Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers 4/2011

01.09.2011

RiskM: A multi-perspective modeling method for IT risk assessment

verfasst von: Stefan Strecker, David Heise, Ulrich Frank

Erschienen in: Information Systems Frontiers | Ausgabe 4/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Stakeholder involvement and participation are widely recognized as being key success factors for IT risk assessment. A particular challenge facing current IT risk assessment methods is to provide accessible abstractions on matters of IT risk that attend to both managerial and technical perspectives of the stakeholders involved. In this paper, we investigate whether a conceptual modeling method can address essential requirements in the IT risk assessment domain, and which structural and procedural features such a method entails. The research follows a design research process in which we describe a research artifact, and evaluate it to assess whether it meets the intended goals. In the paper, we specify requirements and assumptions underlying the method construction, discuss the structural specification of the method and its design rationale, present a prototypical application scenario, and provide an initial method evaluation. The results indicate that multi-perspective modeling methods satisfy requirements specific to the IT risk assessment domain, and that such methods, in fact, provide abstractions on matters of IT risk accessible to both a technical and a managerial audience.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Atkinson, C., & Kuehne, T. (2008). Reducing accidental complexity in domain models. Software & Systems Modeling, 7(3), 345–359.CrossRef Atkinson, C., & Kuehne, T. (2008). Reducing accidental complexity in domain models. Software & Systems Modeling, 7(3), 345–359.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bandyopadhyay, K., Mykytyn, P. P., & Mykytyn, K. (1999). A framework for integrated risk management in information technology. Management Decision, 37(5), 437–444.CrossRef Bandyopadhyay, K., Mykytyn, P. P., & Mykytyn, K. (1999). A framework for integrated risk management in information technology. Management Decision, 37(5), 437–444.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boczany, W. J. (1983). Justifying Office Automation. Journal of Systems Management, 34(7), 15–19. Boczany, W. J. (1983). Justifying Office Automation. Journal of Systems Management, 34(7), 15–19.
Zurück zum Zitat Carnaghan, C. (2006). Business process modeling approaches in the context of process level audit risk assessment: An analysis and comparison. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 7(2), 170–204.CrossRef Carnaghan, C. (2006). Business process modeling approaches in the context of process level audit risk assessment: An analysis and comparison. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 7(2), 170–204.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chavez-Demoulin, V., Embrechts, P., & Neslehova, J. (2006). Quantitative models for operational risk: Extremes, dependence, and aggregation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(10), 2636–2658. Chavez-Demoulin, V., Embrechts, P., & Neslehova, J. (2006). Quantitative models for operational risk: Extremes, dependence, and aggregation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(10), 2636–2658.
Zurück zum Zitat Clemen, R. T., & Winkler, R. L. (1999). Combining Probability Distributions From Experts in Risk Analysis. Risk Analysis, 19(2), 187–203. Clemen, R. T., & Winkler, R. L. (1999). Combining Probability Distributions From Experts in Risk Analysis. Risk Analysis, 19(2), 187–203.
Zurück zum Zitat Crouhy, M., Galai, D., & Mark, R. (2001). Risk management. New York: McGraw-Hill. Crouhy, M., Galai, D., & Mark, R. (2001). Risk management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zurück zum Zitat Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., & Gallo, S. (2006). How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data & Knowledge Engineering, 58(3), 358–380.CrossRef Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., & Gallo, S. (2006). How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data & Knowledge Engineering, 58(3), 358–380.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Frank, U. (1994). Multiperspektivische Unternehmensmodellierung: Theoretischer Hintergrund und Entwurf einer objektorientierten Entwicklungsumgebung. München: Oldenbourg. Frank, U. (1994). Multiperspektivische Unternehmensmodellierung: Theoretischer Hintergrund und Entwurf einer objektorientierten Entwicklungsumgebung. München: Oldenbourg.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank, U. (2006). Towards a Pluralistic Conception of Research Methods in Information Systems Research. Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB), Duisburg-Essen University. ICB Research Report 7. Frank, U. (2006). Towards a Pluralistic Conception of Research Methods in Information Systems Research. Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB), Duisburg-Essen University. ICB Research Report 7.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank, U. (2008). The MEMO Meta Modelling Language (MML) and Language Architecture. Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB), Duisburg-Essen University. ICB Research Report 24. Frank, U. (2008). The MEMO Meta Modelling Language (MML) and Language Architecture. Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB), Duisburg-Essen University. ICB Research Report 24.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank, U., & Lange, C. (2007). E-MEMO: a method to support the development of customized electronic commerce systems. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 5(2), 93–116.CrossRef Frank, U., & Lange, C. (2007). E-MEMO: a method to support the development of customized electronic commerce systems. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 5(2), 93–116.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Frank, U. (1999). Conceptual Modelling as the Core of the Information Systems Discipline—Perspectives and Epistemological Challenges Proceedings of the Fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 99), Milwaukee, WI. 695–697. Frank, U. (1999). Conceptual Modelling as the Core of the Information Systems Discipline—Perspectives and Epistemological Challenges Proceedings of the Fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 99), Milwaukee, WI. 695–697.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank, U. (2002). Multi-perspective enterprise modeling (MEMO): Conceptual framework and modeling languages Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Honululu, HI, 72–82. Frank, U. (2002). Multi-perspective enterprise modeling (MEMO): Conceptual framework and modeling languages Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Honululu, HI, 72–82.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank, U., Heise, D., Kattenstroth, H., & Schauer, H. (2008). Designing and Utilising Business Indicator Systems within Enterprise Models—Outline of a Method. In Loos P, Nüttgens M, Turowski K, Werth D, eds. Proceedings of the Modellierung betrieblicher Informationssysteme (MobIS 2008), Saarbruecken, Germany, Koellen:89–105. Frank, U., Heise, D., Kattenstroth, H., & Schauer, H. (2008). Designing and Utilising Business Indicator Systems within Enterprise Models—Outline of a Method. In Loos P, Nüttgens M, Turowski K, Werth D, eds. Proceedings of the Modellierung betrieblicher Informationssysteme (MobIS 2008), Saarbruecken, Germany, Koellen:89–105.
Zurück zum Zitat Frank, U., Heise, D., Kattenstroth, H., Ferguson, D., Hadar, E., & Waschke, M. (2009). ITML: A Domain-Specific Modeling Language for Supporting Business Driven IT Management. In Rossi M, Gray J, Sprinkle J, Tolvanen J-P, eds. Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling (DSM) at the International Conference on Object Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and Applications (OOPSLA), Orlando, Florida, USA. Frank, U., Heise, D., Kattenstroth, H., Ferguson, D., Hadar, E., & Waschke, M. (2009). ITML: A Domain-Specific Modeling Language for Supporting Business Driven IT Management. In Rossi M, Gray J, Sprinkle J, Tolvanen J-P, eds. Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling (DSM) at the International Conference on Object Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and Applications (OOPSLA), Orlando, Florida, USA.
Zurück zum Zitat Gemmer, A. (1997). Risk Management: Moving Beyond Process. Computer, 30(5), 33–43.CrossRef Gemmer, A. (1997). Risk Management: Moving Beyond Process. Computer, 30(5), 33–43.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber, M., & Solms, R. v. (2005). Management of risk in the information age. Computers & Security, 24(1), 16–30.CrossRef Gerber, M., & Solms, R. v. (2005). Management of risk in the information age. Computers & Security, 24(1), 16–30.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hatfield, A. J., & Hipel, K. W. (2002). Risk and Systems Theory. Risk Analysis, 22(6), 1043–1057.CrossRef Hatfield, A. J., & Hipel, K. W. (2002). Risk and Systems Theory. Risk Analysis, 22(6), 1043–1057.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heemstra, F. J., & Kusters, R. J. (1996). Dealing with risk: a practical approach. Journal of Information Technology, 11, 333–346.CrossRef Heemstra, F. J., & Kusters, R. J. (1996). Dealing with risk: a practical approach. Journal of Information Technology, 11, 333–346.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kirchner, L. (2005). Cost Oriented Modelling of IT-Landscapes: Generic Language Concepts of a Domain Specific Language. In Desel J, Frank U, eds. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2005), 166–179. Kirchner, L. (2005). Cost Oriented Modelling of IT-Landscapes: Generic Language Concepts of a Domain Specific Language. In Desel J, Frank U, eds. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2005), 166–179.
Zurück zum Zitat Kliem, R. L. (2000). Risk Management for Business Process Reengineering Projects. Information Systems Management, 17(4), 71–73.CrossRef Kliem, R. L. (2000). Risk Management for Business Process Reengineering Projects. Information Systems Management, 17(4), 71–73.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2002). A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk-Based, Precaution-Based, and Discourse-Based Strategies. Risk Analysis, 22(6), 1071–1094.CrossRef Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2002). A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk-Based, Precaution-Based, and Discourse-Based Strategies. Risk Analysis, 22(6), 1071–1094.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lankhorst, M. (2005). Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Berlin: Springer. Lankhorst, M. (2005). Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Berlin: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Loch, K. D., Carr, H. H., & Warketin, M. E. (1992). Threats to Information Systems: Today's Reality, Yesterday's Understanding. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 173–186.CrossRef Loch, K. D., Carr, H. H., & Warketin, M. E. (1992). Threats to Information Systems: Today's Reality, Yesterday's Understanding. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 173–186.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lu, R., Sadiq, S., & Governatori, G. (2008). Compliance Aware Business Process Design. In ter Hofstede AHM, Benatallah B, Paik H-Y, eds. Proceedings of the Business Process Management Workshops, Brisbane, Springer:120–131. Lu, R., Sadiq, S., & Governatori, G. (2008). Compliance Aware Business Process Design. In ter Hofstede AHM, Benatallah B, Paik H-Y, eds. Proceedings of the Business Process Management Workshops, Brisbane, Springer:120–131.
Zurück zum Zitat March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33(11), 1404–1418. March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33(11), 1404–1418.
Zurück zum Zitat McGaughey, R. E., Jr., Synder, C. A., & Carr, H. H. (1994). Implementing information technology for competitive advantage: Risk management issue. Information & Management, 26(5), 273–280.CrossRef McGaughey, R. E., Jr., Synder, C. A., & Carr, H. H. (1994). Implementing information technology for competitive advantage: Risk management issue. Information & Management, 26(5), 273–280.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mun, J. (2004). Applied risk analysis: Moving beyond uncertainty in business. Hoboken: Wiley. Mun, J. (2004). Applied risk analysis: Moving beyond uncertainty in business. Hoboken: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Neiger, D., Curilov, L., zur Muehlen, M., & Rosemann, M. (2006). Integrating Risks in Business Process Models with Value Focused Process Engineering Proceedings of the 2006 European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2006), Goteborg, Sweden, June 12–14, 2006. Neiger, D., Curilov, L., zur Muehlen, M., & Rosemann, M. (2006). Integrating Risks in Business Process Models with Value Focused Process Engineering Proceedings of the 2006 European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2006), Goteborg, Sweden, June 12–14, 2006.
Zurück zum Zitat Odell, J. (1998). Power Types. In J. Odell (Ed.), Advanced Object-Oriented Analysis and Design Using UML, (pp. 23–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Odell, J. (1998). Power Types. In J. Odell (Ed.), Advanced Object-Oriented Analysis and Design Using UML, (pp. 23–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rainer, R. K., Synder, C. A., & Carr, H. H. (1991). Risk Analysis for Information Technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(1), 129–147. Rainer, R. K., Synder, C. A., & Carr, H. H. (1991). Risk Analysis for Information Technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(1), 129–147.
Zurück zum Zitat Remenyi, D., Bannister, F., & Money, A. (2007). The Effective Measurement and Management of ICT Costs & Benefits. Oxford: Elsevier. Remenyi, D., Bannister, F., & Money, A. (2007). The Effective Measurement and Management of ICT Costs & Benefits. Oxford: Elsevier.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers, S., Lukens, S., Lin, S., & Jon, E. (2008). Balancing Risk and Performance with an Integrated Finance Organization (The Global CFO Study 2008). Somers: IBM Global Business Services. Rogers, S., Lukens, S., Lin, S., & Jon, E. (2008). Balancing Risk and Performance with an Integrated Finance Organization (The Global CFO Study 2008). Somers: IBM Global Business Services.
Zurück zum Zitat Sadiq, S., Governatori, G., & Namiri, K. (2007). Modeling Control Objectives for Business Process Compliance. In Alonso G, Dadam P, Rosemann M, eds. Business Process Management, Springer:149–164. Sadiq, S., Governatori, G., & Namiri, K. (2007). Modeling Control Objectives for Business Process Compliance. In Alonso G, Dadam P, Rosemann M, eds. Business Process Management, Springer:149–164.
Zurück zum Zitat Salmela, H. (2008). Analysing business losses caused by information systems risk: a business process analysis approach. Journal of Information Technology, 23(3), 185–202.CrossRef Salmela, H. (2008). Analysing business losses caused by information systems risk: a business process analysis approach. Journal of Information Technology, 23(3), 185–202.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schaefer, G. (1988). Functional Analysis of Office Requirements: A Multiperspective Approach. Chichester: Wiley. Schaefer, G. (1988). Functional Analysis of Office Requirements: A Multiperspective Approach. Chichester: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheer, A.-W. (1992). Architecture of Integrated Information Systems: Foundations of Enterprise Modelling. Berlin: Springer. Scheer, A.-W. (1992). Architecture of Integrated Information Systems: Foundations of Enterprise Modelling. Berlin: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheer, A.-W. (1999). ARIS—Business Process Frameworks (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Scheer, A.-W. (1999). ARIS—Business Process Frameworks (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scheer, A.-W. (2000). ARIS—Business Process Modeling (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Scheer, A.-W. (2000). ARIS—Business Process Modeling (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schelp, J., & Winter, R. (2006). Method Engineering: Lessons Learned from Reference Modeling. In Chatterjee S, Hevner A, eds. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST'06), Claremont, CA, 555–575. Schelp, J., & Winter, R. (2006). Method Engineering: Lessons Learned from Reference Modeling. In Chatterjee S, Hevner A, eds. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST'06), Claremont, CA, 555–575.
Zurück zum Zitat Sienou, A., Lamine, E., Karduck, P. A., & Pingaud, H. (2007). Conceptual model of risk: towards a risk modeling language. In Weske M, Hacid M-S, Godart C, eds. Proceedings of the Web Information Systems Engineering—WISE 2007 Workshop, Montpellier, France, June 17, 2008, Springer:118–129. Sienou, A., Lamine, E., Karduck, P. A., & Pingaud, H. (2007). Conceptual model of risk: towards a risk modeling language. In Weske M, Hacid M-S, Godart C, eds. Proceedings of the Web Information Systems Engineering—WISE 2007 Workshop, Montpellier, France, June 17, 2008, Springer:118–129.
Zurück zum Zitat Sienou, A., Lamine, E., & Pingaud, H. (2008). A Method for Integrated Management of Process-risk. In Sadiq S, Indulska M, zur Muehlen M, Franch X, Hunt E, Coletta R, eds. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Governance, Risk and Compliance—Applications in Information Systems (GRCIS'08) held in conjunction with the CAiSE'08 Conference, Montpellier, France, June 17, 2008. Sienou, A., Lamine, E., & Pingaud, H. (2008). A Method for Integrated Management of Process-risk. In Sadiq S, Indulska M, zur Muehlen M, Franch X, Hunt E, Coletta R, eds. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Governance, Risk and Compliance—Applications in Information Systems (GRCIS'08) held in conjunction with the CAiSE'08 Conference, Montpellier, France, June 17, 2008.
Zurück zum Zitat Verschuren, P., & Hartog, R. (2005). Evaluation in Design-Oriented Research. Quality & Quantity, 39(6), 733–762.CrossRef Verschuren, P., & Hartog, R. (2005). Evaluation in Design-Oriented Research. Quality & Quantity, 39(6), 733–762.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wand, Y., & Weber, R. (2002). Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling-A Research Agenda. Information Systems Research, 13(4), 363–376.CrossRef Wand, Y., & Weber, R. (2002). Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling-A Research Agenda. Information Systems Research, 13(4), 363–376.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wand, Y., Monarchi, D. E., Parsons, J., & Woo, C. C. (1995). Theoretical foundations for conceptual modelling in information systems development. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 285–304.CrossRef Wand, Y., Monarchi, D. E., Parsons, J., & Woo, C. C. (1995). Theoretical foundations for conceptual modelling in information systems development. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 285–304.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ward, S., & Chapman, C. (2003). Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 97–105.CrossRef Ward, S., & Chapman, C. (2003). Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 97–105.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Harvard Business School Press Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Harvard Business School Press
Zurück zum Zitat Westerman, G., & Hunter, R. (2007). IT Risk: Turning Business Threats into Competitive Advantage. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press. Westerman, G., & Hunter, R. (2007). IT Risk: Turning Business Threats into Competitive Advantage. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Willcocks, L., & Margetts, H. (1994). Risk assessment and information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 3(2), 127–138.CrossRef Willcocks, L., & Margetts, H. (1994). Risk assessment and information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 3(2), 127–138.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat zur Muehlen, M., & Rosemann, M. (2005). Integrating Risks in Business Process Models Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2005), Sydney, 62–72. zur Muehlen, M., & Rosemann, M. (2005). Integrating Risks in Business Process Models Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2005), Sydney, 62–72.
Metadaten
Titel
RiskM: A multi-perspective modeling method for IT risk assessment
verfasst von
Stefan Strecker
David Heise
Ulrich Frank
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2011
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Information Systems Frontiers / Ausgabe 4/2011
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-010-9235-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2011

Information Systems Frontiers 4/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner