Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
Erschienen in: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2/2010

01.04.2010

The Dynamics of Material Artifacts in Collaborative Research Teams

verfasst von: Deana D. Pennington

Erschienen in: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) | Ausgabe 2/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Boundary objects are material artifacts that mediate the relationship between two or more disparate perspectives. The concept of boundary objects has been demonstrably useful in a variety of research areas; however, the meaning and function of boundary objects is contested. At issue is the relationship between boundary objects that negotiate between perspectives and those that specify across perspectives. In this study the changing nature of boundary objects in cooperative work is related to the dynamics of evolving problem conceptualization, system design, and enactment within cooperative work settings. Design based research on material artifacts produced by an incipient cross-disciplinary research team during their efforts towards negotiating integrated conceptualizations and specifying shared research agendas is used to generate a more comprehensive model of boundary objects through the life of a project.
Vorheriger Artikel Technology Effects in Distributed Team Coordination—High-Interdependency Tasks in Offshore Oil Production
Nächster Artikel Knowing the Way. Managing Epistemic Topologies in Virtual Game Worlds

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Bodker, S., & Christiansen, E. (2006). Computer support for social awareness in flexible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15, 1–28.CrossRef
Boujut, J.-F., & Blanco, E. (2003). Intermediary objects as a means to foster co-operation in engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12, 205–219.CrossRef
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999): Sorting things out (pp 389). MIT.
Bud, R. (1991). Biotechnology in the Twentieth Century. Social Studies of Science, 21(3), 415–457.CrossRef
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Hyattsville, MD: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381.CrossRef
Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 265–272.CrossRef
Duncker, E. (2001). Symbolic communication in multidisciplinary cooperation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26(3), 349–386.CrossRef
Eckert, C., & Boujut, J.-F. (2003). The role of objects in design co-operation: communication through physical or virtual objects. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12, 145–151.CrossRef
Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: what we learn when we engage in design. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 105–121.
Fujimura, J. H. (1992). Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and “translation”. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 168–211). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Guilford, J. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Heemskerk, M., Wilson, K., & Pavao-Zuckerman, M. (2003). Conceptual models as tools for communication across disciplines. Conservation Ecology, 7(3), 8–17.
Herrmann, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2005). The metamorphoses of workflow projects in their early stages. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 14, 399–432.CrossRef
Hinds, P. J., & Pfeffer, J. (2003). Why organizations don’t “know what they know”: Cognitive and motivational factors affecting the transfer of expertise. In M. S. Ackerman, V. Pipek, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Sharing expertise: Beyond knowledge management (pp. 3–26). Cambridge: MIT.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild (pp 381). MIT.
Jeffrey, P. (2003). Smoothing the waters: observations on the process of cross-disciplinary research collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 33(4), 539–562.CrossRefMathSciNet
Lawrence, K. A. (2006). Walking the tightrope: the balancing acts of a large e-Research project. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15, 385–411.CrossRefMathSciNet
Lee, C. P. (2007). Boundary negotiating artifacts: unbinding the routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16, 307–339.CrossRef
Lutters, W. G., & Ackerman, M. S. (2007). Beyond boundary objects: collaborative reuse in aircraft technical support. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16, 341–372.CrossRef
Magnus, P. D. (2007). Distributed cognition and the task of science. Social Studies of Science, 37(2), 297–310.CrossRef
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A Computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information (pp. 397). Henry Holt and Co., Inc.
Novak, J. D., & Wurst, M. (2005). Collaborative knowledge visualization for cross-community learning. In: S. Tergan, & T. Keller (Eds.), Knowledge and information visualization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3426, 95–116.
Okada, A., Buckingham Shum, S., & Sherborne, T. (2008). Knowledge cartography (pp 400). London: Springer.
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139–178.CrossRef
Perry, M., & Sanderson, D. (1998). Co-ordinating joint design work: the role of communication and artefacts. Design Studies, 19(3), 273–288.CrossRef
Roth, W. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35–59.
Sandoval, W. A. (2004). Developing elarning theory by refining conjectures embodied in educational designs. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 213–223.CrossRef
Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199–201.CrossRef
Schmidt, K., & Simone, C. (1996). Coordination mechanisms: towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 5, 155–200.CrossRef
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.CrossRef
Subrahmanian, E., Monarch, I., Konda, S., Granger, H., Milliken, R., Westerberg, A., et al. (2003). Boundary objects and prototypes at the interfaces of engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12, 185–203.CrossRef
Upham, P. (2000). Scientific consensus on sustainability: the case of the natural step. Sustainable Development, 8, 180–190.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Dynamics of Material Artifacts in Collaborative Research Teams
verfasst von
Deana D. Pennington
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2010
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) / Ausgabe 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0925-9724
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9108-9

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise