Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning 3/2021

11.06.2020 | Original research

Technology Acceptance Model: Assessing Preservice Teachers’ Acceptance of Floor-Robots as a Useful Pedagogical Tool

verfasst von: J. Elizabeth Casey, Lisa K. Pennington, Selina V. Mireles

Erschienen in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Institutions of higher education ensure preservice teachers are prepared to meet the needs of K-12 students through multiple layers of support. Along with rigorous coursework, preservice teachers are placed in K-12 environments to ensure they are prepared to address the needs of diverse learners. Preservice teachers: (a) learn content across multiple areas depending on desired level/area of certification; (b) study pedagogical approaches that are effective in addressing K-12 students’ needs; (c) employ research-based strategies in K-12 settings; and, (d) take content and pedagogical exams for certification purposes. However, preservice teachers may be unfamiliar with newer educational technology such as floor-robots, a type of robotics that may support content learning, as well as engage K-12 students in critical thinking and/or problem solving. Increasing preservice teachers’ awareness of new technologies may benefit their future K-12 students. The purpose of this research was to ascertain whether preservice teachers would accept floor-robots as a useful instructional tool to support learning. During an undergraduate education course, thirty-two Hispanic, preservice teachers were introduced to two types of floor-robots to enhance their awareness/use of an unfamiliar educational technology. Researchers in this study had previous experience introducing floor-robots to approximately 250 fourth and fifth graders across two academic school years. Researchers were interested in gauging preservice teachers’ willingness to accept and/or use new technologies as an additional instructional strategy to support K-12 student learning.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Asing-Cashman, J., Gurung, B., Limbu, Y. B., & Rutledge, D. (2014). Free and open source tools (FOSTs): An empirical investigation of pre-service teachers’ competencies, attitudes, and pedagogical intentions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(1), 66–77. Asing-Cashman, J., Gurung, B., Limbu, Y. B., & Rutledge, D. (2014). Free and open source tools (FOSTs): An empirical investigation of pre-service teachers’ competencies, attitudes, and pedagogical intentions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(1), 66–77.
Zurück zum Zitat Batane, T., & Ngwako, A. (2017). Technology use by pre-service teachers during teaching practice: Are new teachers embracing technology right away in their first teaching experience? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 48–61. Batane, T., & Ngwako, A. (2017). Technology use by pre-service teachers during teaching practice: Are new teachers embracing technology right away in their first teaching experience? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 48–61.
Zurück zum Zitat Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 58, 978–988.CrossRef Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 58, 978–988.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, C. P., & Englehardt, J. (2017). A case study of how a sample of preservice teachers made sense of incorporating iPads into their instruction with children. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 38(1), 19–38.CrossRef Brown, C. P., & Englehardt, J. (2017). A case study of how a sample of preservice teachers made sense of incorporating iPads into their instruction with children. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 38(1), 19–38.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Catlin, D., & Woollard, J. (2014). Educational robots and computational thinking. Conference presentation: 4th TRTWR & RIE 2014 - 4th International Workshop "Teaching Robotics & Teaching with Robotics" & 5th International Conference "Robotics in Education", Padova, Italy Catlin, D., & Woollard, J. (2014). Educational robots and computational thinking. Conference presentation: 4th TRTWR & RIE 2014 - 4th International Workshop "Teaching Robotics & Teaching with Robotics" & 5th International Conference "Robotics in Education", Padova, Italy
Zurück zum Zitat Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill. Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zurück zum Zitat Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Chandra, V. (2014). Developing students’ technological literacy through robotics activities. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 22(3), 24–29. Chandra, V. (2014). Developing students’ technological literacy through robotics activities. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 22(3), 24–29.
Zurück zum Zitat Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Curby, A., & William, K. (2014). The influence of a technology-based internship on first-year teachers' instructional decision-making. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(3), 265–285. Curby, A., & William, K. (2014). The influence of a technology-based internship on first-year teachers' instructional decision-making. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(3), 265–285.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340.
Zurück zum Zitat Durkin, D. (1978/1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 482–533. Durkin, D. (1978/1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 482–533.
Zurück zum Zitat Eguchi, A. (2014). Educational robotics for promoting 21st century skills. Journal of Automation, Mobile Robotics & Intelligent Systems, 8(1), 5–11.CrossRef Eguchi, A. (2014). Educational robotics for promoting 21st century skills. Journal of Automation, Mobile Robotics & Intelligent Systems, 8(1), 5–11.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382.CrossRef Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hayes, E., & Ohrnberger, M. (2013). The gamer generation teaches school: The gaming practices and attitudes towards technology of pre-service teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 21(2), 154–177. Hayes, E., & Ohrnberger, M. (2013). The gamer generation teaches school: The gaming practices and attitudes towards technology of pre-service teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 21(2), 154–177.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Angeli,. (2017). Effect of robotics on elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, science learning, and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 175–192.CrossRef Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Angeli,. (2017). Effect of robotics on elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, science learning, and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 175–192.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Karp, T., & Maloney, P. (2013). Exciting young students in grades K-8 about STEM through an afterschool robotics challenge. American Journal of Engineering Education, 4(1), 39–54. Karp, T., & Maloney, P. (2013). Exciting young students in grades K-8 about STEM through an afterschool robotics challenge. American Journal of Engineering Education, 4(1), 39–54.
Zurück zum Zitat Kazakoff, E. R., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education, 41, 245–255.CrossRef Kazakoff, E. R., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education, 41, 245–255.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaya, E., Newley, A., Deniz, H., Yesilyurt, E., & Newley, P. (2017). Introducing engineering design to a science teaching methods course through educational robotics and exploring changes in views of preservice elementary teachers. Research and Teaching, 47(2), 66–75. Kaya, E., Newley, A., Deniz, H., Yesilyurt, E., & Newley, P. (2017). Introducing engineering design to a science teaching methods course through educational robotics and exploring changes in views of preservice elementary teachers. Research and Teaching, 47(2), 66–75.
Zurück zum Zitat Kliebard, H. M. (2004). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893–1958 (3rd ed.). New York, New York: Routledge.CrossRef Kliebard, H. M. (2004). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893–1958 (3rd ed.). New York, New York: Routledge.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.CrossRef Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, K., Li, Y., &, Franklin, T., (2016). Preservice teachers’ intention to adopt technology in their future classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(7), 946–966.CrossRef Li, K., Li, Y., &, Franklin, T., (2016). Preservice teachers’ intention to adopt technology in their future classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(7), 946–966.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, L., Worch, E., Zhou, Y., & Aguiton, R. (2015). How and why digital generation teachers use technology in the classroom: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 1–9.CrossRef Li, L., Worch, E., Zhou, Y., & Aguiton, R. (2015). How and why digital generation teachers use technology in the classroom: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 1–9.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges and guidelines. The Lancet., 358, 483–488.CrossRef Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges and guidelines. The Lancet., 358, 483–488.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martínez Ortiz, A. (2015). Examining students’ proportional reasoning strategy levels as evidence of the impact of an integrated LEGO robotics and mathematics learning experience. Journal of Technology Education, 26(2), 46–69. Martínez Ortiz, A. (2015). Examining students’ proportional reasoning strategy levels as evidence of the impact of an integrated LEGO robotics and mathematics learning experience. Journal of Technology Education, 26(2), 46–69.
Zurück zum Zitat Matson, E., DeLoach, S., & Pauly, R. (2004). Building interest in math and science for rural and underserved elementary school children using robots. Journal of STEM Education, 5(3&4), 35–46. Matson, E., DeLoach, S., & Pauly, R. (2004). Building interest in math and science for rural and underserved elementary school children using robots. Journal of STEM Education, 5(3&4), 35–46.
Zurück zum Zitat Maxwell, L. A. (2014). Latino students are nation's most segregated, report finds. Education Week, 33(32), 6. Maxwell, L. A. (2014). Latino students are nation's most segregated, report finds. Education Week, 33(32), 6.
Zurück zum Zitat Meagher, M., Ozgun-Koca, A., & Edwards, M. T. (2011). Preservice teachers' experiences with advanced digital technologies: The interplay between technology in a preservice classroom and in field placements. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(3), 243–270. Meagher, M., Ozgun-Koca, A., & Edwards, M. T. (2011). Preservice teachers' experiences with advanced digital technologies: The interplay between technology in a preservice classroom and in field placements. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(3), 243–270.
