nach oben

Small Business Economics

Erschienen in:

01.05.2010

Gibrat’s law and the learning process

verfasst von: Mercedes Teruel-Carrizosa

Erschienen in: Small Business Economics | Ausgabe 4/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper discusses the speed of convergence of small firms in the context of Gibrat’s law for manufacturing and service industries. We analyze unbalanced panel data from 139,922 firms belonging to the Spanish manufacturing and service industries between 1994 and 2002. The results show that small firms grow faster than large firms. The evidence supports the proposition that market structure affects the capacity of firms to grow. In particular, small firms in service industries do not grow as quickly as small firms in manufacturing industries. This is mainly due to the lower medium efficient size (MES) in the service industries diminishing the incentives to grow and the positive effect of MES on the speed of convergence.

Nächster Artikel The institutional environment and the number of bank relationships: an empirical analysis of European SMEs

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Between 1994 and 2002, the number of SMEs (firms with more than 1 employee and fewer than 20 employees) increased by 4% in the manufacturing industries and by 23% in the service industries (Source: Directorio Central de Empresas).

Source: Encuesta Anual de Servicios and Encuesta Industrial (Spanish Statistics Institute).

Spanish empirical evidence shows that firms in the service sector are more likely to fail: 58.86% of service firms created in 1994 had failed by the end of 2005. This may be related to the lower sunk costs and more short-term strategies for facing unemployment situations in the service sector.

These authors applied a chi-square test and the equation of the persistence of firm growth. With the chi-square test, Gibrat’s law was accepted for firms operating above the MES. With the equation of persistence of firm growth, Gibrat’s law was accepted in 11 out of 15 cases. However, their results varied according to year and business group.

Oliveira and Fortunato (2004a, b) used unbalanced panel data with 8,072 firms, but with only 419 firms from the service sectors.

As the dependent variable they used current size and as the independent variable they used previous size. In this case, their coefficient was <1.

NACE (from the French abbreviation for nomenclature statistique des activités économiques dans la Communauté Européenne) is a general industrial classification of economic activities within the European Union. This classification is officially recognized by the Accounting Economic System (National Institute of Statistics).

We excluded sectors 16 (industries related to tobacco products) and 23 (industries related to coke, refined petroleum products, and nuclear fuel) because there are few firms in these traditional monopolistic industries.

The original database had 162,208 firms: 80% of the firms survived until 2002. The percentages of firms surviving until 2002 were 68% of those born in 1994, 69% of those born in 1995, 70% of those born in 1996, 74% of those born in 1997, 77% of those born in 1998, 82% of those born in 1999, and 91% of those born in 2000. This evidence is in concordance with previous empirical literature (Segarra et al. 2002; Segarra and Teruel 2007).

Calculations are available upon request.

The income per worker includes the sales per worker plus other incomes obtained by the firm.

Evans (1987a, b), Hall (1987) and Dunne et al. (1989) differentiated between a latent firm growth equation and a real firm growth equation. The former includes surviving and nonsurviving firms and would raise a sample selection bias arising from exit. The latter estimates the growth of surviving firms.

The Hausman test does not accept the null hypothesis about the absence of correlation between individual effects and explanatory variables. Furthermore, the Breusch and Pagan (B and P) test does not accept the null hypothesis of homoskedasticity in the error distribution, conditional on a set of variables which are presumed to influence the error variance.

Calculations are available upon request.

The F and chi-squared test are the values reported by the fixed effects and random effects estimations. They test whether the model is significant or not. The tests do not accept the null hypothesis about the nonsignificance of the model.

For example, in 2006 the capital per worker intensity in the manufacturing industries was equal to 15.113 euros and in the service industries was equal to 9.376 euros (Spanish Statistical Institute).

The estimations of the effect of the effect of capital per worker intensity and the microfirms on individual sectors are available upon request.

Acs, Z. J. (1996). Small firms and economic growth. In P. H. Admiraal (Ed.), Small business in the modern economy (pp. 1–62). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1990). Innovation and small firms. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1990). La econometría de datos de panel. Investigaciones Económicas, 14, 3–45.

Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Audretsch, D. B. (2002). The dynamic role of small firms: Evidence from the U.S. Small Business Economics, 18, 13–40.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2000). Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century: From the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10, 17–34.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Lehman, E. E. (2005). Mansfield’s missing link: The impact of knowledge spillovers on firm growth. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 207–210.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Mahmood, T. (1994). Firm selection and industry evolution: The post-entry performance of new firms. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4, 243–260.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., Carree, M. A., van Stel, A. J., & Thurik, A. R. (2002). Impeded industrial restructuring: The growth penalty. Kyklos, 55, 81–98.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., Klomp, L., & Thurik, R. (1999). Do services differ from manufacturing? In D. B. Audretsch & R. Thurik (Eds.), Innovation, industry evolution and employment (pp. 230–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Audretsch, D. B., Klomp, L., Santarelli, E., & Thurik, A. R. (2004). Gibrat’s Law: Are the services different? Review of Industrial Organization, 24, 301–324.CrossRef

Baltagi, B. H. (1995). Econometrics of panel data. West Sussex: Wiley.

Cabral, L. (1995). Sunk costs, firm size and firm growth. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 43, 161–172.CrossRef

Calvo, J. L. (2006). Testing Gibrat’s Law for small, young and innovating firms. Small Business Economics, 26, 117–123.CrossRef

Carree, M. A., van Stel, A. J., Thurik, A. R., & Wennekers, A. R. M. (2002). Economic development and business ownership: An analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976–1996. Small Business Economics, 19, 271–290.CrossRef

Correa, A., Acosta, M., González, A. L., & Medina, U. (2003). Size, age and activity sector on the growth of small and medium firm size. Small Business Economics, 21, 289–307.CrossRef

Cuadrado-Roura, J. R., & Garcia-Tabuenca, A. (2004). ICT policies for SMEs and regional disparities. The Spanish case. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16, 55–75.CrossRef

Das, S. (1995). Size, age and firm growth in an infant industry: The computer hardware industry in India. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 111–126.CrossRef

Dunne, P., & Hughes, A. (1994). Age, size, growth and survival: UK companies in the 1980s. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42, 115–140.CrossRef

Dunne, T., Roberts, M. J., & Samuelson, L. (1989). The growth and failure of U.S. manufacturing plants. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 671–698.CrossRef

Ericson, R., & Pakes, A. (1995). Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work. Review of Economic Studies, 62, 53–82.CrossRef

Evans, D. S. (1987a). The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 567–581.CrossRef

Evans, D. S. (1987b). Tests of alternative theories of firm growth. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 657–674.CrossRef

Fariñas, J. C., & Moreno, L. (2000). Firm’s growth, size and age: A nonparametric approach. Review of Industrial Organization, 17, 249–265.CrossRef

Fotopoulos, G., & Louri, H. (2004). Firm growth and FDI: Are multinationals stimulating local industrial development? Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 4, 163–189.CrossRef

Geroski, P. A. (1995). What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 421–440.CrossRef

Gibrat, R. (1931). Les Inégalités Économiqués; Applications: Aux Inégalités des Richesses, a la Concentration des Entreprises, Aux Populations des Villes, Aux Statistiques des Familles, etc., d’une Loi Nouvelles, La Loi de l’Effet Proportionnel. (Paris).

Hall, B. H. (1987). The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the U.S. manufacturing sector. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 583–606.CrossRef

Hart, E., & Prais, S. J. (1956). The analysis of business concentration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 119, 150–191.

Hart, P. E., & Oulton, N. (1996). Growth and size of firms. The Economic Journal, 106, 1242–1252.CrossRef

Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271.CrossRef

Hyytinen, A., & Toivanen, O. (2005). Do financial constraints hold back innovation and growth? Evidence on the role of public policy. Research Policy, 34, 1385–1403.CrossRef

Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and evolution of industry. Econometrica, 50, 649–670.CrossRef

Kumar, M. S. (1985). Growth, acqusition activity and firm size: Evidence from the United Kingdom. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 33, 327–338.CrossRef

Lotti, F., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2001). The relationship between size and growth: The case of Italian newborn firms. Applied Economics Letters, 8, 451–454.CrossRef

Mansfield, E. (1962). Entry, Gibrat’s Law, innovation, and the growth of firms. The American Economic Review, 52, 1023–1051.

Martin, M., & Segarra, A. (2004). Dinámica Empresarial en las Industrias Maduras Españolas. Economía Industrial, 355–356, 97–106.

Mata, J., & Portugal, P. (2004). Patters of entry, post-entry growth and survival. Small Business Economics, 22, 283–298.CrossRef

Oliveira, B., & Fortunato, A. (2004a). Determinants of firm growth: A comparative study between a panel of Portuguese manufacturing and services firms. Paper presented at the 31st Conference of the European Association for Research in Industrial Economics, Berlin.

Oliveira, B., & Fortunato, A. (2004b). The dynamics of the growth of firms: Are the services different? Paper presented at the Economic Policies in the New Millennium Conference, Coimbra.

Pakes, A., & Ericson, R. (1998). Empirical implications of alternative models of firm dynamics. Journal of Economic Theory, 79, 1–45.CrossRef

Peña, I. (2004). Business incubation center and new firm growth in the Basque Country. Small Business Economics, 22, 223–236.CrossRef

Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2002). Is subsidizing entry an optimal policy? Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 39–52.CrossRef

Segarra, A., Arauzo, J. M., Gras, N., Manjón, M., Mañé, F., Teruel, M., et al. (2002). La creación y la supervivencia de las empresas industriales. Civitas: Madrid.

Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2007). Creación y Supervivencia de las Nuevas Empresas en las Manufacturas y los Servicios. Economía Industrial, 363, 47–58.

Siegel, D. S., Wessner, C., Binks, M., & Lockett, A. (2003). Policies promoting innovation in small firms: Evidence from the U.S. and U.K. Small Business Economics, 20, 121–127.CrossRef

Simon, H. A., & Bonini, C. P. (1958). The size distribution of business firms. American Economic Review, 48, 607–617.

Singh, A., & Whittington, G. (1975). The size and growth of firms. Review of Economic Studies, 42, 15–26.CrossRef

Snijders, J., & van der Horst, R. (2002). SMEs in focus main results from the 2002 observatory of European SMEs. Belgium: European Communities.

Storey, D. J., & Tether, B. S. (1998). Public policy measures to support new technology-based firms in the European Union. Research Policy, 26, 1037–1057.CrossRef

Sutton, J. (1997). Gibrat’s legacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 40–59.

Teece, D. J. (1993). The dynamics of industrial capitalism: perspectives on Alfred Chandler’s scale and scope. Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 199–225.

Voulgaris, F., Asteriou, D., & Agiomirgianakes, D. (2003). The determinants of small firm growth in the Greek manufacturing sector. Journal of Economic Integration, 18, 817–836.

Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Aspiring for, and achieving growth: The moderating role of resources and opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1919–1941.CrossRef

Titel: Gibrat’s law and the learning process
verfasst von: Mercedes Teruel-Carrizosa
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2010
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Small Business Economics / Ausgabe 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9127-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2010

The institutional environment and the number of bank relationships: an empirical analysis of European SMEs

Information asymmetry and small business in online auction market

Relationship lending and SME financing in the continental European bank-based system

Downsizing in the German chemical manufacturing industry during the 1990s. Why is small beautiful?

Economic creativity and innovation implementation: the entrepreneurial drivers of growth? Evidence from 63 countries

Testing a model of signals in the IPO offer process

Premium Partner