Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 1-2/2011

01.07.2011

Why Do REITs Go Private? Differences in Target Characteristics, Acquirer Motivations, and Wealth Effects in Public and Private Acquisitions

verfasst von: David C. Ling, Milena Petrova

Erschienen in: The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics | Ausgabe 1-2/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper first identifies the characteristics of publicly-traded REITs associated with an increased probability of becoming the target of an announced merger or acquisition bid. Second, conditional on being a target, we determine which target characteristics influence the probability of the bidder being a private versus a public firm. Third, we document the magnitude of the wealth effects that accrue to the shareholders of target REITs in both privatizations and public-to-public transactions and how these effects vary with the characteristics of the target firms. Finally, we investigate the extent to which privatizations differ from “staying public” acquisitions in the type of financing employed and the motivation of the two investor types. We find that REITs more likely to become acquisition targets are smaller and less liquid with higher dividend yields than non-targets. The existence of an umbrella partnership (UPREIT) structure reduces the probability of becoming a target. Private acquirers are more likely to bid on underleveraged REITs with poor operating performance. Conversely, public buyers are more focused on acquiring highly levered REITs with greater institutional ownership and superior operating results. The determinants of abnormal returns also differ in privatizations and public-to-public deals.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
NAREIT classifies a REIT as a hybrid if the REIT combines the investment strategies of both equity REITs and mortgage REITs.
 
2
IPO and merger and acquisition activity statistics are obtained from NAREIT.
 
3
See, for example, Haughney (2005).
 
4
Prior to the REIT Modernization Act of 2001, qualified REITs were required to distribute 95% of taxable income as dividends.
 
5
See Einhorn et al. (2007) for more details on the complications of combining a REIT with an UPREIT.
 
6
For example, the average leverage ratio of firms in the NAREIT universe, defined as total debt divided by total market capitalization, was 41.9% in the fourth quarter of 2007 (www.​nareit.​com).
 
7
We also conduct tests using firm accounting characteristics one quarter before the announcement, rather than one year. Our results are essentially the same; however, due to variability in reported quarterly results, especially with profitability and leverage, our results using annual data were more robust.
 
8
We also examine the impact of governance characteristics on the acquisition probability. We do not report our results here, since anti-takeover measures are only available for 71 of the 370 firms, while director data are available for 57 of the firms. We find that while G-Index is not significantly related to the acquisition probability, the existence of a poison pill is significantly negatively related to the probability of receiving a bid. Regarding internal governance, we find that CEO—Chairman duality is significantly and positively related to the probability of a firm becoming a takeover target. These findings are consistent with the corporate governance literature related to mergers (see, for example, Masulis et al. 2007).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Allen, P. R., & Sirmans, C. F. (1987). An analysis of gains to acquiring firm’s shareholders: the special case of REITs. Journal of Financial Economics, 18(1), 175–184.CrossRef Allen, P. R., & Sirmans, C. F. (1987). An analysis of gains to acquiring firm’s shareholders: the special case of REITs. Journal of Financial Economics, 18(1), 175–184.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ambrose, W. B., & Megginson, W. L. (1992). The role of asset structure, ownership structure, and takeover defenses in determining acquisition likelihood. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(4), 575–589.CrossRef Ambrose, W. B., & Megginson, W. L. (1992). The role of asset structure, ownership structure, and takeover defenses in determining acquisition likelihood. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(4), 575–589.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Andrade, G., Mitchell, M., & Stafford, E. (2001). New evidence and perspectives on mergers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 103–120.CrossRef Andrade, G., Mitchell, M., & Stafford, E. (2001). New evidence and perspectives on mergers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 103–120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Agrawal, A., & Jaffe, J. (2003). Do takeover targets underperform? Evidence from operating and stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(3), 721–747.CrossRef Agrawal, A., & Jaffe, J. (2003). Do takeover targets underperform? Evidence from operating and stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(3), 721–747.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bianco, C., Ghosh, C., & Sirmans, C. F. (2007). The impact of corporate governance on the performance of REITs. Journal of Portfolio Management, 33, 175–491.CrossRef Bianco, C., Ghosh, C., & Sirmans, C. F. (2007). The impact of corporate governance on the performance of REITs. Journal of Portfolio Management, 33, 175–491.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, R. (2002). Shareholder wealth effects in equity REIT restructuring transactions: sell-offs, mergers and joint ventures. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 10(2), 205–222. Campbell, R. (2002). Shareholder wealth effects in equity REIT restructuring transactions: sell-offs, mergers and joint ventures. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 10(2), 205–222.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, R., Ghosh, C., & Sirmans, C. F. (2010). The information content of method of payment in mergers: evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). Real Estate Economics, 29(3), 361–87.CrossRef Campbell, R., Ghosh, C., & Sirmans, C. F. (2010). The information content of method of payment in mergers: evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). Real Estate Economics, 29(3), 361–87.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, R. D., Ghosh, C., & Sirmans, C. F. (2005). Value creation and governance structure in REIT mergers. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 31(2), 225–239.CrossRef Campbell, R. D., Ghosh, C., & Sirmans, C. F. (2005). Value creation and governance structure in REIT mergers. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 31(2), 225–239.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, R.D., Ghosh, C., Petrova, M., & Sirmans, C.F. (2010). Corporate Governance and Performance in the Market for Corporate Control: The Case of REITs. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, forthcoming. Campbell, R.D., Ghosh, C., Petrova, M., & Sirmans, C.F. (2010). Corporate Governance and Performance in the Market for Corporate Control: The Case of REITs. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, forthcoming.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark, K., & Ofek, E. (1994). Mergers as a means of restructuring distressed firms: an empirical investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29(4), 541–565.CrossRef Clark, K., & Ofek, E. (1994). Mergers as a means of restructuring distressed firms: an empirical investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29(4), 541–565.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Del Guercio, D. (1996). The distorting effect of the prudent-man laws on institutional equity investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(1), 31–62.CrossRef Del Guercio, D. (1996). The distorting effect of the prudent-man laws on institutional equity investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(1), 31–62.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eichholtz, P. M. A., & Kok, N. (2008). How does the market for corporate control function for property companies. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 36(2), 141–163.CrossRef Eichholtz, P. M. A., & Kok, N. (2008). How does the market for corporate control function for property companies. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 36(2), 141–163.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Einhorn, D. M., Emmerich, A. O., & Panovka, R. (2007). REITs: mergers and acquisitions. New York: Law Journal Press. Einhorn, D. M., Emmerich, A. O., & Panovka, R. (2007). REITs: mergers and acquisitions. New York: Law Journal Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Elayan, F. A., & Young, P. J. (1994). The value of control: evidence from full and partial acquisitions in the real estate industry. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 8(2), 167–182.CrossRef Elayan, F. A., & Young, P. J. (1994). The value of control: evidence from full and partial acquisitions in the real estate industry. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 8(2), 167–182.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gompers, P. A., & Metrick, A. (1998). How are large institutions different from other investors? Why do these differences matter? Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Paper, 1830, Harvard Institute of Economic Research Gompers, P. A., & Metrick, A. (1998). How are large institutions different from other investors? Why do these differences matter? Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Paper, 1830, Harvard Institute of Economic Research
Zurück zum Zitat Halpern, P., Kieschnick, R., & Rotenberg, W. (1999). On the heterogeneity of leveraged going private transactions. Review of Financial Studies, 12(2), 281–309.CrossRef Halpern, P., Kieschnick, R., & Rotenberg, W. (1999). On the heterogeneity of leveraged going private transactions. Review of Financial Studies, 12(2), 281–309.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huang, Y., & Walkling, R. A. (1987). Target abnormal returns associated with acquisition announcement: payment, acquisition form, and managerial resistance. Journal of Financial Economics, 19(2), 329–349.CrossRef Huang, Y., & Walkling, R. A. (1987). Target abnormal returns associated with acquisition announcement: payment, acquisition form, and managerial resistance. Journal of Financial Economics, 19(2), 329–349.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haughney, C. (2005). RealEstateJournal.com, Wall Street Journal, October 31, 2005. Haughney, C. (2005). RealEstateJournal.com, Wall Street Journal, October 31, 2005.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehn, K., & Poulsen, A. (1989). Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions. Journal of Finance, 44(3), 771–787.CrossRef Lehn, K., & Poulsen, A. (1989). Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions. Journal of Finance, 44(3), 771–787.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li, J., Elayan, F. A., & Meyer, T. O. (2001). Acquisitions by Real Estate Investment Trusts as a strategy for minimisation of investor tax liability. Journal of Economics and Finance, 25(1), 115–134.CrossRef Li, J., Elayan, F. A., & Meyer, T. O. (2001). Acquisitions by Real Estate Investment Trusts as a strategy for minimisation of investor tax liability. Journal of Economics and Finance, 25(1), 115–134.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2007). Corporate governance and acquirer returns. Journal of Finance, 62(4), 1851–1889.CrossRef Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2007). Corporate governance and acquirer returns. Journal of Finance, 62(4), 1851–1889.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McIntosh, W., Officer, D. T., & Born, J. A. (1989). The wealth effects of merger activities: further evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts. Journal of Real Estate Research, 4(4), 141–155. McIntosh, W., Officer, D. T., & Born, J. A. (1989). The wealth effects of merger activities: further evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts. Journal of Real Estate Research, 4(4), 141–155.
Zurück zum Zitat Mikkelson, W. H., & Partch, M. M. (1988). Withdrawn security offerings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23(2), 184–204.CrossRef Mikkelson, W. H., & Partch, M. M. (1988). Withdrawn security offerings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23(2), 184–204.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell, M. L., & Mulherin, J. H. (1996). The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activity. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(2), 193–229.CrossRef Mitchell, M. L., & Mulherin, J. H. (1996). The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activity. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(2), 193–229.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell, M. L., & Stafford, E. (2000). Managerial decisions and long-term stock-price performance. Journal of Business, 73(3), 289–329. Mitchell, M. L., & Stafford, E. (2000). Managerial decisions and long-term stock-price performance. Journal of Business, 73(3), 289–329.
Zurück zum Zitat Morck, R., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Characteristics of targets of hostile and friendly takeovers. In A. J. Auerbach (Ed.), Corporate takeovers: causes and consequences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Morck, R., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Characteristics of targets of hostile and friendly takeovers. In A. J. Auerbach (Ed.), Corporate takeovers: causes and consequences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat North, D. (2001). The role of managerial incentives in corporate acquisitions: the 1990s evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(4), 125–149.CrossRef North, D. (2001). The role of managerial incentives in corporate acquisitions: the 1990s evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(4), 125–149.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Opler, T., & Titman, S. (1993). The determinants of leveraged buyout activity: free cash flow vs financial distress costs. Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1985–1999.CrossRef Opler, T., & Titman, S. (1993). The determinants of leveraged buyout activity: free cash flow vs financial distress costs. Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1985–1999.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Palepu, K. G. (1986). Predicting takeover targets: a methodological and empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8(1), 3–35.CrossRef Palepu, K. G. (1986). Predicting takeover targets: a methodological and empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8(1), 3–35.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sahin, O. F. (2005). The performance of acquisitions in the real estate investment trust industry. The Journal of Real Estate Research, 27(1), 321–342. Sahin, O. F. (2005). The performance of acquisitions in the real estate investment trust industry. The Journal of Real Estate Research, 27(1), 321–342.
Zurück zum Zitat Servaes, H. (1991). Tobin’s q and the gains from takeovers. Journal of Finance, 46(1), 409–419.CrossRef Servaes, H. (1991). Tobin’s q and the gains from takeovers. Journal of Finance, 46(1), 409–419.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461–488.CrossRef Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461–488.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.CrossRef Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shumway, T. (2001). Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: a simple hazard model. Journal of Business, 74(1), 101–124.CrossRef Shumway, T. (2001). Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: a simple hazard model. Journal of Business, 74(1), 101–124.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Song, M., & Walkling, R. (1993). The impact of managerial ownership on acquisition attempts. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(3), 439–457.CrossRef Song, M., & Walkling, R. (1993). The impact of managerial ownership on acquisition attempts. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(3), 439–457.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Trahan, E. (1993). Financial characteristics of acquiring firms and their relation to the wealth effects of acquisition announcements. Journal of Economics and Finance, 17(2), 21–35.CrossRef Trahan, E. (1993). Financial characteristics of acquiring firms and their relation to the wealth effects of acquisition announcements. Journal of Economics and Finance, 17(2), 21–35.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, K., Erikson, J., & Chan, S. H. (1995). Does the REIT stock market resemble the general stock market? Journal of Real Estate Research, 10(4), 445–460. Wang, K., Erikson, J., & Chan, S. H. (1995). Does the REIT stock market resemble the general stock market? Journal of Real Estate Research, 10(4), 445–460.
Zurück zum Zitat Wansley, J. W., Lane, W. R., & Yang, H. C. (1987). Gains to acquiring firms in cash and securities transactions. The Financial Review, 22(4), 403–414.CrossRef Wansley, J. W., Lane, W. R., & Yang, H. C. (1987). Gains to acquiring firms in cash and securities transactions. The Financial Review, 22(4), 403–414.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weir, C., & Lang, D. (2003). Ownership structure, board composition and the market for corporate control in the UK: an empirical analysis. Applied Economics, 35(16), 1747–1759.CrossRef Weir, C., & Lang, D. (2003). Ownership structure, board composition and the market for corporate control in the UK: an empirical analysis. Applied Economics, 35(16), 1747–1759.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weir, C., & Wright, M. (2006). Governance and takeovers: are public-to-private transactions different from traditional acquisitions of listed corporations? Accounting and Business Research, 36(4), 289–307. Weir, C., & Wright, M. (2006). Governance and takeovers: are public-to-private transactions different from traditional acquisitions of listed corporations? Accounting and Business Research, 36(4), 289–307.
Zurück zum Zitat Wruck, K. H. (1990). Financial distress, reorganization, and organizational efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 419–444.CrossRef Wruck, K. H. (1990). Financial distress, reorganization, and organizational efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 419–444.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Why Do REITs Go Private? Differences in Target Characteristics, Acquirer Motivations, and Wealth Effects in Public and Private Acquisitions
verfasst von
David C. Ling
Milena Petrova
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2011
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics / Ausgabe 1-2/2011
Print ISSN: 0895-5638
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-010-9295-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1-2/2011

The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 1-2/2011 Zur Ausgabe