nach oben

Technology, Knowledge and Learning

Erschienen in:

02.01.2020

Analysis of Teachers’ Pedagogical Digital Competence: Identification of Factors Predicting Their Acquisition

verfasst von: Francisco D. Guillén-Gámez, Mª José Mayorga-Fernández, Javier Bravo-Agapito, David Escribano-Ortiz

Erschienen in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The current technological revolution has reached all social classes and its educative use by teachers has not gone unnoticed. The introduction of 2.0 tools has become a reality in many classrooms. In order to evaluate the digital competence of teachers, different dimensions must be considered, including knowledge and educative use. The first objective of this research is to find out whether there are any differences between the knowledge and use of teaching staff of ICT, specifically regarding different 2.0 tools, as well as different modules on the Moodle virtual platform, using the t-Student test. The second objective is to analyse, through a multiple linear regression model, which factors have an effect on the level of digital competence: gender, age and educational stage. With this aim, a non-experimental, ex post facto type of research has been carried out with a study population of 81 teachers from the community of Madrid (Spain). The results have shown that there are statistically significant differences between the knowledge and use of 2.0 tools and Moodle Modules. In addition, the results have found that the variables age and gender have an effect on the prediction of the level of pedagogical digital competence of the teaching staff, while the educational stage in which they teach has no effect. The conclusions derived from this study can help to develop educational interventions focused on improving the unfavourable digital competence of teachers.

Vorheriger Artikel Distance Education Attitudes (DEAS) During Covid-19 Crisis: Factor Structure, Reliability and Construct Validity of the Brief DEA Scale in Greek-Speaking SEND Teachers

Nächster Artikel Technology Acceptance Model: Assessing Preservice Teachers’ Acceptance of Floor-Robots as a Useful Pedagogical Tool

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Aesaert, K., & Van Braak, J. (2015). Gender and socioeconomic related differences in performance based ICT competences. Computers & Education, 84, 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.017.CrossRef

Ahmed, A. M., AbdelAlmuniem, A., & Almabhouh, A. A. (2016). The current use of web 2.0 tools in university teaching from the perspective of faculty members at the college of education. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 179–194.CrossRef

Alhassan, R. (2017). Exploring the relationship between web 2.0 tools self-efficacy and teachers’ use of these tools in their teaching. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 217–228.CrossRef

Amhag, L., Hellström, L., & Stigmar, M. (2018). Teacher educators’ need continuing pedagogical support in digital teaching. In Dialogkonferens 2018 Pedagogisk forsknin (pp. 1–14). Malmö University Electronic Publishing.

Ananiadou, K. & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. OECD education working papers (vol. 41, pp. 1–33). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154.

Badia, A., Martín, D., & Gómez, M. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of the use of Moodle activities and their learning impact in secondary education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9354-3.CrossRef

Balta, N., & Duran, M. (2015). Attitudes of studens and teachers towards the use of interactive whiteboards in elementary and secondary schools classrooms. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Tecnology, 14(2), 15–21.

Barak, M. (2017). Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9501-y.CrossRef

Benali, M., Kaddouri, M., & Azzimani, T. (2018). Digital competence of Moroccan teachers of English. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 14(2), 1–22.

Borenstein, M. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta analysis (pp. 221–237). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2017). The social life of information: Updated, with a new preface. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press.

Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.

Cabero Almenara, J., Roig Vila, R., & Mengual Andrés, S. (2017). Conocimientos tecnológicos, pedagógicos y disciplinares de los futuros docentes según el modelo TPACK. Digital Education Review, 32, 85–96.

Cabero-Almenara, J., Arancibia, M., & Del Prete, A. (2019). Technical and didactic knowledge of the Moodle LMS in higher education. Beyond functional use. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (NAER Journal), 8(1), 25–33.CrossRef

Casillas, S., Cabezas, M., Ibarra, M. S., & Rodríguez, G. (2017). Evaluation of digital competence from a gender perspective. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on technological ecosystems for enhancing multiculturality (pp. 1–25). https://doi.org/10.1145/3144826.3145372.

Chan, Y. H. (2004). Biostatistics 201: Linear regression analysis. Singapore Medical Journal, 45(2), 55–61.

Chen, Y. (2016). Spatial autocorrelation approaches to testing residuals from least squares regression. PLoS One, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146865.CrossRef

Costa, C., Alvelos, H., & Teixeira, L. (2012). The use of Moodle e-learning platform: A study in a Portuguese university. Procedia Technology, 5(1), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.037.CrossRef

Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0327-1.CrossRef

Cristol, D. & Gimbert, B. G. (2018). Teachers as digital citizens: Factors influencing teachers’ levels of digital citizenship. In World conference on mobile and contextual learning (pp. 1–7).

Dauda, M., Ayanda, M., & Jibrin, A. (2018). Analysis of students’ attitude towards the use of information and communication technology in Nigerian Tertiary institutions. ATBU Journal of Science, Technology And Education, 6(1), 100–105.

EC (European Commission). (2007). The key competences for lifelong learning—a European framework. Retrieved on November 16, 2019 from https://www.erasmusplus.org.uk/file/272/download.

EC (European Commission). (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Retrieved on November 16, 2019 from https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC83167/lb-na-26035-enn.pdf.

EC (European Commission). (2017). Digital competence framework for educators (DigCompEdu). Retrieved on November 16, 2019 from https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcompedu.

EC (European Commission). (2018). Key competences for lifelong learning. Retrieved on November 16, 2019 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)&from=EN.

Egan, A., FitzGibbon, A., Johnston, K., & Oldham, E. (2018). Factors influencing pre-service teachers’ use of technology on school placement-mind the gap. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1435–1440). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

El-Bahsh, R. & Daoud, M. (2016). Evaluating the use of Moodle to achieve effective and interactive learning: A case study at the German Jordanian university. In Proceedings of the 35th annual IEEE international conference on computer communications (pp. 1–5).

Eraković, B. R., & Lazović, V. S. (2017). Student perspectives on the advantages and drawbacks of using learning management systems within a social-constructivist approach to translation teaching: Moodle and Edmodo. Nastava i Vaspitanje, 66(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas1702259E.CrossRef

Faizi, R. (2018). Moroccan higher education students’ and teachers’ perceptions towards using web 2.0 technologies in language learning and teaching. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 10(1), 86–96.

From, J. (2017). Pedagogical digital competence-between values. Knowledge and skills. Higher Education Studies, 7(2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n2p43.CrossRef

García-Gil, D., & Andreu, R. C. (2017). Gender differences in music content learning using a virtual platform in secondary education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.017.CrossRef

Ghani, I. M. M., & Ahmad, S. (2010). Stepwise multiple regression method to forecast fish landing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 549–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.076.CrossRef

Ghavifekr, S., & Mahmood, H. (2017). Factors affecting use of e-learning platform (SPeCTRUM) among university students in Malaysia. Education and Information Technologies, 22(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9435-z.CrossRef

Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J. J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.057.CrossRef

González Martínez, J., Esteve-Mon, F. M., Larraz Rada, V., Espuny Vidal, C., & Gisbert Cervera, M. (2018). INCOTIC 2.0: una nueva herramienta para la autoevaluación de la competencia digital del alumnado universitario = INCOTIC 2.0: A new self-assessment tool for digital competences at the university studies. Profesorado: revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 22(4), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i4.8401.CrossRef

Gregory, S., Scutter, S., Jacka, L., McDonald, M., Farley, H., & Newman, C. (2015). Barriers and enablers to the use of virtual worlds in higher education: An exploration of educator perceptions, attitudes and experiences. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 3–12.

Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085.CrossRef

Guillén-Gámez, F. D. & Fernández-López, M. L. (2017). A study about professional training and the use that high school teachers do of ICT and the virtual Moodle platform. In ICERI2017, the 10th annual international conference of education, research and innovation (ICERI2017) (pp. 226–232). https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2017.0105.

Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Lugones, A., & Mayorga-Fernández, M. J. (2019). ICT use by pre-service foreign languages teachers according to gender, age and motivation. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1574693.CrossRef

Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Mayorga-Fernández, M. J., & Álvarez-García, F. J. (2018). A study on the actual use of digital competence in the practicum of education degree. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9390-z.CrossRef

Guo, R. X., Dobson, T., & Petrina, S. (2008). Digital natives, digital immigrants: An analysis of age and ICT competency in teacher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.2190/ec.38.3.a.CrossRef

Hatlevik, O. E., & Christophersen, K. A. (2013). Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers & Education, 63, 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.015.CrossRef

He, T., & Zhu, C. (2017). Digital informal learning among Chinese university students: The effects of digital competence and personal factors. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 14–44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0082-x.CrossRef

Hrtoňová, N., Kohout, J., Rohlíková, L., & Zounek, J. (2015). Factors influencing acceptance of e-learning by teachers in the Czech Republic. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 873–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.018.CrossRef

Ilkan, M., Bheshti, M., Rahimi, S., & Atalar, E. (2017). The role of information and communication technology (ICT) in tourism education: A case study of higher education students. Retrieved on November 16, 2019 from http://i-rep.emu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11129/3491.

Incantalupo, L., Treagust, D. F., & Koul, R. (2014). Measuring student attitude and knowledge in technology-rich biology classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9453-9.CrossRef

Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016.CrossRef

INTEF. (2017). Marco Común de Competencia Digital Docente. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologías Educativas y de Formación del Profesorado. Retrieved on November 16, 2019 from https://intef.es/Noticias/marco-comun-de-competencia-digital-docente-2017-intef/.

Jackson, E. A. (2017). Impact of MOODLE platform on the pedagogy of students and staff: Cross-curricular comparison. Education and Information Technologies, 22(1), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9438-9.CrossRef

Janssen, J., Stoyanov, S., Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., Pannekeet, K., & Sloep, P. (2013). Experts’ views on digital competence: Commonalities and differences. Computers & Education, 68, 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.008.CrossRef

Kalayci, S., & Humiston, K. R. (2015). Students’ attitudes towards collaborative tools in a virtual learning environment. Educational Process: International Journal, 4(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.12973/edupij.2015.412.6.CrossRef

Kerlinger, F. N., Lee, H. B., Pineda, L. E., & Mora Magaña, I. (2002). Investigación del comportamiento. Mexico City: McGraw Hill.

Kline, R. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60–70.

Krumsvik, R. J. (2014). Teacher educators’ digital competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.726273.CrossRef

Krumsvik, R. J., Jones, L. Ø., Øfstegaard, M., & Eikeland, O. J. (2016). Upper secondary school teachers’ digital competence: Analysed by demographic, personal and professional characteristics. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 11(03), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2016-03-02.CrossRef

Kunda, D., Chembe, C., & Mukupa, G. (2018). Factors that influence Zambian higher education lecturer’s attitude towards integrating ICTs in teaching and research. JOTSE, 8(4), 360–384. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.338.CrossRef

Kuo, R., Chang, M., & Chen, C. L. (2018). In-game card as educational reward (ICER) Moodle plug-in: A pilot study. In International conference on technology in education (pp. 65–76). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0008-0_7.

Lakkala, M., Ilomäki, L., & Kantosalo, A. (2011). Which areas of digital competences are important for a teacher? In Linked portal (pp. 1-8). Brussels: European Schoolnet (EUN).

Lázaro-Cantabrana, J., Usart-Rodríguez, M., & Gisbert-Cervera, M. (2019). Assessing teacher digital competence: The construction of an instrument for measuring the knowledge of pre-service teachers. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (NAER Journal), 8(1), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.370.CrossRef

León, R. C., Gámez, A. N., & Osuna, J. B. (2016). Las competencias del profesorado universitario desde el modelo TPACK (conocimiento tecnológico y pedagógico del contenido). Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 49, 105–119.CrossRef

Lund, A., Furberg, A., Bakken, J., & Engelien, K. L. (2014). What does professional digital competence mean in teacher education? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(04), 280–298.CrossRef

Maraver-López, P., Nunes, C., & Hernando-Gómez, Á. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of their use of Moodle in higher education. Interdisciplinarity in Social and Human Sciences, 5, 288–295.

Marozas, V., & Dumbrava, V. (2010). Motivating the students to study the basics of digital signal processing by using virtual learning environment. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika, 102(6), 87–90.

Mercader, C., & Gairin Sallan, J. (2017). How do university teachers use digital technologies in class? Redu-revista de docencia universitaria, 15(2), 257–273.CrossRef

Napal Fraile, M., Peñalva-Vélez, A., & Mendióroz Lacambra, A. M. (2018). Development of digital competence in secondary education teachers’ training. Education Sciences, 8(104), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030104.CrossRef

Navarro, S., Zervas, P., Gesa, R., & Sampson, D. (2016). Developing teachers’ competences for designing inclusive learning experiences. Educational Technology and Society, 19(1), 17–27.

NMC-New Media Consoritum. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edicion. Retrieved on November 16, 2019 from https://www.nmc.org/publication/nmc-horizon-report-2017-higher-education-edition/.

Rivera-Laylle, L. I., Fernández-Morales, K., Guzmán-Games, F. J., & Eduardo-Pulido, J. (2017). ICT acceptance by university professors: Knowledge, attitude, and practicality. Revista Electrónica Educare, 21(3), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.21-3.CrossRef

Rodrigues, S., Rocha, A., & Abreu, A. (2018). Needs and expectations faced with the Moodle platform and institutional support available: The case of ISCAP. In 2018 13th Iberian conference on information systems and technologies (CISTI) (vol. 1, pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/cisti.2018.8399409.

Ruiz, A. B. M., Sánchez, F. A. G., & Pina, F. H. (2015). Cuestionario para el estudio de la actitud, el conocimiento y el uso de TIC (ACUTIC) en Educación Superior. Estudio de fiabilidad y validez. Revista interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado, 83, 75–89.

Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). An investigation of the factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions and integration of web 2.0 tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9410-9.CrossRef

Saleem, N. E., Al-Saqri, M. N., & Ahmad, S. E. (2016). Acceptance of Moodle as a teaching/learning tool by the faculty of the department of information studies at Sultan Qaboos university, Oman based on UTAUT. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 6(2), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2016.6.2.005.CrossRef

Sánchez-Santamaría, J., Ramos-Pardo, F. J., & Sánchez-Antolín, P. (2012). The student’s perspective: teaching usages of Moodle at university. The student’s perspective: Teaching usages of Moodle. In Proceedings of ICERI2012 conference, Madrid, Spain (pp. 2968–2973).

Saw, T., Win, K. K., Aung, Z. M. M., & Oo, M. S. (2018). Investigation of the use of learning management system (Moodle) in university of computer studies, Mandalay. In International conference on big data analysis and deep learning applications (pp. 160–168). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0869-7_18.

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2015). Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers’ perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 88, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.005.CrossRef

Siddiq, F., Scherer, R., & Tondeur, J. (2016). Teachers’ emphasis on developing students’ digital information and communication skills (TEDDICS): A new construct in 21st century education. Computers & Education, 92, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.006.CrossRef

Stosic, L., & Fadiya, S. O. (2017). The attitudes of students towards the use of ICT during their studies. Russian Psychological Journal, 14(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2017.1.9.CrossRef

Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2018). A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher’s ICT competencies. Computers & Education, 122, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002.CrossRef

Tondeur, J., Van de Velde, S., Vermeersch, H., & Van Houtte, M. (2016). Gender differences in the ICT profile of university students: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies, 3(1), 57–77.CrossRef

Yin, L., Shaw, S. L., & Yu, H. (2011). Potential effects of ICT on face-to-face meeting opportunities: a GIS-based time-geographic approach. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(3), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.09.007.CrossRef

Titel: Analysis of Teachers’ Pedagogical Digital Competence: Identification of Factors Predicting Their Acquisition
verfasst von: Francisco D. Guillén-Gámez
Mª José Mayorga-Fernández
Javier Bravo-Agapito
David Escribano-Ortiz
Publikationsdatum: 02.01.2020
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 2211-1662
Elektronische ISSN: 2211-1670
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09432-7

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Distance Education Attitudes (DEAS) During Covid-19 Crisis: Factor Structure, Reliability and Construct Validity of the Brief DEA Scale in Greek-Speaking SEND Teachers

Digital Inquiry Through Games

Making Sense of Maritime Simulators Use: A Multiple Case Study in Norway

Technology Acceptance Model: Assessing Preservice Teachers’ Acceptance of Floor-Robots as a Useful Pedagogical Tool

Writing a Descriptive Paragraph Using an Augmented Reality Application: An Evaluation of Students’ Performance and Attitudes

Motivation Outcomes in Math-Related Videogames

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten