Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Soft Computing 23/2020

16.07.2020 | Focus

FOPA-MC: fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making for peer assessment

verfasst von: Nicola Capuano, Santi Caballé, Gennaro Percannella, Pierluigi Ritrovato

Erschienen in: Soft Computing | Ausgabe 23/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses are gaining popularity with millions of students enrolled, thousands of courses available and hundreds of learning institutions involved. Due to the high number of students and the relatively small number of tutors, student assessment, especially for complex tasks, is a typical issue of such courses. Thus, peer assessment is becoming increasingly popular to solve such a problem and several approaches have been proposed so far to improve the reliability of its outcomes. Among the most promising, there is fuzzy ordinal peer assessment (FOPA) that adopts models coming from fuzzy set theory and group decision Making. In this paper we propose an extension of FOPA supporting multi-criteria assessment based on rubrics. Students are asked to rank a small number of peer submissions against specified criteria, then provided rankings are transformed in fuzzy preference relations, expanded to obtain missing values and aggregated to estimate final grades. Results obtained are promising if compared to other peer assessment techniques both in the reconstruction of the correct ranking and on the estimation of students’ grades.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
2
miriadax.net
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Albano G, Capuano N, Pierri A (2017) Adaptive peer grading and formative assessment. J e-Learn Knowl Soc 13(1):147–161 Albano G, Capuano N, Pierri A (2017) Adaptive peer grading and formative assessment. J e-Learn Knowl Soc 13(1):147–161
Zurück zum Zitat Allen L, Likens A, McNamara D (2018) A multi-dimensional analysis of writing flexibility in an automated writing evaluation system. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. Sydney, Australia Allen L, Likens A, McNamara D (2018) A multi-dimensional analysis of writing flexibility in an automated writing evaluation system. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. Sydney, Australia
Zurück zum Zitat Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alcala-Fdez J, Porcel C (2008) A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values. Int J Intell Syst 23(1):155–175MATH Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alcala-Fdez J, Porcel C (2008) A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values. Int J Intell Syst 23(1):155–175MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2009) Individual and social strategies to deal with ignorance situations in multi-person decision making. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 8(2):313–333MATH Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2009) Individual and social strategies to deal with ignorance situations in multi-person decision making. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 8(2):313–333MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Ashton S, Davies R (2015) Using Scaffolded rubrics to improve peer assessment in a MOOC. Distance Educ 36(3):312–334 Ashton S, Davies R (2015) Using Scaffolded rubrics to improve peer assessment in a MOOC. Distance Educ 36(3):312–334
Zurück zum Zitat Bang H (2013) Reliability of national writing project’s analytic writing continuum assessment system. J Writ Assess 6(1):13–24 Bang H (2013) Reliability of national writing project’s analytic writing continuum assessment system. J Writ Assess 6(1):13–24
Zurück zum Zitat Borda JC (1784) Memoire sur les elections au scrutin, Histoire de l’Académie royale des sciences. Paris 1781:31–34 Borda JC (1784) Memoire sur les elections au scrutin, Histoire de l’Académie royale des sciences. Paris 1781:31–34
Zurück zum Zitat Bouzidi L, Jaillet A (2009) Can online peer assessment be trusted? Educ Technol Soc 12(4):257–268 Bouzidi L, Jaillet A (2009) Can online peer assessment be trusted? Educ Technol Soc 12(4):257–268
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley RA, Terry ME (1952) Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39(3):324MathSciNetMATH Bradley RA, Terry ME (1952) Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39(3):324MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Capuano N, Caballé S, Miguel J (2016) Improving peer grading reliability with graph mining techniques. Int J Emerg Technol Learn 11(7):24–33 Capuano N, Caballé S, Miguel J (2016) Improving peer grading reliability with graph mining techniques. Int J Emerg Technol Learn 11(7):24–33
Zurück zum Zitat Capuano N, Loia V, Orciuoli F (2017) A fuzzy group decision making model for ordinal peer assessment. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 10(2):247–259 Capuano N, Loia V, Orciuoli F (2017) A fuzzy group decision making model for ordinal peer assessment. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 10(2):247–259
Zurück zum Zitat Capuano N, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E, Loia V (2018) Fuzzy group decision making with incomplete information guided by social influence. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(3):1704–1718 Capuano N, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E, Loia V (2018) Fuzzy group decision making with incomplete information guided by social influence. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(3):1704–1718
Zurück zum Zitat Capuano N, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E, Loia V (2018) Fuzzy rankings for preferences modeling in group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(7):1555–1570 Capuano N, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E, Loia V (2018) Fuzzy rankings for preferences modeling in group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(7):1555–1570
Zurück zum Zitat Capuano N, Caballé S (2015) Towards adaptive peer assessment for MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on P2P, parallel, GRID, cloud and internet computing (3PGCIC 2015). Krakow, Poland Capuano N, Caballé S (2015) Towards adaptive peer assessment for MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on P2P, parallel, GRID, cloud and internet computing (3PGCIC 2015). Krakow, Poland
Zurück zum Zitat Capuano N, Caballé S (2018) Multi-criteria fuzzy ordinal peer assessment for MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on intelligent networking and collaborative systems (INCOS 2018). Bratislava, Slovakia Capuano N, Caballé S (2018) Multi-criteria fuzzy ordinal peer assessment for MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on intelligent networking and collaborative systems (INCOS 2018). Bratislava, Slovakia
Zurück zum Zitat Capuano N, Orciuoli F (2017) Application of fuzzy ordinal peer assessment in formative evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on P2P, parallel, grid, cloud and internet computing (3PGCIC 2017). Barcelona, Spain Capuano N, Orciuoli F (2017) Application of fuzzy ordinal peer assessment in formative evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on P2P, parallel, grid, cloud and internet computing (3PGCIC 2017). Barcelona, Spain
Zurück zum Zitat Caragiannis I, Krimpas A, Voudouris AA (2015) Aggregating partial rankings with applications to peer grading in massive online open courses. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Istanbul Caragiannis I, Krimpas A, Voudouris AA (2015) Aggregating partial rankings with applications to peer grading in massive online open courses. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Istanbul
Zurück zum Zitat Carlson PA, Berry FC (2003) Calibrated peer review and assessing learning outcomes. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference frontiers in education Carlson PA, Berry FC (2003) Calibrated peer review and assessing learning outcomes. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference frontiers in education
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng L, Watanabe Y, Curtis A (2004) Washback in language testing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah Cheng L, Watanabe Y, Curtis A (2004) Washback in language testing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah
Zurück zum Zitat Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy sets and systems 97(1):33–48MathSciNetMATH Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy sets and systems 97(1):33–48MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 182(1):383–399MATH Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 182(1):383–399MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Ekel P, Queiroz J, Parreiras R, Palhares R (2009) Fuzzy set based models and methods of multicriteria group decision-making. Nonlinear Anal Theory Methods Appl 71(12):409–419MATH Ekel P, Queiroz J, Parreiras R, Palhares R (2009) Fuzzy set based models and methods of multicriteria group decision-making. Nonlinear Anal Theory Methods Appl 71(12):409–419MATH
Zurück zum Zitat Falchikov N, Boud D (1989) Student self-assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 59(4):395–430 Falchikov N, Boud D (1989) Student self-assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 59(4):395–430
Zurück zum Zitat Falchikov N, Goldfinch J (2000) Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Rev Educ Res 70(3):287–322 Falchikov N, Goldfinch J (2000) Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Rev Educ Res 70(3):287–322
Zurück zum Zitat Frederiksen J, Collins A (1989) A systems approach to educational testing. Educ Res 18(9):27–32 Frederiksen J, Collins A (1989) A systems approach to educational testing. Educ Res 18(9):27–32
Zurück zum Zitat Goldin IM (2012) Accounting for peer reviewer bias with Bayesian models. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems Goldin IM (2012) Accounting for peer reviewer bias with Bayesian models. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems
Zurück zum Zitat Huisman B, Admiraal W, Pilli O, van de Ven M, Saab N (2018) Peer assessment in MOOCs: the relationship between peer reviewers’ ability and authors’ essay performance. Br J Educ Technol 49(1):101–110 Huisman B, Admiraal W, Pilli O, van de Ven M, Saab N (2018) Peer assessment in MOOCs: the relationship between peer reviewers’ ability and authors’ essay performance. Br J Educ Technol 49(1):101–110
Zurück zum Zitat Jonsson A, Svingby G (2007) The use of scoring rubrics: reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educ Res Rev 2(2):130–144 Jonsson A, Svingby G (2007) The use of scoring rubrics: reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educ Res Rev 2(2):130–144
Zurück zum Zitat Jonsson A, Svingby G (2007) The use of scoring rubrics: reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educ Res Rev 2:130–144 Jonsson A, Svingby G (2007) The use of scoring rubrics: reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educ Res Rev 2:130–144
Zurück zum Zitat Joyner D (2018) Intelligent evaluation and feedback in support of a credit-bearing MOOC. In: Proceedings of artificial intelligence in education (AIED 2018), LNCS Joyner D (2018) Intelligent evaluation and feedback in support of a credit-bearing MOOC. In: Proceedings of artificial intelligence in education (AIED 2018), LNCS
Zurück zum Zitat Lan CH, Graf S, Lai KR (2011) Kinshuk, enrichment of peer assessment with agent negotiation. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 4(1):35–46 Lan CH, Graf S, Lai KR (2011) Kinshuk, enrichment of peer assessment with agent negotiation. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 4(1):35–46
Zurück zum Zitat Lu J, Zhang G, Ruan D, Wu F (2007) Multi-objective group decision making, methods, software and applications with fuzzy set techniques. World Scientific, SingaporeMATH Lu J, Zhang G, Ruan D, Wu F (2007) Multi-objective group decision making, methods, software and applications with fuzzy set techniques. World Scientific, SingaporeMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Mi F, Yeung D (2015) Probabilistic graphical models for boosting cardinal and ordinal peer grading in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 29th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence Mi F, Yeung D (2015) Probabilistic graphical models for boosting cardinal and ordinal peer grading in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 29th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen H, Xiong W, Litman D (2017) Iterative design and classroom evaluation of automated formative feedback for improving peer feedback localization. Int J Artif Intell Educ 27(3):582–622 Nguyen H, Xiong W, Litman D (2017) Iterative design and classroom evaluation of automated formative feedback for improving peer feedback localization. Int J Artif Intell Educ 27(3):582–622
Zurück zum Zitat Panadero E, Romero M, Strijbos J (2013) The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort. Stud Educ Eval 39(4):195–203 Panadero E, Romero M, Strijbos J (2013) The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort. Stud Educ Eval 39(4):195–203
Zurück zum Zitat Passonneau R, Poddar A, Gite G, Krivokapic A, Yang Q, Perin D (2018) Wise crowd content assessment and educational rubrics. Int J Artif Intell Educ 28(1):29–55 Passonneau R, Poddar A, Gite G, Krivokapic A, Yang Q, Perin D (2018) Wise crowd content assessment and educational rubrics. Int J Artif Intell Educ 28(1):29–55
Zurück zum Zitat Pedrycz W, Ekel P, Parreiras R (2010) Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: models, methods and applications. Wiley, HobokenMATH Pedrycz W, Ekel P, Parreiras R (2010) Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: models, methods and applications. Wiley, HobokenMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Perin D, Lauterbach M (2018) Assessing text-based writing of low-skilled college students. Int J Artif Intell Educ 28(1):56–78 Perin D, Lauterbach M (2018) Assessing text-based writing of low-skilled college students. Int J Artif Intell Educ 28(1):56–78
Zurück zum Zitat Piech C, Huang J, Chen Z, Do C, Ng A, Koller D (2013) Tuned models of peer assessment in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on educational data mining Piech C, Huang J, Chen Z, Do C, Ng A, Koller D (2013) Tuned models of peer assessment in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on educational data mining
Zurück zum Zitat Rahimi Z, Litman D, Correnti R, Wang E, Matsumura L (2017) Assessing students’ use of evidence and organization in response-to-text writing: using natural language processing for rubric-based automated scoring. Int J Artif Intell Educ 27(4):694–728 Rahimi Z, Litman D, Correnti R, Wang E, Matsumura L (2017) Assessing students’ use of evidence and organization in response-to-text writing: using natural language processing for rubric-based automated scoring. Int J Artif Intell Educ 27(4):694–728
Zurück zum Zitat Raman K, Joachims T (2014) Methods for ordinal peer grading. In: Proceedings of the 20th SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining Raman K, Joachims T (2014) Methods for ordinal peer grading. In: Proceedings of the 20th SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining
Zurück zum Zitat Reddy Y, Andrade H (2009) A review of rubric use in higher education. Assess Eval High Educ 35(4):435–448 Reddy Y, Andrade H (2009) A review of rubric use in higher education. Assess Eval High Educ 35(4):435–448
Zurück zum Zitat Rezaei A, Lovorn M (2010) Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing. Assess Writ 15:18–39 Rezaei A, Lovorn M (2010) Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing. Assess Writ 15:18–39
Zurück zum Zitat Staubitz T, Petrick D, Bauer M, Renz J, Meinel C (2016) Improving the peer assessment experience on MOOC platforms. In: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on learning@Scale. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK Staubitz T, Petrick D, Bauer M, Renz J, Meinel C (2016) Improving the peer assessment experience on MOOC platforms. In: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on learning@Scale. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Zurück zum Zitat Suen HK (2014) Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs). Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 15(3):312–327 Suen HK (2014) Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs). Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 15(3):312–327
Zurück zum Zitat Sun D, Harris N, Walther G, Baiocchi M (2015) Peer assessment enhances student learning: the results of a matched randomized crossover experiment in a college statistics class. PLoS ONE 10(12):e0143177 Sun D, Harris N, Walther G, Baiocchi M (2015) Peer assessment enhances student learning: the results of a matched randomized crossover experiment in a college statistics class. PLoS ONE 10(12):e0143177
Zurück zum Zitat Uto M, Ueno M (2016) Item response theory for peer assessment. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 9(2):157–160 Uto M, Ueno M (2016) Item response theory for peer assessment. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 9(2):157–160
Zurück zum Zitat Vajjala S (2018) Automated assessment of non-native learner essays: investigating the role of linguistic features. Int J Artif Intell Educ 28(1):79–105 Vajjala S (2018) Automated assessment of non-native learner essays: investigating the role of linguistic features. Int J Artif Intell Educ 28(1):79–105
Zurück zum Zitat Vie J, Popineau F, Bruillard E, Bourda Y (2018) Automated test assembly for handling learner cold-start in large-scale assessments. Int J Artif Intell Educ 28:616–631 Vie J, Popineau F, Bruillard E, Bourda Y (2018) Automated test assembly for handling learner cold-start in large-scale assessments. Int J Artif Intell Educ 28:616–631
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh T (2014) The peer rank method for peer assessment. In: Proceedings of the 21st European conference on artificial intelligence Walsh T (2014) The peer rank method for peer assessment. In: Proceedings of the 21st European conference on artificial intelligence
Zurück zum Zitat Wang YM, Fan ZP (2007) Fuzzy preference relations: aggregation and weight determination. Comput Ind Eng 53(1):163–172MathSciNet Wang YM, Fan ZP (2007) Fuzzy preference relations: aggregation and weight determination. Comput Ind Eng 53(1):163–172MathSciNet
Zurück zum Zitat Zadeh LA (1983) A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Comput Math Appl 9:149–184MathSciNetMATH Zadeh LA (1983) A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Comput Math Appl 9:149–184MathSciNetMATH
Metadaten
Titel
FOPA-MC: fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making for peer assessment
verfasst von
Nicola Capuano
Santi Caballé
Gennaro Percannella
Pierluigi Ritrovato
Publikationsdatum
16.07.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Soft Computing / Ausgabe 23/2020
Print ISSN: 1432-7643
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7479
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05155-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 23/2020

Soft Computing 23/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Methodologies and Application

A two-stage density clustering algorithm

Premium Partner