nach oben

Small Business Economics

Erschienen in:

11.09.2018

Three waves and counting: the rising tide of contextualization in entrepreneurship research

verfasst von: Friederike Welter, Ted Baker, Katharine Wirsching

Erschienen in: Small Business Economics | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Although the field was initially slow on the uptake, contextualization of entrepreneurship research has come a long way in recent years. Arguably, entrepreneurship demands contextualization more than many other fields, because not only is entrepreneurship broad and diverse in its scope but it is also frequently about the creation of differences. In this paper, we outline three recent and overlapping waves of contextualization in the entrepreneurship field. The discussion has moved from challenging the “standard” or Silicon Valley model of entrepreneurship by considering the why, what, and how of entrepreneurship (first wave) towards considering more subjective elements and the construction and enactment of contexts (second wave), through challenging us to deepen our theorizing by broadening the domain of entrepreneurship research (third wave). The articles in this special issue on “Entrepreneurship in Context” represent this third wave. Taken together, they illustrate entrepreneurial diversity and comprehend entrepreneurship and innovation as everyday activities. We end with a brief consideration of where the rising tide of contextualization may take the field during the next few years.

Nächster Artikel A plea for varieties of entrepreneurship

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

See Baker and Welter (2018) for a review of contextual entrepreneurship, also from interdisciplinary perspectives.

This paper won the Greif award as the mostly highly cited entrepreneurship paper from 2011 during the six years after its publication.

Aldrich, H. E. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Aldrich, H. E. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage.

Aldrich, H. E. (2009). Lost in space, out of time: Why and how we should study organizations comparatively. In B. G. King, T. Felin, & D. A. Whetten (Eds.), Studying Differences between Organizations: Comparative Approaches to Organizational Research (pp. 21–44, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 26). Bingley: Emerald Group publishing limited.

Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 573–596.CrossRef

Aldrich, H. E., & Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 79–105.CrossRef

Aldrich, H. E., & Ruef, M. (2018). Unicorns, gazelles, and other distractions on the way to understanding real entrepreneurship in America. Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0123.

Alsos, G. A., Carter, S., & Ljunggren, E. (2014). Kinship and business: how entrepreneurial households facilitate business growth. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(1–2), 97–122.CrossRef

Alvarez, S. A., Young, S. L., & Woolley, J. L. (2015). Opportunities and institutions: a co-creation story of the king crab industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 95–112.CrossRef

Anderson, A. R., Dodd, S. D., & Jack, S. (2010). Network practices and entrepreneurial growth. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(2), 121–133.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., Kuratko, D. F., & Link, A. N. (2015). Making sense of the elusive paradigm of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 45(4), 703–712.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2016). The seven secrets of Germany: economic resilience in an era of global turbulence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Baker, T., Aldrich, H., & Liou, N. (1997). Invisible entrepreneurs: the neglect of women business owners by mass media and scholarly journals in the USA. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 9(3), 221–238.CrossRef

Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366.CrossRef

Baker, T., & Powell, E. E. (2016). Let them eat bricolage? Toward a contextualized notion of inequality of entrepreneurial opportunity. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context (pp. 41–53). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Baker, T., & Powell, E. E. (2018). Entrepreneurship as a New Liberal Art. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0099-0.

Baker, T., & Welter, F. (2017). Come on out of the ghetto, please! – building the future of entrepreneurship research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(2), 170–184.CrossRef

Baker, T., & Welter, F. (2018). Contextual entrepreneurship: an interdisciplinary perspective. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 14(4), 357–426.CrossRef

Balachandra, L., Briggs, T., Eddleston, K., & Brush, C. (2017). Don’t pitch like a girl! How Gender Stereotypes Influence Investor Decisions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717728028.

Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65–107.CrossRef

Ben-Hafaïedh, C., & Cooney, T. M. (Eds.) (2017). Research handbook on entrepreneurial teams: Theory and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Berglund, K. A. E., & Wigren-Kristoferson, C. (2012). Using pictures and artefacts in a PAR process to disclose new wor(l)ds of entrepreneurship. Action Research, 10(3), 276–292.CrossRef

Bettinelli, C., Fayolle, A., & Randerson, K. (2014). Family entrepreneurship: a developing field. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 10(3), 161–236.CrossRef

Bird, B., & Brush, C. G. (2002). A gendered perspective on organizational creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(3), 41–65.CrossRef

Brännback, M., & Carsrud, A. (2016). Understanding entrepreneurial cognitions through the lenses of context. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda on entrepreneurship and context (pp. 16–27). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Bruton, G. D., Zahra, S. A., & Cai, L. (2018). Examining entrepreneurship through indigenous lenses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(3), 351–361.CrossRef

Capelli, P., & Sherer, P. D. (1991). The missing role of context in OB: the need for a meso-level approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 55–110.

Carter, S., Kuhl, A., Marlow, S., & Mwaura, S. (2017). Households as a site of entrepreneurial activity. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 81–190.CrossRef

Chandra, Y. (2018). Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990–2013): a scientometric analysis. PLoS One, 13(1), e0190228.CrossRef

Clarke, J. S. (2011). Revitalizing entrepreneurship: how visual symbols are used in entrepreneurial performances. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1365–1391.CrossRef

Corbett, A. C., & Katz J. A. (Eds.) (2013). Entrepreneurial resourcefulness: competing with constraints. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Cornelissen, J. P., & Clarke, J. S. (2010). Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 539–557.

Cornelissen, J. P., Clarke, J. S., & Cienki, A. (2012). Sensegiving in entrepreneurial contexts: the use of metaphors in speech and gesture to gain and sustain support for novel business ventures. International Small Business Journal, 30(3), 213–241.CrossRef

Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: a critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203–1213.CrossRef

De Bruin, A., & Lewis, K. V. (2015). Traversing the terrain of context in social entrepreneurship. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 127–136.CrossRef

Dorado, S., & Ventresca, M. J. (2013). Crescive entrepreneurship in complex social problems: institutional conditions for entrepreneurial engagement. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 69–82.CrossRef

Drakopoulou Dodd, S., Pret, T., & Shaw, E. (2016). Advancing understanding of entrepreneurial embeddedness: forms of capital, social contexts and time. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda on entrepreneurship and context (pp. 120–133). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Fletcher, D., & Selden, P. (2016). A relational conceptualization of context and the real-time emergence of entrepreneurship processes. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context (pp. 79–92). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Gaddefors, J., & Cronsell, N. (2009). Returnees and local stakeholders co-producing the entrepreneurial region. European Planning Studies, 17(8), 1191–1203.CrossRef

Gartner, W. B. (1995). Aspects of organizational emergence. In I. Bull, H. Thomas, & G. Willard (Eds.), Entrepreneurship–perspectives on theory building (pp. 67–86). Oxford: Pergamon.

Gartner, W. B. (2008). Variations in entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 31(4), 351–361.CrossRef

Gartner, W. B. (2016). Narrating context. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context (pp. 146–155). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Glade, W. P. (1967). Approaches to a theory of entrepreneurial formation. Explorations in Economic History, 4(3), 245–259.

Greenman, A. (2013). Everyday entrepreneurial action and cultural embeddedness: an institutional logics perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(7–8), 631–653.CrossRef

Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 311–591.CrossRef

Greer, M. J., & Greene, P. G. (2003). Feminist theory and the study of entrepreneurship. In J. E. Butler (Ed.), New Perspectives on Women Entrepreneurs (pp. 1–24). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

Griffin, M. A. (2007). Specifying organizational contexts: systematic links between contexts and processes in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(7), 859–863.CrossRef

Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.CrossRef

Hechavarría, D. M., Terjesen, S. A., Stenholm, P., Brännback, M., & Lång, S. (2018). More than words: do gendered linguistic structures widen the gender gap in entrepreneurial activity? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12278.

Herrmann, A. (2018). A Plea for varieties of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0093-6.

Hodges, N., & Link, A. N. (2018). Innovation by Design. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0098-1.

Hughes, K. D., Jennings, J. E., Brush, C., Carter, S., & Welter, F. (2012). Extending women’s entrepreneurship research in new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 1–14.

Hyrsky, K. (1998). Entrepreneurship: metaphors and related concepts. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 6(04), 391–412.CrossRef

Jayawarna, D., Jones, O., & Marlow, S. (2015). The influence of gender upon social networks and bootstrapping behaviours. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 316–329.CrossRef

Jennings, J. E., & Brush, C. G. (2013). Research on women entrepreneurs: challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 663–715.CrossRef

Jennings, P. D., Greenwood, R., Lounsbury, M. D., & Suddaby, R. (2013). Institutions, entrepreneurs, and communities: a special issue on entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 1–9.CrossRef

Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. [Review]. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408.CrossRef

Johnstone, H., & Lionais, D. (2004). Depleted communities and community business entrepreneurship: revaluing space through place. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(3), 217–233.CrossRef

Korsgaard, S., & Anderson, A. R. (2011). Enacting entrepreneurship as social value creation. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 135–151.CrossRef

Korsgaard, S., Ferguson, R., & Gaddefors, J. (2015). The best of both worlds: how rural entrepreneurs use placial embeddedness and strategic networks to create opportunities. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 27(9-10), 574–598.CrossRef

Korsgaard, S., Müller, S., & Tanvig, H. W. (2015). Rural entrepreneurship or entrepreneurship in the rural–between place and space. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21(1), 5–26.CrossRef

Lang, R., Fink, M., & Kibler, E. (2014). Understanding place-based entrepreneurship in rural Central Europe: a comparative institutional analysis. International Small Business Journal, 32(2), 204–227.CrossRef

Lehmann, E. E., Schenkenhofer, J., & Wirsching, K. (2018). Hidden champions and unicorns: a question of the context of human capital investment. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0096-3.

Lippmann, S., & Aldrich, H. E. (2016a). A rolling stone gathers momentum: generational units, collective memory, and Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 658–675.CrossRef

Lippmann, S., & Aldrich, H. E. (2016b). The temporal dimension of context. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context (pp. 54–64). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Low, M. B., & MacMillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, 14(2), 139–161.CrossRef

Lundmark, E., Krzeminska, A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2017). Images of entrepreneurship: exploring root metaphors and expanding upon them. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717734369.

Maclean, M., Harvey, C., Gordon, J., & Shaw, E. (2015). Identity, storytelling and the philanthropic journey. Human Relations, 68(10), 1623–1652.CrossRef

Malmström, M., Johansson, J., & Wincent, J. (2017). Gender stereotypes and venture support decisions: how governmental venture capitalists socially construct entrepreneurs’ potential. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5), 833–860.CrossRef

McKeever, E., Jack, S., & Anderson, A. (2015). Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 50–65.CrossRef

Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2017). Underdog entrepreneurs: a model of challenge-based entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 7–17.CrossRef

Mowday, R. T., & Sutton, R. I. (1993). Organizational behavior - linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 195–229.CrossRef

Müller, S., & Korsgaard, S. (2018). Resources and bridging: the role of spatial context in rural entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(1-2), 224–255.CrossRef

Nählinder, J., Tillmar, M., & Wigren, C. (2015). Towards a gender-aware understanding of innovation: a three-dimensional route. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 66–86.CrossRef

Pahnke, A., & Welter, F. (2018). The German Mittelstand: antithesis to the Silicon Valley entrepreneurship model? Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0095-4.

Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 309–328.CrossRef

Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2017). Conceptual foundations: community-based enterprise and community development. In M. Van Ham, D. Reuschke, R. Kleinhans, C. Mason, & S. Syrett (Eds.), Entrepreneurial Neighbourhoods (pp. 151–178). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Powell, E. E. (2011). Weathering the Gale: Toward a Theory of Entrepreneurial Resourcefulness and Resilience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Raleigh: North Carolina State University.

Powell, E. E., & Baker, T. (2014). It's what you make of it: founder identity and enacting strategic responses to adversity. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1406–1433.CrossRef

Powell, E. E., & Baker, T. (2017). The beginning: identity processes and organizing in multi-founder nascent ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2381–2414.CrossRef

Randerson, K., Bettinelli, C., Fayolle, A., & Anderson, A. (2015). Family entrepreneurship as a field of research: exploring its contours and contents. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(3), 143–154.CrossRef

Rehn, A., & Taalas, S. (2004). ‘Znakomstva I Svyazi’ (Acquaintances and connections) – Blat, the Soviet Union, and mundane entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(3), 235–250.CrossRef

Renzulli, L. A., & Aldrich, H. (2005). Who can you turn to? Tie activation within core business discussion networks. Social Forces, 84(1), 323–341.CrossRef

Renzulli, L. A., Aldrich, H., & Moody, J. (2000). Family matters: gender, networks, and entrepreneurial outcomes. Social Forces, 79(2), 523–546.CrossRef

Rindova, V., Barry, D., & Ketchen, D. J. (2009). Entrepreneuring as emancipation. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 477–491.CrossRef

Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. (2001). Location, location, location: contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(1), 1–13.CrossRef

Sarasvathy, S. D., Ramesh, A., & Forster, W. (2015). The ordinary entrepreneur. In T. Baker & F. Welter (Eds.), The Routledge companion to entrepreneurship (pp. 227–244). London: Routledge.

Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

Smallbone, D., & Welter, F. (2001). The distinctiveness of entrepreneurship in transition economies. Small Business Economics, 16(4), 249–262.CrossRef

Smith, R. (2015a). Con’text’ualizing images of enterprise: an examination of ‘visual metaphors’ used to represent entrepreneurship in textbooks. In H. Neergaard & C. Leitch (Eds.), Qualitative research techniques and analysis in entrepreneurship (pp. 139–169). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Smith, R. (2015b). Seeing the light:using visual ethnography in family business settings. Family Business Review, 28(1), 76–82.CrossRef

Spedale, S., & Watson, T. J. (2013). The emergence of entrepreneurial action: at the crossroads between institutional logics and individual life-orientation. International Small Business Journal, 32(7), 759–776.CrossRef

Stevenson, R. M., Kuratko, D. F., & Eutsler, J. (2018). Unleashing main street entrepreneurship: crowdfunding, venture capital, and the democratization of new venture investments. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0097-2.

Steyaert, C. (2016). 'After' context. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context (pp. 28–53). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Steyaert, C., & Katz, J. A. (2004). Reclaiming the space of entrepreneurship in society: geographical, discursive and social, dimensions. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(3), 179–196.CrossRef

Tedmanson, D., Verduyn, K., Essers, C., & Gartner, W. B. (2012). Critical perspectives in entrepreneurship research. Organization, 19(5), 531–541.CrossRef

Thornton, P. H., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Urbano, D. (2011). Socio-cultural factors and entrepreneurial activity: an overview. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 105–118.CrossRef

Tolbert, P. S., David, R. J., & Sine, W. D. (2011). Studying choice and change: the intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organization Science, 22(5), 1332–1344.CrossRef

Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2001). The focus of entrepreneurial research: contextual and process issues. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 25(4), 57–80.

Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 3(1), 119–138.

Wadhwani, R. D. (2016). Entrepreneurship in historical context: using history to develop theory and understand process. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context (pp. 65–78). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Wang, Q. (2013). Constructing a multilevel spatial approach in ethnic entrepreneurship studies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 19(1), 97–113.CrossRef

Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship - conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.CrossRef

Welter, F., Baker, T., Audretsch, D. B., & Gartner, W. B. (2017). Everyday entrepreneurship-a call for entrepreneurship research to embrace entrepreneurial diversity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 311–321.CrossRef

Welter, F., & Gartner, W. B. (2016). Advancing our research agenda for entrepreneurship and contexts. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda on entrepreneurship and context (pp. 156–160). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107–125.CrossRef

Welter, F., Smallbone, D., Slonimski, A., Linchevskaya, O., Pobol, A., & Slonimska, M. (2014). Enterprising families in a cross-border context: the example of Belarus. In M. T. T. Thai & E. Turkina (Eds.), Internationalization of firms from economies in transition (pp. 276–302). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Welter, F., Xheneti, M., & Smallbone, D. (2018). Entrepreneurial resourcefulness in unstable institutional contexts: the example of European Union borderlands. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 23–53.CrossRef

Yang, T., & Aldrich, H. E. (2014). Who’s the boss? Explaining gender inequality in entrepreneurial teams. American Sociological Review, 79(2), 303–327.CrossRef

Yousafzai, S. Y., Lindgreen, A., Saeed, S., Henry, C., & Fayolle, A. (2018). Contextual embeddedness of women’s entrepreneurship. London: Routledge.CrossRef

Zahra, S. A. (2007). Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3), 443–452.CrossRef

Zahra, S. A., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4), 67–83.CrossRef

Zahra, S. A., Wright, M., & Abdelgawad, S. G. (2014). Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal, 32(5), 479–500.CrossRef

Titel: Three waves and counting: the rising tide of contextualization in entrepreneurship research
verfasst von: Friederike Welter
Ted Baker
Katharine Wirsching
Publikationsdatum: 11.09.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Small Business Economics / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0094-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems

Innovation by design

A plea for varieties of entrepreneurship

Governance in entrepreneurial ecosystems: venture capitalists vs. technology parks

Entrepreneurship as a new liberal art

The governance of universities and the establishment of academic spin-offs

Premium Partner