nach oben

Hydrogeology Journal

Erschienen in:

23.01.2023 | Paper

Using geophysical data to assess groundwater levels and the accuracy of a regional numerical flow model

verfasst von: Yan Lévesque, Romain Chesnaux, Julien Walter

Erschienen in: Hydrogeology Journal | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The use of geophysical data to accurately determine water levels is demonstrated for an aquifer within the Saint-Narcisse moraine in the Mauricie region of southeastern Québec, Canada. Two numerical simulations were conducted using FEFLOW, one based on regional piezometric data and the other using geophysical data; the data were acquired through transient electromagnetic (TEM), electrical resistivity (ERT), and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) surveys. The three-dimensional geological and groundwater flow model was based on data from 94 boreholes, 5 stratigraphic cross-sections, and 20 TEM, 6 ERT (~1.44 km) and 4 GPR (~0.97 km) surveys. Both numerical analyses confirmed the simulated water levels, and the root mean square errors obtained from the piezometric data and the multiple geophysical techniques were similar at 3.81 and 2.76 m, respectively. Through a discrete modeling approach, this study shows that groundwater levels estimated using geophysical tools and methods and those determined by direct observation are comparable. The outcome illustrates how geophysical data can complement direct observations to provide additional hydraulic information to hydrologic modellers. Geophysical surveys provide an extensive set of soft data that can be leveraged to improve groundwater flow models and determine groundwater levels, particularly in areas characterized by limited direct piezometric information.

Vorheriger Artikel Use of electrical resistivity tomography to reveal the shallow freshwater–saline interface in The Fens coastal groundwater, eastern England (UK)

Nächster Artikel Combining harmonic pumping with a tracer test for fractured aquifer characterization

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abu-Hassanein ZS, Benson CH, Blotz LR (1996) Electrical resistivity of compacted clays. J Geotech Eng 122:397–406. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:5(397)CrossRef

Allen DM, Schuurman N, Deshpande A, Scibek J (2008) Data integration and standardization in cross-border hydrogeological studies: a novel approach to hydrostratigraphic model development. Environ Geol 53:1441–1453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0753-3CrossRef

Asprion U, Aigner T (1997) Aquifer architecture analysis using ground-penetrating radar: Triassic and Quaternary examples (S. Germany). Environ Geol 31:66–75CrossRef

Baines D, Smith DG, Froese DG, Bauman P, Nimeck G (2002) Electrical resistivity ground imaging (ERGI): a new tool for mapping the lithology and geometry of channel-belts and valley-fills. Sedimentology 49:441–449CrossRef

Baker PL (1991) Response of ground-penetrating radar to bounding surfaces and lithofacies variations in sand barrier sequences. Explor Geophys 22:19–22. https://doi.org/10.1071/EG991019CrossRef

Benn D, Evans DJA (2010) Glaciers and glaciation, 1st edn. Routledge, London

Benzaazoua M, Fall M, Belem T (2004) A contribution to understanding the hardening process of cemented pastefill. Miner Eng 17:141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2003.10.022CrossRef

Beres M Jr, Haeni FP (1991) Application of ground-penetrating-radar methods in hydrogeologic studies. Groundwater 29:375–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1991.tb00528.xCrossRef

Bersezio R, Giudici M, Mele M (2007) Combining sedimentological and geophysical data for high-resolution 3-D mapping of fluvial architectural elements in the Quaternary Po plain (Italy). Sediment Geol 202:230–248CrossRef

Binley A, Beven K (2003) Vadose zone flow model uncertainty as conditioned on geophysical data. Groundwater 41:119–127CrossRef

Binley A, Cassiani G, Deiana R (2010) Hydrogeophysics: opportunities and challenges. Boll Geofis Teor Appl 51(4):267–284

Boumaiza L, Chesnaux R, Walter J, Stumpp C (2020) Assessing groundwater recharge and transpiration in a humid northern region dominated by snowmelt using vadose-zone depth profiles. Hydrogeol J 28:2315–2329. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13056CrossRef

Boumaiza L, Chesnaux R, Walter J, Stumpp C (2021) Constraining a flow model with field measurements to assess water transit time through a vadose zone. Groundwater 59:417–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13056CrossRef

Boumaiza L, Walter J, Chesnaux R, Lambert M, Wanke H, Brookfield A, Batelaan O, Galvão P, Laftouhi N (2022) Groundwater recharge over the past 100 years: regional spatiotemporal assessment and climate change impact over the Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean region, Canada. Hydrol Process e14526. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14526

Bowling JC, Rodriguez AB, Harry DL, Zheng C (2005) Delineating alluvial aquifer heterogeneity using resistivity and GPR data. Groundwater 43:890–903

Bowling JC, Harry DL, Rodriguez AB, Zheng C (2007) Integrated geophysical and geological investigation of a heterogeneous fluvial aquifer in Columbus Mississippi. J Appl Geophys 62:58–73CrossRef

Bristow CS, Jol HM (2003) An introduction to ground penetrating radar (GPR) in sediments. Geol Soc London Spec Publ 211:1–7CrossRef

Busch S, Weihermüller L, Huisman JA, Steelman CM, Endres AL, Vereecken H, Van Der Kruk J (2013) Coupled hydrogeophysical inversion of time-lapse surface GPR data to estimate hydraulic properties of a layered subsurface. Water Resour Res 49:8480–8494CrossRef

Calvache ML, Ibáñez S, Duque C, Martín-Rosales W, López-Chican M, Rubio JC, González A, Viseras C (2009) Numerical modelling of the potential effects of a dam on a coastal aquifer in S Spain. Hydrol Process 23:1268–1281. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7234CrossRef

Chesnaux R (2013) Regional recharge assessment in the crystalline bedrock aquifer of the Kenogami Uplands, Canada. Hydrol Sci J 58:421–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2012.754100CrossRef

Chesnaux R, Lambert M, Walter J, Dugrain V, Rouleau A, Daigneault R (2011) Building a geodatabase for mapping hydrogeological features and 3D modeling of groundwater systems: application to the Saguenay–Lac-St.-Jean region. Canada Comput Geosci 37:1870–1882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.04.013CrossRef

Chesnaux R, Dal Soglio L, Wendling G (2013) Modelling the impacts of shale gas extraction on groundwater and surface water resources. In: Proceedings of GeoMontreal 2013, Montreal, May, 2013

Chesnaux R, Lambert M, Walter J, Fillastre U, Hay M, Rouleau A, Daigneault R, Moisan A, Germaneau D (2017) A simplified geographical information systems (GIS)-based methodology for modeling the topography of bedrock: illustration using the Canadian Shield. Appl Geomatics 9:61–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-017-0183-1CrossRef

Claes N, Paige GB, Grana D, Parsekian AD (2020) Parameterization of a hydrologic model with geophysical data to simulate observed subsurface return flow paths. Vadose Zone J 19:e20024. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20024CrossRef

Cloutier V, Blanchette D, Dallaire P-L, Nadeau S, Rosa E, Roy M (2013) Abitibi- Témiscamingue groundwater knowledge acquisition project (part 1). Final Report submitted to the Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment, Parks Wildlife as part of the Quebec Groundwater Knowledge Acquisition Program. Rapp Rech P1

Cojan I, Renard M (2013) Sédimentologie [Sedimentology], 3rd edn. Dunod, Paris

Constable SC, Parker RL (1987) Occam’s inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics 52:289–300. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442303CrossRef

Costabel S, Siemon B, Houben G, Günther T (2017) Geophysical investigation of a freshwater lens on the island of Langeoog, Germany: insights from combined HEM, TEM and MRS data. J Appl Geophys 136:231–245CrossRef

Cui T, Sreekanth J, Pickett T, Rassam D, Gilfedder M, Barrett D (2021) Impact of model parameterization on predictive uncertainty of regional groundwater models in the context of environmental impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 90:106620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106620CrossRef

Daigneault R-A, Occhietti S (2006) Les moraines du massif Algonquin, Ontario, au début du Dryas récent, et corrélation avec la Moraine de Saint-Narcisse [Moraines of the Algonquin Massif, Ontario, at the beginning of the Younger Dryas, and correlation with the Moraine of Saint-Narcisse]. Géogr Phys Quat 60:103–118. https://doi.org/10.7202/016823arCrossRef

Davis JL, Annan AP (1989) Ground-penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy 1. Geophys Prospect 37:531–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1989.tb02221.xCrossRef

Dewar N, Knight R (2020) Estimation of the top of the saturated zone from airborne electromagnetic data. Geophysics 85:EN63–EN76. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019-0539.1CrossRef

Diersch H-JG (2013) FEFLOW: finite element modeling of flow, mass and heat transport in porous and fractured media. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

Doherty J (2003) Ground water model calibration using pilot points and regularization. Groundwater 41:170–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02580.xCrossRef

Doherty J, Christensen S (2011) Use of paired simple and complex models to reduce predictive bias and quantify uncertainty. Water Resour Res 47. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010763

Doherty J, Moore C (2020) Decision support modeling: data assimilation, uncertainty quantification, and strategic abstraction. Groundwater 58:327–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12969CrossRef

Dunlap E, Tang CCL (2006) Modelling the mean circulation of Baffin Bay. Atmosphere-Ocean 44:99–109. https://doi.org/10.3137/ao.440107CrossRef

Dyke AS (2004) An outline of the deglaciation of North America with emphasis on central and northern Canada. Quat Glaciat Chronol Part II North Am 2b:373–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1571-0866(04)80209-4CrossRef

Dyke A, Prest V (1987) Late Wisconsinan and Holocene history of the Laurentide Ice Sheet. Géographie Phys Quat 41:237–263. https://doi.org/10.7202/032681arCrossRef

Evans D (2005) Glacial landsystems, 1st edn. Routledge, London

Farmani MB (2008) Estimation of unsaturated flow parameters by inverse modeling and GPR tomography. 7(4):1239–1252

Fitterman D V, Labson VF (2005) Electromagnetic induction methods for environmental problems. In: Near-surface geophysics. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Houston, TX, pp 301–356

Galazoulas EC, Mertzanides YC, Petalas CP, Kargiotis EK (2015) Large scale electrical resistivity tomography survey correlated to hydrogeological data for mapping groundwater salinization: a case study from a multilayered coastal aquifer in Rhodope, northeastern Greece. Environ Process 2:19–35CrossRef

Gallagher M, Doherty J (2007) Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis for a watershed model. Environ Model Softw 22:1000–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.06.007CrossRef

Gascoyne JK, Eriksen AS (2005) Engineering geology: geophysics. In: Encyclopedia of Geology. Elsevier, Amsterdam

Goutaland D (2008) Caractérisation hydrogéophysique d’un dépôt fluvioglaciaire: évaluation de l’effet de l’hétérogénéité hydrodynamique sur les écoulements en zone non-saturée [Hydrogeophysical characterization of a fluvioglacial deposit: evaluation of the effect of hydrodynamic heterogeneity on flows in an unsaturated zone]. PhD Thesis, Lyon University (INSA), France, 246 pp

Greggio N, Giambastiani B, Balugani E, Amaini C, Antonellini M (2018) High-resolution electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) to characterize the spatial extension of freshwater lenses in a salinized coastal aquifer. Water 10:1067. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10081067CrossRef

Hill MC (2000) Methods and guidelines for effective model calibration. In: Building partnerships. US Geological Survey, Denver, CO, pp 1–10

Hill MC (2006) The practical use of simplicity in developing ground water models. Groundwater 44:775–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00227.xCrossRef

Hinnell AC, Ferré TPA, Vrugt JA, Huisman J-A, Moysey S, Rings J, Kowalsky, M-B (2010) Improved extraction of hydrologic information from geophysical data through coupled hydrogeophysical inversion. Water Resour Res 46

Hudon-Gagnon E, Chesnaux R, Cousineau PA, Rouleau A (2011) A methodology to adequately simplify aquifer models of quaternary deposits: preliminary results. In: Proceedings of GeoHydro 2011, Joint Meeting of the Canadian Quaternary Association and the Canadian Chapter of the International Association of Hydrogeologists, Quebec City, QC, August 28–31, 2011

Hudon-Gagnon E, Chesnaux R, Cousineau PA, Rouleau A (2015) A hydrostratigraphic simplification approach to build 3D groundwater flow numerical models: example of a Quaternary deltaic deposit aquifer. Environ Earth Sci 74:4671–4683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4439-yCrossRef

Huisman JA, Hubbard SS, Redman JD, Annan AP (2003) Measuring soil water content with ground penetrating radar: a review. Vadose Zone J 2:476–491

Huisman JA, Rings J, Vrugt JA, Sorg J, Vereecken H (2010) Hydraulic properties of a model dike from coupled Bayesian and multi-criteria hydrogeophysical inversion. J Hydrol 380:62–73CrossRef

Kalisperi D, Kouli M, Vallianatos F, Soupios P, Kershaw S, Lydakis-Simantiris N (2018) A transient ElectroMagnetic (TEM) method survey in north-central coast of Crete, Greece: evidence of seawater intrusion. Geosciences 8:107. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8040107CrossRef

Kowalsky MB, Finsterle S, Rubin Y (2004) Estimating flow parameter distributions using ground-penetrating radar and hydrological measurements during transient flow in the vadose zone. Adv Water Resour 27:583–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.03.003CrossRef

Kowalsky MB, Finsterle S, Peterson J, Hubbard S, Rubin Y, Majer E, Ward A, Gee G (2005) Estimation of field-scale soil hydraulic and dielectric parameters through joint inversion of GPR and hydrological data. Water Resour Res 41

Landry B, Beaulieu J, Gauthier M, Lucotte M, Moingt S, Occhietti S, Pinti DL, Quirion M (2012) Notions de géologie [Notions of geology], 4nd edn. Modulo, Montréal, QC

Légaré-Couture G, Leblanc Y, Parent M, Lacasse K, Campeau S (2018) Three-dimensional hydrostratigraphical modelling of the regional aquifer system of the St. Maurice Delta Complex (St. Lawrence Lowlands, Canada). Can Water Resour J/Rev Can Ressour Hydriques 43:92–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2017.1316215CrossRef

Lévesque Y, Saeidi A, Rouleau A (2016) Estimating earth pressure exerted by the backfill on the vertical pillars in underground mine stopes. In: Proceedings of the 69th Canadian Geotechnical Conference and the 11th Joint CGS/IAH-CNC Groundwater Conference (GeoVancouver-2016), Vancouver, Canada, October, 2016, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20407218

Lévesque Y, Saeidi A, Rouleau A (2017) An earth pressure coefficient based on the geomechanical and geometric parameters of backfill in a mine stope. Int J Geo-Eng 8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-017-0065-8CrossRef

Lévesque Y, St-Onge G, Lajeunesse P, Desiage P, Brouard E (2019) Defining the maximum extent of the Laurentide Ice Sheet in Home Bay (eastern Arctic Canada) during the Last Glacial episode. Boreas 49:52–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/bor.12415CrossRef

Lévesque Y, Walter J, Chesnaux R (2021) Transient Electromagnetic (TEM) Surveys as a first approach for characterizing a regional aquifer: the case of the Saint-Narcisse Moraine, Quebec, Canada. Geosciences 11:415–442. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11100415CrossRef

Li C, Doble R, Hatch M, Heinson G, Kay B (2021) Constraining regional-scale groundwater transport predictions with multiple geophysical techniques. J Hydrol Reg Stud 36:100841CrossRef

Loke MH (1999) Time-lapse resistivity imaging inversion. Proceedings of the 5th Meeting of the Environmental and Engineering. Geophys Soc Eur Sect Em 1:1–12. https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922877CrossRef

Loke MH (2000) Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies: a practical guide to 2-D and 3-D surveys. USM, Penang, Malaysia

Loke MH (2006) RES2DINV ver. 3.55, rapid 2-D resistivity & IP inversion using the least-squares method. Softw Man 139:131–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00142.xCrossRef

Loke MH, Barker RD (1995) Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections. Geophysics 60:1682–1690. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443900CrossRef

Loke MH, Barker RD (1996) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method 1. Geophys Prospect 44:131–152CrossRef

Loke MH, Barker RD (2006) Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion1. Geophys Prospect 44:499–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00162.xCrossRef

MacInnes S, Raymond M (2001) ZONGE data processing two-dimensional, smooth-Model CSAMT Inversion version 3.00. Zonge, Tuscon, AZ, 41 pp

MacInnes S, Durham J, Dickerson J, Snyder S, Zonge K (2001) Fast TEM for UXO mapping at Gambell, Saint Lawrence Island, Alaska. In: UXO/Countermine Forum, New Orleans, LA, April 2001

Margold M, Stokes CR, Clark CD (2015) Ice streams in the Laurentide Ice Sheet: identification, characteristics and comparison to modern ice sheets. Earth-Science Rev 143:117–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.01.011CrossRef

Mari JL, Arens G, Chapellier D, Gaudiani P (1998) Geophysique de gisement et de genie civil [Geophysics for deposits and civil engineering]. OSTI, Paris, France

Marker PA, Foged N, He X, Christiansen AV, Refsgaard JC, Auken E, Bauer-Gottwein P (2015) Performance evaluation of groundwater model hydrostratigraphy from airborne electromagnetic data and lithological borehole logs. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19:3875–3890. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3875-2015CrossRef

McClymont AF, Hayashi M, Bentley LR, Muir D, Ernst E (2010) Groundwater flow and storage within an alpine meadow-talus complex. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-859-2010

McClymont AF, Roy JW, Hayashi M, Maurer H, Langston G (2011) Investigating groundwater flow paths within proglacial moraine using multiple geophysical methods. J Hydrol 399:57–69CrossRef

Milsom J (2003) Field geophysics. Wiley Oxford

Nabighian MN (1988) Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics. Soc. Explor. Geophys., Tulsa, OK

Neal A (2004) Ground-penetrating radar and its use in sedimentology: principles, problems and progress. Earth-Sci Rev 66:261–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.01.004CrossRef

Neal A, Roberts CL (2000) Applications of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) to sedimentological, geomorphological and geoarchaeological studies in coastal environments. Geol Soc London Spec Publ 175:139–171. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.175.01.12CrossRef

Occhietti S (1977) Stratigraphie du Wisconsinien de la région de Trois-Rivières-Shawinigan, Québec [Wisconsinan stratigraphy of the Trois-Rivières-Shawinigan region, Québec]. Géographie Phys Quat 31:307–322. https://doi.org/10.7202/1000280arCrossRef

Occhietti S (2007) The Saint-Narcisse morainic complex and early Younger Dryas events on the southeastern margin of the Laurentide Ice Sheet. Géographie Phys Quat 61:89–117. https://doi.org/10.7202/038987arCrossRef

Occhietti S, ChartierH M, Hillaire-Marcel C, Cournoyer M, Cumbaa S, Harington R (2001) Paléoenvironnements de la Mer de Champlain dans la région de Québec, entre 11 300 et 9750 BP: le site de Saint-Nicolas [Paleoenvironments of the Champlain Sea in the region of Québec, between 11,300 and 9,750 BP: the site of Saint-Nicolas]. Géographie Phys Quat 55:23–46. https://doi.org/10.7202/005660arCrossRef

Palacky GJ (1993) Use of airborne electromagnetic methods for resource mapping. Adv Sp Res 13:5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(93)90196-ICrossRef

Pandey LMS, Shukla SK, Habibi D (2015) Electrical resistivity of sandy soil. Géotechnique Lett 5:178–185. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.15.00066CrossRef

Parent M, Occhietti S (1988) Late Wisconsinan deglaciation and Champlain sea invasion in the St. Lawrence Valley, Québec. Géogr Phys Quat 42:215–246. https://doi.org/10.7202/032734arCrossRef

Parent M, Occhietti S (1999) Late Wisconsinan deglaciation and glacial lake development in the Appalachians of southeastern Québec. Géographie Phys Quat 53:117–135. https://doi.org/10.7202/004859arCrossRef

Parsekian AD, Singha K, Minsley BJ, Holbrook WS, Slater L (2015) Multiscale geophysical imaging of the critical zone. Rev Geophys 53:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000465

Pondthai P, Everett ME, Micallef A, Weymer BA, Faghih Z, Haroon A, Jegen M (2020) 3D characterization of a coastal freshwater aquifer in SE Malta (Mediterranean Sea) by time-domain electromagnetic. Water 12:1566. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061566CrossRef

Preisig G, Cornaton FJ, Perrochet P (2014) Regional flow and deformation analysis of basin-fill aquifer systems using stress-dependent parameters. Groundwater 52:125–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12034CrossRef

Reynolds JM (1987) Dielectric analysis of rocks: a forward look. Geophys J Royal Astronom Soc, Oxford, 457 pp

Reynolds JM (2011) An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, UK

Rivers T, van Gool JAM, Connelly JN (1993) Contrasting tectonic styles in the northern Grenville province: implications for the dynamics of orogenic fronts. Geology 21:1127–1130. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1993)021<1127:CTSITN>2.3.CO;2CrossRef

Ross M, Parent M, Lefebvre R (2005) 3D geologic framework models for regional hydrogeology and land-use management: a case study from a Quaternary basin of southwestern Quebec, Canada. Hydrogeol J 13:690–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0365-xCrossRef

Shi X, Polycarpou AA (2005) Measurement and modeling of normal contact stiffness and contact damping at the meso scale. J Vib Acoust 127:52. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1857920CrossRef

Shukla SK, Yin J-H (2006) Fundamentals of geosynthetic engineering, 1st edn. Taylor and Francis, BalkemaCrossRef

Slater L (2007) Near surface electrical characterization of hydraulic conductivity: from petrophysical properties to aquifer geometries—a review. Surv Geophys 28:169–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-007-9022-yCrossRef

Spies BR, Frischknecht FC (1991) Electromagnetic sounding: electromagnetic methods. Appl Geophys 2:285–426

Steenhuis TS, Van der Molen WH (1986) The Thornthwaite-Mather procedure as a simple engineering method to predict recharge. J Hydrol 84:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(86)90124-1CrossRef

Topp GC, Davis JL, Annan AP (1980) Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resour Res 16:574–582. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i003p00574CrossRef

Tran AP, Vanclooster M, Zupanski M, Lambot S (2014) Joint estimation of soil moisture profile and hydraulic parameters by ground-penetrating radar data assimilation with maximum likelihood ensemble filter. Water Resour Res 50:3131–3146. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014583CrossRef

Walter J, Rouleau A, Chesnaux R, Lambert M, Daigneault R (2018) Characterization of general and singular features of major aquifer systems in the Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean region. Can Water Resour J/Rev Can Resour Hydrique 43:75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2018.1433069CrossRef

Wise S (2000) Assessing the quality for hydrological applications of digital elevation models derived from contours. Hydrol Process 14:1909–1929. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1085(20000815/30)14:11/12<1909::AID-HYP45>3.0.CO;2-6CrossRef

Yu Y, Weihermüller L, Klotzsche A, Lärm L, Vereecken H, Huisman JA (2021) Sequential and coupled inversion of horizontal borehole ground penetrating radar data to estimate soil hydraulic properties at the field scale. J Hydrol 596:126010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126010CrossRef

Titel: Using geophysical data to assess groundwater levels and the accuracy of a regional numerical flow model
verfasst von: Yan Lévesque
Romain Chesnaux
Julien Walter
Publikationsdatum: 23.01.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Hydrogeology Journal / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1431-2174
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-0157
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02591-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Analytical multispecies chemical mixture transport model comprising degradable byproducts subject to scale-dependent dispersion

Identification of the sources of mine drainage in a multiaquifer area: a case study of the abandoned Dashu pyrite mine in southwest China

Enhancing the prediction of hydraulic parameters using machine learning, integrating multiple attributes of GIS and geophysics

Simulation of coupled flow and contaminant transport in an unconfined aquifer using the local radial point interpolation meshless method

Effects of structure and volcanic stratigraphy on groundwater and surface water flow: Hat Creek basin, California, USA

Applied multivariate statistical analysis as a tool for assessing groundwater reactions in the Niebla-Posadas aquifer, Spain