Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
A Basic Proxy System Design for Integrating Complicated Distributed Simulation Systems Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Opinion Formation Using the Gür Game

verfasst von : Shu-Yuan Wu, Theodore Brown

Erschienen in: Theory, Methodology, Tools and Applications for Modeling and Simulation of Complex Systems

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Opinion leaders with different degrees of influence may lead to different outcomes when seeking support from their followers. In this paper, we present the opinion leaders with high trustworthiness or the effective persuasion tactics will gain the desired proportion of support from followers sooner in the Gür game framework. The composition of followers in a group affects the time to achieve the target proportion of support as well. The Gür game is a self-organized artificial game associating players with finite state automata and a moderator with a reward function. We regard each follower as a player associating with a finite state automaton to reflect their states of mind. An opinion leader, considered as a moderator, has a reward function to reflect his/her degree of influence and to predict the probability of followers changing their state of mind after he/she delivers a speech or comments on a topic or a product.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Simulation-Based Population Dynamics Analysis: Korean Population Aging
Nächstes Kapitel Can a Buffering Strategy Reduce Workload Related Stress?
Literatur
1.
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81(2), 591 (2009)CrossRef
2.
Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G., Faure, T.: How can extremism prevail? a study based on the relative agreement interaction model. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5(4) (2002)
3.
Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv. Complex Syst. 3(01–04), 87–98 (2000)CrossRef
4.
Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics driven by various ways of averaging. Comput. Econ. 25(4), 381–405 (2005)CrossRefMATH
5.
Hegselmann, R., Krause, U., et al.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5(3), 1–33 (2002)
6.
Iyer, R., Kleinrock, L.: Qos control for sensor networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2003, vol. 1, pp. 517–521. IEEE (2003)
7.
Katz, E., Lazarsfeld, P.F.: Personal influence; the part played by people inthe flow of mass communications. Free Press, Glencoe, Ill (1955)
8.
Liu, C., Hui, P., Branch, J., Yang, B.: Qoi-aware energy management forwireless sensor networks. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), pp. 8–13. IEEE (2011)
9.
Lorenz, J.: Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: a survey. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 18(12), 1819–1838 (2007)CrossRefMATH
10.
Nayer, S.I., Ali, H.H.: A dynamic energy-aware algorithm for self-optimizing wireless sensor networks. In: Hummel, K.A., Sterbenz, J.P.G. (eds.) IWSOS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5343, pp. 262–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-540-92157-8_​23 CrossRef
11.
Song, X., Shi, W., Ma, Y., Yang, C.: Impact of informal networks on opinion dynamics in hierarchically formal organization. Phys. A 436, 916–924 (2015)CrossRef
12.
Song, X., Zhang, S., Qian, L.: Opinion dynamics in networked command and control organizations. Phys. A 392(20), 5206–5217 (2013)CrossRef
13.
14.
Sznajd-Weron, K.: Sznajd model and its applications. arXiv preprint physics/0503239 (2005)
15.
Sznajd-Weron, K., Sznajd, J.: Opinion evolution in closed community. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11(06), 1157–1165 (2000)CrossRefMATH
16.
Tsai, R.G., Wang, H.L.: A coverage-aware qos control in wireless sensornetworks. In: 2010 International Conference on Communications and Mobile Computing (CMC), vol. 3, pp. 192–196. IEEE (2010)
17.
Tsetlin, M.: Automaton theory and modeling of biological systems: by ML Tsetlin. Translated by Scitran (Scientific Translation Service), vol. 102. Academic Press (1973)
18.
Tung, B., Kleinrock, L.: Distributed control methods. In: Proceedings the 2nd International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, pp. 206–215. IEEE (1993)
19.
Tung, B., Kleinrock, L.: Using finite state automata to produce self-optimization and self-control. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 7(4), 439–448 (1996)CrossRef
20.
Watts, D.J., Dodds, P.S.: Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J. Consum. Res. 34(4), 441–458 (2007)CrossRef
21.
Wu, S., Hofman, J.M., Mason, W.A., Watts, D.J.: Who says what to whom on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 705–714. ACM (2011)
22.
Wu, S.Y., Brown, T.: Opinion formation under the two-step flow model and the gur game framework. In: The Sixth Annual Asian Conference on the Social Sciences (ACSS 2015). IAFOR (2015)
23.
Zhao, L., Xu, C., Xu, Y., Li, X.: Energy-aware qos control for wireless sensor network. In: 2006 1ST IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2006)
Metadaten
Titel
Opinion Formation Using the Gür Game
verfasst von
Shu-Yuan Wu
Theodore Brown
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Theory, Methodology, Tools and Applications for Modeling and Simulation of Complex Systems

Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2671-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-10-2672-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2672-0_38

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise