nach oben

Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment

Erschienen in:

01.09.2022 | Original Paper

Liquefaction hazard assessment in a seismically active region of Himalayas using geotechnical and geophysical investigations: a case study of the Jammu Region

verfasst von: Abdullah Ansari, Falak Zahoor, Kondalamahanaty Seshagiri Rao, Arvind Kumar Jain

Erschienen in: Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment | Ausgabe 9/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The Jammu Region (JR) in the northwestern Himalayas trigged by medium to high magnitude near-field as well as far-field earthquake events, including the most recent 2019 Mirpur earthquake. In this paper, an attempt has been made to develop the zonation map for liquefaction hazard in the JR based on liquefaction potential index (\(\mathrm{LPI}\)) and probability of liquefaction (\({P}_{L}\)). To achieve this, factor of safety against liquefaction was estimated using standard penetration test (SPT) data collected from geotechnical consultancies and shear wave velocity measured during field testing at 243 locations, and an integrated liquefaction hazard map generated. The liquefaction features such as sand blows and ground rupture were found in Jatah (Samba district) and Simbal (Jammu district). According to the integrated hazard map, places near the bank of Tawi River and Ravi River in Jammu have young alluvium, making them particularly prone to liquefaction. Liquefaction does not occur in the eastern and western sections because of high shear wave velocities and rock at shallow depth, and it also does not occur in the central area due to thick sand deposits. \(\mathrm{LPI}\) values ranged from 0 to 27.45 having very low to very high liquefaction risk. \({P}_{L}\) is greater than 0.75 for sites located on the southwestern side due to uniformly graded soil having extremely low SPT (N) and \({V}_{s}\) values. This study will aid site planners in the construction of structures that consider liquefaction mitigation and well-defined liquefaction risk measures.

Vorheriger Artikel Influence of wetting–drying cycles on the compression behavior of a compacted loess from microstructure analysis

Nächster Artikel Characteristics and mechanism of dump landslides under compound loads based on physical model test

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ahmad B, Sana H, Alam A (2014) Macroseismic intensity assessment of 1885 Baramulla Earthquake of northwestern Kashmir Himalaya, using the Environmental Seismic Intensity scale (ESI 2007). Quatern Int 321:59–64CrossRef

Alam A, Ahmad S, Bhat MS, Ahmad B (2015) Tectonic evolution of Kashmir basin in northwest Himalayas. Geomorphology 239:114–126CrossRef

Andrus RD, Stokoe KH II (2000) Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(11):1015–1025CrossRef

Andrus RD, Stokoe KH (1997) Liquefaction resistance based on shear wave velocity, Proc., NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, Tech. Rep. NCEER-97, 89–128

Andrus RD, Stokoe KH, Hsein Juang C (2004) Guide for shear-wave-based liquefaction potential evaluation. Earthq Spectra 20(2):285–308CrossRef

Ansari A, Rao KS, Jain AK (2021a) Seismic hazard and risk assessment in Maharashtra: a critical review. In: Sitharam, T.G., Kolathayar, S., Sharma, M.L. (Eds), Seismic hazards and risk, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Springer, Singapore. pp. 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9976-7_4

Ansari A, Rao KS, Jain AK (2022a) Damage assessment of tunnels in seismic prone zone during earthquakes: a part of hazard evaluation, In: Sitharam, T.G., Kolathayar, S., Jakka, R. (Eds), Earthquakes and structures, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Springer, Singapore. pp. 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5673-6_13

Ansari A, Rao, KS, Jain AK (2022c) Seismic analysis of shallow tunnels in soil medium. In: Satyanarayana Reddy, C.N.V., Muthukkumaran, K., Vaidya, R. (Eds.), Stability of slopes and underground excavations, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Springer, Singapore. pp. 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5601-9_29

Ansari A, Satake K, Malik JN (2017) Modelling the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami to estimate tsunami heights and its amplitude and to study its effects on coastal areas. Proc. of the ERI Earthquake Conference, University of Tokyo, Japan

Ansari A, Zahoor F, Rao KS, Jain AK (2022b) Deterministic approach for seismic hazard assessment of Jammu Region, Jammu and Kashmir. In Geo-Congress 2022c: Geophysical and Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, GSP(334), 590–598

Ansari A, Zahoor F, Rao KS, Jain AK (2022d) Seismic hazard assessment studies based on deterministic and probabilistic approaches for the Jammu region, NW Himalayas. Arab Jo Geosci 15(11):1–26

Ansari A, Zahoor F, Rao KS, Jain AK, Riyaz TU (2021b) Seismic vulnerability of residential buildings in Jammu City, Jammu and Kashmir. Proc. of the Indian Geotechnical Conference (IGC), Trichy, India

Ansari A., Rao KS, Jain AK (2022e) Damage analysis of seismic response of shallow tunnels in Jammu. In: Das BB, Hettiarachchi H, Sahu PK, Nanda S (Eds) Recent developments in sustainable infrastructure (ICRDSI-2020)—GEO-TRA-ENV-WRM. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 207. Springer, Singapore, pp 611–619 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7509-6_47

Asim KM, Martínez-Álvarez F, Basit A, Iqbal T (2017) Earthquake magnitude prediction in Hindukush region using machine learning techniques. Nat Hazards 85(1):471–486CrossRef

Avouac JP, Ayoub F, Leprince S, Konca O, Helmberger DV (2006) The 2005, Mw 7.6 Kashmir earthquake: sub-pixel correlation of ASTER images and seismic waveforms analysis. Earth Planet Sci Lett 249(3–4):514–528CrossRef

Beroya MAA, Aydin A, Tiglao R, Lasala M (2009) Use of microtremor in liquefaction hazard mapping. Eng Geol 107(3–4):140–153CrossRef

Bhanja SN, Mukherjee A, Rodell M (2018) Groundwater storage variations in India. In Groundwater of South Asia, Springer, Singapore, pp 49–59

Bilham R, Wallace K (2005) Future Mw>8 earthquakes in the Himalaya: implications from the 26 Dec 2004 Mw=9.0 earthquake on India’s eastern plate margin. Geol Surv India Spec Publ 85:1–14

Bonilla LF, Steidl JH, Lindley GT, Tumarkin AG, Archuleta RJ (1997) Site amplification in the San Fernando Valley, California: variability of site-effect estimation using the S-wave, coda, and H/V methods. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(3):710–730CrossRef

Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2004) Evaluating the potential for liquefaction or cyclic failure of silts and clays. Davis, California: Center for Geotechnical Modeling, pp 131

Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2012) Probabilistic standard penetration test–based liquefaction–triggering procedure. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138(10):1185–1195CrossRef

Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2014) CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures. Report No. UCD/CGM.-14, 1

Castellaro S, Panzeri R, Mesiti F, Bertello L (2015) A surface seismic approach to liquefaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 77:35–46CrossRef

Cetin KO, Seed RB, Der Kiureghian A, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF Jr, Kayen RE, Moss RE (2004) Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(12):1314–1340CrossRef

CGWB (2020) Ground water year book 2018–19 Jammu & Kashmir. Central Ground Water Board-North Western Himalayan Region, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India

Chen CJ, Juang CH (2000) Calibration of SPT- and CPT-based liquefaction evaluation methods. In: Mayne PW, Hryciw R (Eds) Innovations and applications in geotechnical site characterization. Geotechnical Special Publication 97. ASCE, Reston, pp 49–64

Dar JA, Dubey RK (2015) Probabilistic seismic hazard analyses (PSHA) and liquefaction susceptibility evaluation of Kashmir Valley, India. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect A 85(1):177–186CrossRef

Ferraro A, Grasso S, Massimino MR (2018) Site effects evaluation in Catania (Italy) by means 0f 1-D numerical analysis. Ann Geophys 61(2):SE224–SE224CrossRef

Grasso S, Massimino MR, Sammito MSV (2020) New stress reduction factor for evaluating soil liquefaction in the coastal area of Catania (Italy). Geosciences 11(1):12CrossRef

Grasso S, Maugeri M (2008) The Seismic Dilatometer Marchetti Test (SDMT) for evaluating liquefaction potential under cyclic loading. In Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, pp 1–15

Gupta H, Gahalaut VK (2014) Seismotectonics and large earthquake generation in the Himalayan region. Gondwana Res 25(1):204–213CrossRef

Gupta K, Satyam N (2022) Estimation of Arias intensity and peak ground acceleration (PGA) using probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Uttarakhand state (India). Arab J Geosci 15:437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09733-9CrossRef

Hashash YMA, Groholski DR, Philips CA, Park D (2008) DEEPSOIL v3.5beta. University of Illinois, U.C, User manual and tutorial

Huang HC, Tseng YS (2002) Characteristics of soil liquefaction using H/V of microtremors in Yuan-Lin area, Taiwan. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 13(3):325–338CrossRef

Idriss IM (1990) Response of soft soil sites during earthquakes. In: Proceedings of H. Bolton Seed Memorial Symposium, vol 2, No. 4. University of California, Berkeley

Idriss IM (1999) An update to the Seed-Idriss simplified procedure for evaluating liquefaction potential. Proc., TRB Worshop on New Approaches to Liquefaction, Pubbl. n. FHWA-RD-99–165, Federal Highway Administation

Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2006) Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26(2–4):115–130CrossRef

Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2008) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthq Eng Res Inst

Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2010) PT-based liquefaction triggering procedures. Rep UCD/CGM-10 2:4–13

Iwasaki T (1978) A practical method for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on case studies at various sites in Japan. In Proc. Second Int. Conf Microzonation Safer Construct Re Appl 2:885–896

Iwasaki T, Tokida KI, Tatsuoka F, Watanabe S, Yasuda S, Sato H (1982) Microzonation for soil liquefaction potential using simplified methods. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on microzonation, Seattle 3(2):1310–1330

Jayangondaperumal R, Thakur VC, Suresh N (2008) Liquefaction features of the 2005 Muzaffarabad–Kashmir earthquake and evidence of palaeoearthquakes near Jammu, Kashmir Himalaya. Curr Sci 1071–1077

Jishnu RB, Naik SP, Patra NR, Malik JN (2013) Ground response analysis of Kanpur soil along Indo-Gangetic Plains. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 51:47CrossRef

Juang CH, Jiang T (2000) Assessing probabilistic methods for liquefaction potential evaluation. In Soil dynamics and liquefaction, pp 148–162

Juang CH, Jiang T, Andrus RD (2002) Assessing probability-based methods for liquefaction potential evaluation. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 128(7):580–589CrossRef

Karastathis VK, Karmis P, Novikova T, Roumelioti Z, Gerolymatou E, Papanastassiou D, Liakopoulos S, Tsombos P, Papadopoulos GA (2010) The contribution of geophysical techniques to site characterisation and liquefaction risk assessment: case study of Nafplion City, Greece. J Appl Geophys 72(3):194–211CrossRef

Khan RA, Shah MY (2016) Earthquake induced liquefaction features in the Karewas of Kashmir Valley North-West Himalayas, India: implication to paleoseismicity. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 90:101–111CrossRef

Kramer SL (2000) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Int Series in Civil Engg and Engg Mech, New Jersey, p 653

Lin CP, Chang CC, Chang TS (2004) The use of MASW method in the assessment of soil liquefaction potential. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(9–10):689–698CrossRef

Lister G, Kennett B, Richards S, Forster M (2008) Boudinage of a stretching slablet implicated in earthquakes beneath the Hindu Kush. Nat Geosci 1(3):196–201CrossRef

Mahajan AK, Mundepi AK, Chauhan N, Jasrotia AS, Rai N, Gachhayat TK (2012) Active seismic and passive microtremor HVSR for assessing site effects in Jammu city, NW Himalaya, India—a case study. J Appl Geophys 77:51–62CrossRef

Malik JN, Mohanty C (2007) Active tectonic influence on the evolution of drainage and landscape: geomorphic signatures from frontal and hinterland areas along the Northwestern Himalaya. Ind J Asian Earth Sci 29(5–6):604–618CrossRef

Malik JN, Sahoo AK, Shah AA, Rawat A, Chaturvedi A (2007) Farthest recorded liquefaction around Jammu caused by 8 October 2005 Muzaffarabad earthquake of Mw= 7.6. Jr Geolg Soc India 69(1):39

Micromed s.p.a. (2009) The short Tromino how to. Ver 1(1):26

Naik SP, Choudhury B, Garg A (2021) Laboratory investigations of liquefaction mitigation of Ganga sand using stable carbon material: a case study. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng. 7:89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-021-00333-3CrossRef

Naik SP, Mohanty A, Porfido S, Tuttle M, Gwon O, Kim YS (2020) Intensity estimation for the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, India on ESI-07 scale and comparison with historical 16th June 1819 Allah Bund earthquake: a test of ESI-07 application for intraplate earthquakes. Quatern Int 536:27–143CrossRef

Naik SP, Patra NR (2018) Generation of liquefaction potential map for Kanpur city and Allahabad city of northern India: an attempt for liquefaction hazard assessment. Geotech Geol Eng 36(1):293–305CrossRef

Nardone L, Maresca R (2011) Shallow velocity structure and site effects at Mt. Vesuvius, Italy, from HVSR and array measurements of ambient vibrations. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 101(4):1465–1477CrossRef

Ohta Y, Goto N (1978) Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristic soil indexes. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 6(2):167–187CrossRef

Pandey SJ, Bhat GM, Puri S, Raina N, Sing Y, Pandita SK, Verma M, Bansal BK, Sutar A (2017) Seismotectonic study of Kishtwar region of Jammu Province using local broadband seismic data. J Seismolog 21(3):525–538CrossRef

