Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 1/2017

18.04.2015 | NOTE

Life cycle assessment of bio-sludge for disposal with different alternative waste management scenarios: a case study of an olefin factory in Thailand

verfasst von: Parnuwat Usapein, Orathai Chavalparit

Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Bio-sludge generated from wastewater treatment plants is typically disposed of in landfills. Among the pressure of environmental problems, alternative options for bio-sludge disposal have been proposed. In addition to landfills, burning sludge in cement kilns and composting are new options for managing bio-sludge in Thailand. The objective of this study is to evaluate the environmental impact of alternative waste management practices for bio-sludge, including landfilling with landfill gas utilization systems, cement kilns, and composting, compared with conventional landfills. The environmental impact from each scenario was calculated at midpoints and damage levels using the IMPACT 2002+ method. The results indicate that landfilling with landfill gas utilization systems shows the greatest potential for greenhouse gas reduction compared with conventional landfills. The cement kiln option has the highest potential for aquatic acidification, terrestrial acidification and nitrification. While the fertilizer option has lowest potential for those impacts, the potential for aquatic eutrophication and terrestrial ecotoxicity is highest in this option. Finally, the endpoint analysis showed that the fertilizer option has a high performance in regard to human health and climate change, and it was recommended for selection as a first priority for bio-sludge disposal in Thailand.
Vorheriger Artikel An overview of electronic waste recycling in Vietnam
Nächster Artikel Municipal food waste management in Singapore: practices, challenges and recommendations

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Dong JI (2007) Characterization of sewage sludge for the thermal conversion into gaseous and liquid energy source, in 26th Annual international conference on incineration and thermal treatment technologies. Phoenix, AZ; USA. p 7
2.
Tarantini M, Buttol P, Maiorino L (2007) An environmental LCA of alternative scenarios of urban sewage sludge treatment and disposal. Therm Sci 11(3):153–164CrossRef
3.
Wittmaier M, Langer S, Sawilla B (2009) Possibilities and limitations of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the development of waste utilization systems—applied examples for a region in Northern Germany. Waste Manag 29(5):1732–1738CrossRef
4.
Aranda-Usón A et al (2012) Characterisation and environmental analysis of sewage sludge as secondary fuel for cement manufacturing. Chem Eng Trans 29:457–462
5.
Monte MC et al (2009) Waste management from pulp and paper production in the European Union. Waste Manag 29(1):293–308CrossRef
6.
7.
Iraldo F, Testa F, Bartolozzi I (2014) An application of life cycle assessment (LCA) as a green marketing tool for agricultural products: the case of extra-virgin olive oil in Val di Cornia, Italy. J Environ Plan Manag 57(1):78–103CrossRef
8.
Nucci B et al (2014) Improving the environmental performance of vegetable oil processing through LCA. J Clean Prod 64:310–322CrossRef
9.
Simões CL et al (2013) Integrating environmental and economic life cycle analysis in product development: a material selection case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1734–1746CrossRef
10.
Valderrama C et al (2013) Comparative LCA of sewage sludge valorisation as both fuel and raw material substitute in clinker production. J Clean Prod 51:205–213CrossRef
11.
Lundin M et al (2004) Environmental and economic assessment of sewage sludge handling options. Resour Conserv Recycl 41(4):255–278CrossRef
12.
Johansson K et al (2008) Sewage sludge handling with phosphorus utilization—life cycle assessment of four alternatives. J Clean Prod 16(1):135–151CrossRef
13.
Cherubini F, Bargigli S, Ulgiati S (2009) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: landfilling, sorting plant and incineration. Energy 34(12):2116–2123CrossRef
14.
Lederer J, Rechberger H (2010) Comparative goal-oriented assessment of conventional and alternative sewage sludge treatment options. Waste Manag 30(6):1043–1056CrossRef
15.
Hong J, Li X (2011) Environmental assessment of sewage sludge as secondary raw material in cement production—a case study in China. Waste Manag 31(6):1364–1371CrossRef
16.
Yoshida H, Christensen TH, Scheutz C (2013) Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge management: a review. Waste Manag Res 31(11):1083–1101CrossRef
17.
Mills N et al (2014) Environmental & economic life cycle assessment of current & future sewage sludge to energy technologies. Waste Manag 34(1):185–195CrossRef
18.
Suh Y-J, Rousseaux P (2002) An LCA of alternative wastewater sludge treatment scenarios. Resour Conserv Recycl 35:191–200CrossRef
19.
Vlasopoulos N et al (2006) Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment technologies treating petroleum process waters. Sci Total Environ 367(1):58–70CrossRef
20.
Liu Q et al (2011) Life cycle assessment of an industrial symbiosis based on energy recovery from dried sludge and used oil. J Clean Prod 19(15):1700–1708CrossRef
21.
ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. Standardization (ed) ISO 14040, pp 33–46
22.
Arworn P, Chavalparit O (2012) Utilization of bio-sludge from olefin wastewater treatment plant as co-composting material in The 9th Kasetsart University conference. Kamphaengsaen Campus, Nakorn Pathom, Kasertsart University, Thailand
23.
Frischknecht R et al (2005) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:3–9CrossRef
24.
Takano A et al (2014) Comparison of life cycle assessment databases: a case study on building assessment. Build Environ 79:20–30CrossRef
25.
Thanawong K, Perret SR, Basset-Mens C (2014) Eco-efficiency of paddy rice production in Northeastern Thailand: a comparison of rain-fed and irrigated cropping systems. J Clean Prod 73:204–217CrossRef
26.
Papong S et al (2014) Comparative assessment of the environmental profile of PLA and PET drinking water bottles from a life cycle perspective. J Clean Prod 65:539–550CrossRef
27.
Bukoski J et al (2014) The life cycle assessment of a solar-assisted absorption chilling system in Bangkok, Thailand. Energy Build 72:150–156CrossRef
28.
Kittner N, Gheewala SH, Kamens RM (2013) An environmental life cycle comparison of single-crystalline and amorphous-silicon thin-film photovoltaic systems in Thailand. Energy Sustain Dev 17(6):605–614CrossRef
29.
30.
Tchobanoglous G, Theisen H, Vigil S (1993) Integrated solid waste management. McGraw-Hill, Singapore
31.
Plaza C et al (2007) Evaluation of alternative landfill cover soils for attenuating hydrogen sulfide from construction and demolition (C&D) debris landfills. J Environ Manag 84(3):314–322CrossRef
32.
Themelis NJ, Ulloa PA (2007) Methane generation in landfills. Renew Energy 32(7):1243–1257CrossRef
33.
Kightley D, Nedwell DB, Cooper M (1995) Capacity for methane oxidation in landfill cover soils measured in laboratory-scale soil microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol 61(2):592–601
34.
Menikpura SNM, Sang-Arun J, Bengtsson M (2013) Integrated Solid Waste Management: an approach for enhancing climate co-benefits through resource recovery. J Clean Prod 58:34–42CrossRef
35.
Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment (1996) Thailand’s Industrial Wastewater Standards. Notification of Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment, Thailand
36.
Phumpradab K, Gheewala SH, Sagisaka M (2009) Life cycle assessment of natural gas power plants in Thailand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(4):354–363CrossRef
37.
Husillos Rodríguez N et al (2013) The effect of using thermally dried sewage sludge as an alternative fuel on portland cement clinker production. J Cleaner Prod 52:94–102CrossRef
38.
39.
40.
Hong J, Li X, Zhaojie C (2010) Life cycle assessment of four municipal solid waste management scenarios in China. Waste Manag 30(11):2362–2369CrossRef
41.
Liu B et al (2013) Life cycle GHG emissions of sewage sludge treatment and disposal options in Tai Lake Watershed, China. Sci Total Environ 447:361–369CrossRef
42.
Cederberg C (2004) Agricultural consultant. Halmstad, Sweden
43.
Flodman M (2002) Emission of methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia from storing of digested sludge. Swedish University of agricultural sciences. Uppsala, Sweden
44.
Jolliet O et al (2003) IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(6):324–330CrossRef
45.
Guinee JB et al (2002) Life cycle assessment: an operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (NL)
46.
Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2000) The Eco-indicator 99: A damage oriented method for life cycle assessment: methodology report. Pre Consultants, Amersfoort (NL), Netherlands
47.
Humbert S et al (2012) IMPACT 2002+: User guide, in draft for version Q2.21 (version adapted by Quantis). Quantis sustainability counts
Metadaten
Titel
Life cycle assessment of bio-sludge for disposal with different alternative waste management scenarios: a case study of an olefin factory in Thailand
verfasst von
Parnuwat Usapein
Orathai Chavalparit
Publikationsdatum
18.04.2015
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1438-4957
Elektronische ISSN: 1611-8227
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0385-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Nature and extent of unauthorized waste dump sites in and around Bangalore city

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Anaerobic digestion combined pyrolysis for paper mill sludge disposal and its influence on char characteristics

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Radon diffusion and exhalation from mortar modified with fly ash: waste utilization and benefits in construction

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Life cycle assessment and valuation of the packaging waste recycling system in Belgium

NOTE

Removal of ammonia using Ca-P (calcium polymer) from wastewaters produced in the recycling of disposable diapers

REVIEW

Recycling of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic using supercritical and subcritical fluids