Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quality & Quantity
Erschienen in: Quality & Quantity 3/2016

28.04.2015

Linkages between defense spending and income inequality in Iran

verfasst von: Muhammad Shahbaz, Reza Sherafatian-Jahromi, Muhammad Nasir Malik, Muhammad Shahbaz Shabbir, Farooq Ahmed Jam

Erschienen in: Quality & Quantity | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper contributes in economic literature by investigating the impact of defense spending on income inequality in case of Iran using time series data over the period of 1971–2011. For this purpose, we have applied the ARDL bounds testing approach to cointegration for long run relationship in the presence of structural breaks arising in the series. The stationarity properties of the variables are tested using structural break unit root tests. The causal relationship between defense spending and income inequality is examined by employing the VECM Granger causality approach. Our findings validate the long run relationship between the series. The results indicate that defense spending improves income distribution in Iran. An inverted-U shaped relationship exists between defense spending and income inequality while economic growth reduces income inequality. The causality analysis reveals that defense spending Granger causes income inequality and feedback effect exists between income inequality and economic growth.
Vorheriger Artikel Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques?
Nächster Artikel Scientists’ spirituality in scientists’ words. Assessing and enriching the results of a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews by means of quantitative approaches

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
Chaitanya (2008) has explained Opportunity Cost Burden Effect Model with help of diagram.
 
2
The results of all studies regarding unit root properties of the variables are biased. The traditional unit root tests do not have information regarding structural break stemming in the series.
 
3
See Tiwari and Shahbaz (2012); Shahbaz et al. (2013).
 
4
Results are available upon request from authors.
 
5
We put dummy variable to capture the impact of structural breaks indicated by Zivot and Andrews (1992) unit root test.
 
Literatur
Abell, J.D.: Military spending and inequality. J. Peace Res. 31, 35–43 (1994)CrossRef
Ali, E.H.: Military expenditures and income inequality in the Middle East and North Africa: a panel analysis. Def Peace Econ 23(6), 575–589 (2012)CrossRef
Ali, H.E.: Military expenditures and inequality: empirical evidence from global data. Def Peace Econ 18, 519–535 (2007)CrossRef
Ali, H.E., Galbraith, J.: Military Expenditures and Inequality: Empirical Evidence from Global Data. The University of Texas at Austin UTIP Working Paper No. 24 (2003)
Brown, R.L., Durbin, J., Evans, J.M.: Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relations over time. J. Royal Stat. Soc. 37, 149–163 (1975)
Chaitanya, V. K.: Exploring the Relationship Between Military Spending & Income Inequality in South Asia. William Davidson Institute Working Paper Number 918, Feb 2008 (2008)
Clemente, J., Montanes, A., Reyes, M.: Testing for a unit root in variables with a double change in the mean. Econ. Lett. 59, 175–182 (1998)CrossRef
Comton, C.: All men created unequal: tends and factors of inequality in the United States. Issues Political Econ. 13, 1–20 (2005)
Diamond, L.: Economic development and democracy reconsidered. In: Marks, G., Diamond, L. (eds.) Re-Examining Democracy: essays in Honor of Seymour Martin Lipset, pp. 93–139. Sage, Newbury Park (1992)
Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A.: Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49, 1057–1079 (1981)CrossRef
DiNardo, J., Fortin, N., Lemieux, T.: Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973–1993: a semi-parametric approach. Econometrica 64, 1001–1045 (1996)CrossRef
Dunne, J.P., Vougas, D.: Military spending and economic growth in South Africa. J. Confl. Resolut. 43, 521–537 (1999)CrossRef
Elliott, G.R., Thomas, J., Stock, J.H.: Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64, 813–836 (1996)CrossRef
Elveren, Y.A.: Military spending and income inequality: evidence on cointegration and causality for Turkey, 1963–2007. Def. Peace Econ. 23, 289–301 (2012)CrossRef
Gradstein, M., Milanovic, B., Ying, Y.: Democracy and Income Inequality: an Empirical Analysis. World Bank, Washington (2001)
Granger, C.W.J.: Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37, 424–438 (1969)CrossRef
Henderson, D.R., McNab, R.M., Rozsas, T.: Did inequality increase in transition: an analysis of the transition countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia. East. Eur. Econ. 46, 28–49 (2008)CrossRef
Hirnissa, M.T., Habibullah, M.S., Baharom, A.H.: Defense spending and income inequality: evidence from selected Asian Countries. Mod. Appl. Sci. 3, 96–111 (2009)CrossRef
Jamal, H.: Does inequality matter for poverty reduction? Evidence from Pakistan’s poverty trends. Pak. Dev. Rev. 45(3), 439–459 (2006)
Karagianni, S., Pempetzoglu, M.: Defence spending and economic growth in Turkey: a linear and non-linear granger causality approach. Def. Peace Econ. 20, 139–148 (2009)CrossRef
Karagol, E., Palaz, S.: Does defence expenditure deter economic growth in Turkey? A cointegration analysis. Def. Peace Econ. 15, 289–298 (2004)CrossRef
Keivani, F.S.: Synchronization of Economic Growth and Income Distribution. 2011 International Conference on Sociality and Economics Development, pp. 7–11. IPEDR vol.10 (2011) © (2011) IACSIT Press, Singapore (2011)
Kentor, J., Jorgenson, A.K., Kick, E.: The ‘‘new’’ military and income inequality: a cross national analysis. Soc. Sci. Res. 41, 514–526 (2012)CrossRef
Kollias, C., Mylonidis, N., Paleologou, M.S.: A panel data analysis of the nexus between defence spending and growth in the European Union. Def. Peace Econ. 18, 75–85 (2007)CrossRef
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P., Shin, Y.: Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. J. Econ. 54, 159–178 (1992)CrossRef
Lin, E.S., Ali, H.: Military spending and inequality: panel granger causality test. J. Peace Res. 49, 671–685 (2009)CrossRef
Lipset, S.M., Seong, K.R., Torres, J.C.: A comparative analysis of the social requisites of democracy. Int. Soc. Sci. J. 45, 155–175 (1993)
Looney, R.: The policy relevance of recent research on the economics of third world military expenditures. J. Soc. Political Econ. Stud. 15, 213–223 (1990)
Melman, S.: The Permanent War Economy: American Economy in Decline. Simon & Schuster, New York (1974)
Musai, M., Abhari, M.F., Hemat, R.K.: Income distribution and economic growth in Iran. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. 20, 416–424 (2011)
Narayan, P.K.: The savings and investment nexus for China: evidence from Co-integration tests. Appl. Econ. 37, 1979–1990 (2005)CrossRef
Ng, S., Perron, P.: Lag length selection and the construction of unit root test with good size and power. Econometrica 69, 1519–1554 (2001)CrossRef
Ozsoy, O.: Defence spending and the macroeconomy: the case of Turkey. Def. Peace Econ. 19, 195–208 (2008)CrossRef
Perron, P., Vogelsang, T.J.: Testing for a unit root in a time series with a changing mean: corrections and extensions. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 10, 467–470 (1992)
Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y.: An autoregressive distributed-led modeling approach to cointegration analysis. In: Strom, S. (ed.) Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century. The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., Smith, R.J.: Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of long run relationships. J. Appl. Econ. 16, 289–326 (2001)CrossRef
Phillips, P.C.B., Perron, P.: Testing for a unit root in time series regressions. Biometrika 75, 335–346 (1988)CrossRef
Rodrik, D.: Democracies pay higher wages. Quart. J. Econ. 114, 707–738 (1999)CrossRef
Seiglie, C.: Deficits, defence, and income distribution. CATO J. 17, 11–18 (1997)
Shahbaz, M.: Income inequality-economic growth and non-linearity: a case of Pakistan. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 37, 613–636 (2010)CrossRef
Shahbaz, M., Afza, T., Shabbir, M.S.: Does defence spending impede economic growth? Cointegration and causality analysis for Pakistan. Def. Peace Econ. 24(2), 105–120 (2013)CrossRef
Shahbaz, M., Shabbir, M.S.: Military spending and economic growth in Pakistan: new evidence from rolling window approach. Econ. Res. 25, 144–159 (2012)
Zivot, E., Andrews, D.: Further evidence of great crash, the oil price shock and unit root hypothesis. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 10, 251–270 (1992)
Metadaten
Titel
Linkages between defense spending and income inequality in Iran
verfasst von
Muhammad Shahbaz
Reza Sherafatian-Jahromi
Muhammad Nasir Malik
Muhammad Shahbaz Shabbir
Farooq Ahmed Jam
Publikationsdatum
28.04.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Quality & Quantity / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0207-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Quality & Quantity 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

A dialogue of the deaf in the statistical theater? Adressing structural effects within a geometric data analysis framework

OriginalPaper

When are concepts comparable across minds?

OriginalPaper

Assessing the impact of crime on the economic performance: the case of central america

OriginalPaper

Cognitive interviewing as tool for enhancing the accuracy of the interpretation of quantitative findings

OriginalPaper

Skills and training requirements of municipal directors: a statistical assessment

OriginalPaper

Mail survey abroad with an alternative web survey

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise