nach oben

Social Indicators Research

Erschienen in:

01.11.2013

Social Capital and Subjective Wellbeing in Europe: A New Approach on Social Capital

verfasst von: Marta Portela, Isabel Neira, Maria del Mar Salinas-Jiménez

Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the relationship between the various dimensions of social capital and subjective wellbeing. Data used in this study come from the fourth wave of the European Social Survey and different measures of wellbeing are used to take account of both the cognitive and affective processes of individual wellbeing (i.e. life satisfaction, happiness, and subjective wellbeing). A factor analysis is performed to summarize information coming from a large set of variables into different components corresponding to each dimension of social capital (i.e. networks, norms, and trust). Among the results, we find that the impact of social capital on subjective wellbeing differ depending on the component of social capital which is under analysis. In particular, social networks, social trust and institutional trust are the components that show a higher correlation with subjective wellbeing. Furthermore, in addition to the positive effects of the individual variables, our results suggest that social capital at the aggregate level positively correlates with individual wellbeing, thus pointing to an external or environmental effect of social capital.

Vorheriger Artikel Self-Other Agreement in Happiness and Life-Satisfaction: The Role of Personality Traits

Nächster Artikel Validation of the 12 Item Short form Health Survey in a Sample from Region Central Jutland

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Although acknowledging differences between these concepts, the words happiness, life satisfaction and subjective wellbeing are often used as interchangeable in the economic literature (Frey and Stutzer 2002a). It is worth noting, however, that satisfaction with life is a component of subjective wellbeing, which in turn is generally seen as involving both cognitive and affective processes (Diener 1984; Veenhoven 1994; Diener et al. 2003).

For an extensive review on different explanations to the ‘Easterlin paradox’, see Clark et al. (2008). A complete study on the relationship between income and subjective wellbeing can also be found in Stevenson and Wolfers (2008).

Some exceptions are, among others, the works by Bjørnskov (2006, 2008), who consider three different components corresponding to social trust, social norms and associational activity in an empirical study at the macro level; or Sarracino (2010), who considers four set of proxies and distinguishes between intrinsically and extrinsically motivated group participation.

Argyle (1999) offers a comprehensive review of the effects of various individual and socio-demographic variables on subjective wellbeing. A more recent survey of the economic literature on the determinants of subjective wellbeing can be found in Dolan et al. (2008).

For detailed information on the ESS and on collected data, see http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org.

Prior to this analysis, a categorical principal component analysis has been performed given the ordinal and nominal nature of the variables. We then follow the procedure shown in this paper with the transformed variables coming from this preliminary analysis. This procedure is also adopted for the social norms dimension and for the global analysis presented henceforth.

The statistical summary of the variables used in this study is provided in the “Appendix”.

It is noteworthy that problems of endogeneity and reversed causality may be present in works based on cross-sectional survey data (for some methodological cautions in this literature see, for example, Helliwell and Putnam 2004). Although this can be the case regarding variables such as subjective health or social capital, different studies suggest that the causal relationship goes from these variables to subjective wellbeing (Graham 2008; Dolan et al. 2008). In any case, it should be noted that our focus is on correlations with subjective wellbeing and not on causality.

We thank an anonimous referee for discussion on this point.

Although not focusing on social relationships, previous empirical works also point to differences in subjective wellbeing depending on whether the individuals are intrinsically or extrinsically motivated (see, for example, Rojas 2007; or Salinas-Jiménez et al. 2010).

Argyle, M. (1999). Causes and correlates of happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds), Well-being. The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Pugno, M. (2008). Did the decline in social capital decrease American happiness? A relational explanation of the happiness paradox. University of Siena Department of Economics working paper 513.

Bartolini, S., & Bonatti, L. (2003). Endogenous growth and negative externalities. Journal of Economics, 79, 123–144.

Becchetti, L., Pelloni, A., & Rossetti, F. (2008). Relational goods, sociability, and happiness. Kyklos, 61, 343–363.CrossRef

Bjørnskov, C. (2003). The happy few: Cross-country evidence on social capital and life satisfaction. Kyklos, 56, 3–16.CrossRef

Bjørnskov, C. (2006). The multiple facets of social capital. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 22–40.CrossRef

Bjørnskov, C. (2008). Social capital and happiness in the United States. Applied Research Quality Life, 3, 43–62.CrossRef

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New Cork: Greenwood Press.

Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63, 506–528.CrossRef

Clark, A., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.CrossRef

Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Costa, D., & Kahn, M. (2003). Understanding the American decline in social capital, 1952–1998. Kyklos, 56, 17–46.CrossRef

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Di Tella, R., McCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 809–827.CrossRef

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRef

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.CrossRef

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. I. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decade of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRef

Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy: A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.CrossRef

Durlauf, S. N. (2002). On the empirics of social capital. The Economic Journal, 112, 459–479.CrossRef

Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human a lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press.

Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002a). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic literature, 40, 402–435.CrossRef

Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002b). Happiness and economics. How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princenton: Princenton University Press.

Graham, C. (2008). Happiness and health: Lessons -and questions- for public policy. Health Affairs, 27, 72–87.CrossRef

Gui, B., & Sugden, R. (Eds.). (2005). Economics and social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gui, B., & Stanca, L. (2010). Happiness and relational goods: well-being and interpersonal relations in the economic sphere. International Review of Economics, 57, 105–118.

Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20, 331–360.CrossRef

Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well-being, social capital and public policy: What’s new? The Economic Journal, 116, 34–45.CrossRef

Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (1995). Economic growth and social capital in Italy. Eastern Economic Journal, 21, 295–307.

Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359, 1435–1446.CrossRef

Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H. D. (2000). Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-Being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New Cork: Russel Sage Foundation.

Klein, C. (2011). Social capital or social cohesion: What matters for subjective well-being (SWB)? EPS/INSTEAD working paper 2011–2036.

Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation and social rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 88–127.CrossRef

Pugno, M. (2009). The Easterlin paradox and the decline of social capital: An integrated explanation. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 590–600.CrossRef

Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New Cork: Simon & Schuster.

Rojas, M. (2007). Heterogeneity in the relationship between income and happiness: A conceptual-referent-theory explanation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 1–14.CrossRef

Rothstein, B. (2001). Social capital in the social democratic welfare state. Politics and Society, 29, 207–241.CrossRef

Salinas-Jiménez, M. M., Artés, J., & Salinas-Jiménez, J. (2010). Income, motivation, and satisfaction with life: An empirical analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 779–793.CrossRef

Sarracino, F. (2010). Social capital and subjective well-being trends: Comparing 11 western European countries. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39, 482–517.CrossRef

Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings papers on economic activity.

Stolle, D., & Hooghe, M. (2004). Inaccurate, exceptional, one-sided or irrelevant? The debate about the alleged decline of social capital and civic engagement in Western societies. British Journal of Political Science, 35, 149–167.CrossRef

Stolle, D., & Rochon, T. R. (1998). Are all associations alike? The American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 47–65.CrossRef

Svendsen, G. T., & Bjornskov, C. (2007). How to construct a robust measure of social capital: Two contributions. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 9, 275–292.CrossRef

Uhlaner, C. J. (1989). ‘Relational goods’ and participation: Incorporating sociability into theory of rational action. Public Choice, 62, 253–285.CrossRef

Uslaner, E. M. (1999). Democracy and social capital. In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

van Oorschot, W., & Arts, W. (2005). The social capital of European welfare states: The crowding out hypothesis revisited. Journal of European Social Policy, 15, 5–26.CrossRef

Veenhoven, R. (1994). El Estudio de la satisfacción con la vida. Intervención Psicosocial, 3, 87–116.

Titel: Social Capital and Subjective Wellbeing in Europe: A New Approach on Social Capital
verfasst von: Marta Portela
Isabel Neira
Maria del Mar Salinas-Jiménez
Publikationsdatum: 01.11.2013
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0158-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Self-Other Agreement in Happiness and Life-Satisfaction: The Role of Personality Traits

Loneliness and Subjective Happiness as Mediators of the Effects of Core Self-evaluations on Life Satisfaction Among Chinese College Students

The Pursuit of Happiness in China: Individualism, Collectivism, and Subjective Well-Being During China’s Economic and Social Transformation

The Dual-Factor Model of Mental Health: A Short-Term Longitudinal Study of School-Related Outcomes

The Development of the Good Relations Measurement Framework in Britain: A Template for Experiential Social Measurement

But Who Are Those “Most People” That Can Be Trusted? Evaluating the Radius of Trust Across 29 European Societies

Premium Partner