Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 4-5/2012

01.10.2012

Enabling Large-Scale Deliberation Using Attention-Mediation Metrics

verfasst von: Mark Klein

Erschienen in: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) | Ausgabe 4-5/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Humanity now finds itself faced with a range of highly complex and controversial challenges—such as climate change, the spread of disease, international security, scientific collaborations, product development, and so on—that call upon us to bring together large numbers of experts and stakeholders to deliberate collectively on a global scale. Collocated meetings can however be impractically expensive, severely limit the concurrency and thus breadth of interaction, and are prone to serious dysfunctions such as polarization and hidden profiles. Social media such as email, blogs, wikis, chat rooms, and web forums provide unprecedented opportunities for interacting on a massive scale, but have yet to realize their potential for helping people deliberate effectively, typically generating poorly-organized, unsystematic and highly redundant contributions of widely varying quality. Large-scale argumentation systems represent a promising approach for addressing these challenges, by virtue of providing a simple systematic structure that radically reduces redundancy and encourages clarity. They do, however, raise an important challenge. How can we ensure that the attention of the deliberation participants is drawn, especially in large complex argument maps, to where it can best serve the goals of the deliberation? How can users, for example, find the issues they can best contribute to, assess whether some intervention is needed, or identify the results that are mature and ready to “harvest”? Can we enable, for large-scale distributed discussions, the ready understanding that participants typically have about the progress and needs of small-scale, collocated discussions?. This paper will address these important questions, discussing (1) the strengths and limitations of current deliberation technologies, (2) how argumentation technology can help address these limitations, and (3) how we can use attention-mediation metrics to enhance the effectiveness of large-scale argumentation-based deliberations.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Based on personal communication with Catherine Spence, Information Technology Enterprise Architect, Computing Director/Manager at Intel.
 
2
The one exception we are aware of (the Open Meeting Project’s mediation of the 1994 National Policy Review (Hurwitz 1996)) was effectively a comment collection system rather than a deliberation system, since the participants predominantly offered reactions to a large set of pre-existing policy documents, rather than interacting with each other to create new policy options.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2005). Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(6), 734–749.CrossRef Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2005). Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(6), 734–749.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benbasat, I., & Lim, J. (2000). Information technology support for debiasing group judgments: an empirical evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(1), 167–183.CrossRef Benbasat, I., & Lim, J. (2000). Information technology support for debiasing group judgments: an empirical evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(1), 167–183.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press. Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Boland, R. J., Maheshwari, A. K., Te’eni, D., Schwartz, D., & Tenkasi, R. V. (1992). Sharing Perspectives in Distributed Decision Making. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Boland, R. J., Maheshwari, A. K., Te’eni, D., Schwartz, D., & Tenkasi, R. V. (1992). Sharing Perspectives in Distributed Decision Making. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolstad, W. M. (2010). Understanding Computational Bayesian Statistics. John Wiley. Bolstad, W. M. (2010). Understanding Computational Bayesian Statistics. John Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonaccorsi, A., & Rossi, C. (2004). Altruistic individuals, selfish firms? The structure of motivation in Open Source software. Bonaccorsi, A., & Rossi, C. (2004). Altruistic individuals, selfish firms? The structure of motivation in Open Source software.
Zurück zum Zitat Cappella, J. N., Price, V., & Nir, L. (2002). Argument Repertoire as a Reliable and Valid Measure of Opinion Quality: Electronic Dialogue During Campaign 2000. Political Communication, 19(1), 73–93.CrossRef Cappella, J. N., Price, V., & Nir, L. (2002). Argument Repertoire as a Reliable and Valid Measure of Opinion Quality: Electronic Dialogue During Campaign 2000. Political Communication, 19(1), 73–93.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carr, C. S. (2003). Using computer supported argument visualization to teach legal argumentation. In P. A. Kirschner, S. J. B. Shum, & C. S. Carr (Eds.), Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making (pp. 75–96). Springer-Verlag. Carr, C. S. (2003). Using computer supported argument visualization to teach legal argumentation. In P. A. Kirschner, S. J. B. Shum, & C. S. Carr (Eds.), Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making (pp. 75–96). Springer-Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Chklovski, T., Ratnakar, V., & Gil, Y. (2005). User interfaces with semi-formal representations: a study of designing argumentation structures. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, 130–136. Chklovski, T., Ratnakar, V., & Gil, Y. (2005). User interfaces with semi-formal representations: a study of designing argumentation structures. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, 130–136.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Conklin, J. (2005). Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. Conklin, J. (2005). Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
Zurück zum Zitat Convertino, G., Billman, D., Shrager, J., Pirolli, P., & Massar, J. P. (2008). The CACHE Study: Group Effects in Computer-Supported Collaborative Analysis. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 17(4), 353–393.CrossRef Convertino, G., Billman, D., Shrager, J., Pirolli, P., & Massar, J. P. (2008). The CACHE Study: Group Effects in Computer-Supported Collaborative Analysis. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 17(4), 353–393.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cook, M. B., & Smallman, H. S. (2007). Visual Evidence Landscapes: Reducing Bias in Collaborative Intelligence Analysis. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings. Cook, M. B., & Smallman, H. S. (2007). Visual Evidence Landscapes: Reducing Bias in Collaborative Intelligence Analysis. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings.
Zurück zum Zitat Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 531–537.CrossRef Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 531–537.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eemeren, F. H. v., & Grootendorst, R. (2003). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge University Press. Eemeren, F. H. v., & Grootendorst, R. (2003). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Erickson, T., Halverson, C., Kellogg, W. A., Laff, M., & Wolf, T. (2002). Social Translucence: Designing Social Infrastructures that Make Collective Activity Visible. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 40–44.CrossRef Erickson, T., Halverson, C., Kellogg, W. A., Laff, M., & Wolf, T. (2002). Social Translucence: Designing Social Infrastructures that Make Collective Activity Visible. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 40–44.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Farnham, S., Chesley, H. R., McGhee, D. E., Kawal, R., & Landau, J. (2000). Structured online interactions: improving the decision-making of small discussion groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Farnham, S., Chesley, H. R., McGhee, D. E., Kawal, R., & Landau, J. (2000). Structured online interactions: improving the decision-making of small discussion groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work.
Zurück zum Zitat Finholt, T. A. (2002). Collaboratories. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 73–107.CrossRef Finholt, T. A. (2002). Collaboratories. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 73–107.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gladwell, M. (2002). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Back Bay Books. Gladwell, M. (2002). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Back Bay Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Gopal, A., & Prasad, P. (2000). Understanding GDSS in Symbolic Context: Shifting the Focus from Technology to Interaction. MIS Quarterly, 24(3), 509–546.CrossRef Gopal, A., & Prasad, P. (2000). Understanding GDSS in Symbolic Context: Shifting the Focus from Technology to Interaction. MIS Quarterly, 24(3), 509–546.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hars, A., & Ou, S. (2002). Working for Free? Motivations for Participating in Open-Source Projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(3), 25–39. Hars, A., & Ou, S. (2002). Working for Free? Motivations for Participating in Open-Source Projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(3), 25–39.
