nach oben

Polymer Bulletin

Erschienen in:

11.07.2020 | Review Paper

Developments in pressure-sensitive adhesives: a review

verfasst von: Sachin Mapari, Siddhesh Mestry, S. T. Mhaske

Erschienen in: Polymer Bulletin | Ausgabe 7/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

An adhesive is a non-metallic substance used for the joining of two separate objects by applying it either on one side or both the sides of objects. One of the classifications of adhesives is based on the chemical nature, i.e. it can either be reactive or non-reactive, while the other segregates them depending upon the origin like natural or synthetic. The pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs) are one of the important classes following the mechanism of curing of the adhesive which do not undergo any chemical reaction or physical change during the adhesion process. PSAs are greatly replacing many conventional types of adhesive and are considered safe to use. The application of the hybrid polymers in the field of PSAs that consists of silane-curing organic compounds having wide formulation tolerance and outstanding mechanical properties is a major class in the upcoming PSA market. The present article discusses the various types of PSAs, their recent trends based on the various application properties with the structure–property relationship and their synthesis techniques.

Vorheriger Artikel Importance of gelatin, nanoparticles and their interactions in the formulation of biodegradable composite films: a review

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Gollins K, Elvin N, Delale F (2020) Characterization of adhesive joints under high-speed normal impact: part II. Numerical studies. Int J Adhes Adhes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102530CrossRef

Ebnesajjad S (2011) Introduction and adhesion theories. Handb Adhes Surf Prep. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4377-4461-3.10001-XCrossRef

Santos P, Correia JR, Godinho L (2019) Bonding quality assessment of cross-layered Maritime pine elements glued with one-component polyurethane adhesive. Constr Build Mater 211:571–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.064CrossRef

Abdallah M, Kamar EM, Eid S, El-Etre AY (2016) Animal glue as green inhibitor for corrosion of aluminum and aluminum-silicon alloys in sodium hydroxide solutions. J Mol Liq 220:755–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.062CrossRef

Huang Y, Meng X, Xie Y (2019) New technique of friction-based filling stacking joining for metal and polymer. Compos Part B Eng 163:217–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.050CrossRef

Benatar A (2016) Plastics joining, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

Wang X, Shi J, Wang H (2019) Preparation, properties, and structural evolution of a novel polyborosilazane adhesive, temperature-resistant to 1600 C for joining SiC ceramics. J Alloys Compd 772:912–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.110CrossRef

Barbosa AQ, da Silva LFM, Abenojar J (2017) Toughness of a brittle epoxy resin reinforced with micro cork particles: effect of size, amount and surface treatment. Compos Part B Eng 114:299–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.072CrossRef

Banea MD, Rosioara M, Carbas RJC, da Silva LFM (2018) Multi-material adhesive joints for automotive industry. Compos Part B Eng 151:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.009CrossRef

10.

Sreeja R, Prabhakaran PV, Manwatkar SK, Packirisamy S (2012) Adhesive joining of metal to metal and metal to ceramic by ceramic precursor route. Mater Sci Forum 710:656–661. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.710.656CrossRef

11.

Niaounakis M (2015) Adhesive compositions. Biopolym Process Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-26698-7.00015-5CrossRef

12.

Viljanmaa M (2002) Lactic acid based polymers as hot melt adhesives for packaging applications. Int J Adhes Adhes 22:219–226CrossRef

13.

Mirschel G, Daikos O, Scherzer T (2019) In-line monitoring of the thickness distribution of adhesive layers in black textile laminates by hyperspectral imaging. Comput Chem Eng 124:317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.01.015CrossRef

14.

Blyberg L, Lang M, Lundstedt K (2014) Glass, timber and adhesive joints—innovative load bearing building components. Constr Build Mater 55:470–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.045CrossRef

15.

Flores N, Garcia R, Hajirasouliha I (2018) Composites with recycled rubber aggregates: properties and opportunities in construction. Constr Build Mater 188:884–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.069CrossRef

16.

Tous L, Ruseckaite RA, Ciannamea EM (2019) Sustainable hot-melt adhesives based on soybean protein isolate and polycaprolactone. Ind Crops Prod 135:153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/jindcrop.2019.04.043CrossRef

17.

Pengelly I, Groves J, Northage C (1998) An investigation into the composition of products evolved during heating of hot melt adhesives. Ann Occup Hyg 42:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4878(97)00045-8CrossRefPubMed

18.

Alejandra M, París R, Martín-martínez JM (2019) Viscoelastic and adhesion properties of hot-melts made with blends of ethylene-co-n-butyl acrylate (EBA) and ethylene-co-vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymers. Int J Adhes Adhes 88:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.11.001CrossRef

19.

Chen X, Zhong H, Jia L (2002) Polyamides derived from piperazine and used for hot-melt adhesives: synthesis and properties. Int J Adhes Adhes 22:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00039-2CrossRef

20.

Orgilés-Calpena E, Arán-Aís F, Torró-Palau AM, Orgilés-Barceló C (2016) Novel polyurethane reactive hot melt adhesives based on polycarbonate polyols derived from CO₂ for the footwear industry. Int J Adhes Adhes 70:218–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh2016.07.009CrossRef

21.

Liang B, Kuang S, Huang J (2019) Synthesis and characterization of novel renewable tung oil-based UV-curable active monomers and bio-based copolymer. Prog Org Coat 129:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.01.007CrossRef

22.

Hubmann M, Kong X, Curtis JM (2019) Kinetic stabilization of cellulose nanocrystals in a photocurable prepolymer for application as an adhesion promoter in UV-curable coatings. Prog Org Coat 129:101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.12.019CrossRef

23.

Huang J, Sun J, Zhang R (2016) Improvement of biodegradability of UV-curable adhesives modified by a novel polyurethane acrylate. Prog Org Coat 95:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.02.017CrossRef

24.

Park YJ, Lim DH, Kim HJ (2009) UV- and thermal-curing behaviors of dual-curable adhesives based on epoxy acrylate oligomers. Int J Adhes Adhes 29:710–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.001CrossRef

25.

Hong X, Wen J, Xiong X, Hu Y (2016) Silver nanowire-carbon fiber cloth nanocomposites synthesized by UV curing adhesive for electrochemical point-of-use water disinfection. Chemosphere 154:537–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.013CrossRefPubMed

26.

Heckmann T, Souvignet T, Naccache D (2017) Electrically conductive adhesives, thermally conductive adhesives and UV adhesives in data extraction forensics. Digit Investig. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2017.02.009CrossRef

27.

Kowalczyk A, Kowalczyk K, Weisbrodt M (2018) Influence of a phosphorus-based methacrylate monomer on features of thermally curable self-adhesive structural tapes. Int J Adhes Adhes 85:286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.07.002CrossRef

28.

Park Y, Kim H, Park D, Sung I (2010) Reliability of liquid crystal cell and immiscibility between dual-curable adhesives and liquid crystal. Eur Polym J 46:1642–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.05.034CrossRef

29.

Chung S-W, Kim H-T (2012) Interfacial reliability between hot-melt polyamides resin and textile for wearable electronics application. Microelectron Reliab 52(7):1501–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2012.02.014CrossRef

30.

Lee SW, Park JW, Kwon YE (2012) Optical properties and UV-curing behaviors of optically clear semi-interpenetrated structured acrylic pressure sensitive adhesives. Int J Adhes Adhes 38:5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.04.002CrossRef

31.

Kumar Singh A, Singh Mehra D, Kumar Niyogi U (2012) Effect of tackifier and crosslinkers on electron beam curable polyurethane pressure sensitive adhesive. Radiat Phys Chem 81:547–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.01.017CrossRef

32.

Singh AK, Mehra DS, Niyogi UK (2013) Effect of crosslinkers on adhesion properties of electron beam curable polyurethane pressure sensitive adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes 41:73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.004CrossRef

33.

Zech ZC, Ilker RM (2005) Development trends in pressure-sensitive adhesive systems. Mater Sci Pol 23(4):605–623

34.

Lin SB, Durfee LD, Ekeland RA, Schalau GK (2012) Recent advances in silicone pressure-sensitive adhesives. J Adhes Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856107781192274CrossRef

35.

Dastjerdi Z, Cranston ED, Dubé MA (2018) Pressure sensitive adhesive property modification using cellulose nanocrystals. Int J Adhes Adhes 81:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.11.009CrossRef

36.

Kim JK, Kim JW, Kim MI, Song MS (2006) Thermal conductivity and adhesion properties of thermally conductive pressure-sensitive adhesives. Macromol Res 14:517–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03218718CrossRef

37.

Paul CW, Silverberg E (2011) Handbook of adhesion technology

38.

Cho J (2014) Compression behavior of a pressure-sensitive adhesive material. Macromol Res 22:1238–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-014-2164-0CrossRef

39.

Jin K, López Barreiro D, Martin-Martinez FJ (2018) Improving the performance of pressure sensitive adhesives by tuning the crosslinking density and locations. Polymer (Guildf) 154:164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.08.065CrossRef

40.

Chang EP (1997) Viscoelastic properties of pressure-sensitive adhesives. J Adhes 60:233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218469708014421CrossRef

41.

Yu Q, Yang W, Wang Q (2019) Functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals with γ-MPS and its effect on the adhesive behavior of acrylic pressure sensitive adhesives. Carbohydr Polym 217:168–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.049CrossRefPubMed

42.

Ho KY, Dodou K (2007) Rheological studies on pressure-sensitive silicone adhesives and drug-in-adhesive layers as a means to characterise adhesive performance. Int J Pharm 333:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.09.043CrossRefPubMed

43.

Czech Z, Pełech R (2010) Thermal decomposition of polyurethane pressure-sensitive adhesives dispersions. Prog Org Coat 67:72–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.09.019CrossRef

44.

Pan L, Ding W, Ma W (2018) Galvanic corrosion protection and durability of polyaniline-reinforced epoxy adhesive for bond-riveted joints in AA5083/Cf/Epoxy laminates. Mater Des 160:1106–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10.034CrossRef

45.

Sun S, Li M, Liu A (2013) A review on mechanical properties of pressure sensitive adhesives. Int J Adhes Adhes 41:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.011CrossRef

46.

Mehravar E, Gross MA, Agirre A (2018) Importance of film morphology on the performance of thermo-responsive waterborne pressure sensitive adhesives. Eur Polym J 98:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.11.004CrossRef

47.

Shibakami M, Sohma M (2018) Thermal, crystalline, and pressure-sensitive adhesive properties of paramylon monoesters derived from an euglenoid polysaccharide. Carbohydr Polym 200:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.005CrossRefPubMed

48.

Baek S, Hwang S (2017) Preparation of biomass-based transparent pressure sensitive adhesives for optically clear adhesive and their adhesion performance. Eur Polym J 92:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.04.039CrossRef

49.

Asua M, Daniloska V, Carretero P, Tomovska R (2014) High performance pressure sensitive adhesives by miniemulsion photopolymerization in a continuous tubular reactor. Polymer 55:5050–5056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.08.038CrossRef

50.

Mohammed IK, Charalambides MN, Kinloch AJ (2016) Modeling the effect of rate and geometry on peeling and tack of pressure-sensitive adhesives. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 233:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.01.016CrossRef

51.

Michaelis M, Leopold CS (2015) A measurement system analysis with design of experiments: investigation of the adhesion performance of a pressure sensitive adhesive with the probe tack test. Int J Pharm 496:448–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.09.061CrossRefPubMed

52.

Khire A, Vavia P (2013) Effect of permeation enhancers on dynamic mechanical properties of acrylate pressure sensitive adhesives. Int J Pharm 458:141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.09.037CrossRefPubMed

53.

Sato E, Yamanishi K, Inui T (2015) Acetal-protected acrylic copolymers for dismantlable adhesives with spontaneous and complete removability. Polymer (Guildf) 64:260–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2015.01.057CrossRef

54.

Lei H, He D, Guo Y (2018) Synthesis and characterization of UV-absorbing fluorine-silicone acrylic resin polymer. Appl Surf Sci 442:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.134CrossRef

55.

Stîngă G, Băran A, Iovescu A (2019) Monitoring the confinement of methylene blue in pyrene labeled poly(acrylic acid). J Mol Liq 273:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.10.023CrossRef

56.

Sabatini V, Cattò C, Cappelletti G (2018) Protective features, durability and biodegration study of acrylic and methacrylic fluorinated polymer coatings for marble protection. Prog Org Coat 114:47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.10.003CrossRef

57.

Baek SS, Jang SH, Hwang SH (2017) Construction and adhesion performance of biomass tetrahydro-geraniol-based sustainable/transparent pressure sensitive adhesives. J Ind Eng Chem 53:429–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.05.017CrossRef

58.

Canetta E, Adya AK (2011) Atomic force microscopic investigation of commercial pressure sensitive adhesives for forensic analysis. Forensic Sci Int 210:16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.01.029CrossRefPubMed

59.

Lamnatou C, Chemisana D (2013) Solar radiation manipulations and their role in greenhouse claddings: Fresnel lenses, NIR- and UV-blocking materials. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 18:271–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.041CrossRef

60.

Baek SS, Hwang SH (2016) Preparation and adhesion performance of transparent acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives containing menthyl acrylate. Polym Bull 73:687–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-015-1510-5CrossRef

61.

Karimi Shamsabadi M, Moghbeli MR (2017) Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) reinforced acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs) prepared via miniemulsion polymerization. Int J Adhes Adhes 78:155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.06.024CrossRef

62.

Lee SH, You R, Il Yoon Y, Park WH (2017) Preparation and characterization of acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives based on UV and heat curing systems. Int J Adhes Adhes 75:190–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.03.007CrossRef

63.

Czech Z, Kabatc J, Kowalczyk A (2015) Application of selected 2-methylbenzothiazoles AS cationic photoreactive crosslinkers for pressure-sensitive adhesives based on acrylics. Int J Adhes Adhes 58:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.12.001CrossRef

64.

Zhu M, Lin Z, Fang C (2016) Properties of single-component acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives synthesized using tert-butyl peroxypivalate initiator. Polym Sci Ser A 58:379–385. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965545X16030202CrossRef

65.

Park GH, Kim KT, Ahn YT (2014) The effects of graphene on the properties of acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive. J Ind Eng Chem 20:4108–4111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.01.008CrossRef

66.

Dhal PK, Deshpande A, Babu GN (1982) Pressure sensitive adhesives of acrylic polymers containing functional monomers. Polymer (Guildf) 23:937–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(82)90163-XCrossRef

67.

Baek SS, Hwang SH (2016) Eco-friendly UV-curable pressure sensitive adhesives containing acryloyl derivatives of monosaccharides and their adhesive performances. Int J Adhes Adhes 70:110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.06.002CrossRef

68.

Czech Z (2004) 2-Ethylhexyl acrylate/4-acryloyloxy benzophenone copolymers as UV-crosslinkable pressure-sensitive adhesives. Polym Bull 52:283–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-004-0273-1CrossRef

69.

Fang C, Jing Y, Lin Z (2017) The application research of environment-friendly reactive surfactants in acrylate emulsion pressure sensitive adhesives. Int J Adhes Adhes 73:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.11.002CrossRef

70.

Kim YB, Park SC, Kim HK, Hong JW (2008) Dual-curable acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives based on UV and thermal processes. Macromol Res 16:128–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03218841CrossRef

71.

Kowalski A, Czech Z, Byczyński Ł (2013) How does the surface free energy influence the tack of acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs)? J Coat Technol Res 10:879–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-013-9522-2CrossRef

72.

Czech Z, Kowalczyk A, Kabatc J (2012) Influence of selected photoinitiators type II on tack, peel adhesion, and shear strength of UV-crosslinked solvent-borne acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives used for medical applications. Polym Bull 68:441–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-011-0563-3CrossRef

73.

Czech Z (2006) Solvent-based pressure-sensitive adhesives for removable products. Int J Adhes Adhes 26:414–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.06.009CrossRef

74.

Li H, Liang T, Li Y (2015) In situ synthesis and properties of hydrogenated rosin/polyacrylate composite miniemulsions-based pressure sensitive adhesives. J Adhes Sci Technol 29:2220–2232. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2015.1061904CrossRef

75.

Zhang X, Liu H, Yue L (2018) Fabrication of acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives containing maleimide for heat-resistant adhesive applications. Polym Bull. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-018-2542-4CrossRef

76.

Khalina M, Sanei M, Mobarakeh HS, Mahdavian AR (2015) Preparation of acrylic/silica nanocomposites latexes with potential application in pressure sensitive adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes 58:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.12.007CrossRef

77.

Sowa D, Czech Z, Byczyński Ł (2014) Peel adhesion of acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives on selected substrates versus their surface energies. Int J Adhes Adhes 49:38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.12.013CrossRef

78.

Weidong Z (2018) Water soluble acrylic acid pressure sensitive adhesive and preparation method thereof. Patent No: CN108707444A

79.

Lee JH, Lee TH, Shim KS (2016) Molecular weight and crosslinking on the adhesion performance and flexibility of acrylic PSAs. J Adhes Sci Technol 30:2316–2328. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1182382CrossRef

80.

Zosel A (1998) The effect of fibrilation on the tack of pressure sensitive adhesives. Int J Adhes Adhes 18:261–271CrossRef

81.

Czech Z, Wesolowska M (2007) Development of solvent-free acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives. Eur Polym J 43:3604–3612. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dau032CrossRef

82.

Pang B, Ryu CM, Jin X, Il Kim H (2013) Preparation and properties of UV curable acrylic PSA by vinyl bonded graphene oxide. Appl Surf Sci 285:727–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.117CrossRef

83.

Kajtna J, Krajnc M (2011) Solventless UV crosslinkable acrylic pressure sensitive adhesives. Int J Adhes Adhes 31:822–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.08.002CrossRef

84.

Jamaluddin J, Lee MC (2013) Properties of UV-curable solvent-free pressure sensitive adhesive. J Adhes Sci Technol 27:905–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2012.727162CrossRef

85.

Zbigniew C, Magdalena W, Agnieszka K (2012) The influence of residue monomers on selected properties of acrylic pressure sensitive adhesives. Drewno Pr Nauk Donies Komunik 55:188

86.

Lee J, Lee T, Shim K (2017) Effect of crosslinking density on adhesion performance and flexibility properties of acrylic pressure sensitive adhesives for flexible display applications. Int J Adhes Adhes 74:137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.01.005CrossRef

87.

Zhang X, Ding Y, Zhang G (2011) Preparation and rheological studies on the solvent based acrylic pressure sensitive adhesives with different crosslinking density. Int J Adhes Adhes 31:760–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.07.004CrossRef

88.

Zheng J, Zong Y, Zhao G, Yu Z, Wang M, Zhu C, Gui D (2019) Nematic liquid crystal 4-Cyano-4′-pentylbiphenyl functionalization of MWNTs for improved thermal and mechanical properties of silicone pressure sensitive adhesives. Int J Adhes Adhes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102457CrossRef

89.

Montméat P, Enot T, De Marco Dutra M, Pellat M, Fournel F (2017) Study of a silicon/glass bonded structure with a UV-curable adhesive for temporary bonding applications. Microelectron Eng 173:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee2017.03.008CrossRef

90.

Troughton MJ (Ed) (2009) Adhesive bonding. In: Handbook of plastics joining, 2nd edn. Chap 17, William Andrew Publishing, pp 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-8155-1581-4.50019-6

91.

Lin SB (1994) New silicone pressure-sensitive adhesive technology. Int J Adhes Adhes 14:185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-7496(94)90029-9CrossRef

92.

Yu Q, Yang W, Wang Q, Dong W, Du M, Ma P (2019) Functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals with γ-MPS and its effect on the adhesive behavior of acrylic pressure sensitive adhesives. Carbohydr Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.049CrossRefPubMed

93.

Lee JH, Lee TH, Shim KS (2017) Adhesion performance and recovery of platinum catalyzed silicone PSAs under various temperature conditions for flexible display applications. Mater Lett 208:86–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.05.042CrossRef

94.

Ryu C-M, Pang B, Kim H-I, Kim H-J, Park J-W, Lee S-W, Kim K-M (2013) Wettability and adhesion characteristics of photo-crosslinkable adhesives for thin silicon wafer. Int J Adhes Adhes 40:197–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.08.005CrossRef

95.

Lin SB (1995) High-temperature stability of silicone polymers and related pressure-sensitive adhesives. Prop Appl Polym Mater 603:37–51. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1995-0603.ch003CrossRef

96.

Antosik AK, Bednarczyk P, Czech Z (2018) Aging of silicone pressure-sensitive adhesives. Polym Bull 75:1141–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-017-2083-2CrossRef

97.

Wang W, Zammarano M, Shields JR (2018) A novel application of silicone-based flame-retardant adhesive in plywood. Constr Build Mater 189:448–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.214CrossRef

98.

White C, Tan K, Wolf A, Carbary L (2010) Advances in structural silicone adhesives. Woodhead Publishing Limited, SawstonCrossRef

99.

Arellano IH (2019) Silicone perturbation of the polyamide-polyacrylate adhesive interface. Mater Lett 244:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.02.053CrossRef

100.

Robeyns C, Picard L, Ganachaud F (2018) Synthesis, characterization and modification of silicone resins: an “Augmented Review”. Prog Org Coat 125:287–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.03.025CrossRef

101.

Thousand JD, Smith ST (2019) A direct silicon bonded reference object for performance assessment of computed tomography systems. Precis Eng 58:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2019.04.017102CrossRef

102.

Peloquin RL, Everaerts AI, Wilson KD, Galick SJ (1997) Pressure sensitive adhesives for use on low energy surfaces, US Patent US6280557B1

103.

Sobieski LA, Tangney TJ (1989) Silicone pressure sensitive adhesives. In: Satas D (ed) Handbook of pressure sensitive adhesive technology, 2nd edn. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 508–517CrossRef

104.

Axtmann RC (1985) Desilication of geothermal water. US Patent: 4378295. Geothermics 14:595–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6505(85)90011-2CrossRef

105.

Czech Z, Goracy K (2005) Characterization of the crosslinking process of silicone pressure-sensitive adhesives. Polimery 50(10):762–764CrossRef

106.

Taylor P, Zosel A (2012) The effect of bond formation on the tack of polymers. J Adhes Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856197X00237CrossRef

107.

Petrie EM (2004) Silicone pressure sensitive adhesives. www.specialchem4adhesives.com. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

108.

Yong Q, Liao B, Huang J (2018) Preparation and characterization of a novel low gloss waterborne polyurethane resin. Surf Coat Technol 341:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.01.012CrossRef

109.

Kalaivani SS, Muthukrishnaraj A, Sivanesan S, Ravikumar L (2016) Novel hyperbranched polyurethane resins for the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution. Process Saf Environ Prot 104:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.08.010CrossRef

110.

Lin W, Lee W (2017) Effects of the NCO/OH molar ratio and the silica contained on the properties of waterborne polyurethane resins. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 522:453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.03.022CrossRef

111.

Saeed A, Shabir G (2013) Synthesis of thermally stable high gloss water dispersible polyurethane/polyacrylate resins. Prog Org Coat 76:1135–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2013.03.009CrossRef

112.

Fuensanta M, Martín-Martínez JM (2018) Thermoplastic polyurethane coatings made with mixtures of polyethers of different molecular weights with pressure sensitive adhesion property. Prog Org Coat 118:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.11.021CrossRef

113.

Saleh S, Zurairahetty N, Yunus M (2019) Improving the strength of weak soil using polyurethane grouts: a review. Constr Build Mater 202:738–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.048CrossRef

114.

Hu D, Li L, Li Y, Yang C (2017) Restructuring the surface of polyurethane resin enforced filter media to separate surfactant stabilized oil-in-water emulsions via coalescence. Sep Purif Technol 172:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.07.051CrossRef

115.

Fuensanta M, Martin-Martínez JM (2019) Thermoplastic polyurethane pressure sensitive adhesives made with mixtures of polypropylene glycols of different molecular weights. Int J Adhes Adhes 88:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.11.002CrossRef

116.

Fu H, Wang Y, Chen W (2015) A novel silanized CoFe₂O₄/fluorinated waterborne polyurethane pressure sensitive adhesive. Appl Surf Sci 351:1204–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.06.121CrossRef

117.

Huaxin Y, Gang C (2018) The preparation method of flame retardant polyurethane pressure sensitive adhesive Patent No: CN109053995A

118.

Wang Y, Chen S, Chen X (2019) Controllability of epoxy equivalent weight and performance of hyperbranched epoxy resins. Compos Part B 160:615–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.103CrossRef

119.

Sheinbaum M, Sheinbaum L, Weizman O (2019) Toughening and enhancing mechanical and thermal properties of adhesives and glass-fiber reinforced epoxy composites by brominated epoxy. Compos Part B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.020CrossRef

120.

Luo X, Yu X, Ma Y (2018) Preparation and cure kinetics of epoxy with nanodiamond modified with liquid crystalline epoxy. Thermochim Acta 663:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2018.03.003CrossRef

121.

Shokrian MD, Shelesh-nezhad K, Najjar R (2019) Toughening effect of nanocomposite-wall microcapsules on the fracture behavior of epoxy. Polymer (Guildf). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2019.02.027CrossRef

122.

Farzi G, Lezgy-nazargah M, Imani A (2019) Mechanical, thermal and microstructural properties of epoxy-OAT composites. Constr Build Mater 197:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.202CrossRef

123.

Ahangaran F, Hayaty M, Navarchian AH, Pei Y (2019) Development of self-healing epoxy composites via incorporation of microencapsulated epoxy and mercaptan in poly (methyl methacrylate) shell. Polym Test 73:395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.11.041CrossRef

124.

Incerti D, Wang T, Carolan D, Fergusson A (2018) Curing rate effects on the toughness of epoxy polymers. Polymer (Guildf) 159:116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.008CrossRef

125.

Peng Y, He X, Wu Q (2018) An efficient way for the synthesis of epoxy resin polymers with thermoreversible cross-linking. Polyhedron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2018.09.040CrossRef

126.

Chen S, Xu Z, Zhang D (2018) Synthesis and application of epoxy-ended hyperbranched polymers. Chem Eng J 343:283–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.014CrossRef

127.

Jin F, Li X, Park S (2015) Synthesis and application of epoxy resins: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 29:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.03.026CrossRef

128.

Frias CF, Serra AC, Ramalho A (2017) Preparation of fully biobased epoxy resins from soybean oil based amine hardeners. Ind Crop Prod 109:434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.041CrossRef

129.

Wazarkar K, Kathalewar M, Sabnis A (2018) Anticorrosive and insulating properties of cardanol based anhydride curing agent for epoxy coatings. React Funct Polym 122:148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2017.11.015CrossRef

130.

Zolghadr M, Zohuriaan-mehr MJ, Shakeri A, Salimi A (2019) Epoxy resin modification by reactive bio-based furan derivatives: curing kinetics and mechanical properties. Thermochim Acta 673:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2019.01.025CrossRef

131.

El-ghazawy RA, El-saeed AM, El-sockary MA (2015) Rosin based epoxy coating: synthesis, identification and characterization. Eur Polym J 69:403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.06.025CrossRef

132.

Laurentino LS, Medeiros AMMS, Machado F, Costa C, Araújo PHH, Sayer C (2018) Synthesis of a biobased monomer derived from castor oil and copolymerization in aqueous medium. Chem Eng Res Des 137:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.07.014CrossRef

133.

Goerz O, Ritter H (2013) Polymers with shape memory effect from renewable resources: crosslinking of polyesters based on isosorbide, itaconic acid and succinic acid. Polym Int. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.4443CrossRef

134.

Dai J, Ma S, Wu Y (2015) Properties and bio-based content enhancement. Green Chem. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4gc02057jCrossRef

135.

Jiang H, Sun L, Zhang Y (2019) Novel biobased epoxy resin thermosets derived from eugenol and vanillin. Polym Degrad Stab 160:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.12.007CrossRef

136.

Łukaszczyk J, Janicki B, Kaczmarek M (2011) Synthesis and properties of isosorbide based epoxy resin. Eur Polym J 47:1601–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.05.009CrossRef

137.

Xin J, Zhang P (2014) Study of green epoxy resins derived from renewable cinnamic acid and dipentene: synthesis, curing and properties. RSC Adv. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra47927gCrossRef

138.

Devi R, Gogoi D, Bora P, Das SK (2016) Synthesis of diverse catechin congeners via diastereoselective intramolecular epoxy-arene cyclization. Tetrahedron 72:4878–4888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2016.06.059CrossRef

139.

Toldy A, Niedermann P, Szeb G (2015) Characterization of high glass transition temperature sugar-based epoxy resin composites with jute and carbon fibre reinforcement. Compos Sci Technol 117:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.001CrossRef

140.

Ahn BK, Kraft S, Wang D, Sun XS (2011) Thermally stable, transparent, pressure-sensitive adhesives from epoxidized and dihydroxyl soybean oil. Biomacromol 12:1839–1843. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm200188uCrossRef

141.

Ciannamea EM, Ruseckaite RA (2018) Pressure sensitive adhesives based on epoxidized soybean oil: correlation between curing conditions and rheological properties. JAOCS J Am Oil Chem Soc 95:525–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/aocs.12046CrossRef

142.

Li A, Li K (2015) Development and characterization of pressure-sensitive adhesives from dimer acid and epoxides. ACS, Washington, DC, pp 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2015-1192.ch025CrossRef

143.

Ahn BK, Sung J, Sun XS (2012) Phosphate esters functionalized dihydroxyl soybean oil tackifier of pressure-sensitive adhesives. JAOCS J Am Oil Chem Soc 89:909–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-011-1978-6CrossRef

144.

Li A, Li K (2014) Pressure-sensitive adhesives based on soybean fatty acids. RSC Adv 4:21521–21530. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra03557gCrossRef

145.

Fujita M, Kajiyama M, Takemura A (1998) Effects of miscibility on peel strength of natural-rubber-based pressure-sensitive adhesives. J Appl Polym Sci 70:777–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981024)70:4%3c777:AID-APP18%3e3.0.CO;2-UCrossRef

146.

Deng X (2018) Progress on rubber-based pressure-sensitive adhesives. J Adhes 94:77–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2016.1249573CrossRef

147.

Yoksan R (2008) Epoxidized natural rubber for adhesive applications. Nat Sci 42:325–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14094-5CrossRef

148.

Athavale S (2017) Natural rubber latex based pressure sensitive adhesives. J Polym Environ. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15791.94884CrossRef

149.

Khan I, Poh BT, Lee KE (2013) Material properties and statistical analysis of natural rubber-based adhesives. J Polym Environ 21:833–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0559-6CrossRef

150.

Radabutra S, Saengsuwan S, Jitchati R, Kalapat M (2017) Preparation and characterization of modified telechelic natural rubber-based pressure-sensitive adhesive. J Adhes Sci Technol 31(24):2682–2696. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2017.1325558CrossRef

151.

Robertson F, Wang Y, Rosing H (2014) An oligomeric switch that rapidly decreases the peel strength of a pressure-sensitive adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes 55:64–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.07.016CrossRef

152.

Takahashi K, Shimizu M, Inaba K (2013) Tack performance of pressure-sensitive adhesive tapes under tensile loading. Int J Adhes Adhes 45:90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.05.005CrossRef

153.

Sasaki M, Fujita K, Adachi M (2008) The effect of tackifier on phase structure and peel adhesion of a triblock copolymer pressure-sensitive adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes 28:372–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.11.002CrossRef

154.

Morel N, Tordjeman P, Duwattez J, Papon E (2004) Scaling properties of contact area of pressure-sensitive adhesives. J Colloid Interface Sci 280:374–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.010CrossRefPubMed

155.

Czech Z (2004) Multifunctional propyleneimines-new generation of crosslinkers for solvent-based pressure-sensitive adhesives. Int J Adhes Adhes 24:503–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.01.005CrossRef

156.

Deri JA, Moura JMF (2017) New York city taxi analysis with graph signal processing. In: IEEE global conference on signal and information processing (GlobalSIP), vol 21, pp 1275–1279. https://doi.org/10.1109/GlobalSIP.2016.7906046

157.

Hayashida S, Sugaya T, Kuramoto S (2015) Impact strength of joints bonded with high-strength pressure-sensitive adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes 56:61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.09.005CrossRef

158.

Raja PR, Hagood AG, Peters MA, Croll SG (2013) Evaluation of natural rubber latex-based PSAs containing aliphatic hydrocarbon tackifier dispersions with different softening points Adhesive properties at different conditions. Int J Adhes Adhes 41:160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.11.009CrossRef

159.

Griffith Jr (2002) Pressure sensitive adhesive tape containing natural rubber latex. US Patent: US 6,489,024 B2

160.

Leong YC, Lee LMS, Gan SN (2003) The viscoelastic properties of natural rubber pressure-sensitive adhesive using acrylic resin as a tackifier. J Appl Polym Sci 88:2118–2123. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.11843CrossRef

161.

Yang Z, Peng H, Wang W, Liu T (2010) Crystallization behavior of poly(ε-caprolactone)/layered double hydroxide nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 116:2658–2667. https://doi.org/10.1002/appCrossRef

162.

Ismail H, Poh BT (2000) Cure and tear properties of ENR 25/SMR L and ENR 50/SMR L blends. Eur Polym J 36:2403–2408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(00)00023-9CrossRef

163.

Poh BT, Te CS (2000) Cure index and activation energy of vulcanization of natural rubber and expoxidized natural rubber vulcanized in the presence of antioxidants. J Appl Polym Sci 77:3234–3238. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4628(20000929)77CrossRef

164.

Poh BT, Khok GK (2000) Tensile property of epoxidized natural rubber/natural rubber blends. Polym Plast Technol Eng 39:151–161. https://doi.org/10.1081/PPT-100100021CrossRef

165.

Poh BT, Jaffri JB (1999) Abrasion property of epoxidized natural rubber. Polym Plast Technol Eng 38:341–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559909351582CrossRef

166.

Sadequl AM, Ishiaku US, Ismail H, Poh BT (1998) The effect of accelerator/sulphur ratio on the scorch time of epoxidized natural rubber. Eur Polym J 34:1998CrossRef

167.

Poh BT, Chen MF, Ding BS (1996) Cure characteristics of unaccelerated sulfur vulcanization of epoxidized natural rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 60:1569–1574. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19960606)60:10%3c1569:aid-app7%3e3.3.co;2-kCrossRef

168.

Poh BT, Kwok CP, Lim GH (1995) Reversion behaviour of epoxidized natural rubber. Eur Polym J 31:223–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-3057(94)00167-7CrossRef

169.

Poh BT, Tang WL (1995) Concentration effect of stearic acid on scorch behavior of epoxidized natural rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 55:537–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1995.070550318CrossRef

170.

Poh BT, Tan BK (1991) Mooney scorch time of epoxidized natural rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 42:1407–1416. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1991.070420525CrossRef

171.

Nowak MJ, Severtson SJ, Wang Kroll MS (2003) Properties controlling the impact of styrenic block copolymer based pressure-sensitive adhesives on paper recycling. Ind Eng Chem Res 42(8):1681–1687. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0208974CrossRef

172.

Daoulas KC, Theodorou DN, Roos A, Creton C (2004) Experimental and self-consistent-field theoretical study of styrene block copolymer self-adhesive materials. Macromolecules 37(13):5093–5109. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma035383aCrossRef

173.

He Q, Hu Y, Pollock A (2013) Hot meltadhesives containing styrene butadiene block copolymer. US Patent no: US 8,378,015 B2

174.

Nakajima N, Babrowicz R, Harrell ER (1992) Rheology, composition, and peel-mechanism of block copolymer–tackifier-based pressure sensitive adhesives. J Appl Polym Sci 44:1437–1456. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1992.070440814CrossRef

175.

Akiyama S, Kobori Y, Sugisaki A (2000) Phase behavior and pressure sensitive adhesive properties in blends of poly(styrene-b-isoprene-b-styrene) with tackifier resin. Polymer (Guildf) 41:4021–4027. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00585-6CrossRef

176.

Harrison DJP, Johnson JF, Yates WR (1982) Aging of pressure-sensitive adhesives I: stability of styrene-lsoprene-styrene block copolymer films at 95°C. Polym Eng Sci 22:865–869. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760221403CrossRef

177.

Lebedev EV, Shose K (2011) hybrid organo–inorganic polymer systems: synthesis, structure, and properties. Theor Exp Chem 46(6):409–415CrossRef

178.

Iqbal S, Ahmad S (2018) Recent development in hybrid conducting polymers: synthesis, applications and future prospects. J Ind Eng Chem 60:53–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.09.038CrossRef

179.

He Z, Jiang C, Song C (2019) Inverted polymer/quantum-dots hybrid white light emitting diodes. Thin Solid Films 669:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2018.10.028CrossRef

180.

Shaiq S, Maraj EN, Iqbal Z (2019) Remarkable role of C₃H₈O₂ on transportation of MoS₂ SiO₂ hybrid nanoparticles influenced by thermal deposition and internal heat generation. J Phys Chem Solids 126:294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.11.028CrossRef

181.

Nowakowska M, Szczubia K (2017) Photoactive polymeric and hybrid systems for photocatalytic degradation of water pollutants. Polym Degrad Stab 145:120–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.05.021CrossRef

182.

Wang Y, Feng L, Miao X (2019) Multifunctional energy devices caused by ionic behaviors in perovskite-polymer hybrid films. Synth Met 250:31–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2019.02.009CrossRef

183.

Khosravi A, Syri S, Assad MEH, Malekan M (2019) Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a hybrid ocean thermal energy conversion/photovoltaic system with hydrogen-based energy storage system. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.100CrossRef

184.

Ryu J, Yeal Y, Woo M (2018) Experimental and numerical investigations of steel-polymer hybrid floor panels subjected to three-point bending. Eng Struct 175:467–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.030CrossRef

185.

Mottaghitalab F, Farokhi M, Fatahi Y (2019) New insights into designing hybrid nanoparticles for lung cancer: diagnosis and treatment. J Control Release 295:250–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.01.009CrossRefPubMed

186.

Mir SH, Nagahara A, Thundat T (2018) Review: organic-inorganic hybrid functional materials: an integrated platform for applied technologies. J Electrochem Soc. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0191808jesCrossRef

187.

Ayankojo AG, Reut J, Öpik A, Furchner A (2018) Hybrid molecularly imprinted polymer for amoxicillin detection. Biosens Bioelectron 118:102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2018.07.042CrossRefPubMed

188.

Wang J, Lu C, Liu Y (2018) Preparation and characterization of natural rosin stabilized nanoparticles via miniemulsion polymerization and their pressure-sensitive adhesive applications. Ind Crop Prod 124:244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.079CrossRef

189.

Zhang Z, Zhang P, Zhang W (2016) Recent advances in organic–inorganic well-defined hybrid polymers using controlled living radical polymerization techniques. Polym Chem. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6py00675bCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

190.

Evans C (2016) Multi-phase silicone acrylic hybrid visco-elastic compositions and methods of making same. International patent no: WO 2016/130408 Al

191.

Wang Y (2017) Considerations of functional fluoropolymer structure in the design of acrylic–fluorine hybrid PSAs: graft versus telechelic cooligomers. J Appl Polym Sci 46038:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.46038CrossRef

192.

Sanjiv Kasbe P, Kumar N, Manik G (2017) A molecular simulation analysis of influence of lignosulphonate addition on properties of modified 2-ethyl hexyl acrylate/methyl methacrylate/acrylic acid based pressure sensitive adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes 78:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.06.014CrossRef

193.

Asahara J, Takemura A, Hori N (2004) Crosslinked acrylic pressure sensitive adhesives. 3. Effect of adherend on film formation. Polymer (Guildf) 45:4917–4924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.05.009CrossRef

194.

Czech Z, Pełech R (2009) Thermal degradation of acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives based on copolymers of 2-ethylhexyl acrylate and acrylic acid. Polimery/Polymers 54:828–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.09.017CrossRef

195.

Udagama R, Degrandi-contraires E, Creton C (2011) Synthesis of acrylic à polyurethane hybrid latexes by miniemulsion polymerization and their pressure-sensitive adhesive applications. Macromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma200073d2632-2642CrossRef

196.

Mehravar S, Ballard N, Agirre A (2016) Relating polymer microstructure to adhesive performance in blends of hybrid polyurethane/acrylic latexes. Eur Polym J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.12.031CrossRef

197.

Lopez A, Degrandi-contraires E, Canetta E (2011) Waterborne polyurethane–acrylic hybrid nanoparticles by miniemulsion polymerization: applications in pressure-sensitive adhesives. Langmuir 27:3878–3888. https://doi.org/10.1021/la104830uCrossRefPubMed

Titel: Developments in pressure-sensitive adhesives: a review
verfasst von: Sachin Mapari
Siddhesh Mestry
S. T. Mhaske
Publikationsdatum: 11.07.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Polymer Bulletin / Ausgabe 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0170-0839
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-2449
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-020-03305-1

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2021

Comparative studies of thermal and mechanical properties of macrocyclic versus linear polylactide

Morphology, thermal, and mechanical properties of κ-aluminum oxide/CTBN/epoxy nanocomposites

The physical properties, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of chitosan–gelatin edible films incorporated with the extract from hop plant

Design of pH sensitive low-cost adsorbent from the exudate of Lannea coromandelica (Houtt) for remediation of Malachite Green dye from aqueous solution

Biocomposites based on plasticized starch: thermal, mechanical and morphological characterization

Effect of vulcanization systems on the properties of natural rubber latex films

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten