Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hydrogeology Journal 5/2021

03.05.2021 | Paper

Groundwater head uncertainty analysis in unsteady-state water flow models using the interval and perturbation methods

verfasst von: Guiming Dong, Ying Wang, Juan Tian, Zhihong Fan

Erschienen in: Hydrogeology Journal | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the numerical simulation of groundwater flow, uncertainties often affect the precision of the simulation results. Stochastic and statistical approaches such as the Monte Carlo method, the Neumann expansion method and the Taylor series expansion, are commonly employed to estimate uncertainty in the final output. Based on the first-order interval perturbation method, a combination of the interval and perturbation methods is proposed as a viable alternative and compared to the well-known equal interval continuous sampling method (EICSM). The approach was realized using the GFModel (an unsaturated-saturated groundwater flow simulation model) program. This study exemplifies scenarios of three distinct interval parameters, namely, the hydraulic conductivities of six equal parts of the aquifer, their boundary head conditions, and several hydrogeological parameters (e.g. specific storativity and extraction rate of wells). The results show that the relative errors of deviation of the groundwater head extremums (RDGE) in the late stage of simulation are controlled within approximately ±5% when the changing rate of the hydrogeological parameter is no more than 0.2. From the viewpoint of the groundwater head extremums, the relative errors can be controlled within ±1.5%. The relative errors of the groundwater head variation are within approximately ±5% when the changing rate is no more than 0.2. The proposed method of this study is applicable to unsteady-state confined water flow systems.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Beven K, Binley A (1992) The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 6(3):279–298CrossRef Beven K, Binley A (1992) The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 6(3):279–298CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gao W, Wu D, Song C, Tin-Loi F, Li X (2011) Hybrid probabilistic interval analysis of bar structures with uncertainty using a mixed perturbation Monte-Carlo method. Finite Elements Anal Design 47(7):643–652CrossRef Gao W, Wu D, Song C, Tin-Loi F, Li X (2011) Hybrid probabilistic interval analysis of bar structures with uncertainty using a mixed perturbation Monte-Carlo method. Finite Elements Anal Design 47(7):643–652CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marchant B, Mackay J, Bloomfield J (2016) Quantifying uncertainty in predictions of groundwater levels using formal likelihood methods. J Hydrol 540:699–711CrossRef Marchant B, Mackay J, Bloomfield J (2016) Quantifying uncertainty in predictions of groundwater levels using formal likelihood methods. J Hydrol 540:699–711CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moore RE (1966) Interval analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ Moore RE (1966) Interval analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Zurück zum Zitat Porter DW, Gibbs BP, Jones WF, Huyakorn PS, Hamm LL, Flach GP (2000) Data fusion modeling for groundwater systems. J Contam Hydrol 42:303–335CrossRef Porter DW, Gibbs BP, Jones WF, Huyakorn PS, Hamm LL, Flach GP (2000) Data fusion modeling for groundwater systems. J Contam Hydrol 42:303–335CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Satish MG, Zhu J (1992) Stochastic approach for groundwater flow in a semiconfined aquifer subject to random boundary conditions. Adv Water Resour 15(6):329–339CrossRef Satish MG, Zhu J (1992) Stochastic approach for groundwater flow in a semiconfined aquifer subject to random boundary conditions. Adv Water Resour 15(6):329–339CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sreekanth J, Moore C, Wolf L (2016) Pareto-based efficient stochastic simulation–optimization for robust and reliable groundwater management. J Hydrol 533:180–190CrossRef Sreekanth J, Moore C, Wolf L (2016) Pareto-based efficient stochastic simulation–optimization for robust and reliable groundwater management. J Hydrol 533:180–190CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Geer FC, Te Stroet CBM, Zhou YX (1991) Using Kalman filtering to improve and quantify the uncertainty of numerical groundwater simulations: 1. the role of system noise and its calibration. Water Resour Res 27(8):1987–1994CrossRef Van Geer FC, Te Stroet CBM, Zhou YX (1991) Using Kalman filtering to improve and quantify the uncertainty of numerical groundwater simulations: 1. the role of system noise and its calibration. Water Resour Res 27(8):1987–1994CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vrugt JA, Braak C, Ter JF, Diks CGH, Robinson BA, Hyman JM, Higdon D (2009) Accelerating Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numerical Simul 10(3):273–290CrossRef Vrugt JA, Braak C, Ter JF, Diks CGH, Robinson BA, Hyman JM, Higdon D (2009) Accelerating Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numerical Simul 10(3):273–290CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yamazaki F, Associate M, Shinozuka M, Dasgupta G (1988) Neumann expansion for stochastic finite element analysis. J Eng Mech 114(8):1335–1354CrossRef Yamazaki F, Associate M, Shinozuka M, Dasgupta G (1988) Neumann expansion for stochastic finite element analysis. J Eng Mech 114(8):1335–1354CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Groundwater head uncertainty analysis in unsteady-state water flow models using the interval and perturbation methods
verfasst von
Guiming Dong
Ying Wang
Juan Tian
Zhihong Fan
Publikationsdatum
03.05.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Hydrogeology Journal / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1431-2174
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-0157
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-021-02341-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Hydrogeology Journal 5/2021 Zur Ausgabe