Zurück zum Zitat Millis, K., Forsyth, C., Wallace, P., Graesser, A. C., & Timmins, G. (2017). The impact of game-like features on learning from an intelligent tutoring system. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(1), 1–22.CrossRef Millis, K., Forsyth, C., Wallace, P., Graesser, A. C., & Timmins, G. (2017). The impact of game-like features on learning from an intelligent tutoring system. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(1), 1–22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mosley, P., Ardito, G., & Scollins, L. (2016). Robotic cooperative learning promotes student STEM interest. American Journal of Engineering Education, 7(2), 117–128. Mosley, P., Ardito, G., & Scollins, L. (2016). Robotic cooperative learning promotes student STEM interest. American Journal of Engineering Education, 7(2), 117–128.
Zurück zum Zitat Nadelson, L. S., Bennett, D., Gwilliam, E., Howlett, C., Oswalt, S., & Sand, J. (2013). The intersection of preservice teachers' confidence, perceptions, and ideas for using instructional technology for teaching and learning. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(4), 77–90.CrossRef Nadelson, L. S., Bennett, D., Gwilliam, E., Howlett, C., Oswalt, S., & Sand, J. (2013). The intersection of preservice teachers' confidence, perceptions, and ideas for using instructional technology for teaching and learning. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(4), 77–90.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pressley, M. (2004). The need for research on secondary literacy education. In T. L. Jetton & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 415–432). New York: The Guilford Press. Pressley, M. (2004). The need for research on secondary literacy education. In T. L. Jetton & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 415–432). New York: The Guilford Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rose, M. A., Carter, V., Brown, J., & Shumway, S. (2017). Status of elementary teacher development: Preparing elementary teachers to deliver technology and engineering experiences. Journal of Technology Education, 28(2), 2–18.CrossRef Rose, M. A., Carter, V., Brown, J., & Shumway, S. (2017). Status of elementary teacher development: Preparing elementary teachers to deliver technology and engineering experiences. Journal of Technology Education, 28(2), 2–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sheffield, C. (2011). Navigating access and maintaining established practice: Social studies teachers’ technology integration at three Florida middle schools. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(3), 282–312. Sheffield, C. (2011). Navigating access and maintaining established practice: Social studies teachers’ technology integration at three Florida middle schools. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(3), 282–312.
Zurück zum Zitat Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481.CrossRef Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vermillion, J., Young, M., & Hannafin, R. (2007). An academic technology initiative for teacher preparation candidates: Implications for preservice teacher programs. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(3), 99–104. Vermillion, J., Young, M., & Hannafin, R. (2007). An academic technology initiative for teacher preparation candidates: Implications for preservice teacher programs. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(3), 99–104.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, M. E. (2017). An examination of technology training experiences from teacher candidacy to in-service professional development. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 19, 1–20. Williams, M. E. (2017). An examination of technology training experiences from teacher candidacy to in-service professional development. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 19, 1–20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zawieska K., & Duffy B. R. (2015). The social construction of creativity in educational robotics. In R. Szewczyk, C. Zieliński, & M. Kaliczyńska (Eds.), Progress in automation, robotics and measuring techniques. Advances in intelligent systems and computing (Vol. 351). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15847-1_32 Zawieska K., & Duffy B. R. (2015). The social construction of creativity in educational robotics. In R. Szewczyk, C. Zieliński, & M. Kaliczyńska (Eds.), Progress in automation, robotics and measuring techniques. Advances in intelligent systems and computing (Vol. 351). Springer, Cham. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-319-15847-1_​32
Metadaten
Titel
Technology Acceptance Model: Assessing Preservice Teachers’ Acceptance of Floor-Robots as a Useful Pedagogical Tool
verfasst von
J. Elizabeth Casey
Lisa K. Pennington
Selina V. Mireles
Publikationsdatum
11.06.2020
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Technology, Knowledge and Learning / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 2211-1662
Elektronische ISSN: 2211-1670
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09452-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Technology, Knowledge and Learning 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.