Pandita SK, Haq AU, Bhat GM, Singh Y, Singh A (2021) Identification of active fault topography along the Kishtwar Fault, Jammu and Kashmir, Northwest Himalaya, India. Environ Earth Sci 80(4):1–16CrossRef

Pandita SK, Singh Y, Bhat GM, Pandey SJ, Singh A, Verma M, Bansal BK (2019) Evidence of active tectonic deformation in Kishtwar Area, Jammu and Kashmir, Northwest Himalaya. India Jr Geolg Soc India 93(3):331–342CrossRef

Papathanassiou G (2008) LPI-based approach for calibrating the severity of liquefaction-induced failures and for assessing the probability of liquefaction surface evidence. Eng Geol 96(1–2):94–104CrossRef

Park CB, Miller RD, Miur H (2002) Optimum field parameters of an MASW survey. Japanese Society of Exploration Geophysics Extended Abstracts

Park CB, Miller RD, Xia J (1999) Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics 64(3):800–808CrossRef

Park CB, Miller RD, Xia J (2001) January. Offset and resolution of dispersion curve in multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW). In Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, SSM4-SSM4

Pathier E, Fielding EJ, Wright TJ, Walker R, Parsons BE, Hensley S (2006) Displacement field and slip distribution of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake from SAR imagery. Geophys Res Lett 33(20)

Paul H, Priestley K, Powali D, Sharma S, Mitra S, Wanchoo S (2018) Signatures of the existence of frontal and lateral ramp structures near the Kishtwar Window of the Jammu and Kashmir Himalaya: evidence from microseismicity and source mechanisms. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 19(9):3097–3114CrossRef

Powali D, Sharma S, Mandal R, Mitra S (2020) A reappraisal of the 2005 Kashmir (Mw 7.6) earthquake and its aftershocks: Seismotectonics of NW Himalaya. Tectonophysics 789:228501CrossRef

Putti SP, Satyam N (2018) Ground response analysis and liquefaction hazard assessment for Vishakhapatnam city. Innov Infrastruct Solut 3(1):1–14

Qadir J, Bhat MS, Alam A, Rashid I (2020) Mapping groundwater potential zones using remote sensing and GIS approach in Jammu Himalaya. Jammu and Kashmir Geojournal 85(2):487–504CrossRef

Raazia S, Dar AQ (2021) Insights into the hydrogeological framework of the NW Himalayan Karewas (India). Environ Challenges 4:100086CrossRef

Rai DC, Murty CVR (2006) Effects of the 2005 Muzaffarabad (Kashmir) earthquake on built environment. Curr Sci 90(8):1066–1070

Rao KS, Rathod GW (2014) Seismic microzonation of Indian megacities: a case study of NCR Delhi. Ind Geotech J 44(2):132–148CrossRef

Rao KS, Satyam DN (2007) Liquefaction studies for seismic microzonation of Delhi region. Curr Sci 646–654

Rathod GW (2011) Seismic hazard assessment and development of attenuation relationship for NCR of Delhi, Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi

Rix GJ, Lai CG, Orozco, MC, Hebeler GL, Roma V (2001) Recent advances in surface wave methods for geotechnical site characterization. In Proceedings of the international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. AA Balkema Publishers, pp 499–502

Robertson PK, Campanella RG (1985) Liquefaction potential of sands using the CPT. J Geotech Eng 111(3):384–403CrossRef

Robertson PK, Woeller DJ, Finn WDL (1992) Seismic cone penetration test for evaluating liquefaction potential under cyclic loading. Can Geotech J 29(4):686–695CrossRef

Rollins KM, Evans MD, Diehl NB, William DD III (1998) Shear modulus and damping relationships for gravels. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(5):396–405CrossRef

Sana H (2019) A probabilistic approach to the seismic hazard in Kashmir basin. NW Himalaya Geosci Lett 6(1):1–11

Sana H, Nath SK (2016) Liquefaction potential analysis of the Kashmir valley alluvium, NW Himalaya. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 85:11–18CrossRef

Sana H, Nath SK (2017) Seismic source zoning and maximum credible earthquake prognosis of the Greater Kashmir Territory, NW Himalaya. J Seismolog 21(2):411–424CrossRef

Sana H, Nath SK, Gujral KS (2019) Site response analysis of the Kashmir valley during the 8 October 2005 Kashmir earthquake (Mw 7.6) using a geotechnical dataset. Bull Eng Geol Env 78(4):2551–2563CrossRef

Satyam DN (2006) Seismic microzonation of Delhi region, Ph.D. thesis. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India

Satyam DN, Rao KS (2008) Seismic site characterization in Delhi region using multi channel analysis of shear wave velocity (MASW) testing. Electron J Geotech Eng 13:167–183

Satyam DN, Rao KS (2014) Liquefaction hazard assessment using SPT and VS for two cities in India. Indian Geotech J 44(4):468–479CrossRef

Satyam N, Priyadarsini PS (2021) Seismic site characterization and dynamic analysis of pile-supported wharf structure. Indian Geotech J 51:211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-020-00482-8CrossRef

Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. Report EERC 70–10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley

Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div 97(9):1249–1273CrossRef

Seed HB, Idriss IM (1981) Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on observation of performance in previous earthquakes. In ASCE national convention (MO)

Seed HB, Peacock WH (1971) Test procedures for measuring soil liquefaction characteristics. J Soil Mech Found Div 97(8):1099–1119CrossRef

Seed HB, Sun JI (1989) Implications of site effects in the Mexico City earthquake of Sept. 19, 1985 for earthquake-resistant design criteria in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. University of California, Berkeley, Earthquake Engineering Research Center

Singh AP, Parmar A, Chopra S (2017) Microtremor study for evaluating the site response characteristics in the Surat City of western India. Nat Hazards 89(3):1145–1166CrossRef

Singh K (2010) Tectonic evolution of Kishtwar window with respect to the Main Central Thrust, northwest Himalaya, India. J Asia Earth Sci 39(3):125–135CrossRef

Srinivas GS, Goverdhan K, Narsimhulu CH, Seshunarayana T (2014) Estimation of shearwave velocity in drifts using multichannel analysis of surface wave (MASW) technique—a case study from Jammu & Kashmir, India. J Geol Soc India 84(2):174–180CrossRef

Thaker TP, Rao KS (2014) Seismic hazard analysis for urban territories: a case study of Ahmedabad region in the state of Gujarat, India. In Advances in Soil Dynamics and Foundation Engineering, pp 219–228

Thaker TP, Rathod GW, Rao KS, Gupta KK (2012) Use of seismotectonic information for the seismic hazard analysis for Surat city, Gujarat, India: deterministic and probabilistic approach. Pure Appl Geophys 169(1):37–54CrossRef

Tiwari G, Latha GM (2020) Stability analysis and design of stabilization measures for Chenab railway bridge rock slopes. Bull Eng Geol Env 79(2):603–627CrossRef

Topra S, Holzer TL (2003) Liquefaction potential index: field assessment. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(4):315–322CrossRef

Trivedi SS, Rao KS, Gupta KK, Rathod GW (2009) Mapping of average shear wave velocity for Ahmedabad soil sites: a case study. GEOTIDE, Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference (IGC)

Yilmaz Ö, Eser M, Berilgen M (2006) A case study of seismic zonation in municipal areas. Lead Edge 25(3):319–330CrossRef

Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD, Arango I, Castro G, Christian JT, Dobry R, Finn WDL, Harder LF, Hynes ME, Ishihara K, Koester JP, Liao SSC, Marcuson W, Martin GR, Mitchell JK, Moriwaki Y, Power MS, Robertson PK, Seed RB, Stokoe KH (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng ASCE 127(10):817–33CrossRef

Zahoor F, Rao KS, Banday ZZ, Bhat MA, Farooq M (2019) Liquefaction potential analysis of Srinagar city, Jammu and Kashmir. In Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering for Protection and Development of Environment and Constructions, CRC Press, pp 5807–5814

Zhan Z, Kanamori H (2016) Recurring large deep earthquakes in Hindu Kush driven by a sinking slab. Geophys Res Lett 43(14):7433–7441CrossRef

Titel: Liquefaction hazard assessment in a seismically active region of Himalayas using geotechnical and geophysical investigations: a case study of the Jammu Region
verfasst von: Abdullah Ansari
Falak Zahoor
Kondalamahanaty Seshagiri Rao
Arvind Kumar Jain
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment / Ausgabe 9/2022
Print ISSN: 1435-9529
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-9537
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02852-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2022

Deformation characteristics, gas permeability and energy evolution of low-permeability sandstone under cyclic loading and unloading path

Landslides and flood multi-hazard assessment using machine learning techniques

Influence of grain size and basic element size on rock mechanical characteristics: insights from grain-based numerical analysis

Experimental investigation of pore-fracture relationship on failure behaviour of porous rock materials

Dissolution load-settlement behaviour of saline soil and compression criterion for the natural foundation of high-speed railways

Investigation and numerical simulation of debris flow events in Rochefort basin (Aosta Valley—NW Italian Alps) combining detailed geomorphological analyses and modern technologies