nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

24.04.2021

Contextualized game-based intervention for digital literacy for the Pacific Islands

verfasst von: Pritika Reddy, Kaylash Chaudhary, Bibhya Sharma, Darren Chand

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In the digital age, advocating and improving digital literacy is a global challenge. There have been scales developed to measure individuals' digital literacy competencies; however, intervention programs have been only a few. This research paper articulates design details, validity, reliability and effectiveness of a new online modulated digital literacy intervention program (DLIP). For the development of DLIP, digital literacy is stipulated in this research as a universal framework that consists of six different literacies; media, information, technology, computer, visual, and communication literacy. An online module has been designed for each of these six literacies, and the concept of game-based learning has been used to engage the users and secure high user satisfaction. To test the reliability of the intervention, the Kuder- Richardson- 20 (KR-20) test was performed. The developed intervention was deemed to be reliable with the KR-20 value of 0.86. The construct validity was measured using the spearman’s correlation test and since the values for all the constructs were above 0.3, the DLIP was valid. The effectiveness of the DLIP was evaluated by calculating the effect size. The Cohen’s d test was used and the results show that the intervention was moderately effective. Although DLIP has been developed for the Pacific Islands it has global applicability.

Vorheriger Artikel Learning management systems and technology acceptance models: A systematic review

Nächster Artikel Teachers’ trainers’ intention and motivation to transfer ICT training: The role of ICT individual factors, gender, and ICT self-efficacy

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Adeleke, A., & Joshua, E. (2015). Development and validation of scientific literacy achievement test to assess senior secondary school students’ literacy acquisition in physics. Journal of Education and Practice, 1–16.

Albers, C., & Lakens, D. (2018). When power analyses based on pilot data are biased: Inaccurate effect sizeestimators and follow-up bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 187–195.CrossRef

Anastasiadis, T., Lampropoulos, G., & Siakas, K. (2018). Digital game-based learning and serious games in education. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering, 4(12), 1-6.

Aristizába, L., Cano, S., Collazoc, C., Benavides, F., Moreira, F., & Fardoun, H. (2019). Digital transformation to support literacy teaching to deaf children: From storytelling to digital interactive storytelling. Telematics and Infomatics, 38(87), 99.

Arnab, S., & Clarke, S. (2017). Towards a trans-disciplinary methodology for a game-basedintervention development process. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(279), 312.

Asrizal, Amran, A., Ananda, A., Festiyed, F., & Sumarmin, R. (2018). The development of integrated scinece instructional materials to improve students’ digital literacy in scientific approach. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 7(4),1–18.

Assessment Strategies Inc (2014). The Angoff Method of Standard Setting. Retrieved from https://bcrsp.ca. https://bcrsp.ca/sites/default/files/documents/Angoff%20Method%20Article_1.pdf. 1Accessed 4 Dec 2020.

Beaunoyer, E., Dupere, S., & Guittona, M. (2020). COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in Human Behaviour, 11, 1–19.

Berame, J., Lawsin, N., Gacosta, H., Yadao, M., & Orleans, A. (2017). Development and validation of Organismal Classification Achievement Test (OCAT): Basis for implementation and standardization for test construction in junior science high school. International Journal of Biotechnology and Recent Advances, 1, 30–35.

Brien, K., Kietrys, D., Galantino, Parrott, J., & Aubry, R. (2019). Reliability and validity of the HIV Disability Questionnaire (HDQ) with adults living with HIV in the United States. Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care, 18, 1–10.

Buckingham, D. (2006). Defining digital literacy – What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1, 1–14.CrossRef

Cahill, G. (2020). Why Game-Based Learning? Retrieved from Thelearningcounsel.com: https://thelearningcounsel.com/article/why-game-based-learning.

Chetty, K., Qigui, L., Gcora, N., Josie, J., Wenwei, L., & Fang, C. (2017). Bridging the digital divide: measuring digital literacy. Economics-The Open Access, 69, 1–18.

Covello, S. (2010). A Review of Digital Literacy Assessment Instruments. Retrieved from www.academia.edu: https://www.academia.edu/7935447/A_Review_of_Digital_Literacy_Assessment_Instruments.

Dios, I., Igartua, J, & Vázquez, A. (2016). Development and validation of a digital literacy scale for teenagers. Proceedings of the Fourth Intersnational Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, (pp. 1067–1073).

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Gestionale (2018). Managing ict for business, industry, government and society. Retrieved from http://www.dig.polimi.it/index.php?id=524. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.

Dneprovskaya, N., Bayaskalanova, T., Ruposov, V., & Shevtsova, I. (2018). Study of Digitization of Russian Higher Education as Basis for Smart Education. 2018 IEEE International Conference "Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies, (pp. 607–611).

Dolnicar, D., Podgonik, B., Bartol, T., & Sorgo, A. (2020). Added value of secondary school education toward development of information literacy of adolescents. Library & Information Science Research, 1–20.

Escueta, M., Quan, V., Nickow, A., & Oreopoulos, P. (2017). Education technology: An evidence-based review. Journal of Economic Literature, 1–102.

Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Education Technology Research Development, 68, 1–24.CrossRef

Farahat, T., Hegazy, N., & Mowafy.M. (2018). Information and communication technologies in primary healthcare facilities in Egypt. Primary Health Care Research and Development, 88–95. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6452979/. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.

Gignac, G., & Szodorai, E. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102(74), 78.

Govier, P., Corporat, M., & Weigert, C. (2020). Ionic Framework. Retrieved from ionicframework.com: https://ionicframework.com/docs.

Grandhi, S., & Chugh, R. (2012). Strategic value of mobile CRM applications: A review of mobile CRM at dow corning and DirecTV. International Conference on Innovation and Information Management (pp. 1–7). IACSIT Press.

Haluza, D., & Jungwirth, D. (2018). ICT and the future of healthcare: Aspects of pervasive health monitoring. Informatics for Health and Care - Taylor & Francis Online, 43(1), 11.

Hansen, W. (2020). Reduction in Prevalence (RRP): An Alternative to Cohen’s Effect Size Statistics for Judging Alcohol, Cigarette, and Mar. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 41(5), 473–486.CrossRef

Harvey, L. (2000). New realities: The relationship between higher education and employement. Tertiary Education and Management, 6(3), 17.

Hongthong, T., & Temdee, P. (2018). Personalized mobile learning for digital literacy enhancement of Thai youth (1–4). IEEE.

Huizengaa, J., Dama, G., Voogta, J., & Admiraalb, W. (2017). Teacher perceptions of the value of game-based learning in secondary education. Computers & Education, 110(105), 115.

Incebacak, B., & Ersoy, E. (2017). Developing an achievement test for fraction teaching: Validity and reliability analysis. ITM Web of Conferences, (pp. 1–14).

Indasari, P., & Budiyanto, M. (2019). Theoretical Feasibility of Interactive Multimedia Based on Articulate Storyline in Liquid Pressure. Pensa E-Journal: Science Education, 7(2), 1–5.

Jalil, M., & Mortazhejri, S. (2012). Standard setting for objective structured clinical exam using four methods: Prefixed score angoff borderline regression and cohens. Studies in Development of Medical Education, 9(1), 77–84.

Joss, S., Sengers, F., Schraven, D., Schraven, F., & Dayot, Y. (2019). The smart city as global discourse: Storylines and critical junctures across 27 cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(1), 3–34.CrossRef

Kalolo, J. (2019). Digital revolution and its impact on education systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 345–358.

Ken, D. (2018). Role of information and communication technology in open and distance learning. The Research Journal of Social Sciences, 55–59.

Laerd Statistics (2020). Testing for Normality using SPSS Statistics. Retrieved from https://statistics.laerd.com. https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/testing-for-normality-using-spss-statistics.php. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.

Lim, N., & Shorey, S. (2019). Effectiveness of technology-based educational interventionson the empowerment related outcomes of children and young adults with cancer: A quantitative systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(10), 1–13.CrossRef

Liu, Z., Tretyakova, N., Fedorov, V., & Kharakhordina, M. (2020). Digital literacy and digital didactics as the basis for new learning models development. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 4–18.

Liza, K., & Andriyanti, E. (2019). Digital literacy scale of English pre-service teachers and their perceived readiness toward the application of digital technologies. Journal of Education and Learning, 1–6.

Lynch, W. (2017). What is digital literacy? Retrieved from www.thetechedvocate.org. https://www.thetechedvocate.org/what-is-digital-literacy/. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.

Markham, S., Kordsmeier, W., & Watts, R. (2020). Computer availability and applications in selected European business schools. Journal of InformationSystems Education, 14, 173–180.

McLeod, S. (2019). What does effect size tell you? Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org. https://www.simplypsychology.org/effect-size.html. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.

Meyers, E., Erickson, I., & Small, R. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: an introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 355–367.

Meyvis, T., & Osselaer, S. (2018). Increasing the power of your study by increasing the effect size. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1157), 1173.

Molnar, G., Molnar, E., Dancs, K., & Csapo, B. (2020). Report on ICT in education in hungary. In D. Liu, R. Huang, B. Lalic, H. Zeng, & N. Zivlak, Comparative Analysis of ICT in Education Between China and Central and Eastern European Countries (pp. 173–187). Springer.

Mubuuke, A., Mwesigwa, C., & Kiguli. (2017). Implementing the Angoff method of standard setting using postgraduate students: Practical and affordable in resource-limited settings. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5745345/#.

Muirhead, K., Macaden, L., Clarke, C., Smyth, K., Polson, R., & Malley, C. (2019). The characteristics of effective technology-enabled dementia education for health and social care practitioners: protocol for a mixed studies systematic review. Sytems Reviews, 8, 1–9.

Nam, T. (2014). Determining the type of e-government use. Government Information Quarterly, 31(211), 220.

Neilson, C. (2018). Digital literacy expectations in higher education. Open Oceans: Learning without borders. Proceedings ASCILITE, (pp. 113–120).

Nikou, S., & Aavakare, M. (2021). An assessment of the interplay between literacy and digital technology in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 1–23.

Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 2, 163–174.CrossRef

Perdana, R., Yani, R., Jumadi, J., & Rosana, D. (2019). Assessing students’ digital literacy skill in senior high school Yogyakarta. Indonesian of Educational Journal, 8(2), 1–9.

Polizzi, G. (2020). Digital literacy and the national curriculum for England: Learning from how the experts engage with and evaluate online content. Computers & Education, 152, 1–13.

Premuzic, T., & Frankiewicz, B. (2019). Does higher education still prepare people for jobs? Retrieved from https://hbr.org. https://hbr.org/2019/01/does-higher-education-still-prepare-people-for-jobs

Quaigrain, K., & Arhin, K. (2017). Using reliability and item analysis to evaluate a Using reliability and item analysis to evaluate a measurement and evaluation. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1–11.CrossRef

Radovanovic, D., Holst, C., Belur, S., Srivastava, R., Houngbonon, G., & Noll, J. (2020). Digital Literacy Key Performance Indicators for Sustainable Development. Social Inclusion, 8(2), 151–162.CrossRef

Reddy, P., Sharma, B., & Chaudhary, K. (2020a). Measuring the digital competency of freshmen at a higher education institute. PACIS 2020 Proceedings (pp. 1–13). AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).

Reddy, P., Sharma, B., & Chaudhary, K. (2020b). Digital literacy: A review of literature. International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), 11(2), 65–94.

Reiter, B. (2017). Theory and Methodology of Exploratory Social Science Research. Government and International Affairs Faculty Publications, 5(4), 1–23.

Schippers, H., Adam, P., Smolenski, D., Wong, H., & Wit, J. (2017). A meta‐analysis of overall effects of weight loss interventions delivered via mobile phones and effect size differences according to delivery mode, personal contact and intervention intensity and duration. Obesity Reviews, 18, 450–459.CrossRef

Sebastian, B., & Nelms, J. (2017). The effectiveness of Emotional Freedom Techniques in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis. Elsevier Explore, 1–10.

Sener, N., & Tas, E. (2017). Developing achievement test: A research for assessment of 5th Grade biology subject. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(2), 254–271.CrossRef

Sharma, A., & Chief, I. (2016). The transforming nature of teaching and learning in higher education: A University of the South Pacific experience. In A. Sharma & I. Chief (Eds.), Fast forwarding Higher Education Institutions for Global Challenges. (pp. 61–72). Springer.

Sharma, B., Lauano, F., Narayan, S., Anzeg, A., Kumar, B., & Raj, J. (2018). Science teachers accelerated programme model: a joint partnership in the Pacific region. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 38–60.

Shields, R., & Chugh, R. (2018). Preparing Australian High School Learners with 21st Century Skills. IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

Singh, K., Binti, N., & Jalil, A. (2019). Relationship of digital literacy and teacher’s perception of 21st century learning: A study of SMK Bako KuchinG, Sarawak. International Conference on Education in the Digital Ecosystem, 367–387.

Spante, M., Hashemi, S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–21.CrossRef

statista.com (2020). Worldwide digital population as of July 2020. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com. https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.

Sung, H., & Hwang, G. (2017). Facilitating effective digital game-based learning behaviors and learning performances of students based on a collaborative knowledge construction strategy. Interactive Learning Environments, 118–134.

Taylor, C. (2012). Development of a modified Cohen method of standard setting. Medical Teacher, 33(12), 1–6.

The Fijian Government (2019). Digital Government Transformation. Retrieved from digitalFiji: https://www.fiji.gov.fj/digitalFIJI. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.

Tomczyk, L. (2019). Skills in the area of digital safety as a key component of digital literacy among teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 1–16.

Toquero, C. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 2–5.CrossRef

Üstündağ, M., Güneş, E., & Bahçivan, E. (2017). Turkish adaptation of Digital Literacy Scale and Investigating Pre-service Science Teachers’ Digital Literacy. Journal of Education and Future, 12, 19–29.

Veletsianos, G. (2010). A Definition of Emerging Technologies for Education. Athabasca University Press.

Verville, L., Cote, P., Grondin, D., Mior, S., Moodley, K., Kay, R., & Vaisey, A. (2020). Using technology-based educational interventions to improve knowledge about clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review of the literature. The Journal of Chiropractic Education, 35(1), 1–9.

Walton, G. (2016). Digital literacy: Establishing the boundaries and identifying the partners. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 22(1), 1–4.CrossRef

Wescott, C. (2015). E-Government and the Applications of Technology to Government Services. Retrieved from www.unapcict.org: https://www.unapcict.org/sites/default/files/2019-01/e-Government%20and%20the%20Applications%20of%20Technology%20to%20Government%20Services.pdf.

White, P., Redford, P., & Macdonald, J. (2020). Cohen’s d for two independent samples. Retrieved from https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com: https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/3294892/cohens-d-for-two-independent-samples.

Wilechansky, R., Burgermaster, M., Jones, D., & Seres, D. (2016). Obesity, diet, and exercise education for the primary care clerkship using an articulate storyline 2 e-learning module. The Journal of Teaching and Learning Resources, 12(1), 1–7.

Yim, M. (2018). Comparison of results between modified-Angoff and bookmark methods for estimating cut score of the Korean medical licensing examination Korean. Journal of Medical Education, 30(347), 357.

Yong, A., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94.CrossRef

Titel: Contextualized game-based intervention for digital literacy for the Pacific Islands
verfasst von: Pritika Reddy
Kaylash Chaudhary
Bibhya Sharma
Darren Chand
Publikationsdatum: 24.04.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10534-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Learning management systems and technology acceptance models: A systematic review

Evaluating the use of informational technologies by students of healthcare colleges for academic purposes over a five-year period

Adaptive learning management expert system with evolving knowledge base and enhanced learnability

Demystifying computational thinking for teacher candidates: A case study on Turkish secondary school pre-service teachers

Competence representation and the use of educational technology support for Thai learners

Can we do better? a classification of algorithm run-time-complexity improvement using the SOLO taxonomy

Premium Partner