nach oben

BioControl

Erschienen in:

01.08.2015

Effects of ten naturally occurring sugars on the reproductive success of the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea

verfasst von: Darinka Gonzalez, Anabela Nave, Fátima Gonçalves, Fernando M. Nunes, Mercedes Campos, Laura Torres

Erschienen in: BioControl | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The longevity and reproduction of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) when fed on ten naturally occurring sugars and on an artificial diet composed by honey and pollen (1:1) were evaluated. The effect of these diets differed between sexes. However insects of both sexes lived longer when fed on fructose than on sucrose, melezitose or raffinose. None of the females oviposited when offered raffinose, galactose or mannose. Moreover, lifetime fecundity of females fed on trehalose was not different from the artificial diet. The intrinsic rate of natural increase did not differ between trehalose, maltose, melibiose, fructose, glucose and artificial diet, being significantly lower for individuals fed on melezitose and sucrose. The importance of these results for the selection of natural sugar sources that enhance C. carnea effectiveness as a biological control agent against crop pests is discussed.

Vorheriger Artikel Does a supplemental food improve the effectiveness of predatory bugs on cucumber?

Nächster Artikel Improvement of the mass rearing of larvae of the neotropical lacewing Chrysoperla externa through the incorporation of a new semiliquid artificial diet

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Baker HG, Baker I (1982) Chemical constituents of nectar in relation to pollination mechanism and phylogeny. In: Nitecki MH (ed) Biochemical aspects of evolutionary biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 131–171

Baker HG, Baker I (1983) Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 117–141

Ben Saad AA, Bishop GW (1976) Effect of artificial honeydews on insect communities in potato fields. Environ Entomol 5:453–457CrossRef

Birch LC (1948) The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J Anim Ecol 17:15–26CrossRef

Bogo A, Mantle P (2000) Oligosaccharides in the honeydew of Coccoidea scale insects: Coccus hesperidum L. and a new Stigmacoccus sp. in Brazil. An Soc Entomol Bras 29:589–595CrossRef

Bond AB (1980) Optimal foraging in a uniform habitat: the search mechanism of the green lacewing. Anim Behav 28:10–19CrossRef

Carey JR (1993) Applied demography for biologist: with special emphasis on insects. Oxford University Press, New York

Duelli P (2001) Lacewings in field crops. In: McEwen P, New TR, Whittington AE (eds) Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 158–171CrossRef

Eilenberg J, Hajek A, Lomer C (2001) Suggestions for unifying the terminology in biological control. BioControl 46:387–400CrossRef

Fischer MK, Shingleton AW (2001) Host plant and ants influence the honeydew sugar composition of aphids. Funct Ecol 15:544–550CrossRef

Gotelli NJ (1998) A primer of ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

Gurr GM, Scarratt SL, Wratten SD, Berndt L, Irvin N (2004) Ecological engineering, habitat manipulation and pest management. In: Gurr GM, Wratten SD, Altieri MA (eds) Ecological engineering for pest management: advances in habitat manipulation for arthropods. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp 1–12

Hagen KS (1986) Ecosystem analysis: plant cultivars (HPR), entomophagous species and food supplements. In: Boethel DJ, Eikenbary RD (eds) Interactions of plant resistance and parasitoids and predators of insects. Ellis Horwood Ltd, Chichester, pp 151–197

Hagen KS, Greany P, Sawall EF, Tassan RL (1976) Tryptophan in artificial honeydew as a source of an attractant for adult Chrysoperla carnea. Environ Entomol 5:458–468CrossRef

Harvey JA, Cloutier J, Visser B, Ellers J, Wäckers FL, Gols R (2012) The effect of different dietary sugars and honey on longevity and fecundity in two hyperparasitoid wasps. J Insect Physiol 58:816–823PubMedCrossRef

Henry CS, Brooks SJ, Thierry D, Duelli P, Johnson JB (2001) The common green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea s.lat.) and the sibling species problem. In: McEwen PK, New TR, Whittington AE (eds) Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 29–42CrossRef

Hogervorst PAM, Wäckers FL, Romeis J (2007) Detecting nutritional state and food source use in field-collected insects that synthesize honeydew oligosaccharides. Funct Ecol 21:936–946CrossRef

Karley AJ, Ashford DA, Minto LM, Pritchard J, Douglas AE (2005) The significance of gut sucrose activity for osmoregulation in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. J Insect Physiol 51:1313–1319PubMedCrossRef

Katsoyannos P (1993) Olive pests and their control in the Near East. Bernan Assoc, Lanham

Kennedy JS, van Impe G, Hence T, Lebrum P (1996) Demecology of the false spider mite, Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes) (Acari, Tenuipalpidae). J Appl Ent 120:493–499CrossRef

Khuhro NH, Chen HY, Zhang Y, Zhang LS, Wang MQ (2012) Effect of different prey species on the life history parameters of Chrysoperla sinica (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Eur J Entomol 109:175–180CrossRef

Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Ann Rev Entomol 45:175–201CrossRef

Lauprasert P, Sitthicharoenchai D, Thirakhupt K, Pradatsudarasar A-O (2006) Food preference and feeding behavior of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (Linnaeus). J Sci Res Chula Univ 31:121–126

Li Y, Meissle M, Romeis J (2008) Consumption of Bt maize pollen expressing Cry1Ab or Cry3Bb1 does not harm adult green lacewings, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). PLoS ONE 3:e2909PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Li Y, Michael M, Romeis J (2010) Use of maize pollen by adult Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and fate of Cry proteins in Bt—transgenic varieties. J Insect Physiol 56:157–164PubMedCrossRef

Lundgren JG (2009) Relationships of natural enemies and non-prey foods. Springer, New York

McEwen PK, Kidd NAC (1995) The effects of different components of an artificial food on adult green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea) fecundity and longevity. Entomol Exp Appl 77:343–346CrossRef

McEwen PK, Jervis MA, Kidd NAC (1993) Influence of artificial honeydew on larval development and survival in Chrysoperla carnea (Neur., Chrysopidae). Entomophaga 38:241–244CrossRef

Meissle M, Álvarez-Alfageme F, Malone LA, Romeis J (2012) Establishing a database of bio-ecological information on non-target arthropod species to support the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops in the EU. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma

Pappas ML, Broufas GD, Koveos DS (2011) Chrysopid predators and their role in biological control. J Entomol 8:301–326CrossRef

Pekas A, Tena A, Aguilar A, Garcia-Mari F (2011) Spatio-temporal patterns and interactions with honeydew-producing Hemiptera of ants in a Mediterranean citrus orchard. Agric For Entomol 13(1):89–97CrossRef

Percival MS (1961) Types of nectar in angiosperms. New Phytol 60:235–281CrossRef

Petanidou T (2005) Sugars in Mediterranean floral nectars: an ecological and evolutionary approach. J Chem Ecol 31:1065–1088PubMedCrossRef

Petanidou T (2007) Ecological and evolutionary aspects of floral nectars in Mediterranean habitats. In: Nicolson S, Nepi M, Pacini E (eds) Nectaries and nectar. Springer, New York, pp 343–375CrossRef

Petanidou T, Ellis WN (1993) Pollinating fauna of a phryganic ecosystem: composition and diversity. Biodivers Lett 1:9–22CrossRef

Porcel M (2012) Bioecological study of the Chrysopidae family (Insecta: Neuroptera) in olive orchards from a population growth and conservation perspective. Universidad de Granada, Granada

Porcel M, Cotes B, Campos M (2011) Biological and behavioral effects of kaolin particle film on larvae and adults of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Biol Control 59:98–105CrossRef

Porcel M, Ruano F, Cotes B, Peña A, Campos M (2013) Agricultural management systems affect the Green Lacewing Community (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ Entomol 42:97–106PubMedCrossRef

Price PW (1997) Insect ecology. Wiley, New York

Principi MM, Canard M (1984) Feeding habits. In: Canard M, Séméria Y, New TR (eds) Biology of chrysopidae. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 76–92

Romeis J, Meissle M, Naranjo SE, Li Y, Bigler F (2014) The end of a myth—Bt (Cry1Ab) maize does not harm green lacewings. Front Plant Sci 5:1–10CrossRef

Sarailoo MH, Lakzaei M (2014) Effect of different diets on some biological parameters of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J Crop Prot 3:479–486

Schuster MF, Calderon M (1986) Interactions of host plant resistant genotypes and beneficial insects in cotton ecosystems. In: Boethel DJ, Eikenbary RD (eds) Interactions of plant resistance and parasitoids and predators of insects. Halsted Press, New York, pp 84–97

Senior LJ, McEwen PK (2001) The use of lacewings in biological control. In: McEwen PK, New TR, Whittington AE (eds) Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 296–302CrossRef

Sheldon JK, MacLeod EG (1971) Studies on the biology of Chrysopidae. II. The feeding behavior of the adult Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera). Psyche 78:107–121

Speight MR, Hunter MD, Watt AD (2008) Ecology of insects: concepts and applications. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken

Sunby RA (1966) A comparative study of the efficiency of three predatory insects Coccinella septempunctata L. [Coleoptera, Coccinellidae], Chrysopa carnea St. [Neuroptera, Chrysopidae] and Syrphus Ribesii L. [Diptera,; Syrphidae] at two different temperatures. Entomophaga 11:395–404CrossRef

Tassan RL, Hagen KS, Sawall EFJ (1979) The influence of field food sprays on the egg production rate of Chrysopa carnea. Environ Entomol 8:81–85CrossRef

Tauber MJ, Tauber CA, Daane KM, Hagen KS (2000) Commercialization of predators: recent lessons from green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Am Entomol 46:26–38CrossRef

van Rijn PCJ (2012) The suitability of field margin flowers as food source for Chrysoperla lacewings. IOBC/WPRS Bull 75:213–216

Villenave J, Deutsch B, Lodé T, Rat-Morris E (2006) Pollen preference of the Chrysoperla species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) occurring in the crop environment in western France. Eur J Entomol 103:771–777CrossRef

Wäckers FL (2001) A comparison of nectar- and honeydew sugars with respect to their utilization by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata. J Insect Physiol 47:1077–1084PubMedCrossRef

Wäckers FL (2005) Suitability of (extra-) floral nectar, pollen and honeydew as insect food sources. In: Wäckers FL, van Rijn PCJ, Bruin J (eds) Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: a protective mutualism and its application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 17–74CrossRef

Wäckers FL, van Rijn PCJ (2012) Pick and mix: selecting flowering plants to meet the requirements of target biological control insects. In: Gurr GM, Wratten SD, Snyder WE, Read DMY (eds) Biodiversity and insect pests: key issues for sustainable management. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 139–165CrossRef

Wool D, Hendrix D, Shukry O (2006) Seasonal variation in honeydew sugar content of galling aphids (Aphidoidea: Pemphigidae: Fordinae) feeding on Pistacia: Host ecology and aphid physiology. Basic Appl Ecol 7:141–151CrossRef

Titel: Effects of ten naturally occurring sugars on the reproductive success of the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea
verfasst von: Darinka Gonzalez
Anabela Nave
Fátima Gonçalves
Fernando M. Nunes
Mercedes Campos
Laura Torres
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2015
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: BioControl / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1386-6141
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-8248
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-015-9694-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Weeds within willow short-rotation coppices alter the arthropod community and improve biological control of the blue willow beetle

Can alternative host plant and prey affect phytophagy and biological control by the zoophytophagous mirid Nesidiocoris tenuis?

Laboratory and field studies to evaluate the potential of an open rearing system of Lysiphlebus testaceipes for the control of Aphis craccivora in Argentina

Application of chemical elicitor (Z)-3-hexenol enhances direct and indirect plant defenses against tea geometrid Ectropis obliqua

Movement of three aphidophagous ladybird species between alfalfa and maize revealed by carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analysis

Does a supplemental food improve the effectiveness of predatory bugs on cucumber?