processes. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7565, pp. 212–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33606-5_14CrossRef

15.

Conforti, R., de Leoni, M., La Rosa, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Supporting risk-informed decisions during business process execution. In: Salinesi, C., Norrie, M.C., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) CAiSE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7908, pp. 116–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38709-8_8CrossRef

16.

Cuzzocrea, A., Folino, F., Guarascio, M., Pontieri, L.: A multi-v2016a multi-view multi-dimensional ensemble learning approach to mining business process deviances. In: IJCNN (2016)

17.

Di Francescomarino, C., Dumas, M., Federici, M., Ghidini, C., Maggi, F.M., Rizzi, W.: Predictive business process monitoring framework with hyperparameter optimization. In: Nurcan, S., Soffer, P., Bajec, M., Eder, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9694, pp. 361–376. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39696-5_22CrossRef

18.

Di Francescomarino, C., Dumas, M., Maggi, F.M., Teinemaa, I.: Clustering-based predictive process monitoring. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. PP(99) (2016)

19.

Di Francescomarino, C., Ghidini, C., Maggi, F.M., Petrucci, G., Yeshchenko, A.: An eye into the future: leveraging a-priori knowledge in predictive business process monitoring. In: Carmona, J., Engels, G., Kumar, A. (eds.) BPM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10445, pp. 252–268. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65000-5_15CrossRef

20.

van Dongen, B.F., Crooy, R.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Cycle time prediction: when will this case finally be finished? In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5331, pp. 319–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88871-0_22CrossRef

21.

Dumas, M., Maggi, F.M.: Enabling process innovation via deviance mining and predictive monitoring. In: vom Brocke, J., Schmiedel, T. (eds.) BPM - Driving Innovation in a Digital World. MP, pp. 145–154. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14430-6_10CrossRef

22.

Evermann, J., Rehse, J.-R., Fettke, P.: A deep learning approach for predicting process behaviour at runtime. In: Dumas, M., Fantinato, M. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNBIP, vol. 281, pp. 327–338. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58457-7_24CrossRef

23.

Evermann, J., Rehse, J.R., Fettke, P.: Predicting process behaviour using deep learning. Decis. Support Syst. 100, 129–140 (2017)CrossRef

24.

Feldman, Z., Fournier, F., Franklin, R., Metzger, A.: Proactive event processing in action: a case study on the proactive management of transport processes (industry article). In: ACM DEBS (2013)

25.

Ferilli, S., Esposito, F., Redavid, D., Angelastro, S.: Predicting process behavior in WoMan. In: Adorni, G., Cagnoni, S., Gori, M., Maratea, M. (eds.) AI*IA 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10037, pp. 308–320. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49130-1_23CrossRef

26.

Ferilli, S., Esposito, F., Redavid, D., Angelastro, S.: Extended process models for activity prediction. In: Kryszkiewicz, M., Appice, A., Ślęzak, D., Rybinski, H., Skowron, A., Raś, Z.W. (eds.) ISMIS 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10352, pp. 368–377. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60438-1_36CrossRef

27.

Folino, F., Greco, G., Guzzo, A., Pontieri, L.: Mining usage scenarios in business processes: outlier-aware discovery and run-time prediction. Data Knowl. Eng. 70(12), 1005–1029 (2011)CrossRef

28.

Folino, F., Guarascio, M., Pontieri, L.: Discovering context-aware models for predicting business process performances. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7565, pp. 287–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33606-5_18CrossRef

29.

Folino, F., Guarascio, M., Pontieri, L.: Context-aware predictions on business processes: an ensemble-based solution. In: Appice, A., Ceci, M., Loglisci, C., Manco, G., Masciari, E., Ras, Z.W. (eds.) NFMCP 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7765, pp. 215–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37382-4_15CrossRef

30.

Folino, F., Guarascio, M., Pontieri, L.: Discovering high-level performance models for ticket resolution processes. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8185, pp. 275–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41030-7_18CrossRef

31.

Folino, F., Guarascio, M., Pontieri, L.: Mining predictive process models out of low-level multidimensional logs. In: Jarke, M., et al. (eds.) CAiSE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8484, pp. 533–547. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07881-6_36CrossRef

32.

Halper, F.: Predictive analytics for business advantage. TDWI Research (2014)

33.

van der Aalst, W.M.P., et al.: Process mining manifesto. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 169–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_19CrossRef

34.

Kang, B., Kim, D., Kang, S.H.: Real-time business process monitoring method for prediction of abnormal termination using KNNI-based LOF prediction. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(5), 6061–6068 (2012)CrossRef

35.

Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele UK Keele Univ. 33(2004), 1–26 (2004)

36.

Kofod-Petersen, A.: How to do a structured literature review in computer science. Ver. 0.1, 1 October 2012

37.

Lakshmanan, G.T., Shamsi, D., Doganata, Y.N., Unuvar, M., Khalaf, R.: A Markov prediction model for data-driven semi-structured business processes. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 42(1), 97–126 (2015)CrossRef

38.

de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dees, M.: A general framework for correlating business process characteristics. In: Sadiq, S., Soffer, P., Völzer, H. (eds.) BPM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8659, pp. 250–266. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10172-9_16CrossRef

39.

Leontjeva, A., Conforti, R., Di Francescomarino, C., Dumas, M., Maggi, F.M.: Complex symbolic sequence encodings for predictive monitoring of business processes. In: Motahari-Nezhad, H.R., Recker, J., Weidlich, M. (eds.) BPM 2015. LNCS, vol. 9253, pp. 297–313. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_21CrossRef

40.

Ly, L.T., Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Rinderle-Ma, S., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Compliance monitoring in business processes: functionalities, application, and tool-support. Inf. Syst. 54, 209–234 (2015)CrossRef

41.

Maggi, F.M., Di Francescomarino, C., Dumas, M., Ghidini, C.: Predictive monitoring of business processes. In: Jarke, M., et al. (eds.) CAiSE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8484, pp. 457–472. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07881-6_31CrossRef

42.

Maisenbacher, M., Weidlich, M.: Handling concept drift in predictive process monitoring. In: IEEE SCC, pp. 1–8. IEEE Computer Society (2017)

43.

Mehdiyev, N., Evermann, J., Fettke, P.: A multi-stage deep learning approach for business process event prediction. In: CBI, vol. 01, July 2017

44.

Metzger, A., et al.: Comparing and combining predictive business process monitoring techniques. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.: Syst. 45(2), 276–290 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRef

45.

Metzger, A., Föcker, F.: Predictive business process monitoring considering reliability estimates. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10253, pp. 445–460. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59536-8_28CrossRef

46.

Metzger, A., Franklin, R., Engel, Y.: Predictive monitoring of heterogeneous service-oriented business networks: the transport and logistics case. In: Proceedings of SRII, SRII 2012 (2012)

47.

Márquez-Chamorro, A.E., Resinas, M., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: Predictive monitoring of business processes: a survey. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2017.2772256CrossRef

48.

Márquez-Chamorro, A.E., Resinas, M., Ruiz-Cortés, A., Toro, M.: Run-time prediction of business process indicators using evolutionary decision rules. Expert Syst. Appl. 87, 1–14 (2017)CrossRef

49.

Pandey, S., Nepal, S., Chen, S.: A test-bed for the evaluation of business process prediction techniques. In: 7th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom), October 2011

50.

Pika, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Fidge, C.J., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Wynn, M.T.: Predicting deadline transgressions using event logs. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 211–216. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36285-9_22CrossRef

51.

Pika, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Fidge, C.J., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Wynn, M.T.: Profiling event logs to configure risk indicators for process delays. In: Salinesi, C., Norrie, M.C., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) CAiSE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7908, pp. 465–481. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38709-8_30CrossRef

52.

Pika, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Wynn, M.T., Fidge, C.J., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Evaluating and predicting overall process risk using event logs. Inf. Sci. 352–353, 98–120 (2016)CrossRef

53.

Polato, M., Sperduti, A., Burattin, A., de Leoni, M.: Data-aware remaining time prediction of business process instances. In: 2014 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), July 2014

54.

Polato, M., Sperduti, A., Burattin, A., de Leoni, M.: Time and activity sequence prediction of business process instances. Computing (2018)

55.

Rogge-Solti, A., Vana, L., Mendling, J.: Time series Petri net models. In: Ceravolo, P., Rinderle-Ma, S. (eds.) SIMPDA 2015. LNBIP, vol. 244, pp. 124–141. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53435-0_6CrossRef

56.

Rogge-Solti, A., Weske, M.: Prediction of remaining service execution time using stochastic Petri nets with arbitrary firing delays. In: Basu, S., Pautasso, C., Zhang, L., Fu, X. (eds.) ICSOC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8274, pp. 389–403. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45005-1_27CrossRef

57.

Rogge-Solti, A., Weske, M.: Prediction of business process durations using non-Markovian stochastic Petri nets. Inf. Syst. 54, 1–14 (2015)CrossRef

58.

Ruschel, E., Santos, E.A.P., de Freitas Rocha Loures, E.: Mining shop-floor data for preventive maintenance management: integrating probabilistic and predictive models. Procedia Manuf. 11, 1127–1134 (2017)CrossRef

59.

Senderovich, A., Di Francescomarino, C., Ghidini, C., Jorbina, K., Maggi, F.M.: Intra and inter-case features in predictive process monitoring: a tale of two dimensions. In: Carmona, J., Engels, G., Kumar, A. (eds.) BPM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10445, pp. 306–323. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65000-5_18CrossRef

60.

Senderovich, A., Shleyfman, A., Weidlich, M., Gal, A., Mandelbaum, A.: P\(^3\)-folder: optimal model simplification for improving accuracy in process performance prediction. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9850, pp. 418–436. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_24CrossRef

61.

Senderovich, A., Weidlich, M., Gal, A., Mandelbaum, A.: Queue mining – predicting delays in service processes. CAiSE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8484, pp. 42–57. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07881-6_4CrossRef

62.

Senderovich, A., Weidlich, M., Gal, A., Mandelbaum, A.: Queue mining for delay prediction in multi-class service processes. Inf. Syst. 53, 278–295 (2015)CrossRef

63.

Si, Y.W., Hoi, K.K., Biuk-Aghai, R.P., Fong, S., Zhang, D.: Run-based exception prediction for workflows. J. Syst. Softw. 113, 59–75 (2016)CrossRef

64.

Tax, N., Verenich, I., La Rosa, M., Dumas, M.: Predictive business process monitoring with LSTM neural networks. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10253, pp. 477–492. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59536-8_30CrossRef

65.

Teinemaa, I., Dumas, M., Maggi, F.M., Di Francescomarino, C.: Predictive business process monitoring with structured and unstructured data. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9850, pp. 401–417. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_23CrossRef

66.

Tu, T.B.H., Song, M.: Analysis and prediction cost of manufacturing process based on process mining. In: ICIMSA, May 2016

67.

Verenich, I., Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Maggi, F.M., Di Francescomarino, C.: Complex symbolic sequence clustering and multiple classifiers for predictive process monitoring. In: Reichert, M., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2015. LNBIP, vol. 256, pp. 218–229. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42887-1_18CrossRef

68.

Verenich, I., Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Maggi, F.M., Di Francescomarino, C.: Minimizing overprocessing waste in business processes via predictive activity ordering. In: Nurcan, S., Soffer, P., Bajec, M., Eder, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9694, pp. 186–202. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39696-5_12CrossRef

69.

Verenich, I., Nguyen, H., La Rosa, M., Dumas, M.: White-box prediction of process performance indicators via flow analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Software and System Process, ICSSP 2017 (2017)

70.

Wynn, M.T., Low, W.Z., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Nauta, W.: A framework for cost-aware process management: cost reporting and cost prediction. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 20(3), 406–430 (2014)

71.

Zeng, L., Lingenfelder, C., Lei, H., Chang, H.: Event-driven quality of service prediction. In: Bouguettaya, A., Krueger, I., Margaria, T. (eds.) ICSOC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5364, pp. 147–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89652-4_14CrossRef

Titel: Predictive Process Monitoring Methods: Which One Suits Me Best?
verfasst von: Chiara Di Francescomarino
Chiara Ghidini
Fabrizio Maria Maggi
Fredrik Milani
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Business Process Management
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98647-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-98648-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98648-7_27

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"