Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2/2022

30.07.2021 | Original Paper

Economic efficiency of resource recovery—analysis of time-dependent changes on sustainability perception of waste management scenarios

verfasst von: Tihomir Tomić, Irma Kremer, Daniel R. Schneider

Erschienen in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Waste management systems are modelled to provide a public waste management service and need to be able to meet environmental sustainability requirements at a cost that is acceptable to system users/citizens. Overall environmental, economic, and/or socio-economic sustainability of waste management in previous publications is done through independent analyses and comparisons of obtained results or through multicriterial ranking of different alternatives where final results do not have a meaningful physical significance and cannot be interpreted independently. At the same time, those analysis either neglect time dependant changes by focusing on moment in time, or take into account changes in some timeframe changes but report only ranking focused single-score results, thus, results neglect time-dependent developments. All of these approaches are lacking some information needed for informed decision-making and/or are difficult to understand by wider groups of people. Thus, in this study, link between economic and environmental sustainability is analysed through newly defined single-score Economic Efficiency of Resource Recovery (EERR) index that shows the specific system cost for achieving identified resource recovery, while legislation based time dependent changes are taken into account through successive analyses for legislative most important years. This approach can be used for benchmarking the overall (environmental and economic) sustainability trends, while its graphical representation enables easier presentation of sustainability results and can be used for easier comparison of possible solutions and decision-making. The results show that the quality decision-making process needs to take into account the impact of expected changes on overall sustainability and evaluate how they will affect the actual perception of used technologies. In this context, it is shown that overall changes in sustainability, in comparison to the existing perception, can significantly change, depending on which technologies the system is based on.

Graphic abstract

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat da Costa LG, Ferreira JCE, Kumar V, Garza-Reyes JA (2020) Benchmarking of sustainability to assess practices and performances of the management of the end of life cycle of electronic products: a study of Brazilian manufacturing companies. Clean Technol Environ Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01947-3CrossRef da Costa LG, Ferreira JCE, Kumar V, Garza-Reyes JA (2020) Benchmarking of sustainability to assess practices and performances of the management of the end of life cycle of electronic products: a study of Brazilian manufacturing companies. Clean Technol Environ Policy. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10098-020-01947-3CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat den Boer E, den Boer J, Jager J (2005) Waste management planning and optimisation (LCA IWM). Obidem-Verlag, Stuttgart den Boer E, den Boer J, Jager J (2005) Waste management planning and optimisation (LCA IWM). Obidem-Verlag, Stuttgart
Zurück zum Zitat International Standardisation Organisation (2006a) ISO 14040:2006. In: Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. CEN, Brussels International Standardisation Organisation (2006a) ISO 14040:2006. In: Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. CEN, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat International Standardisation Organisation (2006b) ISO 14044:2006. In: Environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines. CEN, Brussels International Standardisation Organisation (2006b) ISO 14044:2006. In: Environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines. CEN, Brussels
Zurück zum Zitat Penny T, Collins M, Aumônier S et al (2013) Embodied energy as an indicator for environmental impacts – a case study for fire sprinkler systems. In: Håkansson A, Höjer M, Howlett RJ, Jain LC (eds) Sustainability in energy and buildings. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36645-1_52CrossRef Penny T, Collins M, Aumônier S et al (2013) Embodied energy as an indicator for environmental impacts – a case study for fire sprinkler systems. In: Håkansson A, Höjer M, Howlett RJ, Jain LC (eds) Sustainability in energy and buildings. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 555–565. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-642-36645-1_​52CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Warren WKEH (2012) A techno-economic comparison of biogas upgrading technologies in Europe. Jyväskylä. University of Jyväskylä. citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.456.1353&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 23 Jun 2019 Warren WKEH (2012) A techno-economic comparison of biogas upgrading technologies in Europe. Jyväskylä. University of Jyväskylä. citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.456.1353&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 23 Jun 2019
Zurück zum Zitat Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Reinhard J, Vadenbo CO, Wernet G (2013) Overview and methodology - data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database Version 3, Ecoinvent Report 1(v3). Accessed 2 Jan 2019 Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Reinhard J, Vadenbo CO, Wernet G (2013) Overview and methodology - data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database Version 3, Ecoinvent Report 1(v3). Accessed 2 Jan 2019
Metadaten
Titel
Economic efficiency of resource recovery—analysis of time-dependent changes on sustainability perception of waste management scenarios
verfasst von
Tihomir Tomić
Irma Kremer
Daniel R. Schneider
Publikationsdatum
30.07.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1618-954X
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-9558
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02165-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2/2022 Zur Ausgabe