Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education 3/2015

01.08.2015

Investigating technology teachers’ self-efficacy on assessment

verfasst von: Eva Hartell, Lena Gumaelius, Joakim Svärdh

Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study explores possible differences in the views on assessment between two groups of teachers teaching technology in compulsory school: (1) teachers with subject-specific teacher training in technology education; and (2) teachers without such training. This topic is of particular interest because of the recent changes in the regulations that govern compulsory schools in Sweden, such that only certified teachers now will be permitted to teach and assign grades, despite the clear lack of certified teachers in technology education. The study is situated in two fields of interest—technology education and assessment. Both topics are highly relevant, especially in combination, because previous research on teachers’ assessment practices in technology is rare. In this study, the goal is to contribute to deepening the understanding of how subject-specific teacher training affects teachers’ ability to assess students’ knowledge while maintaining alignment with stated regulations. The results show significant difference between these two groups’ use of curriculum documents as the basis of their teaching and their self-efficacy in assessing student’s knowledge in technology. The results suggest interesting possibilities for curriculum alignment and indicate that the opportunities for student learning increase according to whether teachers are specifically trained in the subject.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The merit point is the sum of the 16 awarded grades, a total of 320 p: Pass = 10 p, Pass with distinction = 15 p, and the highest, Pass with special distinction = 20 p.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat ASEI. (2005). Alla barns rätt till teknikundervisning. Stockholm. ASEI. (2005). Alla barns rätt till teknikundervisning. Stockholm.
Zurück zum Zitat Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Zurück zum Zitat Bjurulf, V. (2008). Teknikämnets gestaltningar: En studie av lärares arbete med skolämnet teknik (1st ed., p. 196). Karlstad. Bjurulf, V. (2008). Teknikämnets gestaltningar: En studie av lärares arbete med skolämnet teknik (1st ed., p. 196). Karlstad.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2008). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Great Britain: Routledge. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2008). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Great Britain: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Djurfeldt, G., Larsson, R., & Stjärnhagen, O. (2010). Statistisk verktygslåda 1: Samhällsvetenskapliga orsaksanalys med kvantiavia metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Djurfeldt, G., Larsson, R., & Stjärnhagen, O. (2010). Statistisk verktygslåda 1: Samhällsvetenskapliga orsaksanalys med kvantiavia metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Zurück zum Zitat Gipps, C. (2004). Beyond testing. Towards a theory of educational assessment. London; New York: The Falmer Press. Gipps, C. (2004). Beyond testing. Towards a theory of educational assessment. London; New York: The Falmer Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Harlen, W. (2010). On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 103–117). Chippenham: SAGE. Harlen, W. (2010). On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 103–117). Chippenham: SAGE.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartell, E. (2011). Hur sätter man betyg i teknik? In S.-O. Hansson, E. Nordlander, & I.-B. Skogh (Eds.), Teknikutbildning för framtiden- perspektiv på teknikundervisningen i grundskola och gymnasium (pp. 75–87). Stockholm: Liber AB. Hartell, E. (2011). Hur sätter man betyg i teknik? In S.-O. Hansson, E. Nordlander, & I.-B. Skogh (Eds.), Teknikutbildning för framtiden- perspektiv på teknikundervisningen i grundskola och gymnasium (pp. 75–87). Stockholm: Liber AB.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartell, E. (2012). The inefficient loneliness. A descriptive study about the complexity of assessment for learning in primary technology education. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Hartell, E. (2012). The inefficient loneliness. A descriptive study about the complexity of assessment for learning in primary technology education. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartell, E. (2013). Looking for a glimpse in the eye: A descriptive study of teachers’ work with assessment in technology education. In I.-B. Skogh & M. J. De Vries (Eds.), Technology teachers as researchers: Philosophical and empirical technology education studies in the Swedish TUFF Research School (1st ed., pp. 255–283). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRef Hartell, E. (2013). Looking for a glimpse in the eye: A descriptive study of teachers’ work with assessment in technology education. In I.-B. Skogh & M. J. De Vries (Eds.), Technology teachers as researchers: Philosophical and empirical technology education studies in the Swedish TUFF Research School (1st ed., pp. 255–283). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hartell, E. (2014). Exploring the (un-) usefulness of mandatory assessment documents in primary technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(2), 141–161. doi:10.1007/s10798-013-9250-z.CrossRef Hartell, E. (2014). Exploring the (un-) usefulness of mandatory assessment documents in primary technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(2), 141–161. doi:10.​1007/​s10798-013-9250-z.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A Synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A Synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, A., Buntting, C., & Vries, M. J. (2013). The developing field of technology education: A review to look forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 191–212. doi:10.1007/s10798-011-9174-4.CrossRef Jones, A., Buntting, C., & Vries, M. J. (2013). The developing field of technology education: A review to look forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 191–212. doi:10.​1007/​s10798-011-9174-4.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jönsson, A. (2010). Lärande bedömning. Malmö: Gleerups. Jönsson, A. (2010). Lärande bedömning. Malmö: Gleerups.
Zurück zum Zitat Klasander, C. (2010). Talet om tekniska system: Förväntningar, traditioner och skolverkligheter. Linköping University. Klasander, C. (2010). Talet om tekniska system: Förväntningar, traditioner och skolverkligheter. Linköping University.
Zurück zum Zitat Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom assessment: Minute by minute, day-by-day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 19–24. Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom assessment: Minute by minute, day-by-day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 19–24.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore, D. S., & McCabe, G. P. (2006). Introduction to the practice of statistics. W.H: Freeman & Company. Moore, D. S., & McCabe, G. P. (2006). Introduction to the practice of statistics. W.H: Freeman & Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreland, J., Jones, A., & Barlex, D. (2008). Design and technology inside the black box assessment for learning in the design and technology classroom. London: GL Assessment. Moreland, J., Jones, A., & Barlex, D. (2008). Design and technology inside the black box assessment for learning in the design and technology classroom. London: GL Assessment.
Zurück zum Zitat NAE. (2009). Syllabuses for the compulsory school, (LpO94) 2nd ed. NAE. (2009). Syllabuses for the compulsory school, (LpO94) 2nd ed.
Zurück zum Zitat NAE. (2011b). Skolverkets allmänna råd Planering och genomförande av undervisning för grundskolan, grundsärskolan, specialskolan och sameskolan. Stockholm: Elanders. NAE. (2011b). Skolverkets allmänna råd Planering och genomförande av undervisning för grundskolan, grundsärskolan, specialskolan och sameskolan. Stockholm: Elanders.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordlander, E. (2011). Vad tycker tekniklärarna? In S.-O. Hansson, E. Nordlander, & I.-B. Skogh (Eds.), Teknikutbildning för framtiden -perspektiv på teknikundervisning i grundskolan och gymnasium (pp. 90–102). Stockholm: Liber AB. Nordlander, E. (2011). Vad tycker tekniklärarna? In S.-O. Hansson, E. Nordlander, & I.-B. Skogh (Eds.), Teknikutbildning för framtiden -perspektiv på teknikundervisning i grundskolan och gymnasium (pp. 90–102). Stockholm: Liber AB.
Zurück zum Zitat Nyström, P. (2004). Rätt matt på prov. Om valideringar av bedömningar i skolan. Umeå: Pedagogiska institutionen, Umeå universitet. Nyström, P. (2004). Rätt matt på prov. Om valideringar av bedömningar i skolan. Umeå: Pedagogiska institutionen, Umeå universitet.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen-Jackson, G. (2013). Sustaining teacher education: Does where you learn to teach make a difference to the teacher you become? In P. J. Williams (Ed.), PATT27 Technology education for the future: A play on sustainability (pp. 378–386). Christchurch: Technology Environmental Science and Mathematics Education Research Centre, University of Waikato. Owen-Jackson, G. (2013). Sustaining teacher education: Does where you learn to teach make a difference to the teacher you become? In P. J. Williams (Ed.), PATT27 Technology education for the future: A play on sustainability (pp. 378–386). Christchurch: Technology Environmental Science and Mathematics Education Research Centre, University of Waikato.
Zurück zum Zitat Pettersson, A. (2009). Bedömning- varför, vad och varthän? In L. Lindström & V. Lindberg (Eds.), Pedagogisk bedömning (2nd ed., pp. 31–42). Stockholm: Stockholm universitets förlag. Pettersson, A. (2009). Bedömning- varför, vad och varthän? In L. Lindström & V. Lindberg (Eds.), Pedagogisk bedömning (2nd ed., pp. 31–42). Stockholm: Stockholm universitets förlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritz, J. M., & Martin, G. (2012). Research needs for technology education: an international perspective. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 767–783. doi:10.1007/s10798-012-9215-7.CrossRef Ritz, J. M., & Martin, G. (2012). Research needs for technology education: an international perspective. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 767–783. doi:10.​1007/​s10798-012-9215-7.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ritz, J., & Martin, G. (2013). Research needs of technology education: Highlights of a preliminary analysis. In P John Williams (Ed.), PATT27 Technology education for the future: A play on sustainability (pp. 387–392). Christchurch, New Zealand: Technology Environmental Science and Mathematics Education Research Center, University of Waikato. Ritz, J., & Martin, G. (2013). Research needs of technology education: Highlights of a preliminary analysis. In P John Williams (Ed.), PATT27 Technology education for the future: A play on sustainability (pp. 387–392). Christchurch, New Zealand: Technology Environmental Science and Mathematics Education Research Center, University of Waikato.
Zurück zum Zitat Teknikdelegationen. (2010a). Vändpunkt Sverige – ett ökat intresse för matematik, naturvetenskap, teknik och IKT, SOU 2010:28. Stockholm. Teknikdelegationen. (2010a). Vändpunkt Sverigeett ökat intresse för matematik, naturvetenskap, teknik och IKT, SOU 2010:28. Stockholm.
Zurück zum Zitat Teknikdelegationen. (2010b). Vändpunkt Sverige – ett ökat intresse för matematik, naturvetenskap, teknik och IKT, SOU 2010:28. Stockholm. Teknikdelegationen. (2010b). Vändpunkt Sverigeett ökat intresse för matematik, naturvetenskap, teknik och IKT, SOU 2010:28. Stockholm.
Zurück zum Zitat Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 2020–2248.CrossRef Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 2020–2248.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wiliam, D. (2009). Assessment for learning: Why, what and how? London: Institute of Education University of London. Wiliam, D. (2009). Assessment for learning: Why, what and how? London: Institute of Education University of London.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press. Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiliam, D. (2013). Principled curriculum design: Redesigning schooling-3. In P. Chambers (Ed.). London: SSAT (The School Network) Ltd. Wiliam, D. (2013). Principled curriculum design: Redesigning schooling-3. In P. Chambers (Ed.). London: SSAT (The School Network) Ltd.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, J. P. (2009a). Teacher education. In A. Jones & M. J. deVries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 531–540). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Williams, J. P. (2009a). Teacher education. In A. Jones & M. J. deVries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 531–540). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, J. P. (2009b). Teacher education and professional development. In A. Jones & M. J. deVries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 525–529). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Williams, J. P. (2009b). Teacher education and professional development. In A. Jones & M. J. deVries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 525–529). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Metadaten
Titel
Investigating technology teachers’ self-efficacy on assessment
verfasst von
Eva Hartell
Lena Gumaelius
Joakim Svärdh
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9285-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

International Journal of Technology and Design Education 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

    Premium Partner