Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 3-4/2021

23.11.2020 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Many-objective optimization of build part orientation in additive manufacturing

verfasst von: Marina A. Matos, Ana Maria A. C. Rocha, Lino A. Costa

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Ausgabe 3-4/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Additive manufacturing is the process of building a three-dimensional object from a computer-aided design model, by successively adding material layer-by-layer. This technology allows to print complex shape objects and is being rapidly adopted throughout the aircraft industry, medical implants, jewelry, footwear industry, automotive industry, and fashion products. The build orientation of 3D objects has a strong influence on many quality characteristics. In this paper, a many-objective approach is applied to the Fin model, using the NSGA-II algorithm to optimize four conflicting objective functions regarding the need for support structures, the build time, the surface roughness, and the overall quality of the surface. First, a bi-objective optimization is performed for each couple of two objectives and some representative solutions are identified. However, when applying many-objective optimization to the four objective functions simultaneously, some more orientation angles are found as good optimal solutions. Visualization tools are used to inspect the relationships and the trade-offs between the objectives. Then, the decision-maker can choose which orientation angles are more favorable according to his/her preferences. The optimal solutions found confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Vorheriger Artikel Correction to: Holistic sustainability assessment of hybrid Al-GnP enriched nanofluids and textured-tool in machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy
Nächster Artikel Electrically assisted deep drawing on high-strength steel sheet

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Chong L, Ramakrishna S, Singh S (2018) A review of digital manufacturing-based hybrid additive manufacturing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(5-8):2281–2300
2.
Khan I, Mateus A, Lorger CSK, Mitchell GR (2017) Part specific applications of additive manufacturing. Procedia Manuf 12:89–95
3.
Vahabli E, Rahmati S (2017) Hybrid estimation of surface roughness distribution in FDM parts using analytical modeling and empirical investigation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(5-8):2287–2303
4.
Ahn DK, Kwon SM, Lee SH (2008) Expression for surface roughness distribution of FDM processed parts. In: Smart manufacturing application, 2008. ICSMA 2008. International conference on, pp 490–493. IEEE
5.
Behnam N (2011) Surface roughness estimation for FDM systems. Ph.D. thesis, MSc thesis, Ryerson University, Toronto
6.
Byun HS, Lee KH (2006) Determination of optimal build direction in rapid prototyping with variable slicing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28(3-4):307
7.
Campbell RI, Martorelli M, Lee HS (2002) Surface roughness visualisation for rapid prototyping models. Comput Aided Des 34(10):717–725
8.
Li A, Zhang Z, Wang D, Yang J (2010) Optimization method to fabrication orientation of parts in fused deposition modeling rapid prototyping. In: 2010 International conference on mechanic automation and control engineering, pp 416–419. IEEE
9.
Pandey PM, Reddy NV, Dhande SG (2003) Improvement of surface finish by staircase machining in fused deposition modeling. J Mater Process Technol 132(1-3):323–331
10.
Wang WM, Zanni C, Kobbelt L (2016) Improved surface quality in 3d printing by optimizing the printing direction. Comp grap forum 35(2):59–70
11.
Zhang Y, De Backer W, Harik R, Bernard A (2016) Build orientation determination for multi-material deposition additive manufacturing with continuous fibers. Procedia Cirp 50(2016):414– 419
12.
Taufik M, Jain PK (2013) Role of build orientation in layered manufacturing: a review. Int J Manuf Technol Manag 27(1-3):47–73
13.
Xu F, Wong Y, Loh H, Fuh J, Miyazawa T (1997) Optimal orientation with variable slicing in stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J 3(3):76–88
14.
Jibin Z (2005) Determination of optimal build orientation based on satisfactory degree theory for RPT. In: Computer aided design and computer graphics, 2005. Ninth international conference on, pp 6–pp. IEEE
15.
Sumalatha M, Rao V (2018) Experimental evaluation of the best orientation of taper plug to minimize support material required in 3d printing (FDM). J Innov Mechan Eng 1(2):11–15
16.
Mirzendehdel AM, Suresh K (2016) Support structure constrained topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Comput Aided Des 81:1–13
17.
Pereira S, Vaz A, Vicente L (2018) On the optimal object orientation in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(5-8):1685–1694
18.
Rocha AMAC, Pereira AI, Vaz AIF (2018) Build orientation optimization problem in additive manufacturing. In: International conference on computational science and its applications, pp 669–682. Springer
19.
Matos MA, Rocha AMAC, Pereira AI (2019) On optimizing the build orientation problem using genetic algorithm. In: AIP Conference proceedings, vol. 2116, p 220006. AIP publishing
20.
Matos MA, Rocha AMAC, Pereira AI (2020) Improving additive manufacturing performance by build orientation optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:1993–2005
21.
Das P, Chandran R, Samant R, Anand S (2015) Optimum part build orientation in additive manufacturing for minimizing part errors and support structures. Procedia Manuf 1:343–354
22.
Canellidis V, Dedoussis V, Mantzouratos N, Sofianopoulou S (2006) Pre-processing methodology for optimizing stereolithography apparatus build performance. Comput Ind 57(5):424–436
23.
Ransikarbum K, Ha S, Ma J, Kim N (2017) Multi-objective optimization analysis for part-to-printer assignment in a network of 3d fused deposition modeling. J Manuf Syst 43:35–46
24.
Thrimurthulu K, Pandey PM, Reddy NV (2004) Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(6):585–594
25.
Cheng W, Fuh J, Nee A, Wong Y, Loh H, Miyazawa T (1995) Multi-objective optimization of part-building orientation in stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J 1(4):12–23
26.
Zhang Y, Bernard A (2013) Using AM feature and multi-attribute decision making to orientate part in additive manufacturing. In: High value manufacturing: Advanced research in virtual and rapid prototyping. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on advanced research in virtual and rapid prototyping, pp 411–416
27.
Zhang Y, Bernard A, Gupta RK, Harik R (2016) Feature based building orientation optimization for additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping Journal 22(2):358–376
28.
Asadi-Eydivand M, Solati-Hashjin M, Fathi A, Padashi M, Osman NAA (2016) Optimal design of a 3d-printed scaffold using intelligent evolutionary algorithms. Appl Soft Comput 39:36–47
29.
Golmohammadi A, Khodaygan S (2019) A framework for multi-objective optimisation of 3d part-build orientation with a desired angular resolution in additive manufacturing processes. Virtual Phys Prototyp 14(1):19–36
30.
Zhang X, Le X, Panotopoulou A, Whiting E, Wang CC (2015) Perceptual models of preference in 3d printing direction. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 34(6):215
31.
Brika SE, Zhao YF, Brochu M, Mezzetta J (2017) Multi-objective build orientation optimization for powder bed fusion by laser. J Manuf Sci Eng 139(11):111011
32.
Phatak AM, Pande S (2012) Optimum part orientation in rapid prototyping using genetic algorithm. J Manuf Syst 31(4):395–402
33.
Gurrala PK, Regalla SP (2014) Multi-objective optimisation of strength and volumetric shrinkage of FDM parts: a multi-objective optimization scheme is used to optimize the strength and volumetric shrinkage of FDM parts considering different process parameters. Virtual Phys Prototyp 9(2):127–138
34.
Ga B, Gardan N, Wahu G (2019) Methodology for part building orientation in additive manufacturing. Comput Aided Des Appl 16(1):113–128
35.
Matos MA, Rocha AMAC, Costa LA, Pereira AI (2019) A multi-objective approach to solve the build orientation problem in additive manufacturing. In: International conference on computational science and its applications, pp 261–276. Springer
36.
Di Angelo L, Di Stefano P, Dolatnezhadsomarin A, Guardiani E, Khorram E (2020) A reliablebuild orientation optimization method in additive manufacturing: the application to FDM technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108:263–276
37.
Hada T, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Arakida T, Soeda Y, Katheng A, Otake R, Minakuchi S (2020) Effect of printing direction on the accuracy of 3d-printed dentures using stereolithography technology. Materials 13(15):3405
38.
Mele M, Campana G (2020) Sustainability-driven multi-objective evolutionary orienting in additive manufacturing. Sustain Prod Consum 23:138–147
39.
Jaiswal P, Patel J, Rai R (2018) Build orientation optimization for additive manufacturing of functionally graded material objects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(1–4):223–235
40.
Alexander P, Allen S, Dutta D (1998) Part orientation and build cost determination in layered manufacturing. Comput Aided Des 30(5):343–356
41.
Kattethota G, Henderson M (1998) A visual tool to improve layered manufacturing part quality. In: Proceedings of solid freeform fabrication symposium, pp 327–334
42.
Zhang Y, Bernard A, Harik R, Karunakaran K (2017) Build orientation optimization for multi-part production in additive manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 28(6):1393–1407
43.
Gök A, Gologlu C, Demirci HI (2013) Cutting parameter and tool path style effects on cutting force and tool deflection in machining of convex and concave inclined surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69 (5):1063–1078
44.
Gök A (2015) A new approach to minimization of the surface roughness and cutting force via fuzzy topsis, multi-objective grey design and rsa. Measurement 70:100–109
45.
Gök A, Demirci HI, Gök K. (2016) Determination of experimental, analytical, and numerical values of tool deflection at ball end milling of inclined surfaces. In: Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, part e: journal of process mechanical engineering, 230(2), 111–119
46.
Gök A., Gök K., Bilgin MB, Alkan MA (2017) Effects of cutting parameters and tool-path strategies on tool acceleration in ball-end milling. Mater Technol 51(6):957–965
47.
Canellidis V, Giannatsis J, Dedoussis V (2009) Genetic-algorithm-based multi-objective optimization of the build orientation in stereolithography. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45(7-8):714–730
48.
Mason A (2007) Multi-axis hybrid rapid prototyping using fusion deposition modeling. ProQuest
49.
Pandey PM, Reddy NV, Dhande SG (2003) Slicing procedures in layered manufacturing: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 9(5):274–288
50.
Pandey PM (2010) Rapid prototyping technologies, applications and part deposition planning. Retrieved October 15:550– 555
51.
Frank D, Fadel G (1995) Expert system-based selection of the preferred direction of build for rapid prototyping processes. J Intell Manuf 6(5):339–345
52.
Masood SH, Rattanawong W, Iovenitti P (2000) Part build orientations based on volumetric error in fused deposition modelling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 16(3):162–168
53.
Livesu M, Ellero S, Martínez J., Lefebvre S, Attene M (2017) From 3d models to 3d prints: an overview of the processing pipeline. Comput Graph Forum 36(2):537–564
54.
Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, New YorkMATH
55.
MATLAB: version 9.6.0.1214997 (R2019a). The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts (2019)
56.
Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search optimization, and machine learning. Addison Wesley Publishing Co Inc, New YorkMATH
57.
SIMPLIFY3D (2017) I.s.s.: version 4.0.0 (2017). Simplify3D LLC., Legal Dept Simplify3D
Metadaten
Titel
Many-objective optimization of build part orientation in additive manufacturing
verfasst von
Marina A. Matos
Ana Maria A. C. Rocha
Lino A. Costa
Publikationsdatum
23.11.2020
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Ausgabe 3-4/2021
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06369-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3-4/2021

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 3-4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Survey Paper

Success factors for introducing industrial human-robot interaction in practice: an empirically driven framework

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effects of the internal structures of monolith ceramic substrates on thermal and hydraulic properties: additive manufacturing, numerical modelling and experimental testing

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Design and optimization of rolling mills pass based on parameterization and orthogonal test

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A novel and effective method for cryogenic milling of polytetrafluoroethylene

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Parametric modeling method for integrated design and manufacturing of radial compressor impeller

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Analysis of the machinability when milling AlSi10Mg additively manufactured via laser-based powder bed fusion

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise