nach oben

Journal of Business and Psychology

Erschienen in:

01.06.2010

Generational Differences in Work Ethic: An Examination of Measurement Equivalence Across Three Cohorts

verfasst von: John P. Meriac, David J. Woehr, Christina Banister

Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology | Ausgabe 2/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the work ethic construct using the multidimensional work ethic profile (MWEP).

Design/Methodology/Approach

Data were collected from multiple samples and combined into a large database (N = 1860). Measurement equivalence was examined using Raju et al.’s (1995) differential functioning of items and tests (DFIT) procedure.

Findings

Several dimensions of the MWEP were not equivalent across cohorts, indicating that item content may not operate in the same manner across groups. When equivalent, several significant mean differences were detected across cohorts, indicating that respondents do differ in important work-related attitudes and behaviors.

Implications

Despite several reviews of generational differences across cohorts, relatively few empirical examinations have been undertaken, and no studies have yet examined the measurement equivalence of constructs across generational cohorts. These findings provide evidence that differences do exist across cohorts on dimensions of work ethic, and some differences may be a result of respondents interpreting content in different ways. Managers of multigenerational employees should consider these differences in managing employees and conflict that may arise as a result.

Originality/Value

This is one of the first studies to provide empirical evidence of generational differences in the work ethic construct. In addition, this is the first study to evaluate the measurement equivalence of a work ethic inventory or any other work related individual difference construct across generational cohorts.

Vorheriger Artikel More Similar than Different: Millennials in the U. S. Building Trades

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Baker, F. (1995). EQUATE 2.1: Computer program for equating two metrics in item response theory (version 2.1). Madison: Laboratory of Experimental Design, University of Wisconsin.

Cennamo, L., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes, and person-organization values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 891–906.CrossRef

Cherrington, D. J., Condie, S. J., & England, J. L. (1979). Age and work values. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 617–623.CrossRef

Dries, N., Pepermans, R., & De Kerpel, E. (2008). Exploring four generations’ beliefs about career: Is “satisfied” the new “successful”? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 907–928.CrossRef

Duchscher, J. E. B., & Cowin, L. (2004). Multigenerational nurses in the workplace. Journal of Nursing Administration, 34, 493–501.CrossRef

Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

Erickson, T. (2008, August 25). Don’t treat them like baby boomers. Business Week, p. 64.

Flowers, C. P., Oshima, T. C., & Raju, N. S. (1999). A description and demonstration of the polytomous-DFIT framework. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 309–326.CrossRef

Kupperschmidt, B. (2000). Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management. Health Care Manager, 19, 65–76.PubMed

Lancaster, L. C., & Stillman, D. (2002). When generations collide: Who they are. Why they clash. How to solve the generational puzzle at work. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.

Macky, K., Gardner, D., & Forsyth, S. (2008). Generational differences at work: Introduction and overview. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 857–861.CrossRef

Meade, A. W., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A comparison of item response theory and confirmatory factor analytic methodologies for establishing measurement equivalence/invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 361–388.CrossRef

Meriac, J. P., Poling, T. L., & Woehr, D. J. (2009). Are there gender differences in work ethic?: An examination of the measurement equivalence of the multidimensional work ethic profile. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 209–213.CrossRef

Miller, M. J., Woehr, D. J., & Hudspeth, N. (2002). The meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 451–489.CrossRef

O’Connell, P. O. (2008, August 25). What’s eating gen X. Business Week, pp. 61–62.

Pham, V. H., Case, J., Miyake, L., & Gil, S. (2008). The gen Y perceptions study. Retrieved from Cal State Fullerton Career Center website http://campusapps2.fullerton.edu/career/pdf/Gen_Y.pdf.

Pogson, C., Cober, A., Doverspike, D., & Rogers, J. (2003). Differences in self-reported work ethic across three career stages. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 189–201.CrossRef

Raju, N. S. (1999). DFITPS6: A Fortran program for calculating polytomous DIF/DTF [Computer program]. Chicago: Illinois Institute of Technology.

Raju, N. S., van der Linden, W., & Fleer, P. (1995). An IRT-based internal measure of test bias with implications for differential item functioning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 353–368.CrossRef

Reckase, M. D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 207–230.CrossRef

Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a pattern of graded scores [Monograph]. Psychometrika Supplement No. 17.

Smola, K. W., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 363–382.CrossRef

Stocking, M. L., & Lord, F. M. (1983). Developing a common metric in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 201–210.CrossRef

ter Bogt, T., Raaijmakers, Q., & van Wel, F. (2005). Socialization and development of the work ethic among adolescents and young adults. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 420–437.CrossRef

Thissen, D. (2003). MULTILOG 7.03: A computer program for multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory. Chicago: Scientific Software, Inc.

Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, S. M. (2008). Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 862–877.CrossRef

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.CrossRef

Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). New York, NY: Scribners. (Original work published 1904–1905).

Woehr, D. J., Archinega, L., & Lim, D. (2007). Examining work ethic across populations: A comparison of the multidimensional work ethic profile across three diverse cultures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 154–168.CrossRef

Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L. (2008). Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 878–890.CrossRef

Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (1999). Generations at work: Managing the clash of veterans, boomers, xers and nexters in your workplace. New York, NY: Amacom.

Zickar, M., & Broadfoot, A. (2009). The partial revival of a dead horse? Comparing classical test theory and item response theory. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 37–59). New York, NY: Routledge.

Titel: Generational Differences in Work Ethic: An Examination of Measurement Equivalence Across Three Cohorts
verfasst von: John P. Meriac
David J. Woehr
Christina Banister
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2010
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology / Ausgabe 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0889-3268
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-353X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9164-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Design/Methodology/Approach

Findings

Implications

Originality/Value

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2010

Millennials and the World of Work: An Economist’s Perspective

A Review of the Empirical Evidence on Generational Differences in Work Attitudes

Millennials and the World of Work: Experiences in Paid Work During Adolescence

Millennials and the World of Work: The Impact of Obesity on Health and Productivity

Millennials in the Workplace: A Communication Perspective on Millennials’ Organizational Relationships and Performance

New Generation, Great Expectations: A Field Study of the Millennial Generation

Premium Partner