Zurück zum Zitat Heng, M. S. H., & de Moor, A. (2003). From Habermas' s communicative theory to practice on the internet. Information Systems Journal, 13(4), 331–352.CrossRef Heng, M. S. H., & de Moor, A. (2003). From Habermas' s communicative theory to practice on the internet. Information Systems Journal, 13(4), 331–352.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Iandoli, L., Klein, M., & Zollo, G. (2009). Enabling on-line deliberation and collective decision-making through large-scale argumentation: a new approach to the design of an Internet-based mass collaboration platform. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 1(1), 69–91.CrossRef Iandoli, L., Klein, M., & Zollo, G. (2009). Enabling on-line deliberation and collective decision-making through large-scale argumentation: a new approach to the design of an Internet-based mass collaboration platform. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 1(1), 69–91.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, E. M., & Halpin, S. M. (1974). Multistage inference models for intelligence analysis. Johnson, E. M., & Halpin, S. M. (1974). Multistage inference models for intelligence analysis.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonassen, D., & Jr, H. R. (2005). Mapping alternative discourse structures onto computer conferences. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 1(1/2), 113–129.CrossRef Jonassen, D., & Jr, H. R. (2005). Mapping alternative discourse structures onto computer conferences. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 1(1/2), 113–129.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Karacapilidis, N., Loukis, E., & Dimopoulos, S. (2004). A Web-Based System for Supporting Structured Collaboration in the Public Sector. LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 218–225. Karacapilidis, N., Loukis, E., & Dimopoulos, S. (2004). A Web-Based System for Supporting Structured Collaboration in the Public Sector. LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 218–225.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirschner, P. A., Shum, S. J. B., & Carr, C. S. (2003). Visualizing Argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Springer. Kirschner, P. A., Shum, S. J. B., & Carr, C. S. (2003). Visualizing Argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B. A., & Chi, E. H. (2007). He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B. A., & Chi, E. H. (2007). He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein, M. (2003). A Knowledge-Based Methodology for Designing Reliable Multi-Agent Systems. In P. Giorgini, J. P. Mueller, & J. Odell (Eds.), Agent-Oriented Software Engineering IV (Vol. 2935, pp. 85–95). Springer-Verlag. Klein, M. (2003). A Knowledge-Based Methodology for Designing Reliable Multi-Agent Systems. In P. Giorgini, J. P. Mueller, & J. Odell (Eds.), Agent-Oriented Software Engineering IV (Vol. 2935, pp. 85–95). Springer-Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein, M. (2007). The MIT Collaboratorium: Enabling Effective Large-Scale Deliberation for Complex Problems. Klein, M. (2007). The MIT Collaboratorium: Enabling Effective Large-Scale Deliberation for Complex Problems.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein, M., & Bernstein, A. (2004). Towards High-Precision Service Retrieval. IEEE Internet Computing Journal, 8(1), 30–36.CrossRef Klein, M., & Bernstein, A. (2004). Towards High-Precision Service Retrieval. IEEE Internet Computing Journal, 8(1), 30–36.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klein, M., & Iandoli, L. (2008). Supporting Collaborative Deliberation Using a Large-Scale Argumentation System: The MIT Collaboratorium. Directions and Implications of Advanced Computing; Conference on Online Deliberation (DIAC-2008/OD2008). Klein, M., & Iandoli, L. (2008). Supporting Collaborative Deliberation Using a Large-Scale Argumentation System: The MIT Collaboratorium. Directions and Implications of Advanced Computing; Conference on Online Deliberation (DIAC-2008/OD2008).
Zurück zum Zitat Klein, M., Sayama, H., Faratin, P., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2003). The Dynamics of Collaborative Design: Insights From Complex Systems and Negotiation Research. Concurrent Engineering Research & Applications, 11(3), 201–210.CrossRef Klein, M., Sayama, H., Faratin, P., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2003). The Dynamics of Collaborative Design: Insights From Complex Systems and Negotiation Research. Concurrent Engineering Research & Applications, 11(3), 201–210.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kramer, K., & King, J. (1988). Computer-Based Systems for Coperative Work and Group Decision Making. Computing Surveys, 20(June), 115–146.CrossRef Kramer, K., & King, J. (1988). Computer-Based Systems for Coperative Work and Group Decision Making. Computing Surveys, 20(June), 115–146.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G. (2005). Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, & K. R. Lakhani (Eds.), Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software. MIT Press. Lakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G. (2005). Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, & K. R. Lakhani (Eds.), Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software. MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowrance, J. D., Harrison, I. W., & Rodriguez, A. C. (2001). Capturing Analytic Thought. First International Conference on Knowledge Capture, 84–91. Lowrance, J. D., Harrison, I. W., & Rodriguez, A. C. (2001). Capturing Analytic Thought. First International Conference on Knowledge Capture, 84–91.
Zurück zum Zitat Luppicini, R. (2007). Review of computer mediated communication research for education. Instructional Science, 35(2), 141–185.CrossRef Luppicini, R. (2007). Review of computer mediated communication research for education. Instructional Science, 35(2), 141–185.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Macaulay, L. A., & Alabdulkarim, A. (2005). Facilitation of e-Meetings: State-of-the-Art Review. e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service (EEE’05). Macaulay, L. A., & Alabdulkarim, A. (2005). Facilitation of e-Meetings: State-of-the-Art Review. e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service (EEE’05).
Zurück zum Zitat Moor, A. d., & Aakhus, M. (2006). Argumentation Support: From Technologies to Tools. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 93.CrossRef Moor, A. d., & Aakhus, M. (2006). Argumentation Support: From Technologies to Tools. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 93.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nisbet, D. (2004). Measuring the Quantity and Quality of Online Discussion Group Interaction. Journal of eLiteracy, 1, 122–139. Nisbet, D. (2004). Measuring the Quantity and Quality of Online Discussion Group Interaction. Journal of eLiteracy, 1, 122–139.
Zurück zum Zitat Pervan, G. P., & Atkinson, D. J. (1995). GDSS research: An overview and historical analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 4(6), 475–483.CrossRef Pervan, G. P., & Atkinson, D. J. (1995). GDSS research: An overview and historical analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 4(6), 475–483.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Poole, M. S., Holmes, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1988). Conflict Management and Group Decision Support Systems. Proceedings from Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Poole, M. S., Holmes, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1988). Conflict Management and Group Decision Support Systems. Proceedings from Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work.
Zurück zum Zitat Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research. ACM SIGMIS Database, 35(1), 6–36.CrossRef Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research. ACM SIGMIS Database, 35(1), 6–36.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rahwan, I. (2008). Mass argumentation and the semantic web. Journal of Web Semantics, 6(1), 29–37.CrossRef Rahwan, I. (2008). Mass argumentation and the semantic web. Journal of Web Semantics, 6(1), 29–37.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reagan-Cirincione, P. (1994). Improving the accuracy of group judgment: a process intervention combining group facilitation, social judgment analysis, and information technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(2), 246–270.CrossRef Reagan-Cirincione, P. (1994). Improving the accuracy of group judgment: a process intervention combining group facilitation, social judgment analysis, and information technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(2), 246–270.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts, J. E. F. F. R. E. Y., Hann, I. L.-H. O. R. N., & Slaughter, S. A. N. D. R. A. (2006). Understanding the Motivations, Participation and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects. Management Science, 52(7), 984–999.CrossRef Roberts, J. E. F. F. R. E. Y., Hann, I. L.-H. O. R. N., & Slaughter, S. A. N. D. R. A. (2006). Understanding the Motivations, Participation and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects. Management Science, 52(7), 984–999.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market. Science, 311(5762), 854–856.CrossRef Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market. Science, 311(5762), 854–856.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Lüthgens, C., & Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 655–669.CrossRef Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Lüthgens, C., & Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 655–669.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shrager, J., Billman, D., Convertino, G., Massar, J. P., & Pirolli, P. (2010). Soccer Science and the Bayes Community: Exploring the Cognitive Implications of Modern Scientific Communication. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(1), 53–72.CrossRef Shrager, J., Billman, D., Convertino, G., Massar, J. P., & Pirolli, P. (2010). Soccer Science and the Bayes Community: Exploring the Cognitive Implications of Modern Scientific Communication. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(1), 53–72.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shum, S. B., Liddo, A. D., Iandoli, L., & Quinto, I. (2012). A Debate Dashboard to Support the Adoption of Online Knowledge Mapping Tools. VINE Journal of information and Knowledge Management Systems. Shum, S. B., Liddo, A. D., Iandoli, L., & Quinto, I. (2012). A Debate Dashboard to Support the Adoption of Online Knowledge Mapping Tools. VINE Journal of information and Knowledge Management Systems.
Zurück zum Zitat Shum, S. J. B., Selvin, A. M., Sierhuis, M., Conklin, J., & Haley, C. B. (2006). Hypermedia Support for Argumentation-Based Rationale: 15 Years on from gIBIS and QOC. In A. H. Dutoit, R. McCall, I. Mistrik, & B. Paech (Eds.), Rationale Management in Software Engineering. Springer-Verlag. Shum, S. J. B., Selvin, A. M., Sierhuis, M., Conklin, J., & Haley, C. B. (2006). Hypermedia Support for Argumentation-Based Rationale: 15 Years on from gIBIS and QOC. In A. H. Dutoit, R. McCall, I. Mistrik, & B. Paech (Eds.), Rationale Management in Software Engineering. Springer-Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Smallman, H. S. (2008). JIGSAW – Joint Intelligence Graphical Situation Awareness Web for collaborative intelligence analysis. In M. P. Letsky, N. Warner, S. Fiore, & C. A. P. Smith (Eds.), Macrocognition in Teams: Theories and Methodologies (pp. 321–337). Aldershot, UK.: Ashgate. Smallman, H. S. (2008). JIGSAW – Joint Intelligence Graphical Situation Awareness Web for collaborative intelligence analysis. In M. P. Letsky, N. Warner, S. Fiore, & C. A. P. Smith (Eds.), Macrocognition in Teams: Theories and Methodologies (pp. 321–337). Aldershot, UK.: Ashgate.
Zurück zum Zitat Spatariu, A., Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2004). Defining and Measuring Quality in Online Discussions. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(4). Spatariu, A., Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2004). Defining and Measuring Quality in Online Discussions. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(4).
Zurück zum Zitat Steenbergen, M. R., Bachtiger, A., Sporndli, M., & Steiner, J. (2003). Measuring political deliberation: a discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics, 1(1), 21–48.CrossRef Steenbergen, M. R., Bachtiger, A., Sporndli, M., & Steiner, J. (2003). Measuring political deliberation: a discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics, 1(1), 21–48.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). Measuring deliberation’s content: A coding scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(1), 12. Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). Measuring deliberation’s content: A coding scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(1), 12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford University Press. Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Surowiecki, J. (2005). The Wisdom of Crowds. Anchor. Surowiecki, J. (2005). The Wisdom of Crowds. Anchor.
Zurück zum Zitat Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Portfolio Hardcover. Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Portfolio Hardcover.
Zurück zum Zitat Trénel, M. (2004). Measuring the quality of online deliberation. Coding scheme 2.4. Social Science Research Center Berlin, Germany. Available at: www. wz-berlin. de/online-mediation/files/publications/quod_2_4. pdf. Trénel, M. (2004). Measuring the quality of online deliberation. Coding scheme 2.4. Social Science Research Center Berlin, Germany. Available at: www. wz-berlin. de/online-mediation/files/publications/quod_2_4. pdf.
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgments under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.CrossRef Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgments under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Viegas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., & Dave, K. (2004). Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations. SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Viegas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., & Dave, K. (2004). Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations. SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Zurück zum Zitat Walton, D. N. (2005). Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation (Critical Reasoning and Argumentation). Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Walton, D. N. (2005). Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation (Critical Reasoning and Argumentation). Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Walton, D. N., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995). Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Walton, D. N., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995). Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Metadaten
Titel
Enabling Large-Scale Deliberation Using Attention-Mediation Metrics
verfasst von
Mark Klein
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2012
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) / Ausgabe 4-5/2012
Print ISSN: 0925-9724
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012-9156-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4-5/2012

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 4-5/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner