Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 2/2013

01.12.2013

The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility

verfasst von: Janine S. Hiller

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the wake of the most recent financial crisis, corporations have been criticized as being self-interested and unmindful of their relationship to society. Indeed, the blame is sometimes placed on the corporate legal form, which can exacerbate the tension between duties to shareholders and interests of stakeholders. In comparison, the Benefit Corporation (BC) is a new legal business entity that is obligated to pursue public benefit in addition to the responsibility to return profits to shareholders. It is legally a for-profit, socially obligated, corporate form of business, with all the traditional corporate characteristics combined with societal responsibilities. Considering the history and perception of shareholder primacy in United States law, it is argued that this new business structure is an ethical step toward empowering socially committed commercial entities. The contribution of this research is to provide a fundamental base of knowledge about the new legal form of business, the BC, upon which further study may rely. First, the legal history of the corporation is briefly reviewed in order to provide context to the relationship of the corporate form to society, including exploration of the premise that shareholder wealth maximization is its best and only purpose. Second, the BC is described in detail, and state statutes are compared. Third, the BC is placed within the context of corporate social responsibility. Finally, opportunities for future research are discussed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aguinis, R., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.CrossRef Aguinis, R., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat André, R. (2012). Assessing the accountability of the benefit corporation: Will this new gray sector organization enhance corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 133–150. André, R. (2012). Assessing the accountability of the benefit corporation: Will this new gray sector organization enhance corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 133–150.
Zurück zum Zitat Baur, D., & Schmitz, H. P. (2012). Corporations and NGOs: When accountability leads to co-optation. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 9–21.CrossRef Baur, D., & Schmitz, H. P. (2012). Corporations and NGOs: When accountability leads to co-optation. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 9–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bodie, M. T. (2012). The post revolutionary period in corporate law: Returning to the theory of the firm. Seattle University Law Review, 35, 1033–1059. Bodie, M. T. (2012). The post revolutionary period in corporate law: Returning to the theory of the firm. Seattle University Law Review, 35, 1033–1059.
Zurück zum Zitat Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 281–299. Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 281–299.
Zurück zum Zitat Brewer, C. V. (2012). A novel approach to using LLCS for quasi-charitable endeavors (A/K/A social enterprise). William Mitchell Law Review, 38, 678–736. Brewer, C. V. (2012). A novel approach to using LLCS for quasi-charitable endeavors (A/K/A social enterprise). William Mitchell Law Review, 38, 678–736.
Zurück zum Zitat California Statutes: Benefit Corporations. (2011). §§14600–14631. California Statutes: Benefit Corporations. (2011). §§14600–14631.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark, W. H., & Babson, E. K. (2012). How benefit corporations are redefining the purpose of business corporations. William Mitchell Law Review, 38, 817–850. Clark, W. H., & Babson, E. K. (2012). How benefit corporations are redefining the purpose of business corporations. William Mitchell Law Review, 38, 817–850.
Zurück zum Zitat Conaway, A. E. (2012). The global use of the delaware limited liability company for socially-driven purposes. William Mitchell Law Review, 38, 772–816. Conaway, A. E. (2012). The global use of the delaware limited liability company for socially-driven purposes. William Mitchell Law Review, 38, 772–816.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotton, M. N., & Lasprogata, G. A. (2012). Corporate citizenship & creative collaboration: Best practices for cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Law, Business & Ethics, 18, 9–37. Cotton, M. N., & Lasprogata, G. A. (2012). Corporate citizenship & creative collaboration: Best practices for cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Law, Business & Ethics, 18, 9–37.
Zurück zum Zitat Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. J. (Eds.). (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in global context (pp. 3–20). London: Routledge. Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. J. (Eds.). (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in global context (pp. 3–20). London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Deskins, M. (2011). Benefit corporation legislation, version 1.0—A breakthrough in stakeholder rights? Lewis & Clark Law Review, 15, 1047–1076. Deskins, M. (2011). Benefit corporation legislation, version 1.0—A breakthrough in stakeholder rights? Lewis & Clark Law Review, 15, 1047–1076.
Zurück zum Zitat Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919). Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919).
Zurück zum Zitat eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. Newmark, 16 A.3d 1 (Del., 2010). eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. Newmark, 16 A.3d 1 (Del., 2010).
Zurück zum Zitat Gelter, M. (2009). The dark side of shareholder influence: Managerial autonomy and stakeholder orientation in comparative corporate governance. Harvard International Law Journal, 50, 129–194. Gelter, M. (2009). The dark side of shareholder influence: Managerial autonomy and stakeholder orientation in comparative corporate governance. Harvard International Law Journal, 50, 129–194.
Zurück zum Zitat Hawaii Statutes: Sustainable Business Corporations (2011). §40D-1 to §40D-12. Hawaii Statutes: Sustainable Business Corporations (2011). §40D-1 to §40D-12.
Zurück zum Zitat Haymore, S. J. (2011). Public(ly oriented) companies: B corporations and the Delaware stakeholder provision dilemma. Vanderbilt Law Review, 64, 1311–1346. Haymore, S. J. (2011). Public(ly oriented) companies: B corporations and the Delaware stakeholder provision dilemma. Vanderbilt Law Review, 64, 1311–1346.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly, T. (2009). Law and choice of entity on the social enterprise frontier. Tulane Law Review, 84, 337–377. Kelly, T. (2009). Law and choice of entity on the social enterprise frontier. Tulane Law Review, 84, 337–377.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacovara, C. (2011). Strange creatures: A hybrid approach to fiduciary duty in benefit corporations. Columbia Business Law Review, 2011, 815–880. Lacovara, C. (2011). Strange creatures: A hybrid approach to fiduciary duty in benefit corporations. Columbia Business Law Review, 2011, 815–880.
Zurück zum Zitat Louisiana Statutes: Benefit Corporations. (2012). Title 12, §§12:1801–1832. Louisiana Statutes: Benefit Corporations. (2012). Title 12, §§12:1801–1832.
Zurück zum Zitat Maryland Statutes: Benefit Corporations. (2010). §5-6C-01–5-6C-07. Maryland Statutes: Benefit Corporations. (2010). §5-6C-01–5-6C-07.
Zurück zum Zitat McBride, D. (2011). General corporation laws: History and economics. Law & Contemporary Problems, 74, 1–17. McBride, D. (2011). General corporation laws: History and economics. Law & Contemporary Problems, 74, 1–17.
Zurück zum Zitat Metcalf, L., & Benn, S. (2012). The corporation is ailing social technology: Creating a ‘fit for purpose’ design for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 195–210. Metcalf, L., & Benn, S. (2012). The corporation is ailing social technology: Creating a ‘fit for purpose’ design for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 195–210.
Zurück zum Zitat Mickels, A. (2009). Beyond corporate social responsibility: Reconciling the ideals of a for-benefit corporation with director fiduciary duties in the U.S. and Europe. Hastings International & Comparative Law Review, 32, 271–302. Mickels, A. (2009). Beyond corporate social responsibility: Reconciling the ideals of a for-benefit corporation with director fiduciary duties in the U.S. and Europe. Hastings International & Comparative Law Review, 32, 271–302.
Zurück zum Zitat Munch, S. (2012). Improving the benefit corporation: How traditional governance mechanisms can enhance the innovative new business form. Northwestern Journal of Law & Policy, 7, 170–195. Munch, S. (2012). Improving the benefit corporation: How traditional governance mechanisms can enhance the innovative new business form. Northwestern Journal of Law & Policy, 7, 170–195.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray, S. (2012, April). Benefit corporations: Companies obliged to do good. FT.com [serial online]. Available from ABI/INFORM Global. Accessed June 25, 2012. Document ID: 2642857451. Murray, S. (2012, April). Benefit corporations: Companies obliged to do good. FT.com [serial online]. Available from ABI/INFORM Global. Accessed June 25, 2012. Document ID: 2642857451.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray, J. H., & Hwang, E. I. (2011). Purpose with a profit: Governance, enforcement, capital-raising and capital-locking in low-profit limited liability companies. University of Miami Law Review, 66, 1–52. Murray, J. H., & Hwang, E. I. (2011). Purpose with a profit: Governance, enforcement, capital-raising and capital-locking in low-profit limited liability companies. University of Miami Law Review, 66, 1–52.
Zurück zum Zitat New Jersey Statutes: New Jersey Business Corporation Act. (2011). §14A:1-1 to §14A:1-11. New Jersey Statutes: New Jersey Business Corporation Act. (2011). §14A:1-1 to §14A:1-11.
Zurück zum Zitat New York Statutes: Business Corporation Law. (2011). §1701 et seq. New York Statutes: Business Corporation Law. (2011). §1701 et seq.
Zurück zum Zitat Osuji, O. (2011). Fluidity of regulation—CSR nexus: The multinational corporate corruption example. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 31–57.CrossRef Osuji, O. (2011). Fluidity of regulation—CSR nexus: The multinational corporate corruption example. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 31–57.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Page, A., & Katz, R. A. (2011). Is social enterprise the new corporate responsibility? Seattle University Law Review, 34, 1351–1384. Page, A., & Katz, R. A. (2011). Is social enterprise the new corporate responsibility? Seattle University Law Review, 34, 1351–1384.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89 (January–February), 64–77. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89 (January–February), 64–77.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiser, D. B. (2011). Benefit corporations—A sustainable form of business? Wake Forest Law Review, 46, 591–625. Reiser, D. B. (2011). Benefit corporations—A sustainable form of business? Wake Forest Law Review, 46, 591–625.
Zurück zum Zitat Resor, F. R. (2012). Benefit corporation legislation. Wyoming Law Review, 12, 91–113. Resor, F. R. (2012). Benefit corporation legislation. Wyoming Law Review, 12, 91–113.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabadoz, C. (2011). Between profit-seeking and prosociality: Corporate social responsibility as Derridean supplement. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 77–91.CrossRef Sabadoz, C. (2011). Between profit-seeking and prosociality: Corporate social responsibility as Derridean supplement. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 77–91.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt, E. (2010). Vermont’s social hybrid pioneers: Early observations and questions to ponder. Vermont Law Review, 35, 163–197. Schmidt, E. (2010). Vermont’s social hybrid pioneers: Early observations and questions to ponder. Vermont Law Review, 35, 163–197.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoenjahn, A. (2012). New faces of corporate responsibility: Will new entity forms allow businesses to do good? Journal of Corporation Law, 37, 453–473. Schoenjahn, A. (2012). New faces of corporate responsibility: Will new entity forms allow businesses to do good? Journal of Corporation Law, 37, 453–473.
Zurück zum Zitat Smiddy, L. O. (2010). Symposium introduction: Corporate creativity: The Vermont L3C & other developments in social entrepreneurship. Vermont Law Review, 35, 3–14. Smiddy, L. O. (2010). Symposium introduction: Corporate creativity: The Vermont L3C & other developments in social entrepreneurship. Vermont Law Review, 35, 3–14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sneirson, J. F. (2011). The sustainable corporation and shareholder profits. Wake Forest Law Review, 46, 541–559. Sneirson, J. F. (2011). The sustainable corporation and shareholder profits. Wake Forest Law Review, 46, 541–559.
Zurück zum Zitat South Carolina Statutes: Benefit Corporation Act. (2012). §§33-38-110 to 33-38-600. South Carolina Statutes: Benefit Corporation Act. (2012). §§33-38-110 to 33-38-600.
Zurück zum Zitat Sovacool, B. K. (2010). Broken by design: The corporation as a failed technology. Science, Technology & Society, 15(1), 1–25. Sovacool, B. K. (2010). Broken by design: The corporation as a failed technology. Science, Technology & Society, 15(1), 1–25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sprague, R. (2010). Beyond shareholder value: Normative standards for sustainable corporate governance. William & Mary Business Law Review, 1, 47–82. Sprague, R. (2010). Beyond shareholder value: Normative standards for sustainable corporate governance. William & Mary Business Law Review, 1, 47–82.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor, C. R. (2011). Berle and social business: A consideration. Seattle University Law Review, 34, 1501–1525. Taylor, C. R. (2011). Berle and social business: A consideration. Seattle University Law Review, 34, 1501–1525.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler, J. (2010). Negating the legal problem of having “two masters”: A framework for L3C fiduciary duties and accountability. Vermont Law Review, 35, 117–161. Tyler, J. (2010). Negating the legal problem of having “two masters”: A framework for L3C fiduciary duties and accountability. Vermont Law Review, 35, 117–161.
Zurück zum Zitat Vermont Statutes: Benefit Corporations. (2011). Title 11A, §§21.01–21.14. Vermont Statutes: Benefit Corporations. (2011). Title 11A, §§21.01–21.14.
Zurück zum Zitat Virginia Statutes: Benefit Corporations. (2011). §§13.1-782 to 13.1-793. Virginia Statutes: Benefit Corporations. (2011). §§13.1-782 to 13.1-793.
Metadaten
Titel
The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility
verfasst von
Janine S. Hiller
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1580-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Journal of Business Ethics 2/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner