nach oben

Engineering with Computers

Erschienen in:

15.02.2021 | Original Article

Optimization of weight and cost of cantilever retaining wall by a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm

verfasst von: Sushmita Sharma, Apu Kumar Saha, Geetanjali Lohar

Erschienen in: Engineering with Computers | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

A retaining wall is a structure used to resist the lateral pressure of soil or any backfill material. Cantilever retaining walls provide resistance to overturning and sliding by using backfill weight. In this paper, the weight and cost of the cantilever retaining wall have been minimized using a hybrid metaheuristic optimization technique, namely, h-BOASOS. The algorithm has been developed by the ensemble of two popular metaheuristics, butterfly optimization algorithm (BOA) and symbiosis organism search (SOS) algorithm. BOA’s exploratory intensity is coupled with SOS’s greater exploitative capacity to find the superior algorithm h-BOASOS. The newly developed algorithm has been tested with a suite of 35 classical benchmark functions, and the results are compared with several state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms. The results are evaluated statistically by the Friedman rank test, and convergence curves measure the convergence speed of the algorithm. It is observed in both cases that h-BOASOS is superior to other algorithms. The suggested approach is then used to solve four real-world engineering design problems to examine the problem-solving capacity of the proposed algorithm, and the results are contrasted with a wide range of algorithms. The proposed h-BOASOS is considered to be the winner on each occasion. Finally, the newly suggested algorithm is applied to find the cost and weight of the cantilever retaining wall problems of two different heights, 3.2 m and 6.3 m. The obtained results are compared with the component algorithms and found that the new algorithm works better than the compared algorithms.

Vorheriger Artikel Optimization of weight and collapse energy of space structures using the multi-objective modified crow search algorithm

Nächster Artikel Laguerre wavelet method for solving Thomas–Fermi type equations

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Dede T (2018) Jaya algorithm to solve single objective size optimization problem for steel grillage structures. Steel Compos Struct 26(2):163–170. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.26.2.163MathSciNetCrossRef

Mohammad RB, Morteza M (2019) Application of an improved genetic algorithm for optimal design of planar steel frames. Period Polytech Civ Eng 63(1):141–151. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.13039CrossRef

Kaveh A, Mohammad F (2019) Optimal seismic design of steel plate shear walls using metaheuristic algorithms. Period Polytech Civ Eng 63(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.12119CrossRef

Kaveh A, Seyed RHV, Pedram H (2019) Performance of the modified dolphin monitoring operator for weight optimization of skeletal structures. Period Polytech Civ Eng 63(1):30–45. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.12544CrossRef

Ali K, Mohammad ZK, Mahdi B (2019) Optimal design of multi-span pitched roof frames with tapered members. Period Polytech Civ Eng 63(1):77–86. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.13107CrossRef

Ahmadi NB, Varaee H Optimal design of reinforced concrete retaining walls using a swarm intelligence technique. Proc 1st Int Conf Soft Comput Technol Civil, Structural Environ Eng Civ Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK

Khajehzadeh M, Taha MR, El-Shafie A, Eslami M (2010) Economic design of retaining wall using particle swarm optimization with passive congregation. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 4(11):5500–5507

Khajehzadeh M, Taha M R, El-Shafie A, Eslami M Modified particle swarm optimization for optimum design of spread footing and retaining wall. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Physics Eng) 011; 12(6):415–4272. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1000252

Khajehzadeh M, Eslami M (2011) Gravitational search algorithm for optimization of retaining structures. Indian J Sci Technol 5(1):1821–1827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1627-1CrossRef

10.

Yepes V, Alcala A, Perea C, Gonzalez-Vidosa F (2008) A parametric study of optimum earth-retaining walls by simulated annealing. Eng Struct 30(3):821–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.023CrossRef

11.

Ghazavi M, Bonab SB (2011) Learning from ant society in optimizing concrete retaining walls. J Technol Educ 5(3):205–212

12.

Kaveh A, Abadi ASM (2010) Harmony search based algorithm for the optimum cost design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls. Int J Civ Eng 9(1):1–8

13.

Kaveh A, Behnam AF (2013) Charged system search algorithm for the optimum cost design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls. Arab J Sci Eng 38(3):563–570CrossRef

14.

Camp CV, Akin C (2012) Design of retaining walls using big bang-big crunch optimization optimum design of cantilever retaining walls. J Struct Eng 138:438–448CrossRef

15.

Gandomi AH, Kashani AR, Mousavi M (2015) Boundary constraint handling affection on slope stability analysis. Engineering and Applied Sciences Optimization 2015. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland 341–358

16.

Nama S, Saha AK, Ghosh S (2015) Parameters optimization of geotechnical problem using different optimization algorithm. Geotech Geol Eng 33(5):1235–1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9898-0CrossRef

17.

Nabeel AJ, Ahmed MAY (2016) Optimum Design of Tied Back Retaining Wall. Open Journal of Civil Engineering 6:139–155. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2016.62013CrossRef

18.

Kumar VN, Suribabu CR (2017) Optimal design of cantilever retaining wall using differential evolution algorithm. Int J Optim Civil Eng 7(3):433–449

19.

Bath GS, Dhillon JS, Walia BS (2018) Optimization of geometric design of retaining wall by differential evolution technique. Int J Comput Eng Res 8(6):67–77

20.

Neda M, Sadjad G, Vagelis P (2019) Cost-based optimum design of reinforced concrete retaining walls considering different methods of bearing capacity computation. Journal 7:1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7121232CrossRef

21.

Nama S, Saha AK, Ghosh S (2017) Improved backtracking search algorithm for pseudo dynamic active earth pressure on retaining wall supporting c-\(\phi\) backfill. Appl Soft Comput 52:885–897CrossRef

22.

Prayogo D, Cheng MY, Wu YW, Tran D-H (2020) Combining machine learning models via adaptive ensemble weighting for prediction of shear capacity of reinforced-concrete deep beams. Eng Comput 36:1135–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00753-wCrossRef

23.

Saha A, Saha AK , Ghosh S (2018) Pseudodynamic bearing capacity analysis of shallow strip footing using the advanced optimization technique “hybrid symbiosis organisms search algorithm” with numerical validation. Adv Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3729360

24.

Stefanos S, George K, Nikos DL (2020) Conceptual design of structural systems based on topology optimization and prefabricated components. Comput Struct 226:106–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.106136CrossRef

25.

Lohar G, Sharma S, Saha AK, Ghosh G (2020) Optimization of geotechnical parameters used in slope stability analysis by metaheuristic algorithms. Appl IoT 223–231

26.

Francisco JM, Fernando GV, Antonio H, Victor Y (2010) Heuristic optimization of RC bridge piers with rectangular hollow sections. Comput Struct 88(5–6):375–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.11.009CrossRef

27.

Degertekin SO, Hayalioglu MS (2013) Sizing truss structures using teaching–learning-based optimization. Comput Struct 119:177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.12.011CrossRef

28.

Nama S, Saha AK, Saha A (2020) The hDEBSA global optimization method: a comparative study on CEC2014 test function and application to geotechnical problem. Bio-inspir Neurocomput 225–258

29.

Gordan B, Koopialipoor M, Clementking A, Tootoonchi H, Mohamda ET (2019) Estimating and optimizing safety factors of retaining wall through neural network and bee colony techniques. Eng Comput 35:945–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0642-2CrossRef

30.

Kaveh A, Biabani Hamedani K, Zaerreza A (2020) A set theoretical shuffled shepherd optimization algorithm for optimal design of cantilever retaining wall structures. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-00999-9CrossRef

31.

Koopialipoor M, Murlidhar BR, Hedayat A, Armaghani DJ, Gordan B, Mohamad ET (2020) The use of new intelligent techniques in designing retaining walls. Eng Comput 36:283–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-00700-1CrossRef

32.

Kumar S, Tejani GG, Mirjalili S (2019) Modified symbiotic organisms search for structural optimization. Eng Comput 35:1269–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0662-yCrossRef

33.

Arora S, Singh S (2019) Butterfly optimization algorithm: a novel approach for global optimization. Soft Comput 23:715–734CrossRef

34.

Sharma S, Saha AK (2019) m-MBOA: a novel butterfly optimization algorithm enhanced with mutualism scheme. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04234-6

35.

Guo Y, Liu X, Chen L (2020) Improved butterfly optimisation algorithm based on guiding weight and population restart. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 1–19

36.

Sharma S, Saha AK, Nama S (2020) An Enhanced Butterfly Optimization Algorithm for Function Optimization. In: Pant M, Kumar Sharma T, Arya R, Sahana B, Zolfagharinia H (eds) Soft Computing: Theories and Applications (2020). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1154. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4032-5_54

37.

Sharma S, Saha AK, Ramasamy V, Sarkar JL, Panigrahi CR (2020) hBOSOS: an ensemble of butterfly optimization algorithm and symbiosis organisms search for global optimization. In: Pati B, Panigrahi C, Buyya R, Li KC (eds) Advanced Computing and Intelligent Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (2020), vol 1089. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1483-8_48

38.

Sharma S, Saha AK, Majumder A, Nama S MPBOA - A novel hybrid butterfly optimization algorithm with symbiosis organisms search for global optimization and image segmentation. Multimed Tools Appl

39.

Cheng MY, Prayogo D (2014) Symbiotic Organisms Search: A new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Computers & Structures 139:98–112CrossRef

40.

Nama S, Saha AK, Ghosh S (2016) Improved symbiotic organisms search algorithm for solving unconstrained function optimization. Decis Sci Lett 5(3):361–380CrossRef

41.

Nama S, Saha AK, Ghosh S (2017) A hybrid symbiosis organisms search algorithm and its application to real world problems. Mem Comput 9(3):261–280CrossRef

42.

Nama S, Saha AK (2018) An ensemble symbiosis organisms search algorithm and its application to real world problems. Decis Sci Lett 7(2):103–118CrossRef

43.

Nama S, Saha AK, Sharma S (2020) A novel improved symbiotic organisms search algorithm. Comput Intell. https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.12290

44.

Ezugwu AE, Prayogo D (2019) Symbiotic organisms search algorithm: theory, recent advances and applications. Expert Syst Appl 119:184–209CrossRef

45.

Storn R, Price K (1997) Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim 4:341–359MathSciNetCrossRef

46.

Kennedy J , Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE international conference on neural networks 1942–8

47.

Basturk B, Karaboga D (2006) An artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm for numeric function optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE swarm intelligence symposium 12–14

48.

Rao R (2016) Jaya: a simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. Int J Ind Eng Comput 7(1):19–34

49.

Mirjalili S (2016) SCA: a sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowl Based Syst 96:120–133CrossRef

50.

Mirjalili S (2015) Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl Based Syst 89:228–249CrossRef

51.

Yang XS, Deb S (2009) Cuckoo search via lévy flights. World congress on nature and biologically inspired computing, NaBIC 2009; IEEE, 210–214

52.

Yang XS (2009) Firefly algorithm, levy flights and global optimization. Bramer M, Ellis R, Petridis M (eds) Research and development in intelligent systems XXVI 2009; Springer, Berlin, 209–218

53.

Goldberg DE, Holland JH (1988) Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Mach Learn 3(2):95–99CrossRef

54.

Wang GG, Deb S, Cui Z (2009) Monarch butterfly optimization. Neural Comput Appl 24(3–4):853–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1923-yCrossRef

55.

Chakraborty S, Saha AK, Sharma S, Mirjalili S, Chakraborty R (2020) A novel enhanced whale optimization algorithm for global optimization. Comput Ind Eng. 107086, ISSN 0360-8352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.107086

56.

Wang Z, Luo Q, Zhou Y-Q (2020) Hybrid metaheuristic algorithm using butterfly and flower pollination base on mutualism mechanism for global optimization problems. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01025-8

57.

Mirjalili S (2015) The Ant Lion optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 83:80–98CrossRef

58.

Sable KS, Patil AA (2012) Optimization of retaining wall by using optimtool matlab. Int J Eng Res Technol 01(06):1–11

Titel: Optimization of weight and cost of cantilever retaining wall by a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm
verfasst von: Sushmita Sharma
Apu Kumar Saha
Geetanjali Lohar
Publikationsdatum: 15.02.2021
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Engineering with Computers / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0177-0667
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-5663
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01294-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

An efficient approach for damage identification based on improved machine learning using PSO-SVM

A robust direct modeling method for quadric B-rep models based on geometry–topology inconsistency tracking

Assessment of circular-bored twin tunnel (CBTT) performance using soft computing methods

Integrating the LSSVM and RBFNN models with three optimization algorithms to predict the soil liquefaction potential

An iterative simulation algorithm for large oscillation of the applicable 2D-electrical system on a complex nonlinear substrate

Variable-fidelity hypervolume-based expected improvement criteria for multi-objective efficient global optimization of expensive functions