nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

15.03.2022

Exploring secondary school teachers’ TPACK for video-based flipped learning: the role of pedagogical beliefs

verfasst von: Ying-Tien Wu, Ching-Sing Chai, Li-Jen Wang

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Video-based flipped learning (VFL) has become a popular form of flipped learning. However, teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for video-based flipped learning is still under-explored. A TPACK-VFL questionnaire for assessing teachers’ TPACK for VFL was developed and validated with both EFA and CFA in this study to fill the research gap. After instrument development and validation, a total of 211 secondary school teachers’ TPACK for VFL, their pedagogical beliefs, and the role of teacher pedagogical beliefs on their TPACK for VFL were explored in this study. The results showed that the secondary school teachers in this study generally expressed sufficient confidence in their TPACK for VFL. They tended to have strong learner-centered pedagogical beliefs and moderate teacher-centered pedagogical beliefs. Besides, compared with the senior high school teachers, the junior high school teachers showed significantly higher confidence in their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for VFL (p < 0.05). This study also found that the teachers’ learner-centered pedagogical belief was significantly correlated with their content knowledge (CK), pedagogical knowledge (PK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), technological content knowledge (TCK), and technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK) (p < 0.05). In contrast, their teacher-centered pedagogical belief was significantly correlated with their TCK, TPK, and TPACK (p < 0.05). Cluster analysis was conducted based on the teachers’ pedagogical beliefs, which yielded three groups: the Learner-centered Group, the Double-emphasis Group, and the Neutral Group. A series of ANOVA confirmed that the three groups of teachers significantly differed in their CK, PK, PCK, and TPACK (p < 0.05), indicating that teachers’ pedagogical beliefs played a role in their TPACK for VFL. A series of post hoc analyses further revealed that, in general, the teachers in the Double-emphasis Group (i.e., those teachers who held both strong learner-centered and teacher-centered pedagogical beliefs) showed better TPACK for VFL.

Vorheriger Artikel Using the educational tablet: An evaluation study of teachers’ and pupils’ views in Egyptian primary schools

Nächster Artikel The interaction effects of reading proficiency and personality types on EFL university students’ online reading strategy use

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Angeli, C., & Valanide, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168.CrossRef

Atwa, Z., Din, R., & Hussin, M. (2016). Effectiveness of flipped learning in physics education on Palestinian high school students’ achievement. Journal of Personalized Learning, 2(1), 73–85.

Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher Professional Development in Teaching and Teacher Education over Ten Years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.

Bardakci, S., & Alkan, M. F. (2019). Investigation of Turkish preservice teachers’ intentions to use IWB in in terms of technological and pedagogical aspects. Education and Information Technologies, 2019(24), 2887–2907.CrossRef

Bhagat, K. K., Chang, C. N., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 134–142.

Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of research. Atlanta: Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

Blair, E., Maharaj, C., & Primus, S. (2016). Performance and perception in the flipped classroom. Education of Information Technologies, 2016(21), 1465–1482.CrossRef

Bauer-Ramazani, C., Graney, J. M., Marshall, H. W., & Sabieh, C. (2016). Flipped learning in TESOL: Definitions, approaches, and implementation. TESOL Journal, 7(2), 429–437.CrossRef

Chai, C. S., Hong, H. Y., & Teo, T. (2009). Singaporean and Taiwanese pre-service teachers’ beliefs and their attitude towards ICT use: A comparative study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), 117–128.

Chai, C. S., Koh, H. L., Tsai, C.-C., & Tan, L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184–1193.CrossRef

Chai, C. S., Koh, H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.

Chai, C. S., Koh, H. L., & Teo, Y. H. (2018). Enhancing and modeling teachers’ design beliefs and efficacy of technological pedagogical content knowledge for 21st century quality learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 360–384.CrossRef

Challob, A. I. (2021). The effect of flipped learning on EFL students’ writing performance, autonomy, and motivation. Education and Information Technologies, 2021(26), 3743–3769.CrossRef

Chao, C. Y., Chen, Y. T., & Chuang, K. Y. (2015). Exploring students’ learning attitude and achievement in flipped learning supported computer aided design curriculum: A study in high school engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23(4), 514–526.CrossRef

Cheng, K. H. (2017). A survey of native language teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in Taiwan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 692–708.CrossRef

Clark, K. R. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 91–115.CrossRef

Ekici, M. (2021). A systematic review of the use of gamification in flipped learning. Education and Information Technologies, 2021(26), 3327–3346.CrossRef

Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.CrossRef

Fish, M. C., & Dane, E. (2000). The classroom systems observation scale: Development of an instrument to assess classrooms using a systems perspective. Learning Environments Research, 3(1), 67–92.CrossRef

Flipped Learning Network. (2014). Definition of flipped learning. Retrieved February 2, 2018, from http://flippedlearning.org/domain/46

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. In: Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.

Getenet, S. T. (2017). Adapting technological pedagogical content knowledge framework to teach mathematics. Education of Information Technologies, 2017(22), 2629–2644.CrossRef

Gore, P. (2000). Cluster Analysis. In H. Tinsley & S. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modelling (pp. 297–321). Academic Press.CrossRef

Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical Considerations for Understanding Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(2011), 1953–1969.CrossRef

Grypp, L., & Luebeck, J. (2015). Rotating solids and flipping instruction. Mathematics Teacher, 109(3), 186–193.CrossRef

Gulbahar, Y., & Guven, I. (2008). A survey on ICT usage and the perceptions of social studies teachers in Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 37–51.

Gunduz, A. Y., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2019). Student views on the use of flipped learning in higher education: A pilot study. Education and Information Technologies, 2019(24), 2391–2401.CrossRef

Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). SEM: An Introduction. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (pp. 629–686). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Huang, Y. N., & Hong, Z. R. (2016). The effects of a flipped English classroom intervention on students’ information and communication technology and English reading comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 175–193.MathSciNetCrossRef

Hsu, C.-Y., Tsai, M.-J., Chang, Y.-H., & Liang, J.-C. (2017). Surveying In-Service Teachers’ Belief about Game-Based Learning and Perceptions of Technological and Content Knowledge of Games. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 134–143.

Keppell, M., Suddaby, G., & Hard, N. (2011). Good Practice Report: Technology-Enhanced Learning and Teaching. Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

Kettle, M. (2013). Flipped physics. Physics Education, 48(5), 593–596.CrossRef

Kirvan, R., Rakes, C. R., & Zamora, R. (2015). Flipping an algebra classroom: Analyzing, modeling, and solving systems of linear equations. Computers in the Schools, 32(3–4), 201–223.CrossRef

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R., et al. (2014). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 101–111). Springer Science + Business Media.CrossRef

Koh, H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2014). Demographic factors, TPACK constructs, and teachers’ perceptions ofconstructivist-oriented TPACK. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 185–196.

Kostaris, C., Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., Giannakos, M. N., & Pelliccione, L. (2017). Investigating the Potential of the Flipped Classroom Model in K-12 ICT Teaching and Learning: An Action Research Study. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 261–273.

Kumar, N., Rose, R., & D’Silva, J. (2008). Teachers’ readiness to use technology in the classroom: An empirical study. European Journal of Scientific Research, 21(4), 603–616.

Lee, K. Y., & Lai, Y. C. (2017). Facilitating higher-order thinking with the flipped classroom model: A student teacher’s experience in a Hong Kong secondary school. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12, 8.CrossRef

Li, N., Himanshu, V., Skevi, A., Zufferey, G., Blom, J., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). Watching MOOCs together: Investigating co-located MOOC study groups. Distance Education, 35, 164–177.CrossRef

Liang, J.-C. (2015). Exploring the relationships between in-service preschool teachers’ perceptions of classroom authority and their TPACK. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24, 471–479.CrossRef

Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807–828.CrossRef

Limniou, M., Schermbrucker, I., & Lyons, M. (2018). Traditional and flipped classroom approaches delivered by two different teachers: The student perspective. Education of Information Technologies, 2018(23), 797–817.CrossRef

Lin, T.-C., Tsai, C.-C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M.-H. (2013). Identifying science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325–336.CrossRef

Liu, S.-H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical belief of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education, 56(2011), 1012–1022.CrossRef

Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017a). Using “First Principles of Instruction” to Design Secondary School Mathematics Flipped Classroom: The Findings of Two Exploratory Studies. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 222–236.

Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017b). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(4), 1–11.

Mamun, M. A. A., Azad, M. A. K., Mamun, M. A. A., & Boyle, M. (2021). Review of flipped learning in engineering education: Scientific mapping and research horizon. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 1261–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10630-zCrossRef

Meyliana, Sablan, B., Surjandy, & Hidayanto, A. N. (2021). Flipped learning effect on classroom engagement and outcomes in university information systems class. Education and Information Technologies, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10723-9.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRef

Molnar, K. K. (2017). What effect does flipping the classroom have on undergraduate student perceptions and grades? Education and Information Technologies, 2017(22), 2741–2765.CrossRef

Neaupane, D. (2017). Video production for flipped classroom: A guide for teachers (Master’s thesis). Retrieved October 18., 2021, from http://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/124988/Neaupane_Deepak.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

NG, D. T. K., NG, E. H. L., & CHU, S. K. W. (2021). Engaging students in creative music making with musical instrument application in an online flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies (Dordr), 2021 July 2: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10568-2

O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.CrossRef

Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical belief and their use of digital media in the classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skills, too’ model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations. Computer & Education, 58, 1351–1359.CrossRef

Phillipson, S. N., Cooper, D. G., & Phillipson, S. (2015). Flip, feedback and fly: Using LOOP to Enhance the Professional Experience of Initial Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(8), 115–131.

Polly, D. (2011). Teachers’ learning while constructing technology-based instructional resources. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 950–961.CrossRef

Quinn, M., & Kennedy-Clark, S. (2015). Adopting online lecturing for improved learning: A case study from teacher education. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 12(3), 9.CrossRef

Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, K., & Tondeur, J. (2009). Investigating teacher’s educational belief in Chinese primary schools: Socioeconomic and geographical perspectives. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 363–377.CrossRef

Schultz, D., Duffield, S., Rasmussen, S. C., & Wageman, J. (2014). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1334–1339.CrossRef

Seery, M. K. (2015). Flipped learning in higher education chemistry: Emerging trends and potential directions. Chemistry Education Research Practice, 16, 758–768.CrossRef

Shyr, W.-J., & Chen, C.-H. (2018). Designing a technology-enhanced flipped learning system to facilitate students’ self-regulation and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2018(34), 53–62.CrossRef

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRef

Snyder, C., Paska, L. M., & Besozzi, D. (2014). Cast from the past: Using screencasting in the social studies classroom. The Social Studies, 105(6), 310–314.CrossRef

Saudelli, M. G., & Ciampa, K. (2016). Exploring the role of TPACK and teacher self-efficacy: an ethnographic case study of three iPad language arts classes. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(2), 227–247.CrossRef

Tanner, M., & Scott, E. (2015). A Flipped Classroom Approach to Teaching Systems Analysis, Design and Implementation. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 219–241.CrossRef

Teo, T., Chai, C. S., Hung, D., & Lee, C. B. (2008). Beliefs about teaching and uses of technology among pre-service teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 163–174.CrossRef

Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., van Braak, J., Voogt, J., & Prestridge, S. (2017). Preparing beginning teachers for technology integration in education: Ready for take-off? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1193556.CrossRef

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.CrossRef

Tseng, M. F., Broadstock, M., & Chen, H. (2016). An investigation of the design of a four-stage flipped classroom in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 7(1), 15–42.

Wang, M. S. (2011). Study of the Implementation of Technology Integration from the perspective of senior female elementary school teachers (Master’s thesis). Retrieved October 31, 2021, from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/asg7fg

Wang, Y. H. (2016). Could a mobile-assisted learning system support flipped classrooms for classical Chinese learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 391–415.CrossRef

Wu, Y.-T. (2013). Research trends in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) research: A review of empirical studies published in selected journals from 2002 to 2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2013, 44(3), E73–E76.

Wu, Y. T., & Wang, A. Y. (2015). Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge in teaching English as a foreign language: Representation of primary teachers of English in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3), 525–533.CrossRef

Xi, B. X., Chai, C. S., Tsai, C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2020). Exploring the relationship between Chinese pre-service teachers’ epistemic beliefs and their perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1814698

Yang Ruby, C. C., & Chen, Y. (2020). Implementing the flipped classroom approach in primary English classrooms in China. Education and Information Technologies, 2020(25), 1217–1235.CrossRef

Titel: Exploring secondary school teachers’ TPACK for video-based flipped learning: the role of pedagogical beliefs
verfasst von: Ying-Tien Wu
Ching-Sing Chai
Li-Jen Wang
Publikationsdatum: 15.03.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10977-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2022

Accelerated HE digitalisation: Exploring staff and student experiences of the COVID-19 rapid online-learning transfer

ERSDO: E-learning Recommender System based on Dynamic Ontology

The effectiveness of web-based Mathematics instruction (WBMI) on K-16 students’ mathematics learning: a meta-analytic research

Online Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment with Ordered Multiple-Choice Items for Word Problems involving ‘Time’

Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020

Video conferencing in the e-learning context: explaining learning outcome with the technology acceptance model

Premium Partner