Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education 3/2021

14.02.2020

Concepts of creativity in design based learning in STEM education

verfasst von: Esra Bozkurt Altan, Sema Tan

Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Creativity is deemed as an integral part of twentyfirst century skills and is emphasized in science education curricula in Turkey as well as in other countries. Therefore, the purposes of this research were to examine the concepts of creativity demonstrated in the developing possible solutions step of the DBL and to determine the students’ perceptions of this step. Data were collected from 13 female and 11 male middle school students participated in three different design based learning activities. Analyses of the data derived from students’ writings and drawings, semi-structured interviews, and researchers’ field notes were carried out using two separate methods. Descriptive analysis was used to quantitatively analyze students’ writings and examine the fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration concepts of creativity while content analysis was used to qualitatively analyze the semi-structured interviews and researchers’ field notes to corroborate the results of the descriptive analysis. Findings indicated that students demonstrated the highest frequency in fluency concept of creativity while the lowest frequency in originality. Also, the results of the content analysis revealed that the creativity of the students’ ideas were influenced by several reasons including the exposure to other students’ ideas, the degree of the familiarity with the design based learning process, and the fact that students had to make a working prototype of their ideas. Educators and future researchers might benefit from the findings of this study while using DBL to develop creativity as well as the suggested creativity assessment technique to determine students’ strengths and weaknesses in this process.
Vorheriger Artikel The role of productive failure in 3D printing in a middle school setting
Nächster Artikel Exploring pre-service technology teachers’ content and instructional knowledge to determine teaching readiness

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.
Awang, H., & Ramly, I. (2008). Creative thinking skill approach through problem-based learning: Pedagogy and practice in the engineering classroom. International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 18–23.
Beghetto, R. A. (2015). Teaching creative thinking in K12 schools lingering challenges and new opportunities. In R. Wegerif, L. Li, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching and thinking (pp. 201–211). New York: Routledge Press.
Biçer, A., Nite, S. B., Capraro, R. M., Barroso, L. R., Capraro, M. M., & Lee, Y. (2017). Moving from STEM to STEAM: The effects of informal STEM learning on students’ creativity and problem solving skills with 3D printing. In Frontiers in education conference (FIE) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind myths and mechanisms. London: Routledge.
Bozkurt Altan, E. (2017). Design-based science education and problem-based learning. In S. Çepni (Ed.), STEM Education From Theory to Practice (pp. 169–199). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
Brunsell, E. (2012). The engineering design process. In E. Brunsell (Ed.), Integrating engineering + science in your classroom (pp. 3–5). Arlington, VA: National Science Teacher Association [NSTA] Press.
Charyton, C. (2014). Creative engineering design assessment. London: Springer.
Charyton, C., & Merrill, J. A. (2009). Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in first year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(2), 145–156.
Charyton, C., & Snelbecker, G. E. (2007). General, artistic and scientific creativity attributes of engineering and music students. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 213–225.
Chin, C. (1997). Promoting higher cognitive learning in science through a problem solving approach. React, 1997(1), 7–11.
Conradty, C., & Bonger, F. X. (2018). From STEM to STEAM: how to monitor creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 30(3), 233–240.
Cooper, R., & Heaverlo, H. (2013). Problem solving and creativity and design: what influence do they have on girls’ interest in STEM subject areas? American Journal of Engineering Education Special Edition, 4(1), 27–38.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Cropley, A. J. (1997). More ways than one: Fostering creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: faces of the muse (pp. 169–185). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2010). Recognizing and fostering creativity in technological design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(3), 345–358.
Cszikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity-flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harpercollins Publisher.
Denson, C. D. (2015). Developing instrumentation for assessing creativity in engineering design. Journal of Technology Education, 27(1), 23–40.
Diakidoy, I. A. N., & Costantinou, C. P. (2001). Creativity in physics: response fluency and task specificity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 401–410.
Endean, L., & George, D. R. (1982). Observing thirty able youngsters at science enrichment course. School Science Review, 64(227), 213–224.
Felix, A. L. (2010). Design-based science for STEM Student recruitment and teacher professional development. Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference. Villanova University.
Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. California: Sage Publications.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
Guilford, J. P. (1967a). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Guilford, J. P. (1967b). Creativity: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3–14.
Harris, A., & Bruin, L. (2018). An international study of creative pedagogies in practice in secondary schools: Toward a creative ecology. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 15(2), 215–235.
Hathcock, S. J., Dickerson, D. L., Eckhoff, A., & Katsioloudis, P. (2015). Scaffolding for creative product possibilities in a design-based STEM activity. Research in Science Education, 45(5), 727–748.
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.
Henriksen, D. (2014). Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices. The STEAM Journal, 1(2), 1–7.
Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247–298.
Horowitz, R. (1999). Creative problem solving in engineering design. (Doctoral dissertation). Tel-Aviv University.
Howard, T., Culley, S., Dekoninck, E. (2008). Creativity in the engineering design process. In International conference in engineering design, Cite Des Sciences Et De L’industrie, Paris: France.
Jindal-Snape, D., Davies, D., Collier, C., Howe, A., Digby, R., & Hay, P. (2013). The impact of creative learning environments on learners: A systematic literature review. Improving Schools, 16(1), 21–31.
Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. New Jersey: Wiley.
Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2007). The international handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keana, L., & Keana, M. (2016). STEM by design. Design and Technology Education: an International Journal, 21(1), 61–82.
Kowaltowski, D. C., Bianchi, G., & Paiva, V. T. (2010). Methods that may stimulate creativity and their use in architectural design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(4), 453–476.
Kress, D. K., & Rule, A. C. (2017). Fifth graders’ creativity in inventions with and without creative articulation instruction. Journal of STEM Arts, Craft, and Constructions, 2(2), 130–154.
Lasky, D., & Yoon, S. A. (2011). Making space for the act of making: creativity in the engineering design classroom. Science Educator, 20(1), 34–43.
Lee, C. S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2011). Scaffolding students’ development of creative design skills: A curriculum reference model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 3–15.
Leikin, R., Berman, A., & Koichu, B. (2009). Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students. Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Lou, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Shih, R. C., & Chung, C. C. (2017). A study of creativity in CaC2 steamship-derived stem project-based learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387–2404.
Marulcu, İ. (2014). Teaching habitat and animal classification to fourth graders using an engineering-design model. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(2), 135–161.
Mayasari, T., Kadarohman, A., Rusdiana, D., & Kaniawati, I. (2016). Exploration of student’s creativity by integrating STEM knowledge into creative products. In Hidayat, T., et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of proceedings of international seminar on mathematics, science, and computer science education (MSCEIS 2015), (pp. 080005: 1–5).. Bandung, Indonesia.
Mehalik, M., Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle school science through design based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 71–86.
Mentzer, N. (2011). High school engineering and technology education integration through design challenges. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 48(2), 103–136.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Ministry of Education. (2018). Curriculum of science education. Turkey: Ministry of Education.
Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H.-H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In Ş. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in precollege settings: Research into practice (pp. 35–60). West Lafayette: Purdue Press.
National Academy of Engineering [NAE] & National Research Council [NRC]. (2009). Engineering in k-12 education understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A Framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.
Nemiro, J., Larriva, C., & Jawaharlal, M. (2017). Developing creative behavior in elementary school students with robotics. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(1), 70–90.
Parkhurst, H. B. (1999). Confusion, lack of consensus, and the definition of creativity as a construct. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33(1), 1–21.
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologist? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96.
Punch, K. F. (1998). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.
Rosa, R. (2016). Design-based learning: a methodology for teaching and assessing creativity. (Doctoral dissertation). California State Polytechnic University.
Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity, theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Inc All.
Sanders, M. (2009). Stem, stem education, stemmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
Shaughnessy, M. (2013). Mathematics in a STEM context. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(6), 324.
Sherman, R. R., & Webb, R. B. (2005). Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods. New York: Routledge/Falmer.
Siew, N. M. (2017). Integrating STEM in an engineering design process: The learning experience of rural secondary school students in an outreach challenge program. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 2017(6), 128–141.
Smith, J., & Karr-Kidwell, P. (2000). The interdisciplinary curriculum: a literary review and a manual for administrators and teachers. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED443172).
Starko, A. J. (2014). Creativity in the classroom schools of curious delight. NY: Routledge.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). London: Sage Publications.
Syukri, M., Halim, L., & Mohtar, L. E. (2017). Engineering design process: cultivating creativity skills through development of science technical product. Jurnal Fizik Malaysia, 38(1), 10055–10065.
Tekmen-Aracı, Y., & Mann, L. (2019). Instructor approaches to creativity in engineering design education. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 233(2), 395–402.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking—Directions manual and scoring guide. Verbal test booklet A. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
Urban, K. K. (2005). Assessing creativity: The test for creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP). International Education Journal, 6(2), 272–280.
Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity- intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Metadaten
Titel
Concepts of creativity in design based learning in STEM education
verfasst von
Esra Bozkurt Altan
Sema Tan
Publikationsdatum
14.02.2020
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09569-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

International Journal of Technology and Design Education 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Exploring pre-service technology teachers’ content and instructional knowledge to determine teaching readiness

Original Research Article

Comparative study of industrial design undergraduate education in China and USA

OriginalPaper

Computational thinking embedded in engineering design: capturing computational thinking of children in an informal engineering design activity

OriginalPaper

Viability of competencies, skills and knowledge acquired by industrial design students

OriginalPaper

Sustainability awareness in engineering curriculum through a proposed teaching and assessment framework

OriginalPaper

The role of productive failure in 3D printing in a middle school setting

    Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise