Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research 2/2015

01.06.2015

Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions

verfasst von: Nicholas Charron, Lewis Dijkstra, Victor Lapuente

Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Do aspects of quality of government, broadly defined, such as corruption, impartiality, and quality of public services, vary below the country level? The concept of quality of government (QoG) and various measures to assess it have become more ubiquitous in several social science disciplines. QoG is related with economic and social development, better environmental conditions, and better quality of life. Yet while governance indicators have proliferated in recent years, their focus remains almost universally on analysis at the country level. Moreover, the majority of indices rely on expert assessments, as opposed to the assessments of citizens, who are the on-the-ground consumers of public services. Building on a preliminary round of data collected in 2010, this study, for which data were collected in 2013, presents a novel and comprehensive index that captures the quality of governance for 206 regions in 24 European countries. The ‘European Quality of Government Index’, which will be published free for scholarly use, is built on the largest survey to date focusing on governance at the regional level; over 85,000 citizens were surveyed. The instrument proposed here builds on both perceptions and experiences of citizens in public service areas such as health care, education, and law enforcement. The paper presents final results of the survey, as well as a sensitivity analysis and checks for external and internal validity.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
For recent critiques of leading composite indicators of corruption and governance perception, see, for example, Andersson and Heywood (2009), Abramo (2008), and Kurtz and Schrank (2007).
 
2
Statistics for all NUTS (nomenclature of territorial units for statistics) levels can be found at Eurostat’s data portal (http://​epp.​eurostat.​ec.​europa.​eu/​portal/​page/​portal/​region_​cities/​regional_​statistics/​data/​database).
 
3
To enable wider comparisons, we include smaller EU28 countries for which there are no NUTS 2 regions in the total EQI data in a distinct methodology explained in a subsequent section.
 
6
In addition, we performed extensive sensitivity testing of each of these four pillars of QoG and found the data to be highly robust. For a closer look at the sensitivity tests and results for the EU sample, Charron 010 see Charron (2010).
 
7
A full list of scores by region and country (along with confidence intervals) is found in “Appendix”.
 
8
There are of course several more-advanced techniques for showing within-unit variation, as discussed by Shankar and Shah (2003), such as Gini or Theil indices. For the sake of simplicity, a simple distribution and min–max differences areused here, as those measures correlate strongly with the min–max for this sample.
 
9
Hierarchical clustering with squared Euclidean distancing (Wards linkage) was employed.
 
10
We assume a normal distribution of the sample so that we may use the Central Limit Theorem. Basic statistical probability shows that in a sample x, 95 percent of the area of a basic normal bell curve is between our estimates, (µ) 1.96± the standard error around µ. We calculate the margins of error as \( s.e. = {\raise0.7ex\hbox{$\sigma $} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\sigma {\sqrt n }}}\right.\kern-0pt} \!\lower0.7ex\hbox{${\sqrt n }$}} \). The margin of error for each individual region is based around its QoG estimate, \( 1.96 \pm \left( {{\raise0.7ex\hbox{$\sigma $} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\sigma {\sqrt n }}}\right.\kern-0pt} \!\lower0.7ex\hbox{${\sqrt n }$}}} \right) \), with N = 16, because of the 16 indicators in the regional index.
 
11
To be precise, there are two ways to go about calculating the margin of error for survey data—using an exact confidence interval or an approximate confidence interval. The former takes into account both sampling and non-sampling errors, while the latter only accounts for random sampling errors. While the exact interval may be more precise, we find the advantages of the approximate confidence interval to far outweigh the drawbacks, in particular with respect to the efficiency of the calculation. Moreover, we have no reason to suspect that there is any bias created by certain groups being excluded or not being forthright in their responses, so compensating for such error is simply beyond our reach. Thus we report an approximate confidence interval for each region’s QoG estimate.
 
12
A table showing the full range of EQI estimates in rank order with margins of error by region is included as “Appendix”.
 
13
More details about the results of the EQI by question can be found Charron (2013).
 
14
Measures recommended by Nardo et al. (2008) in the JRC-OECD handbook on composite indicators. We would like to thank Michaela Saisana for her help in this process.
 
15
The pairwise correlation for the pillars quality and impartiality is 0.73, quality and corruption is 0.59, impartiality and corruption, 0.76.
 
16
The 2010 data consisted of 34,000 respondents (200 per region) for 172 regions in 18 countries.
 
17
The risk of poverty “is defined as having equivalised disposable income (i. e. adjusted for household size and composition) of less than 60 % of national median” (EU Commission Cohesion Report 2010).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abramo, C. (2008). How much do perceptions of corruption really tell us? Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 2, 3. Abramo, C. (2008). How much do perceptions of corruption really tell us? Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 2, 3.
Zurück zum Zitat Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersson, S., & Heywood, P. M. (2009). The politics of perception: Use and abuse of transparency international’s approach to measuring corruption. Political Studies, 57(4), 746–767.CrossRef Andersson, S., & Heywood, P. M. (2009). The politics of perception: Use and abuse of transparency international’s approach to measuring corruption. Political Studies, 57(4), 746–767.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Annoni, P., & Dijkstra, L. (2013). EU Regional Competitiveness Index. Luxembourg, Europe. Annoni, P., & Dijkstra, L. (2013). EU Regional Competitiveness Index. Luxembourg, Europe.
Zurück zum Zitat Charron, N. (2013). European perceptions of quality of government: A survey of 24 countries. In A. Mungiu-Pippidi & B. Rothenstein (Eds.) Controlling corruption in Europe—The ANTICORP Report no 1. Verlag Barbara Budrich publishers. Charron, N. (2013). European perceptions of quality of government: A survey of 24 countries. In A. Mungiu-Pippidi & B. Rothenstein (Eds.) Controlling corruption in Europe—The ANTICORP Report no 1. Verlag Barbara Budrich publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European Union Member States. Regional Studies, 48(1), 68–90.CrossRef Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European Union Member States. Regional Studies, 48(1), 68–90.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Charron, N., & Lapuente, V. (2013). Why do some regions in Europe have higher quality of government? Journal of Politics, 75(3), 567–582.CrossRef Charron, N., & Lapuente, V. (2013). Why do some regions in Europe have higher quality of government? Journal of Politics, 75(3), 567–582.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Charron, N., Lapuente, V., & Rothstein, B. (2013). Quality of government and corruption form a European perspective: A comparative study of good government in EU regions. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Charron, N., Lapuente, V., & Rothstein, B. (2013). Quality of government and corruption form a European perspective: A comparative study of good government in EU regions. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (1998). Corruption and government size: A disaggregated analysis. Public Choice, 97(1–2), 107–120.CrossRef Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (1998). Corruption and government size: A disaggregated analysis. Public Choice, 97(1–2), 107–120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Golden, M. A., & Picci, L. (2005). Proposal for a new measure of corruption, illustrated with Italian data. Economics and Politics, 17(1), 37–75.CrossRef Golden, M. A., & Picci, L. (2005). Proposal for a new measure of corruption, illustrated with Italian data. Economics and Politics, 17(1), 37–75.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta, S., Davoodi, H., & Alonso-Terme, R. (2002). Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty? Economics of Governance, 3(1), 23–45.CrossRef Gupta, S., Davoodi, H., & Alonso-Terme, R. (2002). Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty? Economics of Governance, 3(1), 23–45.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Helliwell, J. F., & Huang, H. (2008). How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 595–619.CrossRef Helliwell, J. F., & Huang, H. (2008). How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 595–619.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Holmberg, S., & Rothstein, B. (Eds.). (2012). Good government: The relevance of political science. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Holmberg, S., & Rothstein, B. (Eds.). (2012). Good government: The relevance of political science. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., & Nasiritousi, N. (2009). Quality of government: What you get. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 135–161.CrossRef Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., & Nasiritousi, N. (2009). Quality of government: What you get. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 135–161.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 5430. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 5430.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurtz, M. J., & Schrank, A. (2007). Growth and governance: Models, measures, and mechanisms. Journal of Politics, 69(2), 538–554. Kurtz, M. J., & Schrank, A. (2007). Growth and governance: Models, measures, and mechanisms. Journal of Politics, 69(2), 538–554.
Zurück zum Zitat León, C.J., Araña, J.E., & de León, J. (2013). Correcting for scale perception bias in measuring corruption: an application to Chile and Spain. Social Indicators Research, 1–19. León, C.J., Araña, J.E., & de León, J. (2013). Correcting for scale perception bias in measuring corruption: an application to Chile and Spain. Social Indicators Research, 1–19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mauro, P. (2004). The persistence of corruption and slow economic growth. IMF staff papers, 1–18. Mauro, P. (2004). The persistence of corruption and slow economic growth. IMF staff papers, 1–18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide OECD, European Commission, Joint Research Centre. OECD Publishing. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide OECD, European Commission, Joint Research Centre. OECD Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Norris, P. (2012). Making democratic governance work: How regimes shape prosperity, welfare, and peace. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Norris, P. (2012). Making democratic governance work: How regimes shape prosperity, welfare, and peace. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Garcilazo, E. (2013), Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in european regions, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, No. 2013/12, OECD Publishing. Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Garcilazo, E. (2013), Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in european regions, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, No. 2013/12, OECD Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothstein, B. (2003). Social capital, economic growth and quality of government: The causal mechanism. New Political Economy, 8(1), 49–71.CrossRef Rothstein, B. (2003). Social capital, economic growth and quality of government: The causal mechanism. New Political Economy, 8(1), 49–71.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165–190.CrossRef Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165–190.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M. (2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58(01), 41–72.CrossRef Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M. (2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58(01), 41–72.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Samanni, M., & Holmberg, S. (2010). Quality of government makes people happy. QoG Working Paper Series 2010:1, The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Samanni, M., & Holmberg, S. (2010). Quality of government makes people happy. QoG Working Paper Series 2010:1, The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Zurück zum Zitat Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., & Guiso, L. 2006. Does culture affect economic outcomes? (No. w11999). National Bureau of Economic Research. Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., & Guiso, L. 2006. Does culture affect economic outcomes? (No. w11999). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Zurück zum Zitat Shankar, R., & Shah, A. (2003). Bridging the economic divide within countries: A scorecard on the performance of regional policies in reducing regional income disparities. World Development, 31(8), 1421–1441.CrossRef Shankar, R., & Shah, A. (2003). Bridging the economic divide within countries: A scorecard on the performance of regional policies in reducing regional income disparities. World Development, 31(8), 1421–1441.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Snyder, R. (2001). Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 93–110.CrossRef Snyder, R. (2001). Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 93–110.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sundström, A., & Wängnerud, L. (2013). Women’s local political representation within 30 European countries: A comparative dataset on regional figures. QoG Institute Working Paper Series 2013: 18. The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Sundström, A., & Wängnerud, L. (2013). Women’s local political representation within 30 European countries: A comparative dataset on regional figures. QoG Institute Working Paper Series 2013: 18. The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabellini, G. (2008). Presidential address institutions and culture. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2–3), 255–294.CrossRef Tabellini, G. (2008). Presidential address institutions and culture. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(2–3), 255–294.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tabellini, G. (2010). Culture and institutions: Economic development in the regions of Europe. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(4), 677–716.CrossRef Tabellini, G. (2010). Culture and institutions: Economic development in the regions of Europe. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(4), 677–716.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Veenhoven, R. (2002). Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 58(1–3), 33–46. Veenhoven, R. (2002). Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 58(1–3), 33–46.
Zurück zum Zitat Veenhoven, R. (2010). Greater happiness for a greater number. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(5), 605–629. Veenhoven, R. (2010). Greater happiness for a greater number. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(5), 605–629.
Zurück zum Zitat Welsch, H. (2004). Corruption, growth, and the environment: A cross-country analysis. Environment and Development Economics, 9(5), 663–693.CrossRef Welsch, H. (2004). Corruption, growth, and the environment: A cross-country analysis. Environment and Development Economics, 9(5), 663–693.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions
verfasst von
Nicholas Charron
Lewis Dijkstra
Victor Lapuente
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Social Indicators Research / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0702-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Social Indicators Research 2/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner