nach oben

Empirical Software Engineering

Erschienen in:

01.10.2014

Agile vs. structured distributed software development: A case study

verfasst von: Hans-Christian Estler, Martin Nordio, Carlo A. Furia, Bertrand Meyer, Johannes Schneider

Erschienen in: Empirical Software Engineering | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In globally distributed software development, does it matter being agile rather than structured? To answer this question, this paper presents an extensive case study that compares agile (Scrum, XP, etc.) vs. structured (RUP, waterfall) processes to determine if the choice of process impacts aspects such as the overall success and economic savings of distributed projects, the motivation of the development teams, the amount of communication required during development, and the emergence of critical issues. The case study includes data from 66 projects developed in Europe, Asia, and the Americas. The results show no significant difference between the outcome of projects following agile processes and structured processes, suggesting that agile and structured processes can be equally effective for globally distributed development. The paper also discusses several qualitative aspects of distributed software development such as the advantages of nearshore vs. offshore, the preferred communication patterns, and the effects on project quality.

Vorheriger Artikel Resolving the challenges of time and distance

Nächster Artikel From offshore outsourcing to insourcing and partnerships: four failed outsourcing attempts

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Other names for such processes are: heavyweight, plan-driven, disciplined. In this article, we will consistently use the term “structured” to denote “non-agile” processes; this is merely a terminological convention and does not entail that agile processes have no structure whatsoever, or that structured processes are completely inflexible.

For structured processes, the term “documentation” mainly denotes requirement specifications; for agile processes, it mainly denotes use-case scenarios and test cases.

The dataset is available at http://se.inf.ethz.ch/data/icgse12.zip. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v. 20.

Data about 8 projects.

Data about 10 projects.

We did not provide a definition of the various activities to interviewees, relying on their conventional understanding of the terms in each context. While the same phase may have fairly different connotations in agile rather than structured processes (e.g. requirements in agile projects might refer to user stories), no interviewee voiced doubts about how to assign activities within their projects or asked for clarifications about this aspect.

Allen TJ (1977) Managing the flow of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge

Arcuri A, Briand LC (2011) A practical guide for using statistical tests to assess randomized algorithms in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on software engineering, (ICSE). ACM, Waikiki, Honolulu , HI, USA, 21–28 May 2011, pp 1–10

Beck K, Beedle M, van Bennekum A, Cockburn A, Cunningham W, Fowler M, Grenning J, Highsmith J, Hunt A, Jeffries R, Kern J, Marick B, Martin RC, Mellor S, Schwaber K, Sutherland J, Thomas D (2001) Manifesto for agile software development. http://www.agilemanifesto.org

Begel A, Nagappan N (2008) Pair programming: what’s in it for me? In: Proceedings of the second international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement, (ESEM). ACM, Kaiserslautern, Germany, 9–10 October 2008, pp 120–128

Bhat T, Nagappan N (2006) Evaluating the efficacy of test-driven development: industrial case studies. In: 2006 International symposium on empirical software engineering, (ISESE). ACM, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 21–22 September 2006, pp 356–363

Bird C, Nagappan N, Devanbu PT, Gall H, Murphy B (2009) Does distributed development affect software quality? an empirical case study of Windows Vista. Commun ACM 52(8):85–93CrossRef

Boehm B, Turner R (2004) Balancing agility and discipline: a guide for the perplexed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

Carmel E (1999) Global Software teams: collaborating across borders and time zones. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs

Cataldo M, Nambiar S (2009) On the relationship between process maturity and geographic distribution: an empirical analysis of their impact on software quality. In: Proceedings of the 7th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on foundations of software engineering, 2009. ACM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24–28 August 2009, pp 101–110

Cohen D, Lindvall M, Costa P (2004) An introduction to agile methods. Adv Comput 62:1–66CrossRef

Espinosa JA, Nan N, Carmel E (2007) Do gradations of time zone separation make a difference in performance? a first laboratory study. In: 2nd IEEE international conference on global software engineering, (ICGSE). IEEE, Munich, Germany, 27–30 August 2007, pp 12–22

Estler HC, Nordio M, Furia CA, Meyer B, Schneider J (2012) Agile vs. structured distributed software development: A case study. In: Carmel E, van Solingen R (eds) Proceedings of the 7th international conference on global software engineering, (ICGSE). IEEE Computer Society, pp 11–20

Estler HC, Nordio M, Furia CA, Meyer B (2013) Unifying configuration management with merge conflict detection and awareness systems. In: Dietrich J, Noble J (eds) Proceedings of the 22nd Australasian software engineering conference, (ASWEC). IEEE Computer Society

Fowler FJ, Mangione TW (1989) Standardized survey interviewing: minimizing interviewer-related error. Sage Publications Inc.

Ghezzi C, Jazayeri M, Mandrioli D (2002) Fundamentals of software engineering, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall

Herbsleb JD, Mockus A (2003) An empirical study of speed and communication in globally distributed software development. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 29(6):481–494CrossRef

Herbsleb JD, Mockus A, Finholt TA, Grinter RE (2000) Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM, pp 319–328

Hulkko H, Abrahamsson P (2005) A multiple case study on the impact of pair programming on product quality. In: 27th International conference on software engineering, (ICSE). ACM St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 15–21 May 2005, pp 495–504

Layman L, Williams L, Damian D, Bures H (2006) Essential communication practices for extreme programming in a global software development team. Inf Softw Technol 48(9):781–794CrossRef

Müller MM, Tichy WF (2001) Case study: extreme programming in a university environment. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on software engineering, (ICSE). 12–19 May 2001, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, IEEE, pp 537–544

Nawrocki JR, Walter B, Wojciechowski A (2002) Comparison of CMM Level 2 and eXtreme programming. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on software quality, (ECSQ). Springer, pp 288–297

Nordio M, Mitin R, Meyer B, Ghezzi C, Di Nitto E, Tamburrelli G (2009) The role of contracts in distributed development. In: Proceedings of software engineering advances for offshore and outsourced development, (SEAFOOD). Springer, pp 117–129

Nordio M, Mitin R, Meyer B (2010) Advanced hands-on training for distributed and outsourced software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE international conference on software engineering, (ICSE), vol 1. ACM, Cape Town, South Africa 1–8 May 2010 pp 555–558

Nordio M, Estler HC, Meyer B, Tschannen J, Ghezzi C, Di Nitto E (2011) How do distribution and time zones affect software development? a case study on communication. In: 6th IEEE international conference on global software engineering, (ICGSE). IEEE, Helsinki, Finland, 15–18 August 2011

Nordio M, Ghezzi C, Meyer B, Di Nitto E, Tamburrelli G, Tschannen J, Aguirre N, Kulkarni V (2011b) Teaching software engineering using globally distributed projects: the DOSE course. In: Collaborative teaching of globally distributed software development – community building workshop, (CTGDSD). ACM, pp 36–40

Paasivaara M, Durasiewicz S, Lassenius C (2009) Using Scrum in distributed agile development: Aa multiple case study. In: 4th IEEE international conference on global software engineering, (ICGSE). IEEE, Limerick, Ireland, 13–16 July 2009, pp 195–204

Paasivaara M, af Ornäs NH, Hynninen P, Lassenius C, Niinimaki T, Piri A (2010) Practical guide to managing distributed software development projects. Tech. rep., Aalto University, School of Science, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering

Pfleeger SL, Atlee J (2005) Software engineering: theory and practice, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

Pressman R (2009) Software engineering: a practitioner’s approach, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

Ramasubbu N, Balan R (2007) Globally distributed software development project performance: an empirical analysis. In: Proceedings of the 6th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on foundations of software engineering, 2007. ACM, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 3–7 September 2007, pp 125–134

Ramasubbu N, Cataldo M, Balan RK, Herbsleb JD (2011) Configuring global software teams: a multi-company analysis of project productivity, quality, and profits. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on software engineering, (ICSE). ACM, pp 261–270

Spinellis D (2006) Global software development in the FreeBSD project. In: Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on global software development for the practitioner, (GSD). ACM, pp 73–79

Sprent P, Smeeton N (2007) Applied nonparametric statistical methods. Texts in statistical science. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London

Sureshchandra K, Shrinivasavadhani JJ (2008) Adopting agile in distributed development. In: 3rd IEEE international conference on global software engineering, (ICGSE). IEEE, Bangalore, India, 17–20 August 2008, pp 217–221

Titel: Agile vs. structured distributed software development: A case study
verfasst von: Hans-Christian Estler
Martin Nordio
Carlo A. Furia
Bertrand Meyer
Johannes Schneider
Publikationsdatum: 01.10.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Empirical Software Engineering / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1382-3256
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7616
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-013-9271-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

Evolving robust networks for systems-of-systems: is it viable for large networks?

Special issue on program comprehension

An experimental evaluation of the importance of randomness in hill climbing searches applied to software engineering problems

Measuring and modeling programming experience

Labeling source code with information retrieval methods: an empirical study

Guest editorial: Search-based software engineering

Premium